AN END OF THE REGULAR SEASON LOOK AT THE IOWA BASEBALL TEAM

With the regular season schedule coming to an end, let's take a look at just how good Iowa might be going into the Big Ten Tournament as the #8 seed.

First things first:

As you can see from the full bracket for the 2014 Big Ten Baseball Tournament, Iowa is essentially in a mini-bracket with Indiana (#1 seed), Minnesota (#4 seed) and Michigan (#5 seed).  The Big Ten Tournament uses a double-elimination format, so Iowa will be playing either Minnesota or Michigan, no matter what the result against Indiana.  Obviously, if they win -- they get the winner of Michigan-Minnesota; if they lose, then they'll play the loser of that game instead.  Barring an (unlikely) upset of Indiana in round one, Iowa's bet bet in the Big Ten Tournament might be to knock off Michigan and Minnesota in the loser's bracket and see where that takes them (a game on Saturday against Illinois or Nebraska, most likely).  Iowa did manage to go 3-3 versus Michigan and Minnesota this year and hey -- the last time they were in the Big Ten Tournament (2010), they managed to ride their luck all the way to the championship game...

* * *

Just about two months ago I wrote this about the Iowa Baseball team. And since those two months have passed, and I haven't written anything about baseball since, I thought the end of the regular season might be a good time to take another in depth statistical look at Rick Heller's squad.

Back in March, Iowa had yet to really play anybody that was worth a damn and they only had a meager 13 games under their belt. After taking two of three games from Purdue this past weekend, Iowa has now played 50 games and sits at 29-21 overall and 10-14 in Big Ten play. Early on this season, it seemed fairly obvious that the bats were carrying the team and the pitching (outside of Calvin Mathews) was probably going to face some struggles as the season went on. Did that pattern continue for the final 37 games? Let's find out.

Big Ten Breakdown

Before getting into the team statistics, here are the most recent Boyd's World ratings for each Big Ten team:

Team Win% BW Rating BW Rank SOS Rank
Indiana 0.745 120.7 4 43
Nebraska 0.673 114.3 28 68
Illinois 0.620 110.2 49 90
Iowa 0.580 105.1 97 130
Michigan 0.547 104.8 103 108
Minnesota 0.551 104.6 106 102
Ohio State 0.536 104.5 111 107
Michigan State 0.509 104.4 113 88
Purdue 0.260 93.1 212 25
Penn State 0.360 92.7 218 129
Northwestern 0.365 92.3 222 118
B1G Average 0.571 104.2 115 156

If you've paid any attention to Big Ten baseball this season, it should be no surprise that Indiana and Nebraska are the best teams in the conference. And if you paid attention to the weekend before last, it should be no surprise that Illinois is better than Iowa after they swept the Hawkeyes at Duane Banks Field. Three things I take away from this table: 1) Iowa's schedule was the easiest in the Big Ten this year; 2) Holy crap Indiana -- Iowa's opponent in the opening round of the Big Ten Tournament -- is good; and 3) Outside of the top three, the Big Ten is not very good at baseball.

According to at least one set of advanced statistics, Iowa is #97 in the nation and #4 in the Big Ten. That's pretty good by Iowa baseball standards, but how have they gotten to where they are? Are they still all bats and not much pitching?

Rank Team BABIP BABIP+ AVG Avg.+ OBP OBP+ SLG% SLG%+ OPS OPS+ wOBA wOBA+
1 Indiana 0.321 105 0.295 109 0.357 103 0.430 119 0.787 111 0.392 114
2 Iowa 0.346 113 0.302 111 0.384 111 0.400 111 0.784 111 0.381 111
3 Nebraska 0.322 105 0.296 109 0.358 104 0.389 108 0.748 106 0.361 105
4 Illinois 0.308 100 0.273 100 0.358 104 0.369 102 0.727 103 0.361 105
5 Ohio State 0.306 100 0.269 99 0.345 100 0.366 101 0.711 101 0.350 102
6 Michigan 0.300 98 0.270 99 0.342 99 0.364 101 0.706 100 0.344 100
7 Michigan State 0.293 95 0.258 95 0.337 98 0.347 96 0.685 97 0.332 97
8 Minnesota 0.295 96 0.259 95 0.338 98 0.340 94 0.678 96 0.327 95
9 Northwestern 0.313 102 0.276 102 0.334 97 0.350 97 0.684 97 0.323 94
10 Penn State 0.296 96 0.252 93 0.331 96 0.306 85 0.637 90 0.304 88
11 Purdue 0.275 89 0.235 87 0.311 90 0.305 84 0.617 87 0.300 87
B1G Average 0.307 100 0.272 100 0.345 100 0.361 100 0.707 100 0.344 100

For more information about the listed stats, click on the abbreviation above the column for a link to some nice resources. Also, the columns labeled with "+" are scaled to the league average. 100 = Average, while 95 = 5% below average, and 105= 5% above average.

Well, the Hawkeyes' bats still rate out very good even after going through the Big Ten portion of the schedule. They rank first in batting average on balls in play, batting average, and on-base percentage. They also rank second in slugging percentage, and as a result of Indiana having more power in their lineup, the Hawkeyes are also second in the conference in weighted on base average (wOBA). Keep in mind, however, that these stats are not adjusted for strength of schedule, so Indiana is pretty much the best by a large margin in all of these categories considering their strength of schedule has been much tougher than Iowa's this season. That being said, though, Iowa's offense has been very good this season. The pitching, on the other hand... That has been another story.

Rank Team H/9 H/9+ K/9 K/9+ BB+HBP/9 BB+HBP/9+ RA/9 RA/9+ ERA ERA+ FIP FIP+
1 Indiana 7.93 114 6.93 113 3.93 109 2.88 139 2.22 142 3.22 115
2 Illinois 8.86 104 6.83 111 3.12 128 3.77 121 3.22 116 3.48 109
3 Michigan State 8.10 112 7.43 121 4.94 86 4.00 116 3.25 116 3.49 108
4 Ohio State 9.07 102 6.15 100 3.76 113 4.30 110 3.53 108 3.58 106
5 Nebraska 9.16 101 5.89 96 3.91 110 4.35 108 3.57 107 3.62 105
6 Michigan 8.19 111 6.26 102 4.14 105 4.12 113 3.12 119 3.69 103
7 Iowa 9.74 94 6.69 109 4.34 100 5.09 93 4.36 87 3.93 97
8 Minnesota 8.77 105 5.83 95 4.55 95 4.51 105 3.83 101 3.99 95
9 Penn State 10.46 87 5.07 83 3.99 108 6.42 65 4.77 76 4.17 90
10 Northwestern 10.06 91 5.41 88 5.45 75 6.29 68 4.73 77 4.35 86
11 Purdue 11.35 77 4.93 80 5.73 68 6.90 55 6.01 44 4.45 83
B1G Average 9.21 100 6.14 100 4.35 100 4.76 100 3.85 100 3.80 100

Despite playing the easiest schedule in the Big Ten this season, the Hawkeyes still rank #7 in the conference at 3% below the conference average in fielding independent pitching. Iowa has actually been 9% above the Big Ten average at striking out opponents, and right at average when it comes to walks and hit batters. It's when it comes to giving up hits and home runs where Iowa has struggled. Iowa's hits allowed per nine innings has been 6% worse than the league norm, while their home runs allowed per nine innings has been the worst in the conference. An offense that scores 6.79 runs per nine innings is going to be capable winning quite a few games, but that win total quickly dissipates when the pitching staff (and defense) gives up 5.09 per nine innings.

Let's get a little more micro.

Iowa Players

Batters

Batter PA BABIP BABIP+ Avg. Avg.+ OBP OBP+ SLG SLG+ OPS OPS+ wOBA wOBA+
Taylor Zeutenhorst 234 0.336 109 0.272 100 0.393 114 0.456 126 0.850 120 0.455 132
Jake Yacinich 232 0.414 135 0.369 136 0.440 127 0.455 126 0.894 126 0.438 127
Dan Potempa 200 0.362 118 0.325 120 0.410 119 0.452 125 0.862 122 0.408 119
Tyler Peyton 157 0.374 122 0.336 124 0.408 118 0.448 124 0.855 121 0.401 117
Taylor Kaufman 19 0.500 163 0.375 138 0.474 137 0.375 104 0.849 120 0.398 116
Blake Hickman 70 0.227 74 0.217 80 0.300 87 0.417 115 0.717 101 0.387 112
Jake Mangler 241 0.351 114 0.330 121 0.407 118 0.408 113 0.814 115 0.382 111
Kris Goodman 199 0.333 108 0.287 106 0.362 105 0.407 113 0.769 109 0.376 109
Jimmy Frankos 105 0.387 126 0.326 120 0.429 124 0.360 99 0.788 111 0.370 108
Eric Toole 245 0.327 106 0.310 114 0.371 108 0.381 105 0.752 106 0.359 104
Trevor Kenyon 69 0.361 118 0.241 89 0.377 109 0.333 92 0.710 100 0.331 96
Nick Roscetti 66 0.298 97 0.259 95 0.333 96 0.333 92 0.667 94 0.328 95
Nick Day 183 0.338 110 0.298 110 0.377 109 0.331 92 0.708 100 0.327 95
John Barrett 6 0.333 108 0.200 74 0.333 96 0.200 55 0.533 75 0.270 79
Joe Tellez 9 0.333 108 0.222 82 0.222 64 0.333 92 0.556 79 0.238 69
Bryan Niedbalski 42 0.192 63 0.125 46 0.167 48 0.200 55 0.367 52 0.208 61
Jake Riffice 30 0.118 38 0.091 33 0.200 58 0.136 38 0.336 48 0.167 49
Total 2108 0.346 113 0.302 111 0.384 111 0.400 111 0.784 111 0.381 111

Just like he was two months ago, Taylor Zeutenhorst leads the team with a wOBA that is 32% better than the conference average. He may not look like the best hitter on the team because he strikes out quite a bit and he only sports a .272 batting average, but don't underestimate the value of power. His team leading 9 home runs is easily the best on the team. The next best is 4 by Kris Goodman. And when you take into account plate appearances, only Blake Hickman has a higher home runs per plate appearance percentage than Zeus himself. You better enjoy the Greek God of Power while you still can, because the 6'4" 220 pounder is a senior. I'm going to miss you, Zeus.

On a more positive note, Jake Yacinich is only a junior and he's been just about as good as Zeutenhorst, only without the home run power and the strikeout problem.* And actually, Brian Niedbalski and Trevor Kenyon, in addition to Zeus, are the only other seniors on the roster; and neither Niedbalski or Kenyon were particularly good at the plate this season. That means Iowa should be returning quite a bit of offense next season. They will no doubt miss the thunderous bat of Zeutenhorst, but they should have plenty of other guys that can contribute offensively.

*It should be noted, however, that Yacinich is an extreme contact hitter who is running a .414 batting average on balls in play this season (BABIP), so he could be a candidate for some regression next season.

Eric Toole, I'm guessing, was the leadoff hitter this season, seeing how he has the most plate appearances on the team. 53 of his 65 hits were singles this season, while 9 were doubles and 3 were triples. That's why he has a nice batting average, but his wOBA is only 4% above the conference average. Dan Potempa, meanwhile, had a nice batting average, but his ability to draw walks and hit for power also gave him a very nice wOBA that was 19% better than the norm. And Jake Mangler, he of the gnarly surname, put up an 11% above average wOBA by never striking out, drawing walks, and being second on the team to Potempa in doubles. This was a good offense.

And for your perusal, here are some charts (click to embiggen). Players are in order from the most to the least number of plate appearances.

Plate_appearances_medium

Hits_medium

Pitchers

Pitcher IP H/9 H/9+ K/9 K/9+ BB+HBP/9 BB+HBP/9+ RA/9 RA/9+ ERA ERA+ FIP FIP+
Sasha Kuebel* 85.1 11.21 78 6.35 103 2.43 144 5.61 82 4.44 85 2.75 128
Tyler Radtke 35 8.23 111 9.00 147 5.40 76 4.37 108 4.11 93 3.00 121
Jake Reinhardt 6 15.00 37 4.50 73 3.00 131 4.50 105 4.50 83 3.20 116
Nick Hibbing 38.2 10.13 90 7.07 115 4.48 97 5.89 76 4.95 71 3.46 109
Calvin Mathews* 71 6.97 124 7.48 122 2.79 136 3.42 128 2.79 128 3.57 106
Jared Mandel 20.1 9.85 93 7.61 124 3.13 128 3.58 125 3.13 119 3.85 99
Blake Hickman 29.1 8.35 109 10.21 166 7.73 22 4.33 109 4.33 87 3.96 96
Tyler Peyton* 72 9.38 98 5.38 88 4.63 94 5.00 95 4.75 77 4.45 83
Ryan Rumpf 5 10.80 83 12.60 205 5.40 76 9.00 11 3.60 106 4.80 74
Andrew Hedrick* 46.2 10.91 82 4.87 79 5.84 66 5.06 94 4.68 78 5.19 64
Matt Allen 17 11.65 74 3.18 52 4.24 103 6.88 55 5.29 62 6.20 37
Brandon Shulista 13.2 15.00 37 6.14 100 10.23 -35 12.27 -58 9.55 -48 7.22 10
Total 440 9.74 94 6.69 109 4.34 100 5.09 93 4.36 87 3.93 97

An asterisk indicates the pitcher is mainly a starter.

The pitching on this team is interesting. I think most everyone would agree that Calvin Mathews is the most talented starter on the roster. Out of the starting rotation, he was the best at limiting hits and runs and striking out opposing batters. He was also second best in the starting rotation at not walking or hitting batters. The one problem, and the only thing keeping him from not leading the team in fielding independent pitching, was the fact that he had a bit of a home run problem. His 6 home runs surrendered in 71 innings pitched was over double the Big Ten average, but given the stuff that Mathews' peripherals seem to demonstrate, I'm thinking that it might have been a bit of bad luck. If the NCAA kept track of fly balls, we could calculate his xFIP, which would stabilize Mathews' home run per fly ball rate and I'm sure that would be lower than his current FIP. On the other hand, Mathews' did give up 5 home runs in 40.1 innings pitched last season, so maybe he has a penchant for giving up home runs. I'm still willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, though, because he was a freshman last year. Regardless, it will be interesting to see what he looks like next year. Even with the home runs, he still had a FIP that was 6% above the Big Ten Average and his ERA and runs per nine innings were 28% better than average. In other words, the dude is good, and we have two more years of him.

As for Sasha Kuebel, he's kind of the opposite of Mathews. FIP really likes him, but that's mainly because he only gave up 1 home run in 85.1 innings pitched (and he never walked anyone). Maybe he was an extreme groundball pitcher this year, but I highly doubt it since he gave up 5 homers last year and 4 the year before. I'm willing to bet that home run luck on fly balls will run out next season. Although, home run luck didn't really help him this season, as he gave up 22% more hits per nine and 18% more runs per nine than the Big Ten average. That being said, though, he was about average when it came to strikeouts, and he rarely put guys on base for free. If his home run total goes up next season, maybe his 16% worse than average BABIP against will go down. The fact that he was a control artist who was slightly above average when it came to Ks this year gives me hope that his runs allowed will decrease next year.

Tyler Peyton and Andrew Hedrick, on the other hand, were not very good this season. Hedrick had home run issues similar to Mathews, but without the other good stuff like strikeouts and not walking dudes. Both Peyton and Hedrick had a hard time missing bats and struggled to find the strike zone (especially Hedrick), which is not a formula for success. There's nothing necessarily wrong with pitching to contact, but you cannot hand out free passes on a regular basis if that's your strategy. Hedrick is a junior, so I don't know how much improvement he will make in just one season. Peyton is a sophomore, so maybe he can take a step forward on the mound. Also on his side: he was a very good hitter this year.

Another possibility for next year could be someone else moving into the rotation. Blake Hickman (4) and Nick Hibbing (2) also had a few starts this season. FIP liked Hibbing because he could miss bats, but he also only gave up 1 home run in 38.1 innings pitched, so that's most likely got some regression coming. Blake Hickman, though, if he has the stamina, might be promising. His strikeouts per nine were 66% better than the Big Ten average and he didn't give up too many hits, long balls, or runs. The one issue -- and this was a major issue -- was the fact that he walked guys 88% more than the Big Ten norm. That would need some cleaning up if he wanted to move into the rotation on a more regular basis. Like Peyton, though, Hickman also seems like he may be a pretty good hitter. He whiffed like crazy this year, which really dragged his his on-base percentage down, but he does seem to have some pop in his bat. His 3 home runs in 70 plate appearances was good enough for the best home run per plate appearance percentage on the team; small sample size, of course. Anyway, I'm actually excited to see what Hickman brings on the mound and at the plate next season.

And, looking at relievers, Tyler Radtke was Iowa's best reliever that did not at one point start a game this season. in 35 innings of relief, Radtke was above average in just about everything except for walks and hit by pitches. That ultimately seems to be why his ERA was below average, but why his FIP was above average. With 47% more strikeouts per nine than the average Big Ten pitcher, he obviously has filthy stuff. If he can harness that stuff better next season, he looks like a nice bullpen arm who will have two more years of eligibility.

Finally, here are some pitching charts for you to look at. The starting pitchers are sorted by the number of starts they had, while the relievers are sorted by the number of appearances they made.

Starters_medium

Relievers_medium

In what was Rick Heller's inaugural season as Iowa's head coach, the Hawkeyes had a pretty good season. They weren't world-beaters by any means, but they were solidly above average and finished the regular season 8 games over .500. The offense was entertaining this season, and Calvin Mathews also gave us some some special outings on the mound. All in all, I'd call this a pretty successful season for the Hawkeyes. They run into a buzz saw in the first round against Indiana, but they have a legitimate chance at beating either Michigan or Minnesota after that. Hopefully they can pull of at least one win in the tournament. The bats have carried them before, let's hope they can do it again.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Black Heart Gold Pants

You must be a member of Black Heart Gold Pants to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Black Heart Gold Pants. You should read them.

Join Black Heart Gold Pants

You must be a member of Black Heart Gold Pants to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Black Heart Gold Pants. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker