We Must Break You Is Thinking B1G
Iowa wrestling has the weekend off from competition, but that doesn't mean we can't spend a little time thinking about them. Next weekend is the Big Ten Tournament in West Lafayette, which is important for two reasons: an opportunity to claim a major championship and the means to qualify weights for the NCAA Tournament two weeks later. To that end, the NCAA also released the qualifier allocations for every conference, which contained very good news for the Big Ten. The Big Ten always leads the nation in qualifiers, but they're taking it to another level in 2012: a whopping 74 qualifiers. That's more than they've had in recent years and almost as many as the conferences with the second (EIWA, 46) and third (Big 12, 31) most qualifiers combined (77). It's good to be the king.
The pre-seeds for the Big Ten Tournament will be announced Monday, which should be virtually identical to the final seeds released on Friday. Commenter twade70 has gone ahead and made some excellent educated guesses on what those seeds might look like, so let's take a look at them and forecast how things might play out for Iowa, as well as the winners at each weight. Since Penn State and Minnesota appear to be Iowa's stiffest challengers for an NCAA title (with Penn State being the overall favorite), I'll also take a look at their NCAA qualification projections. (Note: the record in brackets is for B1G dual meets only.)
125 (6 NCAA qualifying spots)
1) Matt McDonough, Iowa (7-1)
2) Zach Sanders, Minnesota (7-1)
3) Jesse Delgado, Illinois (6-2)
4) Nico Megaludis, Penn State (5-3)
5) Levi Mele, Northwestern (6-2)
6) Jonni Dijulius, Ohio State (4-3)
7) Eric Olanowski, Michigan State (3-4)
8) Grant Pizzo, Michigan (3-5)
Analysis: Delgado beat McD, but lost to Sanders and Mele. Mele beat Delgado, but lost to McDonough and Megaludis. Megaludis beat Mele, but lost to Sanders, McDonough, and Olanowski (albeit via DQ). So 3-4-5 is a bit of a muddle. On paper, McD is staring at a semifinal match with Megaludis, who McD beat 3-1 in sudden victory at the dual meet. That was a close match but Megaludis also never looked terribly close to scoring; I'd still strongly favor McD in a rematch. Mele would be a more favorable matchup, though, since McD beat him via major decision (18-4) at the dual meet. On the other side, Sanders-Delgado could put on quite a show in the semis -- Sanders beat him via 14-13 decision (!) earlier this year. I still think we're headed to a third showdown between McD and Sanders, though -- and a second-straight Big Ten title for McD.
Winner: Matt McDonough, Iowa (2x) def. Zach Sanders, Minnesota
NCAA Qualification Notes: Iowa, Minnesota, and Penn State should have no trouble qualifying a wrestler here. McD, Sanders, and Nico should easily finish within the top-6 at this weight. (Note: I'm not going to speculate about who among the wrestlers on those teams could get at-large spots. For the purposes of this exercise, let's just assume everyone either needs to get one of the NCAA's automatic qualifying spots or get left home. I don't think there are that many borderline guys anyway.)
133 (7 NCAA qualifying spots)
1) Logan Stieber, Ohio State (7-1)
2) Tony Ramos, Iowa (7-1)
3) B.J. Futrell, Illinois (7-1)
4) Chris Dardanes, Minnesota (5-2)
5) Cashe Quiroga, Purdue (4-3)
6) Zac Stevens, Michigan (4-4)
7) Ridge Kiley, Nebraska (4-4)
8) Frank Martellotti, Penn State (3-4)
Analysis: There's quite a drop-off here after the top-four, as you can see. Stieber beat Ramos, didn't face Futrell, and lost to Dardanes. Ramos beat Dardanes (twice) and Futrell (thrice), but lost to Stieber. Futrell beat Dardanes, but lost to Ramos (thrice) and didn't face Stieber. Dardanes beat Stieber, but lost to Ramos (twice) and Dardanes. If these are the seeds at this weight, they're probably the best we can hope for. Beating Futrell for a fourth time this year would be daunting, but Tony's still had an easier time with him than Dardanes (who seems to cause Tony's offense to freeze in its tracks). Leaving Dardanes at the 4-seed also sets up a potential semifinal match between Dardanes and Stieber. As much as I want to see Ramos get a rematch with Stieber (protip: don't take down this time, Tony), there's no doubt that his chances of winning a Big Ten title would be much better if Dardanes was his opponent in the finals. Still, it will probably be Stieber... and I just can't pick Tony to beat him until I see Tony actually get a takedown against him.
Winner: Logan Stieber, Ohio State def. Tony Ramos, Iowa
NCAA Qualification Notes: Iowa and Minnesota should have little trouble qualifying wrestlers here. Penn State, on the other hand, will probably need Martellotti to win a few matches, which is a much dicier proposition.
141 (5 NCAA qualifying spots)
1) Kellen Russell, Michigan (8-0)
2) Hunter Stieber, Ohio State (5-1)
3) Montell Marion, Iowa (6-1)
4) Nick Dardanes, Minnesota (5-2)
5) Jake Sueflohn, Nebraska (5-2)
6) Daryl Thomas, Illinois (5-3)
7) Bryan Pearsall, Penn State (3-4)
8) Matt Ortega, Indiana (3-4)
Analysis: What an incredibly top-heavy weight. Five of InterMat's top 10 wrestlers at 141 are in the Big Ten (Russell, Stieber, Marion, Dardanes, Sueflohn)... but no other B1G wrestlers crack their rankings. That big drop-off from the top of the heap to the rest is why the Big Ten only gets five NCAA spots here. On one hand, that means those top guys really need to avoid upsets. On the other hand, the reason there are only five spots is because the rest of the heap hasn't been good enough to mount much of a challenge to the top guys -- and it's unlikely they'll start doing so now. Russell was undefeated in B1G dual meets, but lost to Stieber at an early season tournament and didn't face Marion or Dardanes this year. (He did major Sueflohn.) Stieber beat Russell at that aforementioned tournament and beat Marion and Dardanes in duals, but split two matches with Sueflohn (even getting majored in one of them). Marion lost to Stieber in a dual, but beat Dardanes twice and Sueflohn once. Dardanes beat Sueflohn, but lost to Marion twice and to Stieber. Sueflohn went 1-1 against Stieber, but also lost to Russell, Marion, and Dardanes. It's odd that Russell hasn't wrestled more of the top guys at this weight, but it's also not his fault: Michigan faced Ohio State and Minnesota in duals... those teams just didn't send Stieber or Dardanes out to wrestle Russell. Russell looks like a favorite to get back to the finals, but Marion will need to avenge his loss to Stieber to get there. I think he manages that, but still can't solve Russell.
Winner: Kellen Russell, Michigan (4x) def. Montell Marion, Iowa
NCAA Qualification Notes: Again, Iowa and Minnesota should have little trouble qualifying here, but Penn State will have a much tougher time sending someone at this weight.
149 (9 NCAA qualifying spots)
1) Frank Molinaro, Penn State (8-0)
2) Eric Grajales, Michigan (5-2)
3) Dylan Ness, Minnesota (5-3)
4) Cam Tessari, Ohio State (4-1)
5) Ivan Lopouchanski, Purdue (6-2)
6) Taylor Walsh, Indiana (5-2)
7) Eric Terrazas, Illinois (5-3)
8) Kaleb Friedley, Northwestern (3-4)
Analysis: While this is still a weak weight overall, it has a fair amount of depth in the Big Ten -- thus the 9 qualifying spots. That's a very pleasant surprise from an Iowa perspective, but more on that in a minute. On paper, this looks like a weight where Molinaro should run away from the competition -- he's 3-0 this year against Grajales and Ness and the matches weren't terribly close. He didn't wrestle Tessari this year, so there's some intrigue in a potential semifinal matchup there... but this is the Italian Stallion's weight to lose. And he won't.
Winner: Frank Molinaro, Penn State (2x) def. Dylan Ness, Minnesota
NCAA Qualification Notes: Penn State and Minnesota should easily qualify wrestlers here. I didn't think Mike Kelly would have much of a chance to get an NCAA spot for Iowa here, but the fact that there are NINE qualifying spots gives me much more hope. He's been very close to beating several of those guys at the bottom of the seeds already and just one win may be enough to get him into 9th place. Suddenly it seems doable for Kelly to get into the NCAA tournament.
157 (6 NCAA Qualifying Spots)
1) Jason Welch, Northwestern (8-0)
2) Dylan Alton, Penn State (6-2)
3) James Green, Nebraska (7-1)
4) Anthony Jones, Michigan State (5-3)
5) Josh Demas, Ohio State (4-3)
6) Derek St. John, Iowa (2-1)
7) Alec Ortiz, Minnesota (3-3)
8) Shawn Perry, Wisconsin (2-6)
Analysis: When a wrestler who went 2-6 has a chance at an 8-seed, it's fair to say this was not a terribly good weight class in the Big Ten. But it's also not a great weight class nationally, which is part of the reason why the Big Ten will still send six automatic qualifiers at this weight class. Before the year began, it seemed like a two-horse race between Welch and DSJ; after DSJ's injury, it looks like a one-horse race. Then again, the matches between the top three at this weight were very close: Welch beat Alton 2-1 and Alton beat Green 2-1. (Alton also lost a B1G dual match to Minnesota's Jake Deitchler, who has since retired.) From an Iowa standpoint, these seeds wouldn't be favorable -- Green looks like a bad matchup for DSJ. He's an explosive, powerful wrestler who could easily give a gimpy DSJ lots of problems. He had a questionable gas tank when he wrestled Iowa early in January, but if he's improved that, he's my pick to pull a mild upset here.
Winner: James Green, Nebraska def. Jason Welch, Northwestern
NCAA Qualification Notes: Penn State should easily qualify a wrestler at this weight. I don't think Iowa will have much difficulty qualifying a wrestler here, either, although the fact that it rests on DSJ's balky knee makes me nervous. We saw how bad it looked after he tweaked it against Ohio State a month ago; hopefully that won't happen again, but... I think Minnesota has very little shot of qualifying someone at this weight.
165 (8 NCAA qualifying spots)
1) David Taylor, Penn State (8-0)
2) Mike Evans, Iowa (6-2)
3) Robert Kokesh, Nebraska (6-2)
4) Ben Jordan, Wisconsin (3-3)
5) Conrad Polz, Illinois (6-1)
6) Dan Yates, Michigan (4-3)
7) Cody Yohn, Minnesota (2-5)
8) Derek Garcia, Ohio State (4-4)
Analysis: The reality is this is David Taylor's world and the rest of are just watching the Sainted Unicorn do work on the rest of the Big Ten. Evans lost to Garcia and went 1-1 with Yohn, but he also beat Kokesh, Jordan, and Polz. Kokesh was pretty dominant in his wins (four with bonus points), but he lost to Evans and Taylor. Jordan was manhandled by Evans (twice) and Kokesh (and lost a weird one to a jNW wrestler), but he also beat Polz, which is probably why he gets the nod ahead of him here. Per these seedings, we'd get an Evans-Yohn rubber match, giving Mike a chance to erase the taste of that loss to Yohn last weekend. An Evans-Kokesh semi could be pretty tasty, too -- assuming the good Mike Evans shows up. Either way, though, Taylor's winning this thing.
Winner: David Taylor, Penn State (2x) def. Robert Kokesh, Nebraska
NCAA Qualification Notes: Penn State and Iowa shouldn't have any difficulty qualifying wrestlers here. If the Cody Yohn that showed up against Mike Evans shows up here, Minnesota should be fine, too. If the Yohn that slumped through most of the B1G season shows up, though, it could get interesting.
174 (9 NCAA qualifying spots)
1) Ed Ruth, Penn State (8-0)
2) Logan Storley, Minnesota (7-0)
3) Ethen Lofthouse, Iowa (5-2)
4) Nick Heflin, Ohio State (3-2)
5) Justin Zeerip, Michigan (4-3)
6) Tyler Koehn, Nebraska (4-4)
7) Curran Jacobs, Michigan State (5-3)
8) Jordan Blanton, Illinois (3-2)
Analysis: Guess how many non-bonus point wins recorded for PSU this year? That would be three -- and none of them were against B1G foes. So, yeah, this is another weight where PSU is a big, big favorite. Storley gets the 2-seed by virtue of beating everyone else in the B1G (he didn't wrestle when Minnesota faced PSU in a dual), although Lofthouse did avenge his dual meet loss to Storley last weekend. Ethen's two losses were to Ruth and Storley. He didn't face Heflin, Zeerip, or Jacobs this year, but he did beat Koehn and Blanton (thrice). It's crucial that Ethen gets the 3-seed here, though, because that puts them on the opposite side of the bracket from Ruth -- and that's a rematch we want to delay as long as possible. Ruth-Storley should be a fun final, but Ruth has been too dominant this year to get cute and pick an upset.
Winner: Ed Ruth, Penn State (2x) def. Ethen Lofthouse, Iowa
NCAA Qualification Notes: Penn State, Minnesota, and Iowa have the three best wrestlers at this weight. The Big Ten gets nine qualifying spots here. I don't anticipate them having much difficulty qualifying their wrestlers here.
184 (7 NCAA qualifying spots)
1) Kevin Steinhaus, Minnesota (8-0)
2) Quentin Wright, Penn State (7-1)
3) Josh Ihnen, Nebraska (6-2)
4) Cody Magrum, Ohio State (3-0)
5) Braden Atwood, Purdue (6-2)
6) Grant Gambrall, Iowa (0-0 at 184)
7) Tony Dallago, Illinois (6-2)
8) Ian Hinton, Michigan State (2-4)
Analysis: Steinhaus beat Wright at a dual earlier this year and also beat Ihnen, Atwood, Gambrall, and Dallago. Wright beat Ihnen. After that, though, these seeds are a bit of a stab in the dark, with guys like Magrum missing time due to injury and Gambrall not cutting to 184 until a few weeks ago. Don't be surprised if these seeds are wrong after the top two. On the other hand, I don't think it matters -- I don't think anyone will touch Steinhaus or Wright here.
Winner: Quentin Wright, Penn State (2x) def. Kevin Steinhaus, Minnesota
NCAA Qualification Notes: Obviously, Minnesota and Penn State should have little difficulty qualifying here. If Gambrall wrestles the way he's capable of wrestling -- i.e., as he did against Dallago at National Duals last week -- he shouldn't have any trouble, either. Note: if Gambrall does not finish in the top-7 at this weight, Iowa will NOT qualify for the NCAA tournament at 184, no ifs, ands, or buts.
197 (7 NCAA qualifying spots)
1) Sonny Yohn, Minnesota (6-1)
2) Matt Powless, Indiana (7-0)
3) Morgan McIntosh, Penn State (5-1)
4) Andrew Campolattano, Ohio State (5-3)
5) Max Huntley, Michigan (3-3)
6) Mario Gonzalez, Illinois (6-2)
7) James Nakashima, Nebraska (4-3)
8) Nick McDiarmid, Michigan State (2-5)
Analysis: Yohn and Powless are the class of this division. Yohn beat Powless earlier this year (4-1) at the Southern Scuffle, but they were 2-2 in their head-to-head meetings before this season. McIntosh and Campolattano are the future of this division, two true freshmen who have enjoyed a fair amount of success already. Iowa's options here are either Tomas Lira or Vinnie Wagner; based on Vinnie getting the nod at National Duals last weekend, he's probably the favorite here as well. I don't know if there's such a thing as a good matchup for Iowa at this weight, but it would obviously be preferable to avoid Yohn and Powless as long as possible.
Winner: Matt Powless, Indiana def. Sonny Yohn, Minnesota
NCAA Qualification Notes: Minnesota should qualify easily. Ditto Penn State, assuming McIntosh is healthy (he's been slowed by a knee injury lately). Iowa... well, seven spots gives Vinnie a little bit more of a chance than I thought he'd have. I'll certainly be rooting for him. But I wouldn't bank on him getting one of the spots.
HWT (10 NCAA qualifying spots)
1) Tony Nelson, Minnesota (8-0)
2) Cameron Wade, Penn State (7-1)
3) Ben Apland, Michigan (6-2)
4) Tucker Lane, Nebraska (5-3)
5) Bobby Telford, Iowa (2-2)
6) Roger Vukobratovich, Purdue (4-4)
7) Mike McMullan, Northwestern (5-3)
8) Adam Chalfant, Indiana (3-3)
Analysis: And, finally, the most thrilling weight class of the Big Ten Tournament! Or not. Nelson's the favorite here -- he has the undefeated record in league dual meets, including a 5-0 win over Wade -- but given the razor-thin margin in most heavyweight matches, it wouldn't be a shock to see an upset or three here. As far as Bobby is concerned, these seeds would slot him on the same side as Nelson, who defeated him 2-0 last week. I'm not sure being on the same side as Wade would be any better for Bobby, though. The most important thing for Telford is to rediscover his offense and regain some of his December mojo.
Winner: Tony Nelson, Minnesota def. Cameron Wade, Penn State
NCAA Qualification Notes: Again, Minnesota and Penn State qualify easily here. I'm still nervous in general about Bobby, but with 10 (!) available, there is zero excuse for him not to qualify.
Thanks again to twade70 for the excellent seeding information.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Getting possibly 9 to the NCAA's would be a very good thing.
Hopefully our guys come out as intense as they need to be and get it done. We must not let Cael win another title.
"HOW'S IT HANGIN, SLAPNUTS!"
How is that going to work?
Does this mean there will be some extra matches to determine 9th and 10th place? That might make the bracket look a little interesting.
I believe so, yes.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
best chance we have at beating the Sainted Unicorn
is with a Centaur. I continue to be pissed we don’t have one.
"SUPREME IN STATE: University of Iowa Football Team Established Undisputed Superiority over Football Teams of Rival Institutions within Boundaries of Hawkeyedom.—Trounces Ames" - The Iowa Alumnus
by The Bacon Explosion on Feb 25, 2012 3:34 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
Centaurs definitely can go two ways
"SUPREME IN STATE: University of Iowa Football Team Established Undisputed Superiority over Football Teams of Rival Institutions within Boundaries of Hawkeyedom.—Trounces Ames" - The Iowa Alumnus
by The Bacon Explosion on Feb 25, 2012 6:28 PM CST up reply actions
Brands and Ferentz are such failures.
Cael can recruit mythological beings. WHY CAN’T IOWA?
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I have been waiting for this since the auto-qual numbers came out
Of course you did not disapoint. Well done.
Hoping that knee holds up.
Please don't tell me how you hate BSU or their turf...I know all too well and keep my toliet water blue for a reason.
by BoiseHawk on Feb 25, 2012 4:13 PM CST via mobile reply actions
What are the chances Kelly gets an at-large spot?
"Your spelling and grammar errors belie a seriously skilled thought process"- therealCatnuts
by justsomehawkeyefan on Feb 25, 2012 5:57 PM CST reply actions
I can't imagine they're very good.
His record is pretty lousy.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
Is there a meaningful difference from a team standpoint
of him getting into the NCAAs or not?
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - Teddy Roosevelt
If he's there, it's at least POSSIBLE for him to win a match and get Iowa some points.
If he’s not there, obviously Iowa will get 0 pts at 149.
Can he win a match at 149? I’m skeptical. Not counting the FFT he got from Wisco, he has two wins at 149 since Midlands. Lots of close losses, but at some point you have to turn the corner from close losses to actual wins — he hasn’t been able to do that yet.
It would be nice to get Kelly and Wagner to NCAAs because that gives Iowa the most potential. That said, I don’t really expect either guy to win much (or even at all) if they get there, so it probably doesn’t REALLY matter all that much.
Still, since the Big Ten gets 9 qualifiers at 149, I think there’s a real chance that Kelly can get win of them. If it had been 6 or 7 — probably not. It’s really going to matter who he draws. If he gets drawn against one of the lower seeds in the first round, he might be able to steal a win. Likewise, hopefully he gets drawn against another guy at the bottom of the 149 totem pole when he goes down into the wrestlebacks.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
A wrestleback win or two
Would be more than most would have projected at the begining of the year.
Provided he gets in
Please don't tell me how you hate BSU or their turf...I know all too well and keep my toliet water blue for a reason.
by BoiseHawk on Feb 25, 2012 7:47 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I see
I don’t fully understand tournament scoring and wasn’t sure if there were points given for qualifying or not.
When it comes right down to it, it would take some really heavy lifting by the rest of the team for a few points at 149 or 197. From a sentimental (probably the wrong word) standpoint I guess I’d rather see the 5th year Senior who wrestles as hard or harder than anyone on the team get a chance to continue his career and maybe sneak a win at Nationals.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - Teddy Roosevelt
For a few points at 149 or 197 to matter, that is.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - Teddy Roosevelt
No, no points for qualifying.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I think there is a sort of
symbolic/morale thing being able to qualify 10 guys. Since not so many teams can do it. Sending a full team is always a good thing. Even if you don’t get many/or any points out of guys. It is experience for the guys who went, it is a chance at scoring something.
"Florida! You don't go to Florida in the winter, you go in the summer!" -Tom Brands
by David Starbuck Petersen on Feb 26, 2012 12:03 PM CST up reply actions
The at-large spots are based on certain criteria...
Here’s a helpful article that W.I.N. put together when the new qualification rules were put into place back in 2009:
http://win-magazine.net/Archives/v15%20archives/v15i1%20webstuff/NEWNCAAQUALIFIER.html
Wrestlers are evaluated based on 3 measures: 1) Coaches Poll Ranking, 2) RPI Ranking, and 3) Winning Percentage.
Kelly was ranked #28 in the final coaches poll and #24 in RPI. His record is 14-11 (.560 Win Percentage).
With those stats it’s going to be tough to get an at-large.
What about DSJ? what are his chances of getting an at-large spot
i see him as the least likely guy of the non 149/197 guys to get in due to his injury, so if he fails out would he get a spot?
"Your spelling and grammar errors belie a seriously skilled thought process"- therealCatnuts
by justsomehawkeyefan on Feb 25, 2012 8:05 PM CST reply actions
DSJ's stats...
14-2 Record (.875 Win Percentage)
- in Final Coaches Poll
UR in RPI (17 Match minimum – DSJ only had 16 matches)
As I mentioned above, wrestlers are evaluated based on 3 measures: 1) Coaches Poll Ranking, 2) RPI Ranking, and 3) Winning Percentage.
The conference qualifier allocations were determined using these 3 measures. 290 of the 330 tourney berths (33 wrestlers for each of the 10 weights) are won via the conference tournaments.
After the conference tournaments, the remaining 40 spots are filled via another set of criteria. Wrestlers who didn’t get one of the automatic spots are evaluated based on the following:
- Head-to-head competition
- Conference tournament placement
- Quality wins
- Results against common opponent
- Win%
- RPI
- Coaches rank
- Number of matches at that weight class
If DSJ doesn’t get one of the B1G’s 6 spots at 157, I feel pretty good about his chances of getting an at-large, but I think he needs to win at least 2 matches in the B1G tournament. His best win is against UNI’s David Bonin (#20 Coaches Poll, #23 RPI). He needs a bit more to hang his hat on.
Good write-up Ross...
I think your predictions are pretty much spot-on. My thoughts:
125 – McD is McD. Luckily, Delgado will most likely be on the opposite side of the bracket for Big 10s (and Sanders matches up well with Delgado). Hope it’s the same way at NCAAs. McD over Sanders
133 – Ramos should have a semis matchup with Futrell before going to the Big 10 final (Tony is now 3-1 against him, winning the past 3 matches). L. Stieber is so tough, I’m hoping Dardanes can knock him off in the other semi matchup (Dardanes beat Stieber in the dual, 5-3). I liked seeing Tony bounce back against Devin Carter (VA Tech) at NCAA Duals after losing to him in the Midlands final. I think Tony does the same thing in a rematch with Stieber. Ramos over Stieber
141 – This is the time of year Montell starts turning it on. Provided he doesn’t have any mental lapses (which happens from time to time) I feel pretty good about him avenging his dual loss to H. Stieber and facing Russell in the Big 10 final. Here’s a fun fact for you: Russell is undefeated vs. Iowa wrestlers which includes LeClere (0-3), Tsirtsis (0-1), Montell (0-2). He won 4 of the 6 matches in OT. It HAS to swing Iowa’s way at some point, right? Color me skeptical until I see it happen. Russell over Marion
149 – Kelly’s lack of offense is ridiculous. If you can pull it off due to great defense (like Morningstar), I can stomach it. The Hawks got a nice break with 9 qualifiers allocated to the B1G. I think Kelly is able to win a match (or 2) and qualifies. In a rematch of last year’s B1G Final, Molinaro over Grajales
157 – DSJ looked much better last weekend, but again, how much does that have to do with the competition? I think DSJ gets one of the auto-qualifier spots, but I’m worried about this one. DSJ finishes 4th. Welch over Alton
165 – I think Evans is going to go on a tear this weekend and at NCAAs. The key is he HAS to stay on the opposite side of the bracket from Taylor. Based on Intermat’s rankings, he’s looking at the 6 seed at NCAAs. If he can hold onto that (which would require him to beat Kokesh again and not lose to anyone he shouldn’t at Big 10s before presumably falling to Taylor again) I’ll feel really good about his chances. The worst case scenario is an 8 or 9 seed and a NCAA quarters matchup with Taylor. That’s what happened to DSJ last year when he had the 6 seed and Taylor had the 3. Anyway, I see Evans knocking off Kokesh in the semis. Taylor over Evans
174 – Outside of Ruth, I like Ethen’s chances with anyone. He showed in the Okie St. dual he has the ability to beat Perry (though that was Perry’s first match down at 174 – had to be a tough cut for him) and now he’s got the W over Storley under his belt. He was definitely in the match in his meeting with ISU’s Spangler (tied 5-5 at the end of the 2nd period), plus Spangler is just coming back from concussion issues. Big 12s will give a better indication of how he’s feeling. Provided Ethen is on the opposite side of the bracket from Ruth, I like his chances to get to the Big 10 final. I also could see him finish as low as 5th. Anything can happen with him depending on his mindset. The ultimate head case on Iowa’s team (which is saying something). Ruth over Lofthouse
184 – Gambrall really impressed me last weekend. I like his chances against any other Big 10 184 pounders outside of Wright and Steinhaus. Ihnen is a tough matchup as well for him (Gambrall’s 1-2 against him in his career), but if Gambrall’s stays on the offense like he did against Dallago, I think he can get the W. Gambrall finishes 4th, Wright over Steinhaus
197 – Thanks for the effort, Vinnie. He’s all heart, but I’m not seeing him as a qualifier. Powless over Campollattano
HWT – Not a ton of faith in Telford right now. He hasn’t shown an ability to get out from under any decent HWT – if he’s going to try to grind out victories rather than get to his offense and score points, it’s imperative to avoid giving up a RT point. I have him finishing 6th, Wade over Nelson.
Yeah...
125: Agree that it would be good to keep Delgado on the opposite side of the bracket from McD at B10s and NCAAs. I wouldn’t mind keeping Nico over there, too, although I definitely think McD can (and will) beat him… he definitely frustrated McD at the dual, though.
133: I’d love to see Tony reverse the result here. He has shown an ability to improve against wrestlers he sees multiple times (Futrell, Carter). Tony needs to be careful on the mat — and figure out some way to get a TD.
141: I hope the OSU match was just Montell being infected by whatever malaise hit the whole team that night. If Marion wrestles as well as he has in general the last few weeks, I think he’ll be okay here… until Russell. I hope I’m wrong, but I think Russell is just too good.
149: 9 qualifiers is a huge break for Kelly here. Now he just needs a nice draw. Grajales-Ness could be a fun semi. I think the best bet for an upset is if Ness makes the finals and can get a big move on Frank. Seems unlikely.
157: I admit, part of my motivation for picking Green here was because I didn’t want to go all scratch in my picks. Based on earlier results, Welch, Alton, and Green are all pretty closely matched, too. My biggest issue with DSJ is his health/fitness — one tweak and he could be done. I’d almost rather see Moore here because I do think he could finish in the top 6.
165: Evans worries me lately. Nice wins against Yates (though he could get ridden hard there) and Polz, but an unimpressive loss to Yohn and a really unimpressive win over the Oregon State kid he should have been able to maul. if good Mike shows up, he can definitely make the finals vs. Taylor. If not, I could definitely see Kokesh taking him out.
174: The only real danger to Ethen being on the same side as Ruth is if Heflin gets the 3 seed ahead of him. Let’s hope not, because that would send Ethen down to the consos after the semis. I like the way Ethen is wrestling lately, though. Hopefully his confidence stays high.
184: Gambrall looked great in the Dallago match. If he looks like that at Big Tens, he should easily finish in the top 7 and probably in the top 3-4. I don’t really see anything denying a Steinhaus-Wright final, although GG did beat Q last year and held his own against Steinhaus last weekend (minus one slip-up).
197: I’m amused that you have no faith in Yohn, either. I was shocked to look it up and see that he finished 5TH last year.
HWT: Telford’s ground game over the last few months might be even more disappointing than his offense from neutral. He’s really struggled to get escapes, though, and he sure hasn’t been a hammer on top. Really, really frustrating. I hope he cuts loose a little more at Big Tens.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I had a real hard time NOT picking chalk...
It seems like this year, more than most, there’s a clear cut favorite.
I can’t imagine Heflin getting the 3 over Ethen.
Heflin
B1G wins: Koehn (NE), Stein (PU), Zeerip (MI), LeBlanc (IN) twice
B1G losses: Ruth (PSU), Storley (MN)
Lofthouse:
B1G wins: Blanton (IL) 3x, Koehn (NE), Munster (NW), Kellogg (NW), Grandominico (OSU), Cousins (WI), Storley (MN)
B1G Losses: Ruth (PSU), Storley (MN), Munster (NW)
OSU’s coach, Tom Ryan, moved Heflin up to 184 in the OSU-IA dual so Lofthouse and Heflin didn’t matchup. Lofthouse has much higher quality wins (Blanton, Munster, and Storley). Lofthouse also avenged 2 of his losses (Storley, Munster). I feel pretty good about Ethen getting the 3 seed.
I hate saying this because I know what it's like to be a disappointment...
…but Rasing really has been a big disappoint this year. From winning the B1G to not getting an AA to get losing his spot this year. Wade and Nelson turned their B1G losses into Top rankings this year. I suppose I wouldn’t be so bothered if Telford were more consistent. I hope he can finish this year strong (Top 3 B1G, All-American status) so that there is some hope for the HWT going forward.
meh



















