It's Not Plagiarism If You Link To It Takes a Stroll Down Evy Street
Just a reminder: INPIYL2I is the BHGP daily roundup of vaguely Iowa-ish news. Tips can go to hawkeyestatebhgp@gmail.com.
Enter Cirroc. Scott Dochterman, master of the FOIA action, has put his legal department to good use and obtained a copy of the Iowa-ISU football contract, entered into by Bloodpunch and The Inconsolable One two years ago. It boilerplate legalese for the most part: Each team has the right to broadcast the game pursuant to its own conference's television deal, each team has to provide a radio booth for the other, "whereas" makes an appearance here and there, etc.
The interesting stuff, however, is in paragraph 13 on page 3:
Notwithstanding the terms set forth in paragraph 11 above, during this contract, should either school's conference add additional conference football games, that school shall be entitled to request that the parties seek to renegotiate the contract terms for the remaining contract years that are affected by the conference scheduling change. Both schools agree to make every effort to work with their respective conferences to keep this issue from arising.
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer would like to point out that both teams are now in breach of contract; if both schools were required to "make every effort" to prevent their respective conferences from adding games, Iowa would be contractually required to oppose any expansion plan that would add a conference championship game, and Iowa State would have to oppose any Big 12 salvage operation that would add a ninth conference game (as is widely rumored). This is actually hideous contract drafting, as there's no indication whether Iowa or ISU is required to raise any issues now or can save them for later. The argument can certainly be made that either team can now walk away from this contract at any time. Guess which team is more likely to exercise its rights.
Signs of Spring (And, by Spring, I Mean Gambling Season). The Golden Nugget (the finest sports book located next to a Binion's Horseshoe in all of Nevada!) has published early lines on every game of even modest consequence (T/F/J to our pals at Tomahawk Nation). The bookies know what they're doing, and they have Iowa finishing 11-1. The Hawkeyes are favored over Iowa State (-14), Arizona (-2.5), Penn State (-3), Michigan (-3), Wisconsin (-3), Michigan State (-7.5), and Minnesota (-9, which is basically a gift to you), and are only a four-point underdog to Ohio State. Should the season actually end that way, I think we'd all be OK.
To Forest (This Time, from the University of Iowa). We've made no secret of the fact that we love Forest Evashevski, former Iowa head football coach and athletic director, winner of Rose Bowls, conquerer of the Fainting Irish, wearer of fur. Evy, who died last year at the age of 91, is neglected and misunderstood by modern fans; we all talk about Hayden Fry and Kirk Ferentz, but there is no doubt who is the greatest coach in the program's history. That's why this move is long overdue:
An Iowa City street near Kinnick Stadium will be renamed in honor of the contributions made by Forest Evashevski, the Hawkeye football coach from 1952-60.
Stadium Drive will be renamed Evashevski Drive.
The street begins at the Hawkins Drive intersection near the northeast corner of Kinnick Stadium, bends around the north and west grandstands of Kinnick Stadium and the adjacent parking lot, and ends when the street intersects with Melrose Avenue immediately west of the Krause Family Plaza.
It is painfully obvious why Evashevski has been overlooked by the athletics department: his tenure as athletic director was an unmitigated disaster, as he meddled in the football program and mishandled the Black Boycott. With that said, his record has a head coach is without peer, and the story of his life is phenomenal. It's a shame it took his death for the University to recognize his contribution, but better late than never.
KWIKHITZ: In the wake of Doug Schwab's departure for the Mediterranean climate of Cedar Falls, former Iowa wrestler and veteran bench coach Mike Zadick has been named interim assistant by Tom Brands. Ross will have to chime in on what that might mean, because I'm still over here watching WWE Monday Night Raw. Former Steve Alford assistant (and, interestingly enough, former Sherman Dillard assistant) Greg Lansing has been named as Kevin McKenna's replacement at Indiana State (also in that story, the news that Lickliter assistant Lavall Jordan has joined the Michigan staff). It's an Iowa-centric day on BTN; be sure to catch the 1953 football yearbook premiere at 7:30 CST, because you want to see the Fainting Irish far more than some stupid Obama speech. And EA Sports is killing the productivity of the American workforce.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hmm?
In the wake of Doug Schwab’s departure for the Mediterranean climate of Cedar Falls, former Iowa wrestler and veteran bench coach Mike Zadick has been named interim assistant by Tom Brands. Ross will have to chime in on what that might mean, because I’m still over here watching WWE Monday Night Raw.
John Cena sucks so damn much.
Anyway. What it means? Probably not much, except Zadick moves up one spot on the bench. Oh, and someone will have to take his spot. I’m sure we’d all love to see Metcalf be that spot-taker.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
Kurt Backes, former Clone. I guess the Brands Bros. don’t want to break ALL Cyclones like a twig.
by stpaulhawkeye on Jun 15, 2010 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm no lawyer, but
I’m not sure if a conference championship game counts as a “conference game” in the contract. A BigTex(and friends) round robin schedule definitely would put Iowa State in breach (not that they will even pretend to do anything about it), but adding a conference championship game does not impact the ability of the Hawkeyes to schedule 4 OOC games. If the BigTen does go to a 9 game regular season schedule, then yes, that’s a problem.
The rumor is..
that they want to do a 9 game regular season conference schedule, and then add a conference championship after that. That’s what they are talking about causing the cancellation of the contract, not the championship game itself.
That's true
but I absolutely could make the argument that a conference championship game (seeing as how it’s a regular season game and all) is an additional game on the schedule with a straight face. If Iowa wanted to make a move away from the ISU game, it could. It would be in for a fight, but it could nonetheless.
Before you respond, let me remind you: Brian Cook called me smug, which makes me the Obama of smugness. I'm basically Smugbama.
by Patrick Vint on Jun 15, 2010 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions
Is it a regular season game if only two teams get the 13th game?
Or is it more of a pseudo-bowl game since the participants have to play their way into it? Without it being explicitly stated in the contract how to treat said championship game, there’s probably a compelling argument to be made either way.
That’s the thing I get hung up on in that contract. It seems like the spirit of the contract is to prevent either team from being locked into one of three out of conference games with each other instead of one of four as it currently stands.
The Big XII wants to?
Makes sense, with a 10-team conference. I don’t know that it gains a whole lot for us.
You missed the part where it says
Iowa State must ask Texas before they do anything
by ChryslerKinnick on Jun 15, 2010 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Fixed
You missed the part where it says Iowa State must ask remove its lips from Texas’s cock before they do anything
"You don't become a Hawkeye fan, You're born with Black and Gold in your veins." - Me
by BStylin Hawkye on Jun 15, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions
Please
ISU is never allowed to remove its lips. Instead, it must submit a written request to Texas, all the while never (1) removing Texas’ manhood from its mouth and (2) looking Texas in the eye.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
by HoyaGoon on Jun 15, 2010 6:17 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
My anti-virus
just blocked your comment.
Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.
by Kyle McCann't on Jun 16, 2010 1:17 AM CDT up reply actions
I read that clause differently
I don’t see it as saying, “You need to oppose expansion or you’re in violation of the contract.” Instead, I see it as, “You need to work hard to preserve this game on the schedule, should your non-conference games be taken up with additional conference games.” In that case, the clause is akin to the “paying a settlement clause without admitting fault” sort of deal. Put another way, it’s the school’s lawyers of saying, “Look, fellas, try hard to keep this game in place, even if your conferences go all wacky on us.”
A violation of the contract would only occur if either school didn’t at least make a good-faith effort to preserve the rivalry game, regardless of conference games. My opinion, at least.
by imadirtyoldman on Jun 15, 2010 11:43 AM CDT reply actions
It Went Like This
Barta: The contract says you will “make every effort to work with their respective conferences to keep this issue from arising.” Did you do that?
Pollard: Oh yes, absolutely.
Barta: What did you do exactly?
Pollard: Well, at the AD’s meeting, when I got back with the coffee for everyone they were talking about adding a conference game and I said “Hey fellas, we have this contract with Iowa that has an escape clause if we do this, and I’d really rather we kept it at 8 games so we don’t lose the Iowa game. It’s a money maker for us.”
Barta: And what was their reply?
Pollard: They told me I forgot the dounuts.
Facts sometimes have a strange and bizarre power that makes their inherent truth seem unbelievable. - Werner Herzog
by Flakbait on Jun 15, 2010 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Other interesting contract notes
1. Para. 7 extends TV broadcast rights through the entire universe. Think you’ve got a loophole that gives you Neptune on the sly? Nope. Not with this ironclad deal.
2. para. 10’s force majeure may apply here. Conference realignment may be an “unusual circumstance outside the parties’ reasonable control.”
3. The reason i popped it open in the first place was to see if it had any governing law or dispute resolution procedures. It’s governed by Iowa law, and I bet if I weren’t so stupid and lazy I could find an on-point provision that makes this a Regents issue. In other words, the Regents won’t let one school sue another: that just moves money from one part of their budget to a different part of the budget while paying a bunch of lawyers in the process (not that there’s anything wrong with that, btw). That’s what lets you do such light-weight contracts — you know that beyond the material terms about where the game gets played and the date, it’s all up to the politicians anyway. At least, that’s my uneducated guess.
Couldn't they just move this game
up in the season? If the Big Ten makes Iowa add another conference game to it’s schedule and it fell on the date they had picked for the Iowa-ISU game, couldn’t they just have the ISU game a different weekend instead of bringing in Ball State or someone boring? I’ve definitely lost interest in the series now that Iowa is really good and has a shot at winning the Big Ten conference title (knock on wood), but back in the dark days when we were a lowly 6-6 team, the Iowa-ISU game was one of my favorites. I’d hate to see it go, if for no other reason than I love watching us put the beat down on ISU.
by LoveItOrLeaveIt on Jun 15, 2010 1:12 PM CDT reply actions
If it's just a date conflict
they’ll figure it out. The bigger issue is, if there are only three non-conference games, do you dedicate one of them to ISU every year? That leaves one slot for the opening weekend cupcake and one more where you choose between a mid-major home game or a BCS home-away series. Losing a game in Kinnick every other year costs a lot of money to the U and the community.
Facts sometimes have a strange and bizarre power that makes their inherent truth seem unbelievable. - Werner Herzog
Not sure how to get a hold of you
but I have a few old Iowa VHS if you’re interested.
Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.
by Kyle McCann't on Jun 20, 2010 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Remarkably casual contract.
Reads more like an MOU to me, with ambiguities large enough through which to drive a stock truck. But I guess the real point of it is only two-fold: to assure the world of an ongoing home-and-home arrangement, and to terminate the unbalanced line of ISU-favoring revenue sharing in 2012 (the only deal point captured by Iowa?). I don’t see how it could be reasonably assumed that Iowa would hold up any conference expansion or realignment in order to held in breach, though that is beside the point. I think Indy is right and this series is now too big to fail, and controlled by the politicos, and likely to continue in some form no matter what happens.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
"That belt was a gift! From Texas, because they like us so much! >sob<"
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I noticed that fruity belt as well.
That must be stylish in L’Ames.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Jun 16, 2010 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions
DeLoss Dodds...
beats him with it.
Fetch the belt, boy!
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Jun 16, 2010 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions
Hey. I *know* what a inland Mediterranean climate is, you freaks.
And I went to school @ UNI for one year.
Sacramento is 57 right now. Cool. It will be 90. But with like 10% RH and the ocean breeze from the Delta will start blowing around 2:00, so it won’t feel hot at all :)
My blog: http://www.gretainthebox.com




















