clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

The Big Ten Is Full of Blood and Spiders

Two more upsets on Wednesday night, and now even the bottom of the Big Ten is flexing its muscles. That's life in the nation's best college basketball conference four years running.

Jamie Sabau

If you missed Wednesday night's games in the Big Ten, you missed an utter bloodbath, with Ohio State dropping a home game to Penn State, then Wisconsin getting shot out of its own building by Northwestern down the stretch. That's two former Top 5 teams—like, a couple weeks ago, Top 5 in the damn nation—losing at home to the dregs of the conference.

In the aftermath of those losses, the landscape of the Big Ten looks like a train wreck, but some weird wreck where the front of the train is perfectly fine (maybe a meteor hit it? I don't know, I'm not a trainologist). Anyway, as Chris Hassel tweeted out:


Yes, that's two games separating fourth place and dead last.

What makes a conference strong? Is it how good its best team is? How good its median team is? How good its worst team is? Logically, the last makes the most sense, that the fewer easy wins there are, the stronger the conference is.

Of course, it never works out like that, especially when putative conference title contenders lose to last-place teams. The thought is never "hey, every single team in this conference is pretty decent," it's always "hey, that contender team was a FRAUD." And yeah, maybe, but it's worth noting that the Big Ten is not only strong at the top but unusually devoid of cupcakes, even by B1G standards.

Year Conf. Rating Rank Avg. B1G Worst Team Rating
2003 .7688 5 No. 56 Penn State 210
2004 .7520 5 No. 62 Penn State 218
2005 .7862 3 No. 47 Penn State 215
2006 .7831 4 No. 54 Purdue 152
2007 .8058 4 No. 51 Minnesota 170
2008 .7625 5 No. 65 Northwestern 192
2009 .8144 5 No. 46 Indiana 209
2010 .7851 4 No. 60 Indiana 198
2011 .8527 1 No. 31 Iowa 92
2012 .8263 1 No. 32 Nebraska 150
2013 .8459 1 No. 34 Penn State 148
2014 .8310 1 No. 42 Northwestern 118

When the bottom of the Big Ten was at its best, the Big Ten as a whole was at its best. The four highlighted years are the four highest ranks for the Big Ten's worst team, and they are the four years the Big Ten had the best conference rank. The average Big Ten team in most years is a team that's probably on the wrong side of the bubble; in the last four years, it's been a solid mid-seed tourney team. That's who you're playing game-to-game in this Big Ten.

So of course the middle of the Big Ten is racking up conference losses at a hilarious rate. It's like jumping into a woodchipper and then wondering where your legs went. Were Ohio State and Wisconsin's losses still bad? Well, yeah. For sure. The best teams shouldn't lose to the worst teams. But when the worst teams aren't that far off from the best teams, you shouldn't be pulling out your hair and screaming over this news. It happened, and it's going to keep happening.

All of this is to say, the standings are not going to get a lot prettier over the course of the year. KenPom thinks Wisconsin and Minnesota will work their way back over .500 in the conference, but only to 10-8, and only three teams (Michigan, MSU, Iowa, of course) will escape the B1G season with fewer than eight conference losses.

The Big Ten is full of blood and spiders. The spiders have lasers and chainsaws. You just kick your way through the best you can and hope you're on the right side of .500 by the end of it all. The odds of that are not stellar. So it goes in the best, most evil conference in basketball four years running.