Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Worst Team Ever Projected?

INPIYL2I: Should I Stay or Should I Go?

It's Not Plagiarism If You Link to It is the BHGP news roundup.  Send tips to hawkeyestatebhgp@gmail.com.

One In, One Out, One Who Could Be Either.  Let's begin with the good news from the land of creepiness: Iowa picked up a verbal commitment from Wisconsin halfback/athlete Melvin Gordon over the weekend.  Gordon (3* Rivals, 3* Scout, 79/100 ESPN) chose Iowa from an offer list that went on forever (pretty much the entire Big Ten, plus Tennessee, Louisville, Cincinnati, Iowa State, etc.), had interest from the likes of Alabama and Miami, and was named the best prospect in Wisconsin by Rivals.  He currently stands 6'1" and weighs 185 pounds, which is basically Jordan Cotton two years ago.  He could play anything from halfback to receiver to defensive back.  For now, let's take this moment to gloat over the fact that Iowa has taken a top 3 Wisconsinite from Bret Bielema in each of the last two years.

On the not-so-good news front, it appears that FB Wade Leppert has decided to call it a career.  Leppert, a former walk-on from Wauconda, IL, split time with Brett Morse as Shonn Greene's battering ram in 2008.  However, he was passed by Morse in 2009, spending his time primarily on the kickoff return unit, and was recently demoted to FB3 when Brad Rogers changed positions.  With no scholarship and no real route back into the rotation, Leppert apparently decided he'd had enough.  We wish him well.

And now I'd like to take a shadow off this evening: Brandon Wegher apparently returned to practice last week, only to leave again.  Via the Quad City Times:

Iowa coach Kirk Ferentz told Fox Sports radio Friday night that Wegher, who left the team a few days into fall workouts, practiced a few days last week but "his heart wasn’t into it." He has left the team again, although Ferentz remains optimistic that Wegher will be back permanently at some point.

"He’s a very valued team member and we’re certainly hopeful he’ll choose, at some point, to rejoin the team and get back to football," Ferentz said on the radio show. "But that being said, too, I’m totally respectful of his intentions and desires, and I think he just needs a little time right now, a little space to sort a few things out."

I've heard the rumors.  You've heard the rumors.  We're not going anywhere near them.  If the report is true, and Wegher plans on attending classes today with the start of the fall semester, it's probably not a transfer situation.  Regardless, it's now been two weeks since BW3 went AWOL; even if he is back before August camp breaks, don't expect him on the field any time soon.

EDIT: Andy Hamilton, reporting on the same radio interview, thinks the QCT misheard Ferentz.  Wegher returned for practice at the beginning of August (as in, Media Day, where we've seen the pictures) but hasn't come back since.  However, he is apparently planning on going to class, so it's a start.

Star-divide

Next Up: Divining Rods and Entrails.  FOTP Scott Dochterman details what we've all heard regarding divisional alignment in the new-look Big Ten (competitive balance trumps geography, OSU and Michigan don't necessarily have to stay together, etc.) and takes his best shot at guessing the new divisions.  He puts Iowa in with Nebraska, the two Illinois-based schools, and the Michigan programs.  It's completely plausible and little beyond meh-inducing.  While Nebraska becomes an immediate must-attend game, Illinois and Northwestern don't make up for Minnesota and Wisconsin, and one of those two previously protected rivals would be left out.  And while an annual meeting with Michigan would be enticing, does anyone outside Ann Arbor have any opinion whatsoever on Sparty?  Doc has the math right and the logic to back it up, but I hope he's wrong.

WE WEAR SHORT SHORTZ:

Comment 98 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

… former Michigan State guard Chris Allen, who …. was well-known as a problem in the locker room.

This makes it sound to me like he refused to pick up his dirty towels or left the seat up after he was done. What were his locker room transgressions?

the trailer hitch scrotum was my idea

by Kluginator on Aug 23, 2010 11:17 AM CDT reply actions  

Excessive towel snapping

I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.

by HoyaGoon on Aug 23, 2010 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's how Larry Driscoll went blind.


"All of this has happened before. All of this will happen again."

by Bucketochicken on Aug 23, 2010 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Don't you mean Larry Lester?

Didn’t Allen tape is buns together?

Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.

by Blackheartnopants on Aug 23, 2010 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Different high school.

I’m talking about Springfield High; you’re thinking of Shermer HS.


"All of this has happened before. All of this will happen again."

by Bucketochicken on Aug 23, 2010 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

This makes it sound to me like he refused to pick up his dirty towels or left the seat up after he was done.

Then maybe he needs a “real” coach who can hold him accountable and inspire him.

“How many times to I have to tell you, Ed. We pick up the tape first, then the towels!”

I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.

-- Judge Smails

by WaterlooChazz on Aug 23, 2010 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rubbed a stick of deodorant across everyone's lockers

Yes, I’ve done that and had that done to me.

You see what I did there? Yeeeaaaaaahhhh.

by hkobb7 on Aug 23, 2010 6:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ahh...locker room shenanigans

Nothing was more awesome than throwing soap all over some unsuspecting schmuck right after they get out of the shower.

by HawKCP on Aug 23, 2010 8:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

I guess I don’t understand. You’re taking a dude who has a poor reputation, and he has 1 year of eligibility?

by txhawkeye on Aug 23, 2010 11:28 AM CDT reply actions  

It's puzzling, considering Hoiberg should get plenty of leeway from fans in terms of wins and losses.

It’s not like he needs to win from day one or he’ll be on a hot seat.

The only way it makes sense to me is if he thinks that if he can jumpstart things with the transfers and get some early wins, it will make recruiting good players easier. As we saw with Lickliter, a vicious cycle can develop (lack of talent —> few wins —> hard to recruit top prospects —> more losing —> rinse, repeat) and it can be tough to break out of that cycle. Though I think Hoiberg would have an easier time than Lickliter, given that he seems to have the ears of recruits a bit more (NBA experience as player and front office guy + college star player) and has far more natural charisma.

"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"

by RossWB on Aug 23, 2010 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Is charisma even in Lick's vocabulary?

TOUCHDOWN IOWA! TOUCHDOWN IOWA! - Gary Dolphin
I LOVE IT! I LOVE IT! I LOVE IT! - Jim Zabel

by SpoWAHawk on Aug 23, 2010 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Put him on a one-strike-you're-out plan

and hope, at minimum, that he’ll have enough pride to turn it around. And meanwhile make your team better this year by beating the crap out of your starters on the practice court. Lick’s practice players were D-III guys.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Aug 23, 2010 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lick’s practice players were D-III guys

I think you are giving Lick too much credit.

"The possibility of physical and mental collapse is now very real. No sympathy for the Devil, keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride!" HST

by Dip-Shit on Aug 23, 2010 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nope.

Lick’s practice players were D-II guys, according to Jermain Davis.

I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.

-- Judge Smails

by WaterlooChazz on Aug 23, 2010 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

I stand corrected.

"The possibility of physical and mental collapse is now very real. No sympathy for the Devil, keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride!" HST

by Dip-Shit on Aug 24, 2010 8:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

No offense but it's not worth much unless we're talking real Glocks and M1911s, etc.

With each post, I promise to try to honor Shorty "The Meteoric Mdget" Miller.

by ReadingRambler on Aug 23, 2010 1:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Like in The Last Boyscout?

Billy Cole: “Ain’t life a bitch!” BANG

by HawkeyeRecon on Aug 23, 2010 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ah, a Pennsylvania clinger.

You religious too?

[Please don’t ban me for a needle based on religion and politics in seven words.]

Clearly I am a caged man unable to sublimate football aggression after 8.5 months of waiting.

Full disclosure, I’m seeing at least one PSU game this year (in MSP) so I mean this in all good fun.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Aug 23, 2010 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Island of Misfit Toys...

…that was my exact thought when I heard about Allen.
We better hope Duke doesn’t kick a couple guys out or ISU might actually have a team.
Can’t recruit em? Just wait. Low hanging fruit.

by Eyeheartfreedumb on Aug 23, 2010 11:59 AM CDT reply actions  

Thanks HS!!!!

Just got tickets for my wife, 2 daughters, myself, and a parking pass for $40 total at Indiana!

by Norm Parker's Amputated Toes on Aug 23, 2010 12:18 PM CDT reply actions  

All the angst over the divsions seems like pretty much a non-issue if we go to nine conference games like Delany wants.

Then you can do two protected games against teams from the other division, which should guarantee us yearly games with Minny, Wisco, and Nebraska (unless we’re placed in a separate divsion from all THREE programs and if that’s the case the B10 admins are beyond dumb) and should help keep other programs keep their rivalries intact, too.

At that point you’re also seeing every team at least twice every four years, which seems decent (it’s basically what we have now, I think). I suppose it’s still plausible that if Iowa is in Div A and OSU and PSU are in Div B that there could be a schedule where the two teams Iowa misses from from Div B that year are OSU and PSU, but then the championship game exists to fix that sort of inequity. If Iowa ran the table without playing them, they’d play one of them in the title game or, if neither made it, well, it would be a non-issue that Iowa didn’t play them in the reg. season because they weren’t that awesome anyway.

So, really, I think the nine game conference schedule is the answer to most of our grumbling about the divisional stuff. Of course, the problem there is that if we can’t get that into place for 4-5 years (which is Delany’s latest timeline, if memory serves) and Nebraska’s joining next year… well, then things could be sticky for a few years.

"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"

by RossWB on Aug 23, 2010 12:21 PM CDT reply actions  

With nine in-conference plus your title match

there goes your opportunity for two teams in the BCS bowls. (Which I think is fine.)

But nine will put the ISU game on the bubble, and if the politicians insist that we play ISU forever, we’ll have one of the more challenging scheds in the conference. Supposedly, PSU takes the position that if we play nine, they cannot restart the Pitt series. Pitt=ISU.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Aug 23, 2010 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

PSU taks the position that we cannot restart the Pitt series because we don't want to.

Why? Because we don’t want to.

ISU? I guess in some ways.

With each post, I promise to try to honor Shorty "The Meteoric Mdget" Miller.

by ReadingRambler on Aug 23, 2010 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Personally

I wouldn’t mind not playing Iowa State. It’s not that they’re unimportant (they are unimportant) or bad (they are), but it’s not a game I get excited over. It’s not THE RIVALRY of the MIdwest. Sorry, Clone Chronicles, but my vote’s with ditching you for some random FBS opponent every year, just for the variety. It’s the spice of life, you know.

You see what I did there? Yeeeaaaaaahhhh.

by hkobb7 on Aug 23, 2010 6:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think Iowa drops the ISU series unless...

ISU gets all sorts of greedy, or ISU drops out of the B12 and into a crap conference. This rivalry is too big, and can you imagine all the hawks=chickens jokes that would abound if Iowa looked like they were running away from the series?

I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.

-- Judge Smails

by WaterlooChazz on Aug 23, 2010 11:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Fuck 'em.
can you imagine all the hawks=chickens jokes that would abound if Iowa looked like they were running away from the series?

The extent of the argument is that inferior Clone teams occasionally beat superior Hawk teams (02, 05, 07) and that we’re cowardly for not wanting to risk losing to a team that’s crappier than we are. How strong of an argument is that really?

by Abbas_Cincinnatus on Aug 24, 2010 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Can't disagree with you

but I REALLY don’t want to have to listen to it. Ever since I moved to the DM area, I already see way more red & yellow than I ever cared to, and meet way more Clown fans than I would like. Having to listen to their BS rants about Iowa “ducking” them probably be the straw the broke the camel’s back so to speak.

by Brock8144 on Aug 24, 2010 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just ask them

if they can provide the cash to justify us playing them.
If not, tell’em to hold a bake sale or something

It never gets to be easy

by chitownhawkeye on Aug 24, 2010 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, until recently

ISU had been greedy. Under the old provisions, the teams shared a portion of their gate receipts with the other team, some % of the gross. For Iowa, this was straightforward, we would count up the gate receipts of the ISU game and give them their percentage. The Inconsolable One, however, found a loophole that basically allowed ISU to take an average of all their home games. Since this included games with such great draws as Baylor and Kansas, the “average” attendance/gross revenue figure was much lower than it was for the Iowa game alone. Thus Pollard found away to keep a few extra bucks for ISU. While technically it was allowed under the accounting of the contract, it doesn’t scream a passion for equity. I think under the new contract, the teams no longer share the gate receipts with the other, so Iowa keeps all of the revenue from ticket sales for the ISU game, and vice versa.

I guess what I’m trying to say is, Jamie Pollard is a cheap bastard and huge fucking douchebag.

I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.

by HoyaGoon on Aug 24, 2010 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Was that in effect

the last time we were there, when they wouldn’t sell the tickets without buying a 4 game package? And didn’t it not sell out because of that?
Brilliant!

It never gets to be easy

by chitownhawkeye on Aug 24, 2010 6:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, Hoya.

the fact that they used to (unevenly) share gate was why I wrote what I did.

And I absolutely agree with you when you said:

Jamie Pollard is a cheap bastard and huge fucking douchebag.

And ChiTown, yes I believe it was. That is a huge reason why I was really pissed when I saw that. They took extra money from UI, and then set up a pricing structure that forced UI fans to buy tickets to games that even some ISU fans wouldn’t want.

Thankfully, there is a special place in the afterlife for Pollard and his minions, and I’m pretty sure Dante wrote about it.

I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.

-- Judge Smails

by WaterlooChazz on Aug 24, 2010 11:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Say more about not putting two teams in the BCS...

I don’t totally understand that. Last year the SEC played a CCG and put Florida and Alabama in the BCS. The year before the Big XII played a CCG and put two teams in the BCS. There seem to be plenty of scenarios where you could play a nine game conference slate and still put two teams in the BCS.

by Abbas_Cincinnatus on Aug 23, 2010 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm skeptical of the talk that adding a conference title game or going to 9 conference games will do great harm to the B10's ability to get two teams into BCS games.

So long as the BCS remains a beauty pageant and bowls are most concerned with filling stadiums, providing economic boons to their communities, and getting solid ratings for their TV partners, Big 10 schools will remain highly desirable.

If the risk is that we see more 9-3 Big 10 teams and it’s harder for them to get into the BCS… well, it wouldn’t be a shock to see the BCS amend the rules to make it easier for their member bowls to pick those teams. And, along those same lines, we may see more losses in general among major conference teams if the overall trend is toward more conference games (and with the B10 and B12 headed towards 9-game conference schedules and the Pac-10 already having a 9-game slate, it does seem to be headed that way).

"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"

by RossWB on Aug 23, 2010 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

While I am not losing sleep over it, I could see the following happen....

Iowa goes undefeated in the West division with Nebraska in second with one loss to Iowa earlier in the season. Iowa plays undefeated Ohio State for the Conference Championship and loses in a low scoring close game. The BCS then decides to take one loss Nebraska over one loss Iowa.

the trailer hitch scrotum was my idea

by Kluginator on Aug 23, 2010 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know why you're worried about that.

Nothing like that has ever happened before.

Before you respond, let me remind you: Brian Cook called me smug, which makes me the Obama of smugness. I'm basically Smugbama.

by Patrick Vint on Aug 23, 2010 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Or Kansas going to the Orange Bowl over Mizzou

Still, 62-36. Suck it Solich. No way Nebraska should have played in that MNC game.

by PackerHawk on Aug 23, 2010 6:10 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Well, yeah, and odds are that will happen.

That’s bad if you’re a fan of Iowa (or whichever school gets fucked over in that scenario), but looking at it from the perspective of guaranteeing that the Big 10 continues to get the most money possible out of the bowls, it doesn’t really matter who the second team is, so long as there is a second team.

One of the things we haven’t talked about too much (probably because it’s at least 15 months away from being an issue) is that Nebraska’s inclusion in the league could very well push us down a peg on the bowl pecking order. Our large, travel-happy fanbase has served us well in getting plum bowls in the past, but Nebraska has those same advantages AND the advantage of novelty. There’s no risk of their fans being fatigued about trips to Orlando or Miami or Tampa.

"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"

by RossWB on Aug 23, 2010 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I heard some talk of another BCS bowl being added if M.West gets BCS status.

Either Cap One or Cotton and that rules might be amended to let a BCS conference get up to THREE teams into BCS bowls.

by HawkeyeRecon on Aug 23, 2010 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Our strength of schedule (and probability of another loss) goes up

with 9 in-conference games, the annual Cyclone Charity Super Bowl, one intersectional game and one cupcake.

I suppose we could drop the intersectional game if we can’t drop ISU, but in reality I would see us (in the hypothetical of playing nine this year) replacing EIU or Ball State with ISU or Arizona. I think ISU is here to stay, just to keep things calm in the Statehouse.

We are really full of ourselves here, scenario-testing the next 10 years of Iowa BCS candidacy. This is a little weird. Who knows how many other Old Testament Beware the Sin of Pride Angry Gods (OTBSPAG) are out there.

One thing’s fershur: those PSU guys are pussies if they don’t want to play Pitt.

Also, there will be years when one divisional champ will go into the league championship with a couple of OOC losses, one or two league losses — and then lose the title game. That team will not go to the BCS, and the team that finished second in the other division may not go either. I don’t care, but it will happen. Like, PSU, if they continue to play Temple instead of Pitt, while sliding into the easy chair of playing runner-up to OSU.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Aug 23, 2010 5:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

whoops

“..with 9 in-conference games, the annual Cyclone Charity Super Bowl, one intersectional game and one cupcake and the possibility of a 13th game for the league title.

Again, I don’t care, but that’s potentially two additional BCS contests vs. today. Meanwhile effing Boise is playing UC-Davis and Colorado School of Mines — and two or three Big Ten caliber teams all season.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Aug 23, 2010 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

But the opposite may happen as well.

You could have a CCG that features an 8-4 team and an undefeated team that is vying for a spot in the MNCG and the 8-4 team could win. It’s happened a couple times in the Big XII and damn near happened again last year. In those situations I think the winner would represent the conference in the Rose Bowl and the loser would still likely get an at-large bid.

I agree that when you’re playing a ninth Big Ten team instead of a cupcake your chances for tripping up increase. For Iowa this year, that would probably mean playing Nebraska instead of EIU/Ball State, which obviously diminishes Iowa’s chances of going undefeated.

That said, the opportunity for two BCS teams isn’t eliminated with a nine game conference schedule. If anything, it may improve the chances of a one- or two-loss runner-up getting into the BCS because the strength of schedule is so much higher.

by Abbas_Cincinnatus on Aug 24, 2010 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm cool with ending the ISU series

or at least removing it as an every-year game. When the Big XII implodes – and let’s be honest, it will – ISU will be relegated to the mid-major status that it deserves. What benefit will playing them provide us then?

I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.

by HoyaGoon on Aug 23, 2010 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sure.

But Iowa never goes to Muncie.

"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"

by RossWB on Aug 23, 2010 7:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes.

And they played NIU in Chicago. But they certainly aren’t playing non-BCS schools on the road every other year.

"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"

by RossWB on Aug 23, 2010 8:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

And they're doing it again in 2012

but let’s not kid ourselves, while it’s a “home” game for NIU, Iowa fans are in the majority, and we get a pretty good payout from it.
Like you say, it’s not the sort of thing that would happen regularly

It never gets to be easy

by chitownhawkeye on Aug 23, 2010 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh, of course

An all-Kinnick series would work fine for me, although it wouldn’t be as interesting. It’s like sacrificing someone from the same tribe every weekend. The Aztecs wouldn’t stand for it, but we, being much more tolerant, might.

You see what I did there? Yeeeaaaaaahhhh.

by hkobb7 on Aug 23, 2010 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

How about a 3+1 or a 2+1?

Much more befitting a BCS-MAC matchup

by PackerHawk on Aug 24, 2010 3:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

An away game with split gate?

And everybody makes more money than playing in DeKalb, NIU makes more than coming to Kinnick.

by PackerHawk on Aug 24, 2010 3:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

I suspect what 9 games really means to our non-conference scheduling...

is the end of series with the likes of Pitt, Arizona, etc. I think the political (and social) pressure to maintain the ISU series will be too strong. Which means that our scheduling gets even more insular; we may not venture out of the midwest at all except for bowl games. That’s probably not a benefit to recruiting.

"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"

by RossWB on Aug 23, 2010 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wouldn't ISU ...

just bump one of the directional Illinois schools out of the rotation?

Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.

by Blackheartnopants on Aug 23, 2010 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not unless Directional Illinois starts demanding a home-and-home.

Before you respond, let me remind you: Brian Cook called me smug, which makes me the Obama of smugness. I'm basically Smugbama.

by Patrick Vint on Aug 23, 2010 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

I confess ...

I’ve become indifferent to ISU.

Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.

by Blackheartnopants on Aug 23, 2010 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Illinois State!

Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.

by Kyle McCann't on Aug 23, 2010 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Iceland State!

You see what I did there? Yeeeaaaaaahhhh.

by hkobb7 on Aug 23, 2010 6:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

IS U

SRSLY?!?

Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.

by Kyle McCann't on Aug 23, 2010 7:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

It depends how important that 7 home games scheduling idea really is, I suppose.

For years we’ve heard that schools (including Iowa) need those 7 home games to prop up the rest of the athletic department. I guess it’s theoretically possible that they think they could get more TV money from a 9-game conference schedule than the current system and that would offset the loss of a home game in some years.

On the other hand, it’s been widely reported that a big part of the push for the 9th conference game is because of the increasing cost of scheduling guarantee games against the likes of Directional Illinois or their I-AA brother, Directional Illinois Tech School of Mimes. How that squares away with the also-widely reported need for 7 home games is something that hasn’t really been discussed much.

"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"

by RossWB on Aug 23, 2010 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

True, the cost of cupcakes has about tripled in the past decade.

In effect each B10 school would be removing an expensive cupcake which warrants little interest outside of that school and replacing it with a conference game. Those would at least be of interest to everyone in the conference and would occasionally have national interest.

by HawkeyeRecon on Aug 23, 2010 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

BTW, with nine games a team will play five on the road every other year, additional

degree of difficulty.

Of course, PSU will just play their away game with Indiana in Philly or FedEx or something, but as we’ve seen, they won’t even take Pitt over Temple (pussies) — while we have to slug through the Charity Super Bowl every year.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Aug 23, 2010 5:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Temple was decent last year

so they might have to trade them in for Villanova…or St Joe’s.

by HawKCP on Aug 23, 2010 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe they'll just change the signs at Beaver Stadium

Promise Indiana the revenue. They’d do it.

by PackerHawk on Aug 24, 2010 9:27 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Misfit ToyS? So does that mean

That the entire ISU basketball team will break out in The Most Wonderful Day of the Year after every win?

A Voice From Kinnick - A Hawkeye Blog

by mikjones24 on Aug 23, 2010 12:27 PM CDT reply actions  

I would watch that

…with Fred-in-the-box leading the singing.

A fella steps out for a two pound burrito and all hell breaks loose.

by Mr. Grizz on Aug 23, 2010 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks, BHGP people, for leaving Wegher alone.

It does appear that he has been forced, by conscience, to leave adolescence behind too soon.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Aug 23, 2010 1:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Holy Shit!!

Did you know that Germany has the bundeliga (major) and regionalliga (minor) leagues for American Awesomeness known as football??? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Football_League
They’ve been playing since 1979. How did i and my German heritage not know anything about this? So thumbs up Germans I expect Iowa to now have a whole new recruiting pipeling.

by HawkeyePapyrus on Aug 23, 2010 1:11 PM CDT reply actions  

Genius!

“The idea of a quarterback who bombed at Iowa playing for Dresden has Kurt Vonnegut chuckling in his grave.”

HS: +2

by IDontUnderStanzi on Aug 23, 2010 1:39 PM CDT reply actions  

Braunschweig...

Is that somehow related to Arnold Braunschweiger?

by Smokin Herb Grigsby on Aug 23, 2010 6:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Haha, that movie was awesome.

It was “Galaxy Quest” before “Galaxy Quest” was ever made (which is a far, far, far superior movie, but still…).


"All of this has happened before. All of this will happen again."

by Bucketochicken on Aug 23, 2010 6:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

"To be or not to be...Not to be."

In case any of you poor souls have yet to see this, and to remind of those of you that have that life is still worth living… I present to you the greatest youtube video that has been and will ever be created. You’re welcome.

by Smokin Herb Grigsby on Aug 23, 2010 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Damn Galaxy Quest is drastically underrated.

You got no fear of the underdog; That's why you will not survive!

by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Aug 23, 2010 8:19 PM CDT reply actions  

Reply fail.

Also, I’m guessing that Leppert is pissed that EA left him out of this year’s version of Iowa for NCAA 2011, so he said “fuck it” and left the team.

You got no fear of the underdog; That's why you will not survive!

by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Aug 23, 2010 8:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Mmmmmm...Galaxy Quest.

Love me some Alan Rickman. I’m pretty sure he’s been in everything.

by Argulor on Aug 23, 2010 8:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yum, Braunschweiger Lion...


I know, my photoshop MS Paint skillz are the shit.

"we're the only team in the state, as far as I know."

by IPeeBlackAndGold on Aug 23, 2010 9:54 PM CDT reply actions  

Braunschweiger...

smells and looks pretty gross, but is actually decent on a piece of toast.

I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.

-- Judge Smails

by WaterlooChazz on Aug 24, 2010 11:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think I've only had the stuff a couple times

But as a kid my mom fed me the ham-based sandwich spread stuff from Hy Vee about 3 times a week. Because it was cheap as hell and fast. I was so sick of that pink stuff then, but now, every once in a while, I get a small pack of it for old times’ sake.

"we're the only team in the state, as far as I know."

by IPeeBlackAndGold on Aug 25, 2010 1:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

I will not eat green eggs and ham...

but eat braunschweiger? Yes, I can.

I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.

-- Judge Smails

by WaterlooChazz on Aug 26, 2010 7:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"It’s so extreme, it’s almost a compliment."

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Importance of Iowa Basketball
Tractor_small
Sherlock Holmes: The Story of the Missing Offense. Chpt. 4

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Mcqueen_small Patrick Vint

Louie_small Adam Jacobi

Stains_small jebushchrist

Dumpster_fire_small RossWB

Default_small PSD

Authors

Images_small StoopsMyAss

Spitzenhofen_small Hayden Fry's Moustache Ride

Herky_small hawk6894

Horace_small Horace E. Cow