Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Events Cause Mariners To Lose To Rangers

Iowa 45, Indiana 24: McNuttin' All Over The Place

Well, that was pretty nice, yeah?  Okay, sure, there were reasons for hand-wringing -- questionable substitution decisions, lousy tackling -- and we'll get to those in a bit, but a 20-point win in conference play is pretty good.  Even with the Iowa defense's continued porousness, this game was effectively in the bag after Iowa blew it open with a 21-point second quarter and opened up a 35-14 lead.  Even if Indiana had been able to continue to exploit the soft coverage and poor tackling that was rampant in the Iowa defense, there was precious little indication that they could stop the Iowa offense.  After a slightly nerve-racking opening where the teams traded scores, this settled into a comfortable Iowa win -- exactly what we wanted, right?  (And, also, exactly what we hadn't seen from Iowa-Indiana games too often over the last half-decade.)

Marvin is marvelous.  There's only one place to start discussing this game: with the incomparable Marvin McNutt, who not only set the Iowa career touchdown receptions record -- he shattered it with a career-best day (6 catches, 184 yards, 3 TD).  He did a little bit of everything on Saturday: taking simple crossing routes and turning them into a huge scoring plays (his first touchdown, the record-setter, was a mirror image of his sensational touchdown catch-and-run against Indiana in 2009), pulling in fade routes (a route he and Vandenberg have almost perfected this year), and even doing a little possession work in the second half and snaring some short-yardage first down grabs. He even did some nice downfield blocking during the game (although that also led to one of his tow missteps on the day: the silly holding penalty that negated a big Coker run; the other misstep was the comically easy drop he had... but both of those complaints are mere quibbles).  

He is, simply, the total package as a receiver and with just over half the season done, he's laying siege to the Iowa record books.  Through seven games, he has 43 receptions for 757 yards and 8 touchdowns.  To put that in perspective, his best previous season was 2010, when he had 53 receptions for 861 yards and 8 touchdowns. Eerie coincidence alert: right now, McNutt's season stats have him at 16th best all-time, tied with... Danan Hughes, the same man whose career touchdown mark he officially broke this week.  In terms of all-time season records, he's 40 receptions, 281 yards, and 4 touchdowns away from having the best season ever for an Iowa receiver.  Those latter two figures seem eminently within his reach: so far he's averaging 108 ypg and 1.14 TD per game; assuming Iowa plays six more games (five more regular season games and a bowl game), he would obliterate the previous high-water marks and finish with 1405 receiving yards and 14-15 touchdowns.  The receptions mark would be a little harder; he's averaging 6.14 receptions per game, which would work out to 79-80 catches  -- 2-3 catches short of the record.  

Star-divide

On the other hand, expecting McNutt to maintain this pace is probably unwise: Penn State aside, Iowa's October schedule is full of extremely vulnerable defenses that McNutt has exploited repeatedly; November brings dates with a Michigan State defense that's thoroughly legit, a scrappy Purdue unit that did a solid job of slowing Illinois' attack this week (and held all-conference receiver A.J. Jenkins to 8 catches for 92 yards), and Michigan and Nebraska units that are shaky -- but still less of a smoldering crater than the jNW, Indiana, and (presumably) Minnesota secondaries.  Still, even if he doesn't maintain quite that remarkable pace, the season-best numbers are definitely within reach.  As are a few other career records: he's just 314 yards shy of the career receiving yards record that Derrell Johnson-Koulianos set last year (2616 yards) and 43 receptions shy of that catches mark that DJK set a year ago (173).  The yardage looks more doable than the receptions mark, but either way: McNutt is rewriting the Iowa record book, week by week -- and it's awesome to watch.

Meanwhile, there were some exciting performances from the non-McNutt corners of the Iowa offense, too.  Marcus Coker had his second straight fine game (23 carries for 139 yards -- a very healthy 6.0 ypc average - and 2 TDs) and continued to look like a much healthier, more confident runner than he had early in the season.  Playing a defensive line as hopeless as Indiana's certainly helps (there's a reason they were giving up 220+ ypg entering this game: they're really awful), but there's no getting around the fact that Coker looks more assertive and stronger than he did six weeks ago.  James Vandenberg had a solid day distributing the ball (mainly to McNutt, but hey), going 12/16 for 253 yards and 4 TDs (0 INTs).  Anytime you finish with as many touchdown passes as incompletions (aka, the Robert Griffin III Special), you're doing alright.  There are things Vandenberg still needs to work on -- his blitz pick-up (especially from cornerbacks or defenders on the edges) was very poor today and he tends locks on to one receiver (today, McNutt) a bit too much -- but on the whole he played well.  The only way Indiana was going to have a chance to pull an upset was if Vandenberg gave them gifts in the form of turnovers and he safely avoid that pitfall.  

Why, it was such a good day for the Iowa offense that we even had a rare sighting of the tight end in the passing offense -- actually catching passes, no less, and not just blocking!  Zach Derby had two catches for 26 yards and Brad Herman caught Iowa's final touchdown pass on a 1-yard play action route.  As a team, Iowa put up 45 points and 437 yards on a gaudy 7.7 yards per play average -- this is one of the more explosive offenses Iowa's fielded in quite a while.  The 45 points was Iowa's second-straight 40+ game and fourth of the season, their best totals since 2008.  The last time Iowa scored 40+ in consecutive games was the opening two games of the 2008 season (R.I.P., Maine and Florida International) and the least time Iowa scored that much in back-to-back conference games was in 2002 (against Northwestern and Minnesota to end the regular season).  

Can you tackle?  Do you have eligibility remaining?  Good news, you might be able to play defense for Iowa.  Seven games in, I'm not sure how much more there is to say about the defense: it's bad.  If you created a drinking game based on missed tackles you'd be buzzed by the end of the first drive, drunk by the end of the first quarter, and dead by halftime.  Morehouse put this year's performance into context -- and it's not pretty:

Through seven games, Iowa allows 161.6 rush yards a game.  That would be the most for an Iowa defense since 194.3 in 2000.  The 23.3 points allowed per game is the highest since 2000 (27.5).  The 406.7 yards Iowa has allowed through seven games is the most since, you guessed it, 2000 (440.9).

Iowa can probably get away with one more week of lackluster defense like this, given that this week's game is against yet another Big Ten bottom-feeder.  Hell, Minnesota's anemic offense may even improve the Iowa defense's numbers.  Can Iowa get away with playing defense like that against the stronger teams on the schedule in November?  Seems unlikely.  At the very least, it will put a lot of pressure on the offense to score a ton of points. There were a few bright spots for the defense on Saturday: after letting Indiana march up and down the field on the first two drives (both of which ended in Indiana touchdowns), they forced punts on the next two drives, held them to a field goal on the first drive after halftime, and forced a turnover on downs on the drive after that (albeit after allowing Indiana to drive the length of the field).  By the time they scored another touchdown Iowa was already up 45-17.  But their points allowed isn't really the issue -- even if it's higher than normal (quite a bit higher, in fact), it's not so high that Iowa can't win games giving up 20-24 points a game, particularly with an offense as generally potent as the one they have this year.  The bigger problem is that they struggle mightily to get off the field, which limits the offense's possessions, and that puts a lot of pressure on them to be efficient (i.e., score) with those possessions. They've been very good at that over the last few weeks -- they scored touchdowns on their first five drives yesterday and didn't punt until the fourth quarter -- but it's tough to rely on that week in and week out.

We can use timeouts after all?  It was a mixed bag in terms of the performance of the coaches yesterday.  On the bright side, they actually used timeouts before halftime to get the ball back and mount a drive before halftime -- and, lo and behold, it worked (thanks in no small part to a bit of individual brilliance from McNutt, but hey -- the point is to give him the opportunity to make those plays, right?).  On the less bright side, the starters stayed in the game for a bafflingly long time yesterday.  Vandenberg played virtually the entire game, which made little sense; Wienke couldn't have handed off to running backs and thrown a short play-action pass on the goal line?  Obviously the worst outcome was the injury sustained by Keenan Davis while blocking down the field, even though it doesn't sound like the injury was serious (early reports are that it was a sprained ankle).  There wasn't any reason for the starters to be playing in the fourth quarter.  

We did get to see the reserve running backs in action, albeit not in any meaningful minutes (Coker once again gobbled up all the carries then).  De'Andre Johnson ran for 26 yards on 5 carries, while Jordan Canzeri had 26 yards on 4 carries.  Both looked promising enough that it would be nice to see both get more carries -- Canzeri hit the hole with good burst and both guys displayed some nice elusiveness that we don't see from Coker.  Mika'il McCall was suited up and went through warm-ups before the game, too; it sounds like there's a very good chance that he'll be available to play before the end of the season -- and possibly as soon as this Saturday's Minnesota game.

Poll
Who was Iowa's man of the match against Indiana?
Marvin McNutt (6 catches, 184 yards, 3 TD)
702 votes
James Vandenberg (12/16, 253 yarsd, 4 TD, 0 INT)
47 votes
Marcus Coker (23 carries, 139 yards, 2 TD)
16 votes
Christian Kirksey (12 tackles, 1 pass break-up)
7 votes
Other (To the comments!)
0 votes

772 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 41 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Assuming McCall is as good as he looked in

week 1, it would be very nice to have him back for the last 4 games. Gonna be tough sledding.

Watching the Cubs piss it away for 31 years.

by CarolinaHawk on Oct 23, 2011 9:48 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm still against rushing him back

I want him to be FULLY healed before he plays again, or he risks aggravating the ankle and have it become a chronic problem. Also, and I can only say this about one team, I don’t want him facing an MSU team that (1) he dropped his commitment to in order to sign with Iowa and (2) has shown a penchant for making it personal and playing dirty. I have no problem, whatsoever, imagining a MSU player twisting his ankle in the pile just because it is tender. What’s bad, is that there is literally no other team in the B1G I can imagine doing this.

I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.

by HoyaGoon on Oct 24, 2011 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Realistically

At best, we could beat MN and Purdue, split Mich/MSU, and have an opportunity to play for it all against Nebraska. That’s at best. Destiny seems to be setting us up for reversals of fortunes this year. The loss to PSU, the win over jNWU, putting Indiana away. None of this fits Iowa’s script over the last few seasons.

Realistically, I think if we can go 4-4 in Big 10 play, we ought to be damned happy with that. I think 5-3 is unlikely, but within reach, and 6-2 would almost certainly send us to the championship game.
 
The thing I want most this year is a 4th straight bowl win, even if it’s the Gortmann’s Fish Sticks Bowl.

A man may leave Iowa, but Iowa never leaves a man.

by hawkeyeinstl on Oct 23, 2011 10:00 PM CDT reply actions  

6-2 in the conference probably doesn't cut it

if the other loss is to MSU or Nebraska. And as much as I admire your good old-fashioned common sense, what I want most this year, just like every year, is to get another ridiculously longstanding absolutely ancient monkey off our backs: to win the Rose Bowl for the first time in over half a century. Not gonna happen, I know, but it’s still what I want most….

by BamaGatorHawk on Oct 23, 2011 11:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm with ya

The Orange Bow was great but I want a Rose. But to avoid becoming an insufferable jackass, you have to pick your battles and be realistic and this isn’t a Rose year.

6-2 cuts it if you beat who you need to beat. To go six and two we can lose only one game collectively to Mich, MSU, and Ne. So it’s sort of assumed in the calculus there that we beat the right teams. Obviously we’re in at 7-1.

The big concern is the D up front, but MSU’s offense is too erratic, I actually think we’ll handle MSU. It’s Michigan and Ne I’m concerned about.

A man may leave Iowa, but Iowa never leaves a man.

by hawkeyeinstl on Oct 24, 2011 7:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Fish sticks are good!

I’ll settle for a bowl game and bowl game. I don’t care where the bowl is. This team needs practice for next year, when we should be a lot better than this year has gone so far…

And speaking of other good things, I moved my blog… and was able to snatch up thebirdcult.net – tell me what you think! :)

Never *question* Bruce Dickinson!

by The Bird Cult on Oct 23, 2011 11:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

I voted for Vandy just because of the typo.

"No I'm not going to 'limber up'. You ever see a lion stretching before it takes down a gazelle?"

by Swarley on Oct 23, 2011 10:03 PM CDT reply actions  

Wait, McCall could be back?

I thought he was done for the season.

I spent half my life's earnings on wine, women & song. The other half I wasted.

by therealCatnuts on Oct 23, 2011 10:35 PM CDT reply actions  

I don't know what their plan is.

But, rumors were around last week that he could have even played yesterday. His ankle has healed quickly(not a bad break to start with). The early reports on the injury were not accurate.

by iowabeakster on Oct 23, 2011 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

My initial guess was that the ankle would take 6-8 weeks to heal. (I had a lower leg break that required 12 weeks, so I thought the guess was at least fair)

And then he’d have to condition, then practice, and so on before seeing the field.

Now it sounds like he healed in 4 weeks, was back to running a couple weeks ago and I think he practiced last week. With Coker’s improved play, I don’t think we’ll see McCall until MSU comes to town.

by The Mexican't on Oct 23, 2011 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm very glad McCall seems nearly healed,

but, I’d be OK with it if we take the super-slow path to bringing him back. I wouldn’t even be angry if they somehow managed a way to red-shirt him due to the injury.

I continue to look for signs that DeAndre is going to be at least a good role-player, and Canzeri definitely has some scoot to him. I guess I can’t vouch about the durability of either one.

We will become more intensity!!! --What Reading Rambler thinks Tom Brands should do.

by WaterlooChazz on Oct 23, 2011 11:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know if it's accurate.....

but somebody on another site posted that injury redshirts are not possible if the player is medically cleared to play, which apparently McCall has been.

Life is hard. It's really hard if you're stupid.

by Bluzmn on Oct 24, 2011 7:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's assuming he actually has been medically cleared to play

If he hasn’t, I’m sure that’s something that could be fudged if necessary.

I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.

by HoyaGoon on Oct 24, 2011 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think you needed about 4 McNutt choices

for any other player to get close to winning the poll this week

I spent half my life's earnings on wine, women & song. The other half I wasted.

by therealCatnuts on Oct 23, 2011 10:36 PM CDT reply actions  

Small typo

The Hawks ran up the 21 points in the second (not third) quarter.

There was a heckler (a Hawk fan) seated up behind me. He was giving shit to Morris. “You suck” “Get a clue” etc etc. At first he irritated me with it. But, I ended up spending more time watching Morris because of him. He was right, Morris played very poorly. There was an important play that Morris did not make a play on, that he could/should have. I don’t really remember what part of the game it was, but it was near the north end-zone. It was awful. I have no idea if he just couldn’t make the move because of his ankle, or if his mind was just somewhere else. I am hoping it was just the ankle, as he’s shown pretty good instincts at times.

I don’t blame a player for injuries, or limitations as they battle through it. I like Morris. So my worry isn’t about Morris as an individual player, its about the LB position in general. If he was the best option to play, the Hawks are face deep in shit, at the LB position.

Derby needs to be matrixed into learning LB. And he needs a years worth of practice in two weeks.

Also the ruled non-INT that was actually the greatest INT ever? I think it was Donatell… forget. That was fucking awesomely great super amazingness. The rule book should be changed so that ruling can be overturned right now. And the fan who stormed the field should be allowed to go the Ref’s house and dick-punch the Ref whenever he finds it convenient.

by iowabeakster on Oct 23, 2011 11:16 PM CDT reply actions  

That was the greatest INT ever!

Hope Derby brings some attitude to this defense, they need a real field general. Like Angerer was

"GO HAWKS!" - only cure for Hawkeye Envy

by BentNotBroken on Oct 23, 2011 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

I have noticed Morris getting well-blocked at times.

But keep in mind that he’s still a true sophomore.

I’m trying to think back to the other great Iowa LBs of the last ten years. I think Greenway played some as a frosh, but how many others did? And how many were great as sophs? Let’s give Morris a little more time before we declare him a failure (and that guy who is allegedly a Hawk fan and was heckling Morris, can eat a bowl of Herky-dicks).

Finally, let’s remember that this D-Line may be the worst we’ve had in about a decade. I like Binns and Daniels. And Nardo and Bigach have had their moments, but these guys are probably not all-Big-Ten caliber guys. And that’s going to affect the LBs (who are also not great or at least are young, and don’t have much depth).

We will become more intensity!!! --What Reading Rambler thinks Tom Brands should do.

by WaterlooChazz on Oct 23, 2011 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed and agreed and agreed

My post makes it sound like I that I was eventually convinced that Morris was a failure. Posting fail on my part. The heckler should eat a bowl of dicks. But, Morris did not play the way he is capable of, and it looks like he was the best available… not a good situation. That was my intended thought.

I don’t know if the D-line is all that bad either. It’s the two sides of the same coin. With better LB play the D-line doesn’t look nearly as bad against the run as they have this year.

Since both the line and LB crew are dinged up and/or lack experience, I don’t think any opponent has any reason to throw deep (where the hawk D is still strong). They can move the ball with moderate gains and keep the DB’s out of the play (given the standard Iowa D plan). Thusly, they put together sustained drives that leave us Iowa fans shaking our heads. The only hope is that some stupid coaching has the opponents throwing the ball deep, which may end up as INT with some regularity. But, only really stupid coaches will make that mistake when thinking about what plays to run against Iowa.

by iowabeakster on Oct 24, 2011 1:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

He didn't maintain possession. End of story

He could have been a WR in the middle of the field and catching a pass actually not ended for him – but if he loses the ball the second he hits the ground, it’s not a catch.

Agreed that it was super athletic and awesome, though.

What’s this about a fan on the field? I don’t think it was shown on tv, so what happened?

You got no fear of the underdog; That's why you will not survive!

by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Oct 24, 2011 1:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

Damn auto correct

Intended, not “not ended”

You got no fear of the underdog; That's why you will not survive!

by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Oct 24, 2011 1:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

You are right

I just really wanted it to be an INT.

Some guy from the north-west corner, apparently fed up with the officials, just ran out on the field. He initially looked like he was running to give the Ref’s a piece of his mind. Then he circled a bit as the state troopers started converging on him. He gave up and just let them take him. Nothing all that exciting happened.

The crowd was cheering (as was I) him on, as we were not happy with the officiating for much of the game.

But, yeah I was hoping for the impossible dream that the INT would be counted. I knew it wasn’t going to happen, and I knew I was going to be pissed with the ruling. In real time (and I had a real good view) he had possession for an instant, then falling out the back of the endzone makes the play dead with a touchback.

by iowabeakster on Oct 24, 2011 2:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

There's two sides of the Morris coin

As has been covered elsewhere, he certainly is not a failure, and to label him that is mean and, more importantly, wrong. And he is only a true sophomore. With that said, his hype has far, far exceeded his actual, on-field performance. As I said on another thread, if Morris didn’t have the lifestory he does and was instead just another 3* LB from Illinois, there is no way he’d get as much hype/praise as he’s already received. Morris is an example of the coaches/fans projecting their desire of what they want him to be, rather than what he has actually done.

I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.

by HoyaGoon on Oct 24, 2011 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe so

but it’s not like he hasn’t had his moments. He was a beast against MSU last year, and has had some bright spots. But he’s also looked like a true sophomore from time to time also.

"There are few things graven in stone, except that you have to squat or you're a pussy." -Mark Rippetoe

by Brock8144 on Oct 24, 2011 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

On these "Man of the Match" polls,

I’m usually a contrarian. But how can you not vote for McNutt after that game?

We will become more intensity!!! --What Reading Rambler thinks Tom Brands should do.

by WaterlooChazz on Oct 23, 2011 11:46 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Me too, I like choosing "other" if possible

Yesterday was McNutt’s, with no doubt.

Good job by JVB to audible a second time, to the same play for McNutt’s TD #2. Love this so much.

by iowabeakster on Oct 24, 2011 1:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

McNutt should be the only option for Man of the Match

not because he was the only one who helped the team win…but it’s incredibly sad to see Vandy and Coker not get very many (or any) votes.

by blkngld12 on Oct 24, 2011 1:40 AM CDT reply actions  

Derby

So he is the heir apparent for Nielsen’s spot then?

And we need to go back to the drawing board with hat named recruits on the offensive side of the ball

You got no fear of the underdog; That's why you will not survive!

by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Oct 24, 2011 1:51 AM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, I was thinking that after his special teams tackle

which got an eyebrow raise out of the team in the booth. Which reminds me, who sets up the BTN set up for these things? For the second straight week we got a bird’s eye view of the booth team and it looks stupid with them looking up at the camera. Either that or their both actually midgets, not sure.

by PackerHawk on Oct 24, 2011 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Was one of them Mike Tirico?

Because he is legitimately a little person

I spent half my life's earnings on wine, women & song. The other half I wasted.

by therealCatnuts on Oct 24, 2011 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ross, seriously, that last half decade?

How quickly we forget. I know that it’s been a generally rough stretch against the Hoosiers, but it hasn’t all been dumpster fire losses and nailbiters.

by PackerHawk on Oct 24, 2011 8:48 AM CDT reply actions  

That's true.

But I think once in five years also qualifies as seeing something “not too often.”

"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"

by RossWB on Oct 24, 2011 8:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Marvelous Marvin McNutt

I was in the North Endzone stands and saw the record breaking TD catch by Marvelous Marvin McNutt. I saw him come off the line and weave his way across the field as JVB was bootlegging out to the right. When JVB threw the ball I saw that McNutt was wide open and then I saw him racing straight for the endzone, the endzone I was sitting at. What a great day to be at Kinnick with my daughter. When the fans erupted it was pure heaven.

Thank you Carfino’s Way for letting me have your tickets. It was a great Hawk win and a wonderful day with my daughter and it wouldn’t have been possible, without you.

Hail to Kirk Ferentz the First and to the "Iowa Magna Carta"

TOUCHDOWN IOWA! TOUCHDOWN IOWA! - Gary Dolphin
I LOVE IT! I LOVE IT! I LOVE IT! - Jim Zabel

by Bloodpunch's Barbasol on Oct 24, 2011 10:46 AM CDT reply actions  

This is spot on
The bigger problem is that they struggle mightily to get off the field, which limits the offense’s possessions, and that puts a lot of pressure on them to be efficient (i.e., score) with those possessions.

Even on the drives where we hold someone to a FG or they turn it over on downs….if they’ve driven the entire field and chewed up 7 minutes of clock then that’s less time for the offense to score. Another thing that really stuck out to me this week (was at the game) was how it just sucks the energy out of the crowd. The people in my section were getting tired of standing up and making noise on 3 and 5 or whatever….there was a collective sense of “well, they’re just going to throw a 6 yard out and get it easily” going on. Every third down that the other team gets with ease is deflating.

Indiana’s third possession (when score was tied 14 all) our D came out and looked a little pissed off. There was a noticeable shift in the vibe right there. They need to find a way to tap into that more often and sustain it. The crowd was really into it at that point and it turned from “crap this could be a shootout” to “yeah we got these guys”. Big defensive stops get the crowd fully into it.

by Skillet13 on Oct 24, 2011 11:19 AM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, fully agreed.

Those constant third down conversions are demoralizing to watch and while getting a stop (or even a FG) at the end is OK, it’s not as good as forcing a punt (or turnover, obviously).

And limiting the Iowa offense’s possessions seems like a terrible idea this year, given their ability to move the ball and score points. Taking the air out of the ball (so to speak) makes sense if you have a strong defense and a weak offense; it does not make sense when the opposite is true. It might be worth being riskier on the defense (more blitzes, more overloads, etc.) in order to give the offense more chances to score. Even if we do give up the odd big play, well, that’s not a complete disaster — it just puts the ball in the hands of the best Iowa unit on the field.

Indiana’s third possession (when score was tied 14 all) our D came out and looked a little pissed off.

The score was actually 21-14 Iowa when Indiana got the ball the third time, but I know what you mean: the defense did seem a little more pissed off and they were able to — finally — make some plays. Alvis had a big sack on third down which forced them to punt — in hindsight, that might have been one of the biggest plays of the game. We promptly scored another TD to make it 28-14 and that was all she wrote. Really, the defense on the last two drives before halftime was surprisingly good: Indiana ran 7 plays for 3 yards on those drives. We were aided by an illegal block penalty that pushed them back, but we recorded two tackles for loss (the sack and another tackle behind the LOS) — that was good. They need to figure out a way to have more drives like that.

"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"

by RossWB on Oct 24, 2011 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wow

Umm apparently don’t use “<” in subject lines.

should read “When Iowa had a <1min td drive was I the only one who thought that the D was already gased and wouldn’t be able to get IU off the field?”

by PackerHawk on Oct 24, 2011 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're right on the score.

My mistake.

Agree on the overall mentality of taking the air out of the ball. Worked in ‘09, but I don’t think that’s the way to go about it this year. Our offense has proven they can put points up in bunches.

by Skillet13 on Oct 24, 2011 12:00 PM CDT reply actions  

Ugh...reply fail

Obviously intended for you comment above, Ross.

by Skillet13 on Oct 24, 2011 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I’m not sure if this is the greatest or worst thing I’ve ever read."

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Wendell_rodricks_profile2_small
Player Development 2012: Grading the Journey from High-school Recruit to the NFL

Recent FanPosts

Herkyflash_small
Hamsterdam Doesn't Need Studio Backing
Canters-deli_small
Hamsterdam is Jumping Taurii
Gregpopped_small
Oh, man! Pam Ward is out!
Herkyflash_small
Hamsterdam is Taking Home Some Hardware
Canters-deli_small
Hamsterdam is in a Rose-colored Depression
Brands-e1283460585550-150x150_small
Re-Seating at Kinnick - A Complete Money Grab.
Herkyflash_small
Hamsterdam Knows That It's Sexy
Zoidberg_small
CornNation Takes on Ron Brown
Horace_small
Moving to Des Moines bleg

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editors at Large

Mcqueen_small Patrick Vint

Simpsons_flying_pig_small RossWB

Default_small PSD

Editors Emeritus

Louie_small Adam Jacobi

Stains_small jebushchrist

Correspondents

Images_small StoopsMyAss

Spitzenhofen_small Hayden Fry's Moustache Ride

Herky_small hawk6894

Horace_small Horace E. Cow