The Takeaway, Iowa-Iowa State: Domination
Sure, Iowa just beat Iowa State, 35-7. But what do we really know? What was so important about beating Iowa State? What does it all mean, Basil? The Takeaway has the answer.
Complete and total domination. This must be the first thing said about Saturday's game: taking the competition and situation into consideration, the first half was the best half of football I have ever seen a Kirk Ferentz Iowa team play. The. best. half. I have ever seen them play. The third quarter was mighty fine too, but it's pretty clear the Hawkeyes were on cruise control by the time the fourth quarter started. I mean, Paki O'Meara carried the ball... six times. That kind of a day.
Yes, the streak of quarters without a touchdown given up came to an end late in the game, when Austen Arnaud found Darius Darks for an 8-yard score. And, not to demean the Cyclones' lone accomplishment in the game, but Gary Dolphin was the cornerback in on that play. Still, that streak always seemed somewhat analogous to Iowa's consecutive games without a rushing score given up that they took into last season: while it was a remarkable accomplishment, it was also partially the result of serious luck, and not really an accurate metric of Iowa's ability on defense. So the streak's over. Big deal. Time to move onto more pressing matters.
This defense is still dominant. There really isn't a bad stat for the defense thus far. Iowa has now forced a three-and-out on 10 of its 18 defensive possessions with the starters in--a 55.6% clip. Austen Arnaud threw 44 passes on the day to Ricky Stanzi's 18... and Ricky still threw for more yards. Iowa has given up 143 rushing yards in the two games... and 36 of those came on a fake punt. Opponents are now 9-30 on third downs against the Iowa defense. In all, Iowa is giving up 10.5 first downs per game, tied for fourth best in the nation. And all that's without a glut of big plays from Tyler Sash and Adrian Clayborn.
But let's set the specifics aside and make one overarching observation: if there's a weakness on the Iowa defense, EIU and ISU were completely incapable of exploiting it. Thus, it's probably not much of a weakness.
There is no running back controversy. We don't know how he does it, but for the second straight season, Adam Robinson is not giving up the starting role. The tailback rushed for 156 yards on only 14 carries yesterday, including a 39-yard score down the sideline and a 75-yard rush to the 1 that, frankly, looked like a surer touchdown at live speed than his 39-yarder.
So how does A-Rob keep staving off guys like Jewel Hampton and Brandon Wegher last season? Perhaps it's Robinson's unorthodox stride, one that lets him easily change speeds, or maybe it's just the tenacity that comes from being a former greyshirt and 5th stringer. Whatever it is, A-Rob is a tough, consistent ballcarrier, and if he stays healthy, we don't see him giving this role up to Jewel any time soon. Or Wegher for that matter, but, y'know.
Rick-Six? Try Rick-Zero. Ricky Stanzi still has yet to throw an interception, and although Stanzi had a couple ill-advised throws yesterday, they A) fell harmlessly incomplete, B) weren't nearly as ill-advised as his usual interceptions, and C) were still only two of 18 throws. He's finding open receivers, putting his head down on 3rd and short, and basically performing the way a senior quarterback ought to. Sure, the competition's to be considered, but think about what Stanzi looked like against UNI and Arkansas State last season. This is quite a step up.
Okay, one gripe. Facing 4th and 5 at the ISU 37 in the first three minutes of the second half, Iowa punted the ball. Naturally, it was a touchback, and Iowa netted 17 yards. If Iowa's ever in that position again with anything less than a 28-0 lead, Mssrs. Ferentz and O'Keefe: go for it. Go for it or we torch cars. Wait, that's terrorism. Okay, not that. But that's a minor (if, uh, passionate) complaint, all things considered, and let's not let that take very much away from one of the finest games of the Kirk Ferentz era.
193 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The Spread Offense
My big takeaway is that Iowa seems to be doing better with the spread offense. There were a couple of times that Arnaud was able to take off when there was coverage downfield, but even with those we held State to under 100 yards total rushing. That gives me hope for Michigan and Northwestern, two teams that play the spread really well in the Big Ten.
I may love the Steelers, but I live and die by my Hawkeyes.
Foles will not only avoid a run
he will avoid a shuffle. This guys game is to drop back and throw immediately. They will try to hit the guy who has soft coverage. They will do bubble screens and swing passes endlessly. Foles will never move from that pocket. This game is tailor made for our D-line. This is not the spread…this is a one back offense with a myriad of quick strike throws. They will try to be patient and dink and dunk down the field. So first downs will be huge in this game.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
Was more speaking of Big Ten Spread
I understand Arizona doesn’t play the spread, Foles isn’t fast enough. I was more thinking about our vulnerability to the spread offenses that Northwestern seems to exploit, and now Michigan with Robinson (hard to see because he is short, and fast).
I may love the Steelers, but I live and die by my Hawkeyes.
by HawkeyeFrake on Sep 13, 2010 9:30 AM CDT up reply actions
Best way to beat 'Zona's O ...
is to put together long, body breaking, soul destroying drives by the Hawkeye O.
And I’m optimistic we see that in the desert.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Sep 13, 2010 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions
We need a real game.
It’s clear we can clean up on easier teams at home. I’m excited to see us on the road.
What I can’t understand is that I was seeing replays from every single game on Sportscenter but Iowa’s. I swear we are going to beat Ohio State and SC isn’t going to give us any replays and say "they are still pretenders".
What do we have to do to get coverage? Even the Always Broadcasting Crap announcers were impressed with our stadium, our crowd, our D-line, and our poise (dare I say swagga). When we do start to get covered like a top-ten team?
Re: We need a real game.
I cannot agree with you more, I thought for sure that we would get some more coverage playing Iowa State, but I guess we didn’t because there wasn’t really anything exciting for a non-Hawkeye. The game wasn’t close, we didn’t run up the score to 72 points, and we are still Iowa. The ABC/ESPN guys mentioned we are still an “under the radar” team. We’ll see how far under the radar we are against Arizona, when there are really no “monster” games next week.
I may love the Steelers, but I live and die by my Hawkeyes.
by HawkeyeFrake on Sep 13, 2010 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions
Take it easy.
What I can’t understand is that I was seeing replays from every single game on Sportscenter but Iowa’s.
I saw highlights somewhere on Saturday, so they were definitely playing them. Perhaps not as much as some other games, but they were still available.
I swear we are going to beat Ohio State and SC isn’t going to give us any replays and say “they are still pretenders”.
No.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I am firmly in the camp of “easy there fellas”. Iowa has beaten EIU and ISU, at home. All we need do is look at the conference schedule. The AZ game will finish too late to get press. Iowa is Iowa. Let them continue to be KF teams (improve), stay healthy, be low key, and get Norm well enough to attend games. I’m pretty sure the Manzi doesn’t care about individual shit, so far these guys seem pretty grounded, and there’s plenty of potholes ahead.
Exactly. If Iowa keeps winning the national attention will be there.
Its still early and there were a truckload of big games Saturday.
by HawkeyeRecon on Sep 13, 2010 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions
Norm hasn't been at the games?
Are you exadgerating or is this true? I’ve honestly not heard that.
by Eyeheartfreedumb on Sep 13, 2010 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions
They said during the broadcast that Norm was admitted to the hopital thursday night for complications related to his diabetes.
"You don't become a Hawkeye fan, You're born with Black and Gold in your veins." - Me
by BStylin Hawkye on Sep 13, 2010 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Norm
was not at the ISU game, he was hospitalized for “back pain”. I am not sure about EIU
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Sep 13, 2010 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions
I believe he was in the pressbox for EIU
by PackerHawk on Sep 13, 2010 1:02 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Was mentioned earlier this summer
That Norm would be calling the games from the pressbox all year. Easier on him to be off his feet for the duration of the games. Here’s hoping and praying that he’s ok and back at it this week.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
Also, should be mentioned
that per MasCasa, Darrell Wilson, LBs coach, acted as the d-coordinator in Parker’s absence this past weekend.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
and called a hell of a game, IMO
"In my experience, there's no such thing as luck."
―Obi-Wan Kenobi
by The Bacon Explosion on Sep 13, 2010 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions
There were Sportscenter highlights
And they even replayed the entire game on ESPN2.
That being said, we had a dominant performance and were leapfrogged by Oklahoma. I guess we still get our wish of being underdogs. The announcers said “we won’t be under the radar any more.” Well, they were wrong. We still are.
It seems to me that the coaches and AP are doing what they did with us last year. Wait until AFTER we beat the big programs so they don’t have to go out on a limb and say we’re good now. It’s okay to say Oklahoma is good and then be wrong (or Notre Dame or Michigan or Virginia Tech). No one will fault you for that. But, saying Iowa is good and being wrong makes you look dumb. Prime example? Stewart Mandel. We’re buried on the third page. “The prospect of Iowa developing a balanced offense to go with its dominant defense is a tad scary.” Well, if we’re scary, why not move us up? Why not put us in the Current BCS Forecast? Anyway, it will sort itself out, just like last year. We’ll end up where we should.
Just remember. We’re Iowa, and Hawks have a minimal radar cross section, perfect for flying under the radar before we swoop in and tear our opponent’s head off. Embrace it.
Can we just fast forward to Saturday?
by KinnickNorthHawk on Sep 13, 2010 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions
Can we just fast forward to Saturday?
Amen. I hate that this is only Monday. Hoping for a 4 day mini coma so it won’t seem so long.
I may love the Steelers, but I live and die by my Hawkeyes.
by HawkeyeFrake on Sep 13, 2010 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions
Um.
That being said, we had a dominant performance and were leapfrogged by Oklahoma.
We dominated Iowa State. Oklahoma annihilated a ranked Florida State team.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
Should FSU have been ranked?
Or is it just because they are FSU?
Beating a ranked team that has no business being there doesn’t make you good, it makes you Boise State.
by Eyeheartfreedumb on Sep 13, 2010 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions
I think FSU is a quality team this year.
OU is just proving that Phil Steele was right.
by The Mexican't on Sep 13, 2010 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions
Whether or not they deserved to be ranked is not the issue.
They were ranked and they were destroyed. Even poor little ol’ Iowa would turn some heads if he we whalloped a ranked team by 30+ points like OU did.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
Can we play BSU please?
If there’s anyone I want to stomp by 30+ points, it’s them.
I’m just glad all of the AQ BCS conferences pooled their money together to bribe VT into losing to an FCS school. Since they couldn’t beat BSU the real way, they had to get creative.
by KinnickNorthHawk on Sep 13, 2010 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Careful
That’s a familiar refrain among fans of teams that are about to lose to Boise.
Ceci n'est pas un blogue.
by Adam Jacobi on Sep 13, 2010 10:49 PM CDT up reply actions
I know
but someone has to do it. The B10 hasn’t put anyone against them yet, and it feels like we’d match up better than OSU. I think whoever finally takes them down needs to be disciplined.
Besides, if we’re playing them, it means we’re in another BCS game and we’re giving Norm a month to prepare a game plan.
by KinnickNorthHawk on Sep 13, 2010 11:02 PM CDT up reply actions
Oh, wow...
My mind hadn’t gone there, but I’m glad yours did.
by KinnickNorthHawk on Sep 14, 2010 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions
This!
We’re Iowa, and Hawks have a minimal radar cross section, perfect for flying under the radar before we swoop in and tear our opponent’s head off.
Sometimes, I just wanna say… Fuck you, we’re Iowa!
Going, going, going, going, going, going, going, going.... Alright, I'll stop for now.
by EnergizerHawk on Sep 13, 2010 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions
I wanted to say that
but it felt wrong typing it on my work computer. Reading it is okay though. Thanks for adding the link!
by KinnickNorthHawk on Sep 13, 2010 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions
If Iowa’s ever in that position again with anything less than a 28-0 lead, Mssrs. Ferentz and O’Keefe: go for it.
I would like to have seen Meyer(sp?) come in for a long field goal attempt. He has the leg, why not give him a shot at accuracy? Plus he kicked it out the back of the endzone a few times!
Spelled differently but who gives a fuck.

by Smokin Herb Grigsby on Sep 13, 2010 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions
Student section should don Michael Myers masks during kickoffs
While this plays. The kickoff returner would surely be reduced to a quivering fetus before the ball got to him.
"we're the only team in the state, as far as I know."
by IPeeBlackAndGold on Sep 13, 2010 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
That is a fucking brilliant idea.
Let’s start a petition to at least get that played when Michael is kicking off.
by Smokin Herb Grigsby on Sep 13, 2010 3:03 PM CDT up reply actions
I think this is a cool idea too.
When I saw this idea I remembered this remix of the theme song that I had heard, check this out, I think it would be pretty cool with more bass to go with the theme song in a stadium setting.
by Franimal House on Sep 14, 2010 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions
wind was north to south . . .
. . . that’s a 54-yard attempt with no wind. With the wind in his face, it’s more like 60+. No reason to make a young man attempt that kind of kick with his first ever college attempt. . . .
I think the only reason KF called for the field goal was to give Donahue a chance at another tick in the “punts downed inside the opponent’s 20” stat line. You don’t win that Lou Grohzny award with your punts during warm ups.
by The Final Gun on Sep 13, 2010 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions
Except the field goal would have been WITH the wind, not against it.
’Hue’s punt went soaring out of the south end zone, not north. Therefore, with the wind. I thought we might, FOR ONCE, take a delay penalty to give RD a fighting chance to keep that punt in play. There was just too much wind to keep that punt short.
Now that I think about it, we may be talking about 2 different drives here. But I’m pretty sure I’m talking about the 4th down AJ was referencing.
EIU win might be a bit misleading
this one is not. Sure, Arnaud is the Daryl Clark of the west. We’re in his head, not to mention his face and that has led to a timid QB. We will not be facing that kind of dude this Saturday. The kickoff coverage sucked and I think I know why…there are too many freshmen and redshirt freshmen on that coverage. I like the idea of going with your best tacklers. Lane discipline was a nightmare. And when you kickoff as often as we do, I don’t want to have happen what happened in that Ohio State game. Arizona’s kickoff return tandem can house it, one already has (last year). Get that shit in order.
I think fans need to prepare for much more offensive movement when we go to the desert. Last year we faced an Arnaud type QB. They tried to establish the run. Their plays took forever to develop. THis year they will be much more crisp. THey will also make at least a cosmetic attempt to stretch the field. I am happy we have developed some depth on the D-line and have some depth at LB. We will need it. It will be low 90s at kickoff and they will move that offense side to side with bubble screens in an effort to make our defense run. They know they cannot muscles us. They’re not stupid.
My one concern is our LB pass coverage. We have one area that I think has dropped off considerably. Our MLBs cannot cover very well. It is not a huge issue because we have solid safety play but that may be an area they try to attack.
Our special teams can p[rovide the knockout punch in this game We need to really be sharp there. No missed FGs. Punts downed inside the 20. Coverage sharp. Return game dangerous. If that phase is working then I have a hard time seeing Arizona staying inside of two scores throughout the second half. I also expect more trick plays. What EIU did was the tip of the iceberg. I fully expect Stoops to throw caution to the wind. He knows we are a monster and that his team will need some trickery and momentum changes…I even could see the old onsides’ kick to start the game or half.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
Ditto to Zulu
A few thoughts…..
a) Field goal play- have even attempted a FG yet this year? That worries me a little if for no other reason than Trent has not attempted one in over a year.
b) The Iowa DL has some long arms and has been successful in knocking down some short passes but Foles is a tall kid in the pocket so that should be interesting.
c) I think back in 2004? when Kirk got pissed at the kick coverage and the next week we saw Greenway and Roth on the kick coverage.
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
No, we have not attempted a FG yet.
It would be nice to attempt a few in games where they aren’t absolutely crucial (i.e., the last two weeks and hopefully Ball State in two weeks) so we have a little confidence in that area heading into games where they really might be crucial.
On the other hand, we haven’t had many opportunities to kick field goals, either. I believe in every red zone trip so far we’ve either scored a touchdown, turned the ball over (that fumble against EIU), or ran out of clock (the end of the EIU game).
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
totally agree and was not faulting anyone
but like you said, it would be nice for Moss to get some practice in before he has to do it in critical mode.
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
Bubble screens
Binns on pass rush/deflection is a constant thorn in the side of right-handed QBs. Zona will probably throw left (over Clayborn) in those situations. My only concern is playing soft on the corners and Zona picking up those 5-7 yd gains.
KOK, you might be a genius...
by hawkeye_heartattack on Sep 13, 2010 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions
that's going to happen and Norm is going to roll with that
because he expects our guys to make a play just like AZ expects theirs to make a play. As we saw with Arnaud, the QB has to be accurate and the timing needs to be there. Norm is going to make them be crisp. If they are, then we might see adjustments. But not until they take it in for two TDs. He is not going to panic if they take the first drive and dink and dunk us to the tune of 80 yards. We will play our game and expect that mistakes will be made, plays by our guys will be made, and eventually their O-line will break down and their QB will be squeezed eventually.
I have yet to see any team in the past two years dink and dunk us to death. The closest was that QB from Ark St. But as you might recall he made one heroic play after another. And he was VERY FUCKING MOBILE and this guy is not. That is the equalizer.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
TDs are the most important part:
Norm is going to make them be crisp. If they are, then we might see adjustments. But not until they take it in for two TDs.
It’s fine if they move the ball with a bunch of short passes. I think you’re exactly right that they will have to be crisp and they will have to be patient. However, even when teams have played well in that short passing game, they still don’t typically manage to get into the end zone against this defense. We’ll let them rack up as many passing yards as they want. They’ll be kicking FGs and we’ll be scoring TDs.
by Abbas_Cincinnatus on Sep 13, 2010 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions
Northwestern
seems to be the closest to having that ability.
It never gets to be easy
by chitownhawkeye on Sep 13, 2010 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions
and they scored all of 10 points on us...
remeber that Stanzi fumbled in end zone for other points.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Sep 13, 2010 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Dink and dunk
I would worry about those long drives (a la Ark St and Northwestern last year, and Penn St in ’08), with demoralizing first downs, wearing out our defense in the heat.
Long drives are okay.
The Iowa defense is patient. They’ll let teams move the ball and pick up first downs. What’s really important is that they don’t give up points. In the three games you referenced Iowa gave up an average of 20 points. They also won two of them and lost the third because of myriad offensive problems, not because they were giving up points.
Dink and dunk is fine for the Iowa defense. It’s the Iowa fanbase that gets mysteriously worked up about it.
by Abbas_Cincinnatus on Sep 14, 2010 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions
Everyone feels so much better about a 3 and out.
Who's leg do I have to hump to get a drink around here?-Brian
Bubble Screens and Cover 2
Do bubble screens work very well on a cover two? They take the ball about 3 – 5 yards back of the line of scrimmage, and hope that the cover guys trip over themselves switching places. In the defense we play, wouldn’t the LB and CB switch defending? Then it comes down to tackling. We still seem pretty good at making open field tackles.
I absolutely agree with the trick plays. We seem to have problems (Michigan State last year, EIU this year). We can definitely expect some, if not a hook and ladder or a fake punt, then a flea flicker or an onside kick.
I may love the Steelers, but I live and die by my Hawkeyes.
by HawkeyeFrake on Sep 13, 2010 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions
Bubble screens are intended to let the WR make a play and hope everyone blocks or chips a guy while
the chaos is occuring. If you have good pursuit then you can really fuck them up. Our D-line was chasing down passes on Saturday so they are able to do that. But over the course of 4 quarters in the heat it will tire you out.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
Not to mention the 11:30 Central Game Time.
Starting late isn’t going to help us either. Tired and hot, I’m worried about this game on our defense.
I may love the Steelers, but I live and die by my Hawkeyes.
by HawkeyeFrake on Sep 13, 2010 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions
Meant 9:30 Central...sorry.
I may love the Steelers, but I live and die by my Hawkeyes.
by HawkeyeFrake on Sep 13, 2010 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions
It's also a constraint play to punish the OLB from cheating upfield (anticipating, say, our inside zone).
Complete the screen and the OLB is facing the wrong way, getting creamed.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
As a former Arizonan
Heat at night isn’t an issue any more than it is here. It can be 95 there and it’s like 70’s here in the midwest. Drink plenty of water and there won’t be any overheating. It’s the sun that is the killer.
by KinnickNorthHawk on Sep 13, 2010 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions
Ferentz said this week...
we held some late night practices and the players did fine; the coaches however were sleepy.
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
Defending the Dink Pass

"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
I would say that Iowa's pass defense is quarters (zone), not cover 2.
Analogous to this:
Mr. Boh Knows ...
Thanks for the link.
Not because of the paragraph on the Hawks, but because it lead me to this week’s cheerleader of the week. OH MY GOD! HOT!
I may love the Steelers, but I live and die by my Hawkeyes.
by HawkeyeFrake on Sep 13, 2010 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions
O-line looked fantastic
considering the competion of course… I think I counted 8 pancake blocks in the opening drive. That was impressive. James Ferentz had a monster day. Just outta curiosity, does anyone think that we’d have a better line if Bugala was still suiting up for us? I’m not so sure.
KOK, you might be a genius...
by hawkeye_heartattack on Sep 13, 2010 9:18 AM CDT reply actions
I was equally impressed.
Ferentz was all over the place and dominating their interior linemen, but the most impressive to me was Zusevics. He was routinely making it downfield for blocks finishing block after paving the way for the running game. Calloway V.2?
by Smokin Herb Grigsby on Sep 13, 2010 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions
Yeah, you're right about Zusevics
It is nice to see our backs running to the right with success. I figured that we’d run to the left behind Reiff and Vandervelde
KOK, you might be a genius...
by hawkeye_heartattack on Sep 13, 2010 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Candidly,
while we were playing the Little Sisters OTP, I thought Zusevics looks much more athletic than Calloway, and much more effective. This is pretty hard to believe, so soon after he’s gotten onto the field.
Like Adam says, I have never seen a crisper, more efficient regular season Iowa team, although I must say too I wasn’t paying this much attention in 2002.
There’s some serious confidence behind J.Ferentz: five QB sneaks.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
Ferentz ended up in the back of the endzone during one of the touchdowns.
Gotta like seeing that from your center.
That being said
we had far more success running to left/center-left behind Rieff and Vandevelde than we did going to the right/center right behind MacMillan/Zusevics
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
Let's not get carried away.
Bulaga would be our best offensive player if he came back to play this year. There was a reason he was a 1st round draft pick.
I can't see
adding Bulaga to an offensive line and making it worse.
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Sep 13, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions
while I don't think we "need" Bulaga
Can you imagine adding him in at LT and moving Reiff over to RT? Now that’s a pretty crazy good line if everyone plays like they did this weekend
"I shoot, I score. He shoots, I score." - Dan Gable
by ClaybornSmash on Sep 13, 2010 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions
I think adding Bulaga would move Reiff inside.
I’m just speculating, but I think your OL would be LT- Bulaga, LG – Vandevelde, C- Ferentz, RG – Rieff, RT – Zusevics. I only say that based on the fact that MacMillan has been good, but Zusevics looks that much better. If we’re getting the five best linemen on the field, I think that’s them.
by Abbas_Cincinnatus on Sep 13, 2010 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions
yes to Bulaga....
the guy is currently earning a sizeable NFL paycheck so it is silly to think we don’t miss him. Last year he played hurt much of the year and was still one of the best linemen in the conference. That said, we may miss Spievey more than Bulaga and he likely would have benefited from another year in college, IMO.
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
"IT"
Super excited for this saturdays game. Not sure what “it” is but whatever “it” is Robinson has it. The dude just flat out gets it done.
"IT"
Ability to change direction in mid stride, leaving the defender flatfooted.
Ability to run through the initial contact and keep the legs churning.
SEC speed (that the real “IT”).
by Stay thirsty, my friends. on Sep 13, 2010 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions
A-Rob was awesome on that 75 yd run
He jumped over a diving tackler, broke away from a shoe string tackler, and changed directions about 2 or 3 times. It was just a fantastic run.
Here is hoping to a lot of those kinds of runs.
TOUCHDOWN IOWA! TOUCHDOWN IOWA! - Gary Dolphin
I LOVE IT! I LOVE IT! I LOVE IT! - Jim Zabel
It seems to me that Rick's ill advised passes
so far this year have been less catchable than last year, that is to say, they’ve been balls thrown high or low, ones that our guy had the best shot at, and the defender had very little shot at. Last year he was forcing the ball right in, so the defender could get it right in the numbers. That bodes well.
A little OT, in the Bears – Lions game yesterday, there were several passes (by each team) that were thrown high or off target. At least 2 were batted up (UP!) by the receiver. One the receiver tracked and caught, one was incomplete. But there was one where the receiver batted it down. That’s good defense. I hope guys are being taught that. Never bat it up and hope. Knock it down, make sure the opponent can’t get it. It we do that on Rick’s passes that are offline, I feel pretty good.
It never gets to be easy
Only 2
I saw only two passes that I thought he shouldn’t have thrown yesterday, but you are right, the defense had a hard time getting to both. One of them would have been a pick six as it was on the sideline, and the defender had no one in front of him. But he could only get a finger on it.
I may love the Steelers, but I live and die by my Hawkeyes.
by HawkeyeFrake on Sep 13, 2010 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions
That pass was to McNutt
at 6’4" against a 5’7" DB making his first start. I am hoping that Stanzi put that ball out there high with the thought that if Marvin couldn’t get it short round didn’t have a chance. Of course if he would have thrown it a count earlier he wouldn’t have to worry about DB height.
He won’t have that luxury with AZ, their DB’s are the strength of their defense, bigger, stronger, faster. Shocking they are better than ISU really.
"In my experience, there's no such thing as luck."
―Obi-Wan Kenobi
by The Bacon Explosion on Sep 13, 2010 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Helmet sticker for McNutt...
big catches sure but some great downfield blocking to boot.
I'm sick, but I'm pretty...
Totally agree
He was like another tight end out there blocking for the RBs.
A Voice From Kinnick - A Hawkeye Blog
My gameday.
I had the displeasure of sitting next to a rabid, obnoxious, ignorant Cyclone fan. He screamed, yelled, and whistled constantly throughout the first half for the Cyclones. And got in arguments with everyone around him sans me, as I saw the craziness in his eyes and could only feel pity for his sad ass. By halftime he had his head down and tail between his legs. At the start of the halftime show, as the ISU band is taking the field, someone behind us made the comment "I hope your band doesn’t stink as much as your football team."; this set him off on mega tirade about "respect", i.e. "Show some respect for the band, man.". What!? Listen jerk wad, you just spent two quarters showing no respect for the people around you, the Hawkeyes, or yourself… and you want us to show respect to the Iowa State band?
Well, dissing the ISU band was more than he could take and he stormed away to the cheers and clapping of those that had to suffer through his presence. He’s just a sad, angry Cyclone fan that I suspect is suffering from a severe case of "little man" syndrome.
It should be noted that the ISU band "dominated" the halftime show with there rendition of some Beatles tunes. And angry Cyclone fan missed the show.
by Stay thirsty, my friends. on Sep 13, 2010 9:55 AM CDT reply actions
sounds like his cognitive dissonance finally caught up with him at halftime lol
Keeping wildlife, an amphibious rodent, for uh, domestic, you know, within the city - that aint legal either, Dude.
by AcrimoniousAngerererer on Sep 13, 2010 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions
Ha! Do you sit in Section 109?
I was the guy that made the band comment. Also the “leading the nation in Moral Victories” zinger after the lame touchdown against our scrubs.
Whether or not A-Rob remains the nominal starter seems pretty irrelevant going forward.
As we saw Saturday, we’re going to see plenty of both guys the rest of the season. This may be the closest we’ve seen to a true 50/50 split at RB in quite a while.
A-Rob continues to perform very, very well, but Jewel also looked good and should only look better as things settle down for him and he can hit holes at the right moment and at the right speed — he looked like he was pressing too hard at times Saturday. It seems a little weird to “dis” A-Rob’s speed after he busted off a pair of big runs like that on Saturday, but the fact that he got caught at the end of both runs is perhaps indicative that his top-end speed isn’t great. I don’t think Jewel would have been caught at the end of those runs.
But I don’t want to diminish A-Rob’s accomplishments — he did very well and should continue to be a very capable RB for us. I’m just glad to have two really good options back there right now.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I said the same thing.
On that draw play Jewel Hampton would’ve scored a touchdown. Would he of broken those tackles or had that downfield vision? Don’t know.
A Voice From Kinnick - A Hawkeye Blog
Totally agree with you, and the speed arguement is somewhat over-rated.
Yeah its nice to have a speed guy that just runs away from people. But its also nice to have a guy that will run through you too. Breaking arm tackles and poor tackling mechanics can just as easily demoralize a defensive unit. John Clay won’t run away from too many people, but he sure as hell will break you down. I love Iowa’s smack in the mouth/run by you combination. And I believe that Hampton will just get better as the season goes on. According to KF this is his first real contact since the injury. I think getting “popped” over and over would have a tendency to wear out your legs and make you less effective as the game goes on.
Who's leg do I have to hump to get a drink around here?-Brian
Breaking tackles
I think when it comes down to “running through people” Hampton had the play of the game. I can’t remember exactly when it happened or who he ran over but he lowered his shoulder and leveled one defender and then got tripped up doing it to another defender immediately after. Hampton is not a finesse back. That being said, I think these two are both excellent and it’s going to be fun watching them through the year.
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Sep 13, 2010 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions
second series
2nd down at the 10 or 11, IIRC. Flat out killed the safety coming up to cover. That was sweet to see, he has confidence in that knee and when he knocks the rust out we will be having the best types of discussions – which dominate runner should get more carries.
"In my experience, there's no such thing as luck."
―Obi-Wan Kenobi
by The Bacon Explosion on Sep 13, 2010 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Hampton's Rusty
There were a couple of holes that he missed where he could have made huge gains. However, that will come back. Also, let’s not forget that he still had 84 yards on 20 carries for the second option. Those are solid numbers for a first option, not good, not great, but solid.
I think as he gets more carries, his field vision will go up, and his yards per carry will go up. Either way, I wouldn’t mind this one-two punch all year long.
I may love the Steelers, but I live and die by my Hawkeyes.
by HawkeyeFrake on Sep 13, 2010 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions
It blew my mind that Hampton hadn't been tackled in practice yet.
K. Ferentz said this was his first full-contact activity since 2008.
Wow. He did okay.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
It may have just been reporter speak but
Adam was pretty positive about having Jewell split the duty. He said he really felt rested going into the 4th quarter compared to the previous week when he shouldered almost all the carries. With Iowa’s offense there is ample opportunity for two backs to put up respectable numbers.
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
Saw that too
And he seemed to mean wha he said. I don’t think it was just for the reporter’s benefit. There’s definitely something to be said for always having a set of fresh legs in there.
by HawkeyeInExile on Sep 13, 2010 7:25 PM CDT up reply actions
I think
Those guys live together and are good friends. That has to help
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Sep 14, 2010 8:00 AM CDT up reply actions
RB comparison
I could see this year (and the next 2) playing out similar to 2002 where the fans love seeing the backup w/ ‘Skilz’ (ala Hamptom/ Jermelle Lewis) but the workhorse of the offense is the less flashy but very productive starter (Robinson/ Freddy Russel)
I could totally live with that
This kindof works
With Albert Young and Damien Sims.. he was a decent second back when he was hanging on to the football. Either way, I think the two we have now are much more equals.
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Sep 14, 2010 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions
the importance of having a working ground game
can’t be stressed enough. Having two solid backs and a healthy o-line will force the hand of most teams to put more guys in the box, taking the pressure of stanzi, opening up play action, creating balance, etc, etc
the team seems really focused right now, so I’m feeling pretty good that we won’t see a let down in the next two weeks. but my monday optimism will surely lead to tuesday skepticism, then saturday alcoholism
Keeping wildlife, an amphibious rodent, for uh, domestic, you know, within the city - that aint legal either, Dude.
by AcrimoniousAngerererer on Sep 13, 2010 10:05 AM CDT reply actions
My sentiments exactly
my monday optimism will surely lead to tuesday skepticism, then saturday alcoholism
Well said.
KOK, you might be a genius...
by hawkeye_heartattack on Sep 13, 2010 10:09 AM CDT reply actions
You missed a complaint
How about our Punt/Kickoff coverage teams? They clearly need some work. We gave up a lot of yards there.
We didn’t look nearly as bad as OSU, but we also weren’t playing Miami.
by KinnickNorthHawk on Sep 13, 2010 10:18 AM CDT reply actions
The ISU special teams are considered the Miami of the Big12 north.
Who's leg do I have to hump to get a drink around here?-Brian
Yeah, after all...
They do get more in-game experience than any other Big 12 unit.
A Voice From Kinnick - A Hawkeye Blog
We out kicked our coverage on that one punt.
by Stay thirsty, my friends. on Sep 13, 2010 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions
If you're referring to the punt I think you are...
then Donahue intentionally went for distance instead of hang time. Donahue is an awesome punter, and we’re in danger of becoming spoiled if we expect enough hang time for our coverage team to catch our own punts every time (Hyde vs EIU). That being said he still got about 48 yards net on the punt I’m thinking of despite outkicking the coverage. That is nothing to complain about.
by HawkeyeInExile on Sep 13, 2010 7:31 PM CDT up reply actions
On two or three kickoffs yes
but I don’t remember coverage on any of the punts being bad. Can someone remind me when this was?
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
Well...
I guess it was the 4th quarter, so maybe we were just too relaxed. There was a return for 21 yards. It must have felt like more at the time.
by KinnickNorthHawk on Sep 13, 2010 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions
Guess I wasn't too hard on the punt coverage guys after all
KF mentioned it in his postgame interview. Two kickoffs and one punt.
by KinnickNorthHawk on Sep 13, 2010 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm kind of glad the D isn't needing Sash and Clayborn to make a ton of huge plays
But both of them are still impacting the game and being disruptive. My tailgate-impaired memory recalls 4 or 5 penalties against Clayborn so far this year. Chop blocking, holding, and tripping. Each time he forces a LT to break the rules, it just shows how much he’s in their heads.
by PackerHawk on Sep 13, 2010 10:18 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Clayborn may not have got alot of tackles,
But if you go back and watch just him, he was pushing anyone trying to block him right into the Q.B.’s face.
Who's leg do I have to hump to get a drink around here?-Brian
ISU's offense
with its quick passes and the like don’t allow enough time for a rush to touch him. Five step drop and throw a 3 yard pass doesn’t take very long. When AA held the ball he was introduced to Karl Klug or eating his own linemen’s ass that Clayborn planted on top of him.
Nice thing is ISU’s offense was a good tune up for AZ next week. Same shit just faster and the D-line doesn’t have to worry about Foles running, just about delayed handoff’s to Gribsy. Of course we all know what happens when Grisby attempts to out run our D-line.
"In my experience, there's no such thing as luck."
―Obi-Wan Kenobi
by The Bacon Explosion on Sep 13, 2010 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Sash
Aranaud seemed to be avoiding throwing in Sash’s general area, a lot more to Greenwood’s side or the flats/outs. Can’t say for sure, just that Arnaud really wanted to avoid challenging the center of the field
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
Morse looked good out of the backfield on Saturday as well
It seems like he missed every block last year. I just remember seeing him whizz by LBs at a 100 mph only to run himself into the ground 5 yards deep into the secondary. I think he has his head up now and finding his blocks.
KOK, you might be a genius...
by hawkeye_heartattack on Sep 13, 2010 10:42 AM CDT reply actions
I understand the level of the competition so far isn't "exceptional"
But an offensive line that was considered a problem before the season started, is looking to be REALLY good. And if Hawkeye tradition holds true they should only get better.
Who's leg do I have to hump to get a drink around here?-Brian
I DVR'd it and watched it yesterday.
That is, I watched the first half. Nice to see Iowa closing the door so quickly. Also nice to see Karl Klug is still an animal.
"Now you put a Pamper on him and send him back out here." - Ray Isom, 1987 Fiesta Bowl
by ReadingRambler on Sep 13, 2010 10:56 AM CDT reply actions
Naked Bootleg %
My only quibble is this play. I know how we run to set it up, and I know we’ve busted some big plays on it, but it seems as though 40-50% of the time time a disaster or near disaster happens. I don’t like hanging Ricky out there for a free run. When it gets figured out he either 1) gets crushed 2) takes a huge sack or 3) throws an ill-advised ball. Thoughts?
by RodgersHasAHose on Sep 13, 2010 11:44 AM CDT reply actions
He's always thrown better on the move.
The Wootten deal was a missed block. It was a naked bootleg.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
Saw the game replayed on ESPN U
and it was more impressive on second viewing even. I was a tad frustrated that Arenot escaped the D-line so often but in reality he was running for his damn life. Foles is going to be disrupted by our D-line. Big Time.
As for the bootleg, it was not abused this game in the slightest and the play on the goaline to Reisner was a boot but with a variation. I think KOK is setting some stuff up for some of the big boys this year. Which reminds me of one of my favorite stories in this regard.
Here is the real simple version: Joe Gibbs in like 1993 or whenever Washington won the Super Bowl knew for his team to win the division they had to go thru the Giants. He told Rypien(sp), I think it was him, to NEVER throw across the field on roll outs. So game after game he would roll out and throw to the side he rolled out. Every time. Never back across. Then they came to the Meadowlands and after the first half when he rolled out, every time threw back to the other side of the field. Scored two TDs and blew out the Giants. Genius. I am expecting that KOK is planning some changes along the way to fuck with D-coordinators.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Sep 13, 2010 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions
Who are you
and where do you get this wealth of football knowledge. I hope you are right and KOK has some plans for this play as it does at times seem unnecessarily dangerous. Good posts, thanks.
… also it just occurred to me that I am in a way calling out KOK for not being conservative enough…… whoa..
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Sep 13, 2010 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah, we should actually all be in awe of the first drive (maybe two) that he scripted days in advance. Things of beauty that we aren't used to seeing out of him.
by Eyeheartfreedumb on Sep 13, 2010 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Back in the most recent glory days (02-05 roughly)
we scripted the first couple of offensive possessions. I believe we ran a no-huddle for the entire first quarter in some games. I don’t think we’ll see that same quickness/urgency again, as long as we are executing so well.
KOK, you might be a genius...
by hawkeye_heartattack on Sep 14, 2010 7:43 AM CDT up reply actions
The play-action bootlegs are inextricable from the core rush game.
Everything in this offense now is a sequence, designed to force defenses into making defensive assignment decisions that break at the next level. Perhaps we can think of it as a very logical, binary logic tree: if they do this, we will do that; but if they then do that, we will do this-prime. What’s stunning about the ISU game was the parity in effects; I’ve never seen Iowa so balanced (caveat: in 2002 I just watched a few games). So they took away our tight-end seam routes; McNutt runs a deep cross. They crashed our tendency for inside zone inside the five; we bootleg out and Reisner catches a little flip and scores without being touched.
Some writers criticize Stanzi’s footwork on the straight dropbacks, and it does seem to me that, last year anyway, he much preferred the rollouts for the quick intermediate passes to punish the linebackers for thinking run first. Everything is a sequence. It’s the opposite, really, to what Boise State does, where every play stands alone (cf. SmartFootball.com).
Mr. Boh Knows ...
Because you mention 2002
I have to bring up one of my favorite Iowa play calls. When we were known for throwing the tunnel screen – they go with a pump fake tunnel screen that leaves two Iowa receivers strolling near the endzone with the entire Wisconsin defense collapsing toward the screen.
Seen in the video at 4:49
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPnwC3dIHzg
"Jack Trice Stadium - Easily one of the Top 10 Stadiums in Central Iowa"
by Not Marv Cook on Sep 13, 2010 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions
Agreed
I just wonder about the risk/reward factor. I’m sure he is going to bust something off of that against Wisc or OSU later, but I cringe every time I see it. Having said that, I can think of at least 3-4 huge plays for us last year off that play action (Mich, GTech) and I remember seeing that same play work for the Patriots yesterday as well. This is all nit-picking on my part. Its weird to root for the one pro-style, non-spread offense left in the top 25.
by RodgersHasAHose on Sep 13, 2010 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions
It's not going away because it is a response, as Bellanca states, to defensive pursuit
if the defense is crashing the run, and you may recall Wegher getting tackled about 2 nanoseconds after getting the hand off last year, then we punish them with play action. But if we don’t roll out then you can still be tackled by a run blitz. It’s football, guys are going to get tackled. Both Stanzi and Vandenberg need to learn to slide and move on to next play when they are naked to the defense. Problem solved.
The Northwestern play was a freak accident and Morse’s chip block was a whiff. I think we will see the rollout less and more shotgun this week and five wides. I think KOK is going to freak out Stoops with the playcalling. Not hard to do by the way….
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
KOK does a great job of prep.
This offense is tougher to defend against than it looks. There’s more in the playbook than we see on the field. We just never need to use very much of it. I’m not sure KOK needs to be any trickier (sp?) than running the stretch/counter combo against ’Zona.
BTW, I still think KOK had a case of brainfartitis at Northwestern.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Sep 13, 2010 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions
KOK Brain Fart?

"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
that is so disturbing
I cannot stop watching it
by Pain in the Sash on Sep 13, 2010 10:32 PM CDT up reply actions
Wow. You guys are saying nice things 'bout KOK.
It must have gotten really cold somewhere suddenly.
My blog: http://www.gretainthebox.com
by Leftcoast Hawk on Sep 13, 2010 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions
If we can continue to put drives together like the first two this game
I may rename one of my kids KennyO.
"In my experience, there's no such thing as luck."
―Obi-Wan Kenobi
by The Bacon Explosion on Sep 13, 2010 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions
There's something kind of fun and brutal about ball control when its working
Its got to be the worst feeling in the world, being a defender and not being able to stop the chains from moving 3 to 4 yards at a pop, no matter what you try.
My blog: http://www.gretainthebox.com
by Leftcoast Hawk on Sep 13, 2010 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions
I can't imagine how demoralized
the Iowa State bench was when they realized the 1st quarter was done and they only had a 3 and out to show for it.
It never gets to be easy
by chitownhawkeye on Sep 13, 2010 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions
I just remembered the UNI-Western Illinois game from 3-4 years ago
UNI won 42-3 or so, piled up like 350 yards of rushing. Sanders attempted 8 passes all game. Basically the same thing we did this past weekend, but even more extreme. I was helping with strength and conditioning at the time and our head S&C coach told us just how demoralized every WIU player was by the middle of the 2nd quarter.
Five wides even had ME freaked
I was wondering if I was watching the right game. I mean, sure. Throw it in once against EIU, but using it two weeks in a row?
Seriously, I was nervous. I mean, what would Ricky do without a RB? Who was left to block the D-lineman that blows by our… oh wait. These guys CAN block! Woah!
Our vanilla offense is suddenly getting difficult to prepare for.
by KinnickNorthHawk on Sep 13, 2010 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions
That was exactly my thought process when I saw the empty back set go in.
I mean, what would Ricky do without a RB? Who was left to block the D-lineman that blows by our… oh wait. These guys CAN block! Woah!
The potential is out there!
Going, going, going, going, going, going, going, going.... Alright, I'll stop for now.
by EnergizerHawk on Sep 13, 2010 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions
We're not the only ones
Wisconsin is so anti-spread that it’s not even funny. I’m no offensive guru, but what I saw from ‘Bama didn’t look very spread-like to me. I hear Nebraska is a spread team with a dual threat QB this year though. While I haven’t watched USC yet this year, I don’t think that they’re a spread team either. Stanford? LSU? See, we aren’t the only team that hasn’t gone to the spread.
1991. I was living in DC at the time.
My blog: http://www.gretainthebox.com
by Leftcoast Hawk on Sep 13, 2010 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions
Well...
we’ve also had some luck with it, otherwise we wouldn’t keep running it…well…it is KOK….
But I agree that we should stop running it, unless we run out of options or something. Because everybody knows we love the play action. And everybody knows we love to roll Stanzi out. One missed block or assignment, and you leave Stanzi rolling out right into defenders. Could spell doom.
I don't think RICKY likes that play-call either
KOK, you might be a genius...
by hawkeye_heartattack on Sep 13, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions
IMO, I don't think he looked comfortable on that bootleg
the Clones had it dialed up and had at least one guy closing on him. I think we pocket the naked bootleg and roll Stanzi out with some protection.
KOK, you might be a genius...
by hawkeye_heartattack on Sep 13, 2010 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions
About the kick returns thing...
ISU had three kickoff returns, of 23, 37 and 62 yards.
However, I am happy that we finally seem to have the ability to kick the ball out of the endzone. I don’t know if it’s the wind, or what, but forcing touchbacks is fantastic.
As for the previous returns themselves, well…
23 yards off of a return isn’t all that bad. It probably brings the opposing team out to their 30 yard line or so. In the ISU game, however, it was brought out from the goal line to the 23 yard line. That’s pretty good….only really a 3 yard gain from a touchback.
The 37 yard return is slightly worrying only because it was taken from the 6 and brought out to the ISU 43 yard line. The defense proceeded to force a 3 and out.
Finally, you have the monster 62 yard punt. It was immediately after the 3 play, 97 yard drive we had that covered about 1:20. Not sure if that may have had a role. Also, there was an immense amount of luck on that return as well. The return man (Sims, I think), ran into his own guy, and that ended up tangling up a bunch of Hawks as well. He then bounced out and scampered up until the kicker brought him down (I think).
I am undecided on Meyer
on one hand he can clearly kick the ball long but he does not get much height on his kicks so when they didn’t down the ball they had some running room. Great news is that he is just a frosh and with work could be the second coming of NK in time (at least in terms of distance).
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
Inconsistent height.
From the 4th row (almost field level) in the north endzone, I can tell you he had some high hangers, but also some that were less high. Nothing like DMurray’s line drives last year though. Decide on Meyer. He’s got the goods.
by Eyeheartfreedumb on Sep 13, 2010 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions
I really hope you are correct. For a freshman he does kick it a long way.
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
So much has been said
of the trip six years ago that I’m sure the players are aware of it and KF will have somehow tweaked his preparation to better prepare for the trip. Right now, the forecast down here should be low 90s or even high 80s at kickoff, and with no DST here, the sun will have been down for nearly an hour. Also, looks like little or no humidity. Frankly, I think the weather angle is overrated.
ISU had some short completions which were simply dropped by the receivers or just overthrown. Arizona will go short, and with more success, because Foles is more accurate. Also, and this could backfire on them, if we start getting to the less-mobile Foles, we could see Scott in there. We could also see him in a Wildcat formation. I expect some wrinkes from Arizona because of their perceived speed advantage. They do have some speed players, but I don’t think an advantage exists there, either.
So long as we don’t give up any big plays, I don’t think Arizona can consistently move on our defense. and I think we win this by 10 or more. Certainly more challenging than the past two games, but I think we’re bigger, stronger, and if at all, not appreciably slower than Arizona. Our smaller-than-usual O-line might even be of benefit to us in this game. Finally, this may be the most balanced Iowa team I have ever seen.
In Norm we trust.
I'm pretty sure...
…Arizona is aware that Iowa isn’t as plodding as others believe big ten teams to be.
Case in point:

Brunettes not fighter jets
As impressive as the blocked punt was
and, yeah, that was a bigger play at the time, I think this was the play (and I think he caught the RB later, too) that really showed what Clayborn could do. I think some people expect we can’t do that all game with the time and clmate change but again, and particularly with this group, I think those factors are overrated.
In Norm we trust.
Yeah, the other was going to the other side of the field...
…and Clayborn just reached out, grabbed the back of his jersey and yanked him to the ground (I wish that GIF was out there, cause I think it’s equally impressive).
And if one of our D-Line gets tired- – boom, uncage Mike Daniels.
by Eyeheartfreedumb on Sep 13, 2010 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Not so sure about Scott
His last start was at Kinnick last year, and he didn’t even finish that game. I think Iowa is ready for what he brings to the field.
by PackerHawk on Sep 13, 2010 1:11 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
FYI, A workout buddy of mine, a USC graduate, said to me this morning,
“Your boys are looking pretty tough this year.” Later, another gym rat friend, Michigan State grad, said, “Iowa looks tough.” A girlfriend told me, “Brian (her husband USC grad/post grad) was carrying on all surprised about how truly good Iowa was on Saturday.”
Maybe the media ain’t getting it (so what?) but the rank and file seems to be picking up the Iowa vibe, even out here in Trojan-ville.
Ivan Maisel loves us
He’s had us picked over OSU to win the big ten since before the season started.
we’re in the top ten, that’s plenty within striking distance to keep us in the discussion at the end of the year. gotta keep winning with swagger
Keeping wildlife, an amphibious rodent, for uh, domestic, you know, within the city - that aint legal either, Dude.
by AcrimoniousAngerererer on Sep 13, 2010 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions
HAWKEYE SWAGGER!

"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
by Kluginator on Sep 13, 2010 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
MORE SWAGGER

the fanny pack just adds to the awesomeness of the swagger.
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
Wear that to work or class
and we’re talking serious SWAGGER…and I don’t mean on Friday either. I’ll await the pics.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
I must confess that neither of these handsome men are me
they were photos gleaned from the Hawk Central Photo Gallery
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
Wear it to your wedding. BE A MAN.
My blog: http://www.gretainthebox.com
by Leftcoast Hawk on Sep 13, 2010 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions
It should.
I was actually stunned at how many “NICE SHIRT11” comments I got on Saturday.
by Smokin Herb Grigsby on Sep 13, 2010 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions
That's more American ...
than a John Wayne/ Susan B. Anthony lovechild.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Sep 13, 2010 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions
I know that Tailgate!
Good Ole (shouldn’t say the name of) Business fraternity tailgate behind the abandoned art building… classy. I’ve peed in those trees soooo many times
MORE SWAGGER
How’d you miss this gem?

by KinnickNorthHawk on Sep 14, 2010 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions
Bitch tits?
"The possibility of physical and mental collapse is now very real. No sympathy for the Devil, keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride!" HST
Ricky Stanzi is putting up better numbers
overall than he did in the 4th quarter last year. He is currently ranked #9 in the nation with a QB rating of 183.6. That is good enough for second in the Big Ten and 9 points ahead of #11 rated Nick Foles.
9 Ricky Stanzi, QB IOWA 41 29 70.7 433 10.6 66 3 0 3 183.6
11 Nick Foles, QB ARIZ 59 49 83.1 574 9.7 45 3 2 2 174.8
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
I know, it is far too early to take stock in this stuff.....but
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
but......
it is not too early to say that Ricky appears to be showing much greater maturity than this same time last year. One of the big “IFs” coming into this year was whether Stanzi could stop shooting himself in the foot early on in games. So far so good.
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
Please go rap-tap-tap on the nearest Oak or Maple. STAT.
by Smokin Herb Grigsby on Sep 13, 2010 3:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Sorry, I'm knocking on wood!
![]()
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
I'm nit picking one thing
I will be the first to admit that I’m no offensive line/blocking expert and I’m usually far too drunk when watching games to notice much beyond where the ball is at…but I watched Allen Reisner miss two blocks horribly. There it is…we’re fucked.
Prolly because Reisner was scoring touchdowns
/snark
KOK, you might be a genius...
by hawkeye_heartattack on Sep 13, 2010 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Oh and...
could someone who does possess the ability to watch these types of things comment on Gettis vs. MacMillan? I haven’t noticed Casey getting trounced out there but was hearing really good things about Gettis in the offseason…so it has me terribly vexed.
Did Gettis even play on Saturday? Is so, I missed him.
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."
It's Nolan who has been playing.
And Gettis is out with an ankle injury I believe.
"You don't become a Hawkeye fan, You're born with Black and Gold in your veins." - Me
by BStylin Hawkye on Sep 13, 2010 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions
Not sure we've seen Gettis yet
Ferentz was really high on Gettis this past spring and during fall camp. Then he got injured in the last week and MacMillan has played in his stead. Ferentz has been really high on MacMillan’s play, calling him the best surprise of the season so far. Might have the unfortunate situation where Gettis doesn’t get back on the field unless there’s an injury to someone else.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
Gettis is listed as 2nd string guard this week behind McMillan.
"Have you ever had the Hot Pocket Hot Pocket? It’s Hot Pocket inside a Hot Pocket. Tastes just like a Hot Pocket."

by 
























