We Must Break You Is Still Not Particularly Fond Of Gophers
via thegazette.com
Ending the skid. Tom Brands had a press conference on Tuesday and, shockingly, was not all sunshine and puppy dogs after the first two-meet losing streak of his Iowa head coaching tenure:
"I know one thing, your heads not right when you are losing seven bouts in a match," Brands said. "You’re head isn’t right when your teammates are going down like flies in front of you and you don’t do ANYTHING to stop it.
"It’s going down, boom, boom, boom, now it’s my turn on the mat, what am I going to do? You have to turn that emotion."
It does seem like more of a mental issue than a physical one for several Iowa wrestlers that are struggling right now; hopefully they can get their heads right in a hurry because Minnesota will be a very difficult opponent on Sunday. Meanwhile, the other interesting news item from the presser concerned Grant Gambrall:
Junior Grant Gambrall did offer that he was trying to cut from 197 to 184. When asked if that was an option, Gambrall said "definitely."
"I think that if I’m wrestling to the best of my ability, the weight doesn’t make that big of difference," Gambrall said. "That being said, ‘84 is probably more of my natural weight class."
Weight cut rules mean that Gambrall won't be able to wrestle at 184 for a while yet -- possibly at the National Duals in February or the Big Ten Tournament in March. Whether he actually will wrestle at 184... who knows. I've given up trying to guess what will happen at 184 and 197 this year.
Mat Mayhem! Details have begun trickling out for the NWCA/Cliff Keen Division I National Duals on Feb. 11-12. There will be six teams in each regional, with the 1 and 2 seeds getting byes in the first round while the 3-seed faces the 6-seed and the 4-seed faces the 5-seed. It's not directly specified, but I suspect the winner of the 4/5 dual will face the 1-seed and the winner of the 3/6 dual will face the 2-seed in the second round. The winners of those two meets will face off in the finals, with the winner of that dual will head to the national finals the following weekend (location TBD). All rankings are from the NWCA/USA Today Division I Team Coaches' Poll.
IOWA STATE REGIONAL: #6 Iowa, #17 Oregon State, #23 Virginia Tech, Iowa State, Wisconsin, UNI
CORNELL REGIONAL: #4 Cornell, #8 Illinois, #10 Oklahoma, #21 Central Michigan, Purdue, American
RUTGERS REGIONAL: #3 Minnesota, #11 Michigan, #15 Missouri, #16 Kent State, Rutgers, Cal Poly
OKIE STATE REGIONAL: #1 Oklahoma State, #5 Ohio State, #7 Nebraska, #12 Wyoming, Boise State, Chattanooga
On paper, Iowa is in the easiest regional of the four. They should be the 1-seed; seeds will be announced on Feb. 7. I'll do a more extensive preview at that point, but Iowa should be heavy favorites to win their regional and make it to the final four.
Rankin'
A lot of "N/A"s showing up for Iowa now, which is a problem. Unranked guys don't often score a lot at the NCAA Tournament (and they tend to get tough draws, which makes it even harder to score points), which doesn't bode well for Iowa's title hopes. Ramos slips down to 4th after his loss to Stieber, while Marion falls to the fringes of the top guys at 141 after his own loss to Stieber. (The only oddity is that several polls have him behind Nebraska's Sueflohn... even though Marion beat him just two weeks ago.) St. John finally drops out of most of the polls, while Evans gives up most of the gains he made with the win over Nebraska's Kokesh a few weeks ago.
Previewin' Let's get down to brass tacks and talk about the Iowa-Minnesota dual.
#3 Minnesota (8-2, 5-0) vs. #5 Iowa (9-3, 4-2)
Sunday, January 29, 3pm CT, "Camo Night" promotion
TV: BTN
RADIO: AM-800 KXIC (free), Hawkeye All-Access ($$$)
125: #2 Matt McDonough (JR, 21-1) vs. #1 Zach Sanders (SR, 19-0)
This could be the first of four meetings between McD and Sanders this year: here, at National Duals in February (Iowa and Minnesota could meet in the semis or finals there), the Big Ten Tournament in March, and the NCAA Tournament in March. If that happens, it would be reminiscent of McD's quadrilogy with Northwestern's Brandon Precin. That series wound up working out pretty well for McD: after losing to Precin in the Midlands finals, he rebounded to beat him in their final three encounters, including in the Big Ten Tournament finals and again in the NCAA Tournament semifinals. I certainly hope McD sweeps Sanders again this year, but if he has to lose to him, this would be by far the easiest loss to take, since at worst it would just cost Iowa a dual meet win. Mind you, whether or not you think even one Sanders win is likely depends on how much you believe in his improvement this year (and perhaps McD's slight regression). McD has a perfect 4-0 career record against Sanders, with several lopsided wins (he's beaten him 6-4, 13-2, 8-0, and 10-3) and his length has been a consistent problem for Sanders in their past match-ups. Sanders is wrestling at a very high level this season and several guys have managed to stymie McD this year, but it's not clear that Sanders will be able to follow the same gameplan that guys like Precin, Dijulius, and Megaludis have against McD: he's a shorter 125er than them, which will make it harder for him to tie up with McD and still keep his legs away from McD. I don't think this will be as lopsided as past matches in this series, but McD will win a close one.
McD DEC Sanders (Iowa 3-0)
133: #4 Tony Ramos (SO, 20-2) vs. #7 Chris Dardanes (RS FR, 17-4)
Dardanes beat Stieber who beat Ramos, but Ramos beat Futrell twice who beat Dardanes, so good luck getting the transitive property to apply very well here. There's a cluster of very good wrestlers at 133, but I think Ramos rides the energy of the crowd to a solid win here.
Ramos DEC Dardanes (Iowa 6-0)
141: #7 Montell Marion (SR, 18-2) vs. #12 Nick Dardanes (RS FR, 14-4) or UR Seth Lange (RS FR, 22-9)
Lange wrestled against Michigan (and got pinned by Kellen Russell in less than three minutes) on Friday night, which may or may not indicate who's wrestling for Minnesota in this meet. If "good Montell" shows up it shouldn't matter which guys Minny sends out there -- Marion is better than both. Unfortunately, it's no guarantee that "good Montell" makes an appearance. I'm going to guess that he does.
Marion DEC Dardanes/Lange (Iowa 9-0)
149: UR Mike Kelly (RS FR, 12-7) vs. #11 Dylan Ness (RS FR, 13-5)
Ness (brother of former Minnesota national champion Jayson Ness) came into the year with some high expectations and he's had some stumbles, mainly because he's a funky wrestler who has an ability to pin people -- which also gets him into bad positions at times that cost him. If Kelly can avoid Ness' big moves, he could steal a win here. He wrestled hard against Molinaro but I can't justify picking him to get a win here yet.
Ness DEC Kelly (Iowa 9-3)
157: UR Nick Moore (RS FR, 10-7) or UR Derek St. John (SO, 11-1) vs. UR Alec Ortiz (SO, 11-6)
This is a match that Iowa simply must win, if they want to win the dual meet. Ortiz was pressed into service after Jake Dietchler, Minnesota's potential All-American at this weight, was forced to retire from the sport due to concussions. He's not very good. Unfortunately, Iowa's options are a one-legged DSJ and a Nick Moore who seems bereft of confidence right now. I think he finally gets a little something going here, though.
Moore DEC Ortiz (Iowa 12-3)
165: #8 Mike Evans (RS FR, 18-4) vs. #14 Cody Yohn (JR, 13-5)
Another crucial match for Iowa to win, since Minnesota figures to be fairly big favorites from 174-HWT. Evans went 0-2 last weekend and needs to get a win and arrest that slide. Yohn is in the midst of his own skid, though, and I think that will be the tonic for Evans.
Evans DEC Yohn (Iowa 15-3)
174: #9 Ethen Lofthouse (SO, 15-5) vs. #7 Logan Storley (FR, 16-3)
Storley is a very good wrestler and Ethen is a very inconsistent wrestler (coming off perhaps the worst performance of his career against Penn State's Ed Ruth last Sunday), so logic would suggest that Storley should win here. But I think there will be an upset or two in this meet and this seems like a good possibility, given Lofthouse's propensity to wrestle better on the mat at CHA than anywhere else.
Lofthouse DEC Storley (Iowa 18-3)
184: UN Vinnie Wagner (SR, 6-7) or RS FR Jeremy Fahler (8-4) vs. #8 Kevin Steinhaus (SO, 18-4)
Wagner held his own for most of the match against Penn State's Quentin Wright last Sunday, which was fairly remarkable; as a reward, he gets to take on another top-notch 184er this week in Steinhaus. I have faith in Vinnie to keep it close(ish), but that's all.
Steinhaus DEC Wagner/Fahler (Iowa 18-6)
197: UN Grant Gambrall (JR, 7-6) vs. #6 Sonny Yohn (SR, 16-3)
Based on his showings last weekend, Gambrall will be fairly active and put up a game effort, but he'll come up short. Sounds about right here.
Yohn DEC Gambrall (Iowa 18-9)
HWT: #10 Bobby Telford (RS FR, 14-3) or UN Blake Rasing (SR, 13-5) vs. #4 Tony Nelson (SO, 17-2)
It sounds like Rasing will again get the nod here because Telford is wrestling in the Grand View Open this weekend. Rasing went 1-1 last weekend but does have a 3-0 career record against Nelson (including a win in last year's Big Ten Tournament finals). Still, Nelson seems like he's gotten better this year; I'm not sure the same can be said for Rasing.
Nelson DEC Telford/Rasing (Iowa 18-12)
This looks like another tough dual for Iowa, especially since they don't figure to be huge favorites at any weights. McD and Ramos are Iowa's two best wrestlers, but they're also facing two of Minnesota's best wrestlers, which won't make things easy. Still, I think a little home cooking -- and the desire to erase the taste of last weekend's 0-2 performance -- will be enough for Iowa to post a win here.
24 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think we'll beat Minny worse than this.
What do I know? Well, I would be willing to bet that Brands rode these guys HARD this week at practice and they will come out mentally sharp and fired up. They better have some pent up frustrations from the last two duals and they will take them out on the goofs.
"HOW'S IT HANGIN, SLAPNUTS!"
Any chance that they use the NFL playoff structure after the first round?
This would allow the 1-seed to get the lowest seeded winner from round 1, and is the only reason I can think of for not laying out the playoff structure in advance.
Just in case I’m unclear, here’s how the Iowa regional would work if seeded as listed.
If the bracket plays out chalk, then Iowa would wrestle the 4th seeded Cyclones and Oregon State would get the Hokies.
However, if UNI were somehow able to upset VaTech, then Iowa would get the Panthers and Oregon State would get the Cyclones/Badgers.
Yeah, I'm not sure.
I wondered if they might do the same thing, re: playing the lowest remaining seed. We’ll see.
I’m also not sure how the seeds will shake out, other than Iowa will be the 1-seed. H2H results will probably play a role.
Iowa: 2-0 (beat ISU, UNI; 3-0 if they beat Wisco next week)
Va Tech: 0-1 (lost to ISU; curiously they have a dual scheduled for 2/19… guess they don’t expect to win the regional)
Oregon St: 0-0
Iowa St: 1-1 (beat Va Tech, lost to Iowa; face UNI next week)
UNI: 1-1 (beat Wisco, lost to Iowa; face ISU next week)
Wisco: 0-1 (lost to UNI; face Iowa next week)
I think Va Tech and Oregon State’s overall body of work will keep them as the 2/3 seeds, which would mean the winner of ISU-UNI next week should be the 4-seed. Not sure that really matters too much, though.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I can't look at the Brands brothers without cracking up
They’re the only people who can look surprised yet slightly insane at the same time.
Well, them and Frank Martin.
That's probably my favorite picture ever.
Before you respond, let me remind you: Brian Cook called me smug, which makes me the Obama of smugness. I'm basically Smugbama.
by Patrick Vint on Jan 30, 2012 7:32 AM CST up reply actions
Injuries + Young Team
its really that simple. DSJ and Gambrall were supposed to be top 5 guys for us and ended up both getting hurt, 197 stayed a hole and 149 both didnt improve as much as we had hoped.
i think this year we just have to hope for as many individual champions as we can get, which is probably three. McD, Ramos and Marion, and then ope the team improves next year.
"Your spelling and grammar errors belie a seriously skilled thought process"- therealCatnuts
by justsomehawkeyefan on Jan 28, 2012 5:16 PM CST up reply actions
The chances
of having three champions this year is about the same as winning a team title.
"Florida! You don't go to Florida in the winter, you go in the summer!" -Tom Brands
by David Starbuck Petersen on Jan 29, 2012 12:00 PM CST up reply actions
True
but Arizona State had 2 champs in a year where they did nothing national title wise. it may not be likely, but if any team could do it, it would be Iowa
"Your spelling and grammar errors belie a seriously skilled thought process"- therealCatnuts
by justsomehawkeyefan on Jan 29, 2012 1:33 PM CST up reply actions
also, i meant 3 at the max
"Your spelling and grammar errors belie a seriously skilled thought process"- therealCatnuts
by justsomehawkeyefan on Jan 29, 2012 1:33 PM CST up reply actions
Nobody has commented yet on the picture?
I spent half my life's earnings on wine, women & song. The other half I wasted.
I actually was just staring at it just now trying to figure out which one was which.
Also, they have almost exactly the same sitting posture.
Twitterz: @EnergizerHawk
by EnergizerHawk on Jan 28, 2012 5:55 PM CST up reply actions
That picture is full of win
INTENSE win.
by DJK's bongwater on Jan 28, 2012 6:05 PM CST up reply actions
some of the more Interesting results in the tournament that happened today
Telford lost in the championship match. ive heard he had good competition in the tourney but he should still be winning those.
Dwez won pretty easily at 141, last beating Iowa’s Owens
Grothus and J. Ballweg both lost to the same guy, Ballweg beat Grothus for 3rd
Clark won 133
Lira and Fahler both got 2nd
"Your spelling and grammar errors belie a seriously skilled thought process"- therealCatnuts
by justsomehawkeyefan on Jan 28, 2012 7:08 PM CST reply actions
Something ive been wondering
the Olympics have a “last chance qualifying” tournament a week or two before the real tournament to determine who goes to the olympics. can college wrestlers try out since its after the NCAA championship?
"Your spelling and grammar errors belie a seriously skilled thought process"- therealCatnuts
by justsomehawkeyefan on Jan 28, 2012 7:11 PM CST reply actions
I believe so.
They’re just at a disadvantage because they haven’t been wrestling freestyle all year like the guys they’ll be facing there.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I know Gambrall's weight has been discussed extensively
and at this point we really don’t even know how he’d perform if he got down to 184. I’m just curious if we know with any certainty who would be at 197 for the tournament runs in that scenario.
IIRC, Lira was used earlier in the year. So would Lira (or Ambrose?) have any better chance of racking up some team points than Wagner at 84? Or is that just a wash and we’d simply be hoping for a better Gambrall at 184?
honestly
Wagner probably has better odds than Lira at getting points
"Your spelling and grammar errors belie a seriously skilled thought process"- therealCatnuts
by justsomehawkeyefan on Jan 28, 2012 8:16 PM CST up reply actions
I don't think Ambrose ever made it down to 197.
It would probably be Lira at 197. Wagner would have a better chance of getting points at 184, but the idea is that Gambrall at 184 would by himself get more points than any other combination we could come up with. That would be the hope, anyway.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
There is a pretty good chance
that Lira would not qualify for NCAA wrestling at 197. I think Ross’ assumption is correct, the idea is that Gambrall can be much more effective at 184 than at 197 and score more points than any other arrangement.
"Florida! You don't go to Florida in the winter, you go in the summer!" -Tom Brands
by David Starbuck Petersen on Jan 29, 2012 12:09 PM CST up reply actions
I love Brands' intensity.
That is all.
I said I have a DRINKING PROBLEM!!
by bornofclay on Jan 28, 2012 9:34 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Let’s put the women and children to bed and go lookin for fuckin dinner.
by McNutterButter on Jan 29, 2012 2:27 PM CST via mobile reply actions

by 




















