Assume the Position 2010: Tight End
You know the drill: Every Thursday (or sometimes Friday, apparently) from now until mid-August, BHGP breaks down the depth chart, position by position, from most certain to least certain.
Previously:
1. Quarterback
2. Defensive Tackle
3. Safety
4. Defensive End
Tonight: Tight End

The first four installments of ATP10 were virtually interchangeable. Each featured returning starters; five of the seven players profiled as starters has two or more years experience in Big Ten play. You can quibble over the bottom of the depth chart, but there is a king of each of those four mountains. Sometimes two kings. Broderick Binns might become a duke. He could be a pretty kick-ass duke.
Those days are over, though, as we get to the fifth installment. There may be no serious doubt over who will be starting at tight end on September 5, but there are questions of how effective that starter will be, and there are serious concerns further down the line. There are walk-ons and uber-recruits and everything in between, all fighting for a couple of spots at a position where Iowa keeps churning out pros. ATP stopped being nice. ATP just got real.
The Crown Prince
Allen Reisner (#82, Senior, 6'3", 250, Marion (IA) HS)
Coming out of spring practice, one thing was clear: After three years of picking up the pieces of Tony Moeaki's body, Allen Reisner is going to get his chance. Reisner entered the program with as little fanfare as possible, a universal two-star rated player from 20 miles up Interstate 380 who was a bit of a position tweener and had all of one season at tight end in high school. He would have been a prime candidate for a redshirt, but Moeaki sustained 17 separate and unrelated injuries in 2007, and Reisner vaulted into the backup tight end slot. He racked up two catches in spot duty, plus a couple of tackles on special teams. With Moeaki and Brandon Myers both returning for 2008, Reisner was scheduled to be relegated back off the depth chart. The Flyin' Hawaiian was again grounded, though, and Reisner's role expanded, as he picked up 11 catches for 200 yards, including a team-high three (yes, you read that right; a team-high three) receptions against Iowa State and his first collegiate touchdown in the third quarter of the Wisconsin game. With Myers gone last season, Reisner again played TE2, posting similar numbers.
Blocking won't be an issue for Reisner, as it's been his primary function for the past three seasons. The question is whether Reisner has the athleticism and the hands to capably replace one of the most athletically-gifted tight ends Iowa has ever fielded. The size and experience help, and the track record of similar guys like Myers and Scott Chandler is a positive sign. Ferentz made it abundantly clear this March that Reisner had the top line; I'll gladly defer to his judgment for now.
While You Wait for the Others
Brad Herman (#39, Junior, 6'5", 247, Metamora (IL) HS)
Something's happening here. What it is ain't exactly clear. This time last year, we were anointing Herman as the heir apparent to Moeaki's throne, and for good reason: He's tall, he's big, he's been busy in the strength & conditioning program, he was good enough and motivated enough to play special teams as a true freshman, and he's received heaps of public praise from his position coaches and Kirk Ferentz. And then we got to March, and it all stopped. Entering his junior year, Herman should be competing with Reisner for the starting spot; instead, he's being pushed by unknown underclassmen and a true freshman who isn't even on campus yet. It could be a simple motivational tactic by Ferentz, or it could be a legitimate race, but in a spring that began with three holes in the offensive line, the primary talk out of practice was the lack of a true #2 tight end. It's not a good sign for Herman, who is otherwise a great story: Overlooked by the Big ten's big programs, he sent a highlight reel to the Iowa coaching staff and landed an offer sight unseen, then worked hard to become a true tight end.
C.J. Fiedorowicz (#86, Freshman, 6'7", 250, Johnsburg (IL) HS)
Look at those measurables: Six-foot-seven, 250 lbs., played seven different positions (including quarterback, receiver, and free safety) in high school, 4.55 fake 40 time, top 5 tight end prospect from everyone. Look at the options ahead of him: Herman seems to be fading, and Reisner is a stopgap with one year of eligibility left. Look at the rest of the picture: Initially committed to Illinois -- by his own admission, just to stop the recruiting process -- but saw the light and came to a program that actually uses a tight end, for the express purpose of playing tight end and only tight end. He's ready physically. He's motivated mentally. Look at that. Look at that and tell me he shouldn't be on the field immediately.
Jonathan Gimm (#92, Sophomore, 6'3", 240, Westfield HS (Houston, TX))
They don't post them anymore (or, if they do, I can't find them), but on signing day a couple of years ago, the football program posted 2-minute highlight tapes of the new signees to GoHawks.com. The first highlight films started the Legend of Casey McMillan, as Big Montana pulled around the end of the line and obliterated overmatched defensive backs. But the other outstanding video belonged to Jonathan Gimm, not because he made a spectacular catch or showed fantastic ball skills; in fact, Gimm's video did not feature one catch. Gimm's highlight video was block after block after block, every one maintained until three seconds after the play or the defender hit the turf, whichever occurred first. Gimm probably doesn't have the frame for the offensive line (he's added about 30 pounds in two years, but 6'3" doesn't leave much more room), so it's unclear how he ever gets past a TE2 or fullback role, but his play on special teams last year left us intrigued by the possibilities.
Zach Furlong (#87, Junior, 6'5", 248, Xenia (OH) HS)
There's no denying the football smarts: Furlong was originally a high school wideout, earning first team all-conference consideration as a junior. He converted to quarterback as a senior and made all-state. There's no denying the attitude: Despite not seeing any action, Furlong was named an offensive team leader last season, and he has added 25 pounds of muscle since hitting Iowa City. There's no denying the size: Furlong is finally there, with sufficient weight to match the height. He's buried on the depth chart, and he doesn't have the requisite special teams experience that you typically see from a player on Furlong's trajectory, but stranger things have happened.
60 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Also, prediction;
The Polish Hat will start and score against Arizona.
Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.
Not sooner?
So you’re saying Reisner starts the first two games? Seems reasonable, and they trade time in the first two games. I’m thinking the Hat will score in one of those games though. He seems way too tough to match up against, especially for a directional university and jISU.
by KinnickNorthHawk on Jun 18, 2010 7:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah, I'd give him a TD vs ISU
Davis and Wegher both got freshman TDs vs. ISU, why not The Hat? My logic is quite infallible, as I’m making this up on the spot, but I don’t it’s at all unreasonable to presume a touchdown for anyone, either by luck or by designation. It’s a nice, subtle sign to recruits (especially big-time and/or in-state recruits) that hey, you’ll have your shot.
But I could definitely seem him used rather sparingly for the first game or two.
"Kittens give Morbo gas."
by Bucketochicken on Jun 18, 2010 8:08 PM CDT up reply actions
“….I don’t think it’s unreasonable…”
Shoot.
"Kittens give Morbo gas."
by Bucketochicken on Jun 18, 2010 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions
It's more about him starting that quickly than the scoring.
Ferentz has a knack for being infuriatingly loyal. He’ll let Reisner start at least twice…until The Hat forces his hand.
Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.
by Kyle McCann't on Jun 18, 2010 8:44 PM CDT up reply actions
Would Ferentz really start a true freshman over an experienced senior?
Is CJ really that good and ready? What about blocking? I’m no football guru, but I would think with a line of newbies, and an experienced receiving corp, the TE’s first priority is going to be blocking. Is this kid a phenom or something?
by HawkeyeRecon on Jun 18, 2010 10:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Considering Iowa's love of 2-TE sets...
whether or not The Polish Hat starts is irrelevant. He’ll almost certainly see the field, even if it’s only in limited situations to make use of his receiving abilities. I think most of the reluctance Ferentz has had about playing true freshmen has been beaten out of him by the last few years. If a guy is good enough to play, he’ll play.
Is this kid a phenom or something?
By most accounts… pretty damn close.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
He's easily the most hyped TE to come to Iowa since Tony Mo
And we all know how that turned out. Hell, I’m more excited for the Polish Hat than I remember being when Tony Mo signed, simply because of his insane measurables. I have high hopes for this kid, even though some think he’s got OL written all over him.
by The Mexican't on Jun 18, 2010 10:35 PM CDT up reply actions
The fascination with turning him into an OL seems so dumb.
He’s big, yes, but he came here because he wanted to play TE, he wasn’t renowned for his blocking in HS, and, by most accounts, he’s got good speed and very good hands. He’s going to get every opportunity to play at TE. And, frankly, he could be a match-up nightmare.
And there’s no guarantee that Doyle’s going to simply load another 30 lbs. of muscle on him just because; he may find that he’s carrying a lot of bad weight now and by the time he gets rid of that and puts on “good” weight he’s more or less the same weight he is now. Or he may wind up only adding 10-15 lbs. Different players demand different regimens.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
Your logic is certainly solid...
But I’m not seeing a whole lot of “bad weight,” unless you’re talkin’ about some of the BIGGEST FREAKIN’ ARMS I’VE EVER SEEN ON A HIGHSCHOOLER! And yes, there is nothing to make me think OL when reading about him.
/caring-is-creepy’ed

I will haunt your dreams and eat your children.
I believe the opposing player in this pic
is applying the classic “Don’t Hurt Me!” defensive strategy against Fedora-Witch.
"In case you can't tell, I'm being sarcastic!" - Homer Simpson
by EastLosRandy on Jul 15, 2010 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree, and I'm really not interested in him at OL.
I hope he stays at TE and becomes a TD machine (he’d be a lock for the fade, or corner route from 20 yards) However, I’m not sure I’ve seen many 275-280 pound TEs. Seems a bit huge…
by The Mexican't on Jun 19, 2010 6:59 PM CDT up reply actions
Not that huge given he's 6'7"
The Giants had Scott Chandler listed at 6’7" 265#. Moeaki is 6’5" 250#. So it’s not that far off. Comparing BMI’s (which is not a perfect measure, but I’ll assume they have similar bodyfat percentages so it’s decent for this situation). Chandler’s is 29.9, Moeaki’s is 29.6, and the Hat’s is 31.
Mac: Well, the big deal, Dennis, is that I wasn’t even consulted on the decision, okay? And this is a big deal to me, as well. It’s also my night. Plus, Transporter 2? We haven’t seen Transporter 1 which means we’ll be completely lost… Plus, Jason Statham’s physique is nothing like the line-up in Predator.
Dennis: Okay, will you stop? I don’t want to have conversations anymore about dudes’ physiques and whether they can…
Mac: Dennis, in body mass alone…
Dennis: That’s what I was trying to avoid. A conversation about body mass, okay? We’ve had that conversation five times a day for the last month because we keep watching Predator and all you talk about is Weathers and Jesse “The Body” Ventura and how many pounds they can pack on…
Mac: It’s important to pack on mass. You’re talking about carbo-loading.
Dennis: I don’t want to, I don’t want to have this conversation with you anymore.
Mac: No, you’d rather have conversations with video store clerks.
Dennis: You know what, man, if you don’t wanna watch the movie with me, that’s fine. I will watch it by myself. Goddamn it!
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Jun 20, 2010 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions
I love the logic of some of our fanbase.
He may not start at TE right away because we’re not sure he can block…. STICK HIM IN A BLOCKING ONLY POSITION!
by Eyeheartfreedumb on Jun 21, 2010 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions
I was one of those people once.
The measurables seem to make sense on a move to OL, especially because it looks like his frame could support the weight necessary to play guard or tackle. That said, having a 6’7" TE that can run and catch is a really rare weapon and I’m excited to see him in action next year.
However, in defense of those people advocating “the Hat to OL” I don’t think they’re advocating that move starting this fall. I think the idea is that you bring him in, redshirt him, let him put the pounds on and develop blocking technique for a couple years and get him into the mix as a redshirt sophomore. If you think of it that way, the logic makes a little more sense.
Again, I’m just advocating for the devil here.
by Abbas_Cincinnatus on Jun 21, 2010 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions
It all comes down to blocking though, doesn't it?
If The Hat can prove he can lay a block, I think we all know he’ll see the field pretty quickly. Obviously he has the hands for catching, but I’m worried about the run game with an already weak offensive line if we stick an inexperienced blocker in there.
Absolutely
In MasCasa’s profile of the Polish Hat and TEs, he pointed out the biggest question mark was Fiedorwicz’s blocking and his need to pick it up before he saw significant playing time. Makes sense, especially because you want the Polish Hat to be versatile enough that opposing defenses automatically know a passing play is coming when Fiedorwicz is on the field.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
Reisner's the blocker, The Hat is the decoy...
…and can you imagine the DBs this kid should be able to lay out with some downfield blocking (we may see him Yanda some team’s safety).
by Eyeheartfreedumb on Jun 21, 2010 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions
We had at least two TEs blocking
On Wegher-bomb’s clinching touchdown against Georgia Tech. And we needed both of them (all three? I know sometimes we go three TEs, just don’t remember for that particular play) because Tech was stacking the box to stuff the run and get the ball back.
I remember we made the Fox color guy sound like a genius, because on the play before the TD he said something to the effect of, “Tech is stuffing the box against the run, but Iowa practices for this with two TE and three TE formations, because if you block well at the LOS, you can break a big play.”
Long story short, Fedora-Witch needs to block, block, and block some more. The huge TD catches will come.
"In case you can't tell, I'm being sarcastic!" - Homer Simpson
by EastLosRandy on Jul 15, 2010 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions
He only started Pakibomb once
I think that was the last straw in the true freshmen not playing stuff.
Caution – CJ Hat hasn’t seen the field yet, I would like to have someone take a look at him against some real competition and then lets talk about how many starts, catches and touchdowns he is going to get.
Too high? What do you mean too high?
by The Bacon Explosion on Jun 20, 2010 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions
Fiedorowicz scares me a bit
in a good way. 250 lbs already? Doyle will have him pushing, what, 280 in 2 years? Or more? Lineman body with receiver speed. He’ll be a tank. I just giggled a little thinking about him matching up against a safety.
It never gets to be easy
Me too...
It was kind of a Woody Woodpecker laugh.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Jun 18, 2010 9:08 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't understand the negativity behind Reisner
He clearly isn’t Moeaki, but few our. From what I remember, he was an average blocker and, at times, showed extremely soft hands. I have in mind a few catches that were way outside his body and I don’t remember many easy drops. While I think the Polish hat will end up at number 2, I think Reisner will be a pleasant surprise.
Ankles! We don't need no stinking ankles!
by three and out the kok story on Jun 18, 2010 8:31 PM CDT reply actions
Yeah I don't really get that either
From what I’ve seen his hands aren’t an issue at all. I think at the worst he’s another Brandon Meyers, and there’s nothing wrong with that.
I don't think that saying a guy will be a dependable run blocker, but lacks elite athleticism is negativity
And anticipating him to be replaced by a guy with enormous potential isn’t anything against him. Besides, we have no idea how well Fiederowicz is going to adapt to blocking, and with the OL being what they will be, I think that going with the better blocker is prudent. It’s not like either one of them will likely be the number one receiver this year.
I think Reisner will have much better numbers
than Moeaki had last year. For several reasons…one, Moeaki was injured for parts of the season and I think reisner is more durable; two, Moeaki drew double teams and I cannot imagine any team doubling Reisner with our wideouts and pass receiving RBs; three, I think Reisner is a more obvious target.
I think Moeaki will be a better pro than he was a college player. He will do better with the more open field of the pros. Reisner works very, very well in tight quarters. I love the guy. And I don’t see CJ getting much time at all unless there is an injury. I hope I am worng on that though, becuase if I am that means he is a stud. There is no real great need on paper for a young, light, inexperienced TE to see the light of day IMO.
"I’m sick of following my dreams. I’m just going to ask them where they’re going and hook up with them later." M.H.
by StoopsMyAss on Jun 18, 2010 10:44 PM CDT up reply actions
If we don't need him
throwing a redshirt on a guy with that much upside is nothing but a positive going forward.
It never gets to be easy
by chitownhawkeye on Jun 18, 2010 10:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Short of an injury, I have a tough time seeing him redshirt.
Unless he really fails to grasp the playbook or blocking. Ferentz’s MO has been to let guys get their feet wet (see: Keenan Davis, Jordan Bernstine, Brad Herman, Shaun Prater, Micah Hyde), even if they wind up not playing much and leading fans to think that their freshman year has been “wasted.” (Although, as we found out with Bernstine last year, having that redshirt year can come in handy down the road if the injury bug stirkes.)
Lately, Ferentz seems to redshirt mainly guys on the line who need the extra year to develop their bodies for Big Ten competition and quarterbacks. My guess: CJ shows flashes and plays, but not as much as we like so we bitch about not redshirting him, and then he has a pretty big season in 2011 as the main TE.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I recall that Ferentz leaves it up to the player
as to whether he wants to redshirt or not. I’m sure Ferentz first makes the offer (which I would think means he doesn’t think the kid will play much) and then suggests the pros and cons but that is what I recall. And I would be shocked if CJ is offered and even if offfered I would not expect him to take it. I just don’t think, short of injury, he will play a lot of meaningful minutes. If Reisner and Herman stay healthy all year, then CJ will get mop up and maybe some Keenan Davis time.
Also, I am kind of excited at the thought of us going to the double TE formation this year. That really worked well last year and was almost like a trick play for some teams. And of course, with the offensive line being on the light side to begin with I would expect the TEs to be used a great deal on short yardage and to add to the protection.
"I’m sick of following my dreams. I’m just going to ask them where they’re going and hook up with them later." M.H.
Yeah, I think guys like CJ come here expecting to play right away.
I would be very surprised to see him ask to redshirt. And I agree that he may not see all that much PT next year (unless we get a spate of TE injuries). His PT will be determined by his aptitude at picking up the playbook and the blocking schemes.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I agree,
like every team does. This kid is in here to block ( which he is is ) then pow, I got a big gain on your ass.
by ChryslerKinnick on Jun 19, 2010 12:50 AM CDT up reply actions
I could see The Hat getting some split wideout from time to time.
Even with the good receiving corps. If you get 6’7", 250, 4.55 out wide with 5’10" 195 covering… yeah, you’ve got some options. And if it’s a 6’3" 240 lb LB covering? whew
The guy is a match-up night mare for the NFL right now (based purely on measureables, obviously). If any of it is real along with his pass-catching ability, he’ll see a lot of time in some capacity.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
If The Hat truly
has that good of speed, I wouldn’t be suprised to see him motion out to a slot every now and then…that could cause trouble for a nickel package on defense, or even a linebacker with not so great coverage skills. Should be interesting. I see Reisner and possibly Herman taking over a majority of the blocking, especially on obvious run downs, for atleast the first two or three games…this position could become an issue if there is an injury or two.
by United We Stanzi on Jun 18, 2010 10:14 PM CDT reply actions
Scott Chandler ver 2.0
Now with actual athleticism!
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
by HoyaGoon on Jun 19, 2010 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
This is one of the things I like about Kirk...
The easiest and probably best choice for most coaches would be to throw a red shirt on a player like the Hat. Iowa will be in big-game-hunting mode this season and a freshman can screw things up right quick.
The Hat will get a chance to produce and help the team. I love that confidence. Look where it got us with TMFS.
Reisner will do just fine, BTW.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Jun 19, 2010 12:11 AM CDT reply actions
Remember when Tenacious D got old and played out?
Me neither, plenty of potatoes
Gotta get up to get down
I have a feeling Reisner will get the lion's share of playtime
But I’d bet we’re going to see some TE by committee. We could see polish hat lining up in the slot, we could see different guys rotating in for different series… keeping them fresh and injury-free. When the 4th quarter comes around, a fresh set of TE legs against a safety that’s been out there chasing the ball and receivers all game could prove a big difference maker.
I know the coaches will put all of these guys in the position to succeed. It’s strange, it seems like, unlike other positions where you have some awesome starters and then complete question marks immediately behind them, TE is very deep but without a true standout. It’s always a good problem to have too much talent, it means that if the injury bug bites you can be confident it won’t affect production.
Brunettes not fighter jets
Possible that one of the TEs moves to the defensive line?
I seem to recall Morehouse mentioning in the chat/article after the spring non-game that one of the backup TEs (Grimm? Furlong?) looked pretty shaky with his pass catching and thought a move to the d-line (given lack of depth) was imminent for him. Anyone else remember this/make it look like I know what the hell I’m talking about?
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
I've heard one of the younger TEs does have a bit of a stone hands problem.
I think it was Gimm, but I’m not positive.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I think it was...
J.D. Griggs. If you look at the link below, Morhouse said he had 2 drops in the spring “game.”
We have a lot of TEs with last names that begin with “G”: Griggs, Gimm, and Dakota Getz. And, they are all Sophs or younger. Get used to mixing these dudes up for the next 3 years.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Jun 19, 2010 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions
And,
Griggs is 6-5 and 260, so D-Line wouldn’t be out of the question.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Jun 19, 2010 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Yes, it probably was Griggs.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
Yup, the upside was talked about going in...
…but he seemed a bit nervous (like he knew what was on the line) and just stone handed some catches (also, not all of the passes were great coming from #2/3/4 QBs).
I’d like to see a bit more, because he seemd like he could close off a side of the field, but his receiving (which reportedly had been there) didn’t show up that day.
by Eyeheartfreedumb on Jun 21, 2010 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions
Reisner
is no slouch. He will have this starting spot all year, barring injury. While I could see Polish Hat getting some time, in good situations for him, I’m not sure he will even play more than Herman.
Reisner has had some real nice catches for us. If you compare his per-season numbers to Moeaki’s first year, they are very similar. I’d expect Polish Hat to have similar numbers, or maybe just a bit better, at most. Polish Hat might be more likely to match Moeaki’s longs of 50+ yards, but I think Reisner still keeps most of the catches and TDs.
Reisner’s stats:
2007 2 rec, 31 yds, 0 TDs, a long of 25.
2008 11 rec, 200 yds, 1 TD, a long of 38.
2009 14 rec, 143 yds, 1 TD, a long of 29.
Moeaki’s stats:
2005 8 rec, 112 yds, 0 TDs, a long of 36.
2006 11 rec, 140 yds, 3 TDs, a long of 35.
2007 14 rec, 170 yds, 3 TDs, a long of 52.
2008 13 rec, 144 yds, 1 TD, a long of 48.
2009 30 rec, 387 yds, 4 TDs, a long of 54
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
You can't look at TE utilization without factoring the wide-outs.
The wide-outs are exceptional this year; it lowers the bar for the tight-ends. I don’t think CJ plays until he is a proven blocker. No reason to rush a receiving TE onto the field when you have McNutt and DJK, and Reisner (Reisner has the best hands on the team, according to Morehouse). To me that means the #2 TE must block first and well.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
Not to mention a slew of decent receivers down the depth chart
Chaney and Sandeman both stepped up when needed last year, and if Davis lives up to the hype he could emerge as a legit #3 and another big play threat.
Receivers are probably coming soon to ATP...
…but has anyone heard anything about PCJ? Track just ended (which had me feeling for the kid— he is track first, football second as far as I’ve ever heard) and I was thinking about the recovery time for his injury. Homecoming (PSU) will be 1 year (which seems to be enough time), but I haven’t heard anything about what he’s up to, or if he’ll be back.
by Eyeheartfreedumb on Jun 21, 2010 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions
CJ
I wouldn’t want him to play as a true freshman for no other reason than I wouldn’t want any player on the Iowa team to think they’re entitled to playing time, or passes thrown to them, etc because they were highly recruited or hyped. If he can show to Ferentz et al that he fits the team model in every way (physically, mentally…spiritually (ALL HAIL STANZI!)), then by all means, throw him into the frying pan. Otherwise, I say he should learn by watching.
I think that the last few years have shown us that true freshmen can earn playing time
But I think that they have to earn it, not show up entitled to it. Only 3 true freshmen saw playing time last year (Hyde, Davis, and Wegher). I think that a combination of talent, work, and injuries up the depth chart probably contributed to that. It’s still a fairly low number, but I think that if CJ impresses the staff this summer he could play, IF he earns it. This isn’t a staff that’s going to give somebody entitlement time. Besides, the game we really need him for isn’t until next year when Illinois comes back on the schedule (assuming the Zooker is still there and that they still end up on our schedule with the addition of NE to the conference).
Expect a fair amount of two-TE and three-TE formations this year.
Especially given the need to support a young and developing OL. Fedora-Witch will not be interested in redshirting, based what I’ve seen him say in the creepy reports. So I expect him to get significant time on offense, even though Reisner will be our #1 TE from September to January, barring injury, and deservedly so. I think CJ will be in the mix with Herman and company for the 2nd and 3rd TE positions, when utilized.
"In case you can't tell, I'm being sarcastic!" - Homer Simpson


















