Back To The Future: Thoughts About Iowa Basketball In 2011-2012
Another year, another week of teams gearing up for the opening weekend of the NCAA Tournament (which, for my money, is the best weekend in sports all year) and -- sadly -- another year with Iowa fans having nothing to do but reflect on the past year's failures and dream of better tomorrows. Someday (hopefully soon) we'll be able to again be fully invested in March Madness. In the meantime, though, it's useful to look at five areas that could determine what Iowa does next year.
* Stay put. No more transfers, please. This is not exactly a new thought, of course, but Iowa needs to actually retain underclassmen -- especially the ones that are, you know, kind of good. Three years ago it was Tony Freeman bolting. Two years ago it was Jake Kelly and Jeff Peterson heading for greener pastures. Last year it was Aaron Fuller. Iowa's already operating at a talent disadvantage compared to many schools; they can ill afford to have the few good players they do have running off after a year or two. The good news is that there's no indication that TRANSFERMANIA will be wreaking its usual havoc on the Iowa roster this year. Idle interwebs gossip has singled out Eric May (because he lost his starting job) and Cully Payne (ditto) as potential transfer targets, but there's no actual indication that they're looking to leave.
* Recruit recruit recruit. No matter how well Fran schemed, one thing became abundantly clear this past season: Iowa needs more bodies -- and they need more talented bodies. Frankly, they need more of everything: they need more ballhandlers, they need more outside shooters, they need more bigs, they need more guys who can just plain score. Obviously they won't be able to address every single need with this incoming class, so they'll need to prioritize a bit. From the sounds of things, Fran is focusing his efforts this spring on a big and a point guard, which makes a great deal of sense. Iowa is losing Jarryd Cole, the most talented "big" they had (and he was just 6'7") and the only guys with legitimate "big" size that they have returning are Devon Archie and Andrew Brommer -- and both those guys have had massive consistency issues (not to mention major "staying out of foul trouble" issues, as Horace pointed out yesterday). Cartwright was run ragged because Iowa had no back-up point guard this year; getting Cully Payne back should help on that front, but it won't hurt to add another option, too.
Fortunately, as good as Fran & Co. are at scheming, they might be even better at recruiting. They already went into Texas (Cartwright) and New York (Basabe) last year and they just landed a recruit for 2012 from Georgia (Kyle Meyer). They made it to the final two for Cezar Guerrero, a highly-touted point guard prospect out of California, and they're in on plenty of other guys from one coast to the other. They've also stayed closer to Big Ten territory and landed Aaron White from Ohio, who looks like a potential steal, and Josh Oglesby from Cedar Rapids, who should add valuable depth at the very least. There don't appear to be any stones they won't turn over in the hunt to find new players for this team. That's a refreshing approach, particularly after the prior coach rarely went further east than Indiana or further west than the Missouri River. The jury's still out on how good his recruits will be, but we're happy to give him the benefit of the doubt after the seasons Basabe and Cartwright just had.
* Make a few shots, yeah? Horace went into much greater detail on this in his Retrospecticus yesterday, but offense was really Iowa's biggest failing in 2010-2011 (cue the "Just like football!" chant). The defense wasn't great, but it was respectable enough. Unfortunately, the offense was just horrendous. Mind you, this was true even without Horace's handy statistical breakdown -- anyone who watched more than a few Iowa games should be able to recall a litany of missed lay-ups (or dunks) and a staggering number of bricked jump shots (especially from 3-point range). How far Iowa is able to progress from an 11-20 record this year is likely going to depend on how much better they can shoot the ball in 2011-2012. There's no indication that Fran is bringing in a dead-eye sharpshooter to solve the outside shooting woes, either (edit: although as I was reminded by a few people in the comments, Oglesby was a very good shooter in HS, so he should help), which means that the onus is on the existing players to stop laying so many bricks and starting draining some of those jumpers. Iowa desperately needs guys like Gatens, May, and McCabe to step up and become more consistent outside shooters. If they can't do that, Basabe is going to get smothered, Cartwright will struggle to find open men, and Iowa will continue to be godawful on offense.
* Take advantage of the changes. Another thing we've mentioned before is that there will be a pretty big talent exodus from the Big Ten after this season. John Bohnenkamp broke it down in his blog recently:
• Illinois loses Mike Davis, Mike Tisdale and Demetri McCamey.
• Purdue will lose JaJuan Johnson, the Big Ten’s player of the year, and E’Twaun Moore.
• Ohio State loses David Lighty and Jon Diebler, and if Sullinger and junior guard William Buford decide to leave for the NBA, the Buckeyes take a major hit.
• Penn State, which is in the conference tournament semifinals, loses Talor Battle, David Jackson, Andrew Jones and Jeff Brooks.
• Michigan State loses Kalin Lucas and Durrell Summers. Will Draymond Green look at the NBA?
• Wisconsin loses Jon Leuer and Keaton Nankivil. Does Jordan Taylor skip his senior season to go to the NBA?
• Standout guards Blake Hoffarber (Minnesota) and Michael "Juice" Thompson (Northwestern) are seniors.
Nebraska is also losing their most productive player (Lance Jeter, who led the team in scoring, assists, and steals and was second in rebounds), so there's more fodder for the talent exodus. Conversely, Iowa loses only Jarryd Cole and though he won't be easy to replace, it's not as big of a blow as the one facing many of our Big Ten peers. Many of those teams will be replacing those faces with good recruits so it's unlikely that they'll be sinking back into the mire, but they also shouldn't be as consistent or as strong as they were this season. They'll be more vulnerable and it will be up to Iowa to try and take advantage of those vulnerabilities and move up in the standings.
* Schedule for success. We don't know what the 2011-2012 schedule will look like yet -- but we can make a few educated guesses. They'll likely be playing Iowa State (in Ames), Northern Iowa (in Cedar Falls), and Drake (in Iowa City). They'll be playing in another exempt tourney, although per Scott Dochterman, they'll be playing most of the games in Iowa City or at the Wells Fargo Center in Des Moines -- and we're probably not talking heavyweights here (though one rumored opponent, Creighton, is very solid). There's no indication that they'll be cutting back on eighteen conference games; in a 12-team league that should mean home-and-homes against seven Big Ten opponents, home games against two other Big Ten foes, and road games against two final Big Ten foes. They'll play an ACC team in the Big Ten-ACC Challenge; based on the standings, that's probably someone like NC State, Georgia Tech, or Wake Forest. That accounts for roughly 25 games, which leaves around five games unaccounted for; I wouldn't expect any heavyweights there, either. I doubt they're looking to schedule home-and-homes with the likes of Kansas or UCLA anytime soon.
All told, it probably won't be a terribly brutal schedule -- there will be opportunities for wins there. The key will be avoiding losses to teams they shouldn't lose to (i.e., this year's losses to South Dakota State and Long Beach State). The other key will be improving their record in close games -- this year they went 4-11 in games decided by 10 points or less. If they could have turned half those losses into wins, we're looking at a 15-16 record -- which would be a much more tangible sign of progress than the 11-20 record Iowa had. They had excellent opportunities to win many of those games (Long Beach State, Wake Forest, Iowa State, Wisconsin, Michigan, Michigan State), too -- they just couldn't close out.
34 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ross
I admire your optimism. Had I written this post it would have consisted of “$TOP $UCKING!” /end of post.
"Don't talk about me like I'm not here!" Shelby
twitter.com/dmbmeg
See, you're much more succint than I am.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I'm VERY optimistic
mostly because we’re still so young and the rest of the league is losing a lot. I’m expecting for somewhere in the 5-7th range.
Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.
agreed mccann't.
my standings optimism is basically the same, but i just want to SEE progress. hopefully this will translate into a middle-of-the-pack finish in the big ten and a potential postseason (albeit NIT) appearance.
I look at Long Beach State, Xavier, Wake,
Wisconsin, Michigan, Penn State, Northwestern and Ohio State and see games that were all winnable save for some horrendous FT shooting and immaturity in handling pressure down the stretch. If you can convert on, say, 70% of those games you’re looking at the postseason. Given that the league will be weaker and the Hawks stronger, I see that as a real possibility.
Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.
by Kyle McCann't on Mar 16, 2011 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions
Yep, I'm pretty optimistic too.
Because really, at this point… eh, what the hell? May as well be.
I'm giving up Lent for Science.
Along with the offense
I really hope they work on free throws during the offseason. According to the WWL, we’re tied for 222nd. Those are points we can’t afford to just be giving away given the talent gap
It never gets to be easy.
Why the fuck doesn't it ever get to be easy?
Dude, even I can hit the rim consistently.
We all know there’s no way in hell I’m actually shooting greater than 50% though.
It never gets to be easy.
Why the fuck doesn't it ever get to be easy?
by chitownhawkeye on Mar 16, 2011 5:59 PM CDT up reply actions
Gatens, May, Payne, McCabe and Marble . . .
. . . should each shoot 1,000 three-pointers a day from now until October 15th. If Iowa doesn’t markedly improve its outside shooting, it will be very hard-pressed to win more than 15 games next year regardless of the caliber of opponents on the schedule.
May hit 40% of this 3s
It was more he didn’t take them (or wasn’t in the game), not that he didn’t make them
Yeah his issue was that he seemed scared to shoot for whatever reason
Hope he gets that cleared up, and that he also starts driving to the hoop a little more. McCaffery always seemed incredibly supportive, but for whatever reason he just continued to play scared. Hopefully it was the injury and he’ll be fine next year, because he has the potential to be our best player.
Ignoring any new talented recruits
It was Dean Smith, I think, who said “The best thing about freshmen is they become sophomores.” I would think that Basabe, Marble, and McCabe will show significant improvement next season. That spells improvement.
The other maxim deals with senior leadership. Certainly that was evidenced by Cole towards the end of the season. If we can get similar leadership gains from Gatens, Brommer, Cartright and even Archie (when was the last time we had even three experienced seniors on the roster???) we see more improvement.
Iowa now has two experienced point guards. Payne will provide Cartright needed rest or vice versa. This is huge. How many times did Cartright just look gassed late in the game after tearing things up in the first half. It also frees Marble for minutes at the 2 and 3 spots where he is best suited. This spells improvement.
Now lets insert a couple solid true freshmen for depth and maybe one transfer/JC recruit who can contribute on a par with Cartright or Basabe and this team may be looking at 20-11 next season instead of 11-20.
I know this is a total homer assessment but there is certainly reason to look forward to next season.
with the strength of a grizzly, the reflexes of a puma, and the wisdom of a man.
As I looked up his stats,
I expected to see Basabe’s to be better (he “only” averaged 11 ppg). I was going to say that perhaps we shouldn’t expect him to get a lot better offensively, but I could see him replacing some of those games where he scored 4 points with games that he would score 8 to 12.
I fear that I should not expect the same progress from Brommer and Archie. I feel like, if they give us solid rebounding and good defense (the defense seems a bit of a stretch for both), then I would be pretty happy.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Mar 16, 2011 7:35 PM CDT up reply actions
I think he'll get a lot better offensively. I hope so, anyway.
As he gets stronger and better learns how to play at this level where he can’t just step foot on the floor and automatically dominate, I think his upside is tremendous. So you know, knock on wood.
I'm giving up Lent for Science.
by Bucketochicken on Mar 16, 2011 7:41 PM CDT up reply actions
Long Beach State
was actually kinda good this year.
Jack Trice Stadium - Easily one of the Top 10 Stadiums in Central Iowa
That's true.
That was also a very winnable game for Iowa, though.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I personally want better timed alley oops
i love the alley oops, really i do, but they seemed too quick to go for it.
by justsomehawkeyefan on Mar 16, 2011 5:10 PM CDT reply actions
"here's no indication that Fran is bringing in a dead-eye sharpshooter to solve the outside shooting woes"
Uh, Oglesby? I understand that great shooters sometimes struggle as D-1 freshmen, but he’s an elite shooter if nothing else. White is supposed to be a fairly good shot from beyond the arc as well.
For some reason, I didn't think he was a great shooter.
If he is, wonderful. We can certainly use good outside shooting.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
Yeah, I see that now after looking him up.
For some reason I was thinking he was more of a forward-type. My bad.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
Yeah he's only like 6'3" I think
By most accounts he would have been the best shooter on the team this year. He’ll be a nice addition. I’m also pretty excited to get a look at White. He had a phenomenal senior year of high school and by all accounts was among the very best players in Ohio. From what I’ve heard he sounds like a much more athletic version of McCabe, but I’m not really sure what to expect.
I would also look for Gatens' % to go up
as Cully Payne will split PG duties with Cartwright and negate any real need for Matt to have to handle the ball for extended periods.
Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.
by Kyle McCann't on Mar 16, 2011 5:39 PM CDT up reply actions
I hope so.
Hopefully the growth and development of other players on the team will force teams to stop keying on Gatens as well. I do think that another thing that has hurt Matt’s shooting is how hard he’s working on defense now. I don’t think Fran will want Matt to take a break on D, but another off-season of conditioning for up-tempo, pressure b-ball might help him out.
As I recall Marble was a pretty good shooter in high school, despite how atrocious he looked this year. Hopefully he and McCabe can zero it in a bit better with the added experience and confidence that comes with being sophomores.
hitting shots seems to be as much about confidence
as anything. Hopefully the year of switching to Fran-ball, an off season of shooting practice and the win over Purdue will build the confidence to the level of being able to at least want to take the late game shot. In the few games I was able to get on TV it seemed at the end of close games everyone wanted to dump the ball to someone else instead of stepping up and at least taking the shot. Cartwright had too many off balance, hurried, runners that were decent looks but totally created by himself late in the shot clock. Would have been nice for him to drive and kick it out to an open Matt, et al. to take the less contested shot.
"Sometimes the truth gets in the way of a good story" - KF
by The Bacon Explosion on Mar 17, 2011 7:33 AM CDT up reply actions
He really didn't handle the ball that much this year
As Horace said, he was usually pretty quick to get rid of it, and never tried to force anything off the dribble. He just never really found his stroke. I’m hoping it was just a lingering injury issue and that he’ll be better next year when he’s healthy (although it’s worth noting that his 3pt % was not all that spectacular last year either), and with Basabe hopefully continuing to develop and draw more defensive attention.
Gatens with intensity....
….always scrambling after balls, running to and fro. I’m a little worried about an injury. I want the effort, but it seems like this season he threw his body around a lot more than in the past. How long can his body take it? Who can replace him during the season if he was to get injured? I so did NOT just jinx him.
"Hardcore will never die, but you will."
Great post
I’m in complete agreement on the “get more bodies” point. It seems like we still mostly have the personnel to run Lickliter’s system, not Fran’s. You could see Fran try to press and run a little bit, but we’re not that kind of team, yet. It’s just one more of the bummers of switching coaches/coaching styles abruptly.
Very true.
The exciting thing is that he should be able to quickly remake the roster, though. He gets to bring in four new guys this year. And we have four seniors next year, which will open up spots for four more new guys. That’s eight new players over two years. The only remaining “Lickliter guys” will be May, Payne, McCabe, and Marble. And McCabe and Marble are essentially “Fran guys,” since he finished their recruiting and will have been the only coach they’ve ever known at Iowa. May and Payne seem pretty well-suited to play the way Fran wound like to play, too.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
And the new practice facility might help
Shooters will be able to go shoot any time of the day or night. I think that’s something some of the gym-rat type guys will make use of
Also true.
I’m sure a guy like Gatens will be spending lots of time there.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
we are in the big ten
we need a big
not a kinda big
not 6’7 kid who needs to spend two years in the football
weight program
not to 6’6’ kids who are quick
we need an honest to god kick ass B1G big
long live the pellican whore
I don't intend to upset folks with the way I write it just happens,,,
Amen to that.
No ‘tweeners, no "he has a lot of room to grow but by the time he’s a junior he might be huge!" guys. Just a big ol’ 6’11", 285 lb (with 17% body fat!) BIG with hands the size of toilet seats and an ass three ax handles wide for proper blocking out. Someone who wears size 28 shoes. Someone who wears a 16-inch fitted hat. With a 51-inch vertical leap.
I'm giving up Lent for Science.
by Bucketochicken on Mar 18, 2011 6:01 AM CDT up reply actions
























