Pick Six Just Got Real
So last year we did a thing where we picked 6 "winners" against the spread from the Big Ten slate and we totally owned it. You don't win 19 out of 54 games just on luck, my friends. We'd all be fucking rich if we had been betting real money.
That means I could have been making it rain at my local strippy this whole off-season, instead I mostly just watched cartoons. Well, this year is going to be different. I've decided it's to time to stop dicking around and get serious. It's time to get paid.
So I deposited $50 on a gambling website with the intention of quadrupling it every 3 weeks. All I need now is your expertise. It's up to you, the BHGP commentariat, to choose my lead pipe motherfucking penitentiary lockdown pick each week.
What's in it for you? Spiritualistic appeasement for starters. Plus maybe if I somehow make any money I'll give away a t-shirt or something. Or I'll be broke by week 5. Whatever, fuck it.
Here's the current Big Ten lines (plus Nebraska). Iowa is off the board because they have a 1AA opponent. (Last I heard they are 39 point favorites, so feel free to discuss that)
I've picked a few lines that I think are more favorable than others. Vote for whichever one you would bet a baby bunny's life on. Or if I've overlooked an easy win, put it in the comments. I have to admit that I've got my eye on that jNW over.....
62 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Purdue money line
Looks juicy. Plus you’d instantly quadruple when it hits. Plus you get to cheer against Notre Dame.
The NW/Vandy over looks alright too.
And Vandy getting 4.5 at home against jNW.
The big money this weekend though is Virginia Tech getting points in a virtual homegame against Boise.
"Jack Trice Stadium - Easily one of the Top 10 Stadiums in Central Iowa"
Take UConn.
Edsall is a solid coach and UConn had a respectable team last year. As we all know, Michigan’s already horrible defense headed up by, ahem, Greg Robinson, lost several key contributors and should be fucking terrible.
I like UConn to send a death blow to the Rich Rod era.
by BobCommingStain on Sep 3, 2010 10:21 AM CDT reply actions
Since we'll be playing them every year
I hope he stays around awhile. :)
But, yeah, this season will just be the Rich Rod death watch as far as Wolverine fans go.
by salparadise23 on Sep 3, 2010 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions
I don't know if any of those are a lockdown.
I see you have Illinois/Mo there but no pick for them. I’d probably choose Missouri over Illinois by 12 or more as my pick.
I think Mich St might not beat that spread.
Agreed on that last line
I just don’t see MSU covering a 24 point spread.
by Hank Thrasher on Sep 3, 2010 11:25 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I like
the Illinois-Mizzu OVER. That game is traditionally a real high-scorer.
I’d also take UNLV +20.5
I like UNLV
and Western Michigan and Purdue.
A lot of good lines for underdogs this week. Not unusual for the first week of the season.
by salparadise23 on Sep 3, 2010 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions
MSU beat Western
by 35 last year — and that was when Western didn’t have a stiff under center. 24 points is a lot to give, but I’d still take State.
Purdue +11 is death on a stick.
ND is covering that, and covering it with ease.
Before you respond, let me remind you: Brian Cook called me smug, which makes me the Obama of smugness. I'm basically Smugbama.
Why?
Just because they have Brian Kelly?
And what about that defense?
"Trouble is; I want that fourth carrier!"
by ReadingRambler on Sep 3, 2010 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions
Avoid Notre Dame for awhile...
The Irish are gonna overperform, because first-year ND coaches always do that.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Sep 3, 2010 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions
Kelly will then receive a 15-year extension worth $4.3 million a year.
by The Mexican't on Sep 3, 2010 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Bingo!
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Sep 3, 2010 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions
That, and Kelly's inheriting a ton of talent.
Say what you will for Charlie, but he recruited like a motherfucker to run a similar (at least in personnel needs) offense to what Kelly will run. It’s the Houston Nutt Ole Miss Effect.
Before you respond, let me remind you: Brian Cook called me smug, which makes me the Obama of smugness. I'm basically Smugbama.
Small western Pennsylvania parish, March 2008...
"Monsignor, thank you for the kind introduction. And I want to thank the St. Pius X Ladies Auxiliary for a great fish fry dinner. How about a hand for them!
I want to start my message tonight by assuring everyone here that I am recruiting like a motherfucker…"
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Sep 3, 2010 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions
OK, that's humorous.
Well played, sir.
Before you respond, let me remind you: Brian Cook called me smug, which makes me the Obama of smugness. I'm basically Smugbama.
Only because I can totally see him doing that.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Sep 3, 2010 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions
That defense is not going to be very good.
Especially early in the season.
"Trouble is; I want that fourth carrier!"
by ReadingRambler on Sep 3, 2010 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions
Purdue is underrated (and our hated rival I might add)
and Notre Dame is not loaded with talent. Please. They have at most two players (Floyd and Rudolph—both overhyped in my opinion) projected inside the 6th round for 2011 NFL draft. That’s awful for a team that has 15 seniors on the two deeps.
The problem with Kelly is that he has beaten one ONE 1 team ranked inside the Top 10 in his career (Rutgers who was vastly overrated). He has a tendency to FAIL against any good teams he plays. His record against teams inside the Top 20 is 3-9 lifetime. He was a dog in about half of those.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
I really like Mizzou to cover -12
Illinois still has Zook coaching, and their secondary is depleted versus a team that passes a lot. Lock it up.
It's not that I'm lazy, Bob, it's that I just don't care
Not just depleted, but missing by far their best player back there.
One of my Illinois friends goes down to STL every year for this, and is already calling that they will only be there for “the traditional 1.5 quarters” because Illinois will be getting their asses handed to them again.
by Yinka Double Dare on Sep 3, 2010 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions
The only thing that concerns me about Mizzou
is that they suspended their best running back. I still think they probably cover, but I would have been more comfortable betting that before they started kicking players off the team.
by HeroPatriotStanzi on Sep 3, 2010 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions
I don't think Nebby covers
unless they found an offense better than the one that put up 7 on ISU’s terrible D last year.
Small sample size
Sure, you can put your money on WKU because of Nebraska’s worst performance last year. Vegas would love for you to do that. Then they’ll take that money and cover yet another toilet in gold leaf, because that’s just the dumbest fucking reason to bet against Nebraska short of “I don’t like their uniforms.”
Ceci n'est pas un blogue.
by Adam Jacobi on Sep 3, 2010 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Nebraska would have covered +37 in 2 of their 3 games against Sun Belt teams last year
And all three that they played were better than Western Kentucky, who is awful. The one that fell short of that was a 29 point win over Arkansas State. 46 point win over FAU in the opener, and a 55 point shutout of the Ragin’ Cajuns of ULL.
I don’t know if Zac Lee will be a ton better, but Cody Green probably will be, and if Nebraska opens up a sizeable lead, that could be the difference in the cover.
by Yinka Double Dare on Sep 3, 2010 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions
Sacrilege
If I could take Eastern Illinois at +39 I would probably go all in.
No self-respecting man from Iowa goes anywhere without beer
by Hayden Fry's Moustache Ride on Sep 3, 2010 11:08 AM CDT reply actions
Ferentz is money
Against opening sacrificil lambs.
"Jack Trice Stadium - Easily one of the Top 10 Stadiums in Central Iowa"
by Not Marv Cook on Sep 3, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions
Covers ears and eyes...
I CAN’T HEAR YOU, I CAN’T HEAR YOU, I CAN’T HEAR YOU!
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Sep 3, 2010 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions
Since 2001 in openers
2001 – Kent State W 51-0
2002 – Akron W 57-21
2003 – Miami (OH) W 21-3 (Miami finished 13-1)
2004 – Kent St. 39-7
2005 – Ball State 56-0 (to be fair, BSU had UNC-level suspensions)
2006 – Montana 41-7
2007 – No. Illinois (in Chicago) 16-3; home opener vs. Syracuse 35-0
2008 – Maine 46-3
2009 – UNI 17-16
Now, would I put money on Iowa (-39)? No. But, if I had to pick a side, that’s the one I’m taking.
"Jack Trice Stadium - Easily one of the Top 10 Stadiums in Central Iowa"
by Not Marv Cook on Sep 3, 2010 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions
If I was a betting man
I would pound Purdue/ND OVER so hard it would be bleeding.
When did Cincy or purdue ever play D last year?
by Internet Legend on Sep 3, 2010 11:22 AM CDT reply actions
more
31-24 hits the over and i’d be stunned if the final is less than that.
by Internet Legend on Sep 3, 2010 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions
This is truth
Neither have much of a defense.
It's not that I'm lazy, Bob, it's that I just don't care
Are you kidding?
There’s NO WAY NW and Vandy don’t score 46 points between them—this could be one of those games where they score 46 points EACH.
To me, that’s the surest thing.
The Purdue-ND game has too many variable, #1 of them being Brian Kelly. They might beat Purdue handily, they might get their heads on a stick. I wouldn’t touch that one.
The only other game I’d consider is Mizzou-Illinois. I can’t see the Illini keeping this one close.
But for me, the only sure thing is the NW-Vandy over.
"If you want to become a man--come to Iowa" All American IOWA LB PAT ANGERER, whose best friend is a dog.
I dunno.
Purdue is probably a little bit better than they were last year, maybe the same for ND. ND wasn’t 11 points better last year, they aren’t now.
"Trouble is; I want that fourth carrier!"
by ReadingRambler on Sep 3, 2010 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions
I'm with you on the JNW-Vandy Over
No self-respecting man from Iowa goes anywhere without beer
by Hayden Fry's Moustache Ride on Sep 3, 2010 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions
I know NW doesn't have the greatest defense of all time
and I know that they’re justNorthwestern,
but it wouldn’t shock me if Vandy only scores about 10 points on Saturday. They only exceeded 17 points three times last year (Western Carolina, at Rice, and Georgia Tech), and that was when they still had a coach.
Even if Vandy only scores 17...
…..NW only has to score more than 30 to make the over, and that seems eminently probable.
I do not see this game as three yards and a cloud of dust. Also, NW has a habit of completely shanking an easy game at the start of the season just so they can recover and somehow beat US later on. NW games also tend to be high scoring.
Of course, I could be wrong and HFMR could be out $$$, but compared to the Purdue-ND game, which seems REAL wild cardy to me, I think this is the better bet.
If the over on NW-Vandy seems iffy, I’d take the Mizzou game waaaayyyyy before I’d take the ND game, I’ll tell ya’ that.
"If you want to become a man--come to Iowa" All American IOWA LB PAT ANGERER, whose best friend is a dog.
Wisconsin
Wiscy will never cover the odds out west in the heat and at night. Never have, never will. It is always tough on them.
This, big time.
Wisco almost always starts slow, and its all set up for a close game. I remember Wisco 9, Arizona 7 in Tucson on the same night as the Debacle in Tempe. Wisco needed a late FG to win at all.
Having said that, i also voted for Purdon’t. ND will win, but 11 is a bit high.
Did I mention that the only time I bet on football in Vegas I completely tanked?
A fella steps out for a two pound burrito and all hell breaks loose.
I'd avoid picking Michigan or UConn
But the over is tempting. The Michigan defense will probably be bad, particularly the pass defense. The Michigan offense will probably be pretty good. I believe UConn runs some no-huddle so there could be an above average number of possessions in the game despite both sides having rush-heavy tendencies.
If UConn figures out that maybe, just maybe, they should abandon their 65% run tendency on normal downs in favor of picking on Michigan’s secondary, the scoreboard might explode in this one.
by Yinka Double Dare on Sep 3, 2010 11:34 AM CDT reply actions
Also:
UConn observers note that they have not done well historically against mobile quarterbacks.
by Yinka Double Dare on Sep 3, 2010 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions
Just guessing ...
Mizzou to cover and the over, I like UNLV getting 20.5, and I’ll be contrarian and say jNWU and Vandy won’t cover. Sometimes shootouts turn into rock fights and Vandy has that ESS EEE CEE SPEEED.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Sep 3, 2010 12:06 PM CDT reply actions
I love wagering advice.
Especially when people feel passionately about both sides.
Poor HFMR is gonna be broke by the end of September.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I wouldn't bet the house on any of these
but if i had to pick, I’d say Mizzou -11 and the ND/Purdue over.
just Northwestern
is the pick. Vandy is bad and fielding a new coach. I know it’s trendy to pretend that just Northwestern is a lame excuse for a football team but let’s not forget that they played pretty good last year. The more influence that Fitzgerald has on that team the less susceptible to pulling a Northwestern and shitting the bed against a shitty opponent they become. This will be an easy cover.
Sorry. Dumb questions.
I’ve never bet. (Well, I bet on MSU over ISU in 1979 on the spring baseball trip. And it was awful and I swore I’d never ruin another great game that way.) I think it’s because I know what I’m already addicted to, and that’s enough.
Still. What do “Price” and “Money” mean? In short, WTF does this chart mean? Please don’t explain the spread or the over-under, I got that. I do probabilistic stuff for a living, maybe I should take up another corrupt pastime.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
Price is the payout for the bet. Ex: If the Price is -110…that means I have to bet $110 to win $100. In this chart Price is the payout for the bet against the spread. This would also be referred to by many as the “juice”…essentially how Vegas makes their money by guaranteeing a 50/50 split on each side of the line.
Money is the price for a moneyline bet. If you bet a game on the moneyline that means you are taking the team straight up (no points). If you take the favorite you are sacrificing lots of juice…if you take the underdog you are getting a better return on your money.
Price is describing odds
-110 means that for every $1.10 I bet, I can win $1.00.
Money is the moneyline. That takes the spread out of the equation. So if I bet the moneyline on Purdue to straight up win vs Notre Dame, I get $3.50 per $1.00 I bet.
No self-respecting man from Iowa goes anywhere without beer
by Hayden Fry's Moustache Ride on Sep 3, 2010 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Dammit, HawKCP
It has been my lifelong ambition to be able to explain something to Bellanca. You ruined it.
No self-respecting man from Iowa goes anywhere without beer
by Hayden Fry's Moustache Ride on Sep 3, 2010 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions
And with that he heads to the local bar
to place his bets on jNU.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
Actually, I kinda like the closing scene of Casino
with DeNiro in his safe house, far from the madding crowds, making his bets. I’m a firm believer in safe houses. Mine is in Iowa.
And that is all.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
This poll could come in handy...
as there are lots of sharps (big time…good gamblers) who take stock in what squares (probably everyone on this page) think about a game and then Costanza it and just bet the opposite.
For instance…I have always heard that on big games you almost always want to take the over because Average Joes like me always love the over. Apparantly the more the public loves a bet the more a smart gambler should bet the opposite because let’s be honest…Vegas knows more than you and I do and they do not lose money.
However…like any gambling theory worth a shit…the contrarian method is intended to be spread over a large number of games.
GERG for the over or Missouri out right.
Although I do like the fact that both ND and NE get extravagant lines based on name alone.

by 





![[No words to describe this. No words.--AJ]
Notti Boy gets some competition for the crown. NSFW-ish.](http://cdn3.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/203389/0_small.jpg)
















