Minnesota 27, Iowa 24: The Song Remains The Same
* Well played (and well built), Minnesota. Before engaging in any sort of self-flagellation, let me take a moment to doff my cap to Minnesota, who played hard and well for sixty minutes. They entered the game with a gameplan seemingly built on exploiting Iowa's weaknesses and followed it well. They played with passion and with flair (that onside kick call was genius and beautifully executed) and almost exactly like you would expect from a team that had nothing else to play for and that hadn't won a trophy game in four years. Bully for them. And, also, bully to the university (and the state) for building such a fine stadium: The Bank really is pretty impressive. The viewing angles were very good, the concourses were large and easy to maneuver in, the view of the downtown skyline in the open end was excellent, and the Jumbotron was impressive (and remarkably well-used; unlike most Big Ten venues, Minnesota regularly showed controversial or disputed plays on the screen, which was a nice surprise). And I'm sure it's even better when I can feel my toes.
* It feels like an insult to even call it "deja vu" at this point. If this was Hollywood, the script would be rejected for being too derivative. If this was high school, the teacher would fail you for committing plagiarism. For the fifth sixth (I guess we should include Indiana in this stat, too) time this year, Iowa took a lead (or a tie) in a close game in the fourth quarter... and for the fifth time this year they coughed it up and lost. The elements of this loss were virtually identical to the others, too. Bad special teams plays? Check -- see those persistently dreadful kickoffs. Lack of defensive pressure? Check -- see the inability to get any pressure on Adam Weber or slow down the Minnesota ground game at all. Dreadful two-minute offense? Check (kinda) -- we didn't really get a chance to see how this would go awry since Marcus Coker promptly fumbled the ball on the first snap of Iowa's last drive. And so on. At this point, Iowa's losses feel less like football games and more like watching Greek tragedies: you know what sort of horrible shit is coming, but you're utterly powerless to stop it.
* What a difference a year makes. A year ago, the Iowa football team was many things -- they were road warriors (5-1 away from Kinnick, including wins at Penn State, Wisconsin, Iowa State, Michigan State, and the Orange Bowl, as well as a narrow loss at Ohio State), they were clutch (five wins in games where they trailed or were tied in the fourth quarter), and they were closers (they outscored opponents 121-62 in the fourth quarter last year). A year later, this Iowa football team is none of those things. They're 2-3 away from Kinnick, with the only wins being a brutally ugly (and frankly lucky) win at Indiana and a way-too-close-for-comfort victory at the Big House, and they've only played well on the road in fits and spurts (a quarter against Arizona here, a few quarters against Michigan there, a drive or two against Northwestern and Minnesota, etc.). They're not clutch -- just look at the litany of fourth-quarter collapses. And they're not closers (they've actually outscored opponents 80-79 in the fourth quarter, a figure that seems like it should be far worse). What happened? Too many key players lost to graduation and injuries? Too many bad coaching decisions? Too much bad luck? All of the above? All of that, plus players who were previously extraordinary becoming suddenly ordinary (examples abound on both sides of the ball, but the two most prominent examples are probably at quarterback and on the defensive line, where prior excellence has turned into a whole lot of present putridness/mediocrity). Add it up and you have a recipe for disaster -- or a 7-5 season full of gut-wrenching losses.
* So what now? Well, a bowl game awaits, and possibly one as good as the Outback Bowl. A game like that is probably more than this team deserves after their nightmarish November, but (a) bowl games are often not about a team getting what they deserve, and (b) the middle class of the Big Ten is crowded with 7-5 teams entering the bowl season on losing streaks (Michigan and Northwestern enter on two-game losing streaks and Penn State's lost two of their final three). If the Outback (or Gator) thinks Iowa fans will still turn up in droves to watch their team play on January 1, then they'll still get the nod to play in one of those games, three-game losing streak be damned. Hopefully the month off allows the coaches and players to identify whatever broke in this team in November and end the season on a relative high note and build a little momentum for 2011. Look, obviously a win in whatever bowl game Iowa gets sent to isn't going to salvage this season, a season that began with a top ten ranking and dreams of a national title or a Rose Bowl trip. Beating, say, Mississippi State in the Gator Bowl isn't going to erase the disappointment of the last month -- but it would be a hell of a lot better to head into the off-season off a win than yet another dispiriting loss. As far as the future beyond that, anyone expecting mass bloodlettings is probably deluding themselves. For the short term, I'd settle for some long-term certainty at the defensive coordinator position and a focus on improving the perpetually disappointing special teams (which might mean creating a dedicated special teams coach). That would be a start.
* Finally...this year's been a disappointment for many reasons, but one that really stings is the way that it's tainted the memory of this senior class. Stanzi, Clayborn, Ballard, DJK, et al. were the driving forces behind countless great memories that we have from the 2008 and 2009 seasons and it would be a shame if their enduring legacy is not those memories, but the memory of the underwhelming and frustrating 2010 season, in which they were all (sans DJK, really) far lesser than they were in the past. It was a lot of fun to watch this group of players take Iowa from the painful lows of the 2006 and 2007 seasons to the euphoric highs of the (late) 2008 and (entire) 2009 seasons. It was unique to see the core of a team so unchanged for 3-4 years (although perhaps we overlooked the absences of some of the guys who did depart before this year...) and it was hugely enjoyable to follow a group of players with so much personality and so many great individual stories. At the moment, it's hard not to feel let down and disappointed, but I hope that as time passes those wounds can heal. I can't tell you what to think or how to feel -- just know that if you choose to remember them more for their failures than their successes, it probably says a lot about who you are as a fan than how good (or bad) they were.
316 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
*Sigh*
“I can’t tell you what to think or how to feel — just know that if you choose to remember them more for their failures than their successes, it probably says a lot about who you are as a fan than how good (or bad) they were.”
+1
Great analysis. Thanks RossWB!
Well done!
Sums it up for me pretty well. A high horse riding in, and a lowly jackass riding out. The “Ferentz gets paid too much” comments have already started up at the convenience store I run.
Too bad and very disappointing but these seniors gave us great memories and I will always remember that. Hope we can get a good bowl win in the end!
Jermelle Lewis is workin' the Minnesota D like a part time job.
Yeah, the "Ferentz gets paid too much" has been a meme since the 2005 season
He’s not getting paid for wins and losses. He’s getting paid because he’s made Iowa a perennially competitive and exciting team (harder than you’d imagine!) that puts butts in the seats and dollars in the athletic dept’s wallet, kept the program relatively clean, and commands universal respect as both a coach and a human being, thus being an ideal figurehead for Iowa’s athletic programs.
It will take quite a slide in performance before the “gets paid too much” takes any root in people who make decisions. E.g. a run of losing seasons, combined with a major off-field scandal.
Brunettes not fighter jets
In addition, the salary is a reflection of the market for his services
Iowa had to shell out of that kind of money for him, or he’d have left for the NFL in 2003 or so. I guess you could claim that we should have let him walk, but that seems a little silly since he’s produced two top 10 teams since then and the odds of us drawing in a coach of his caliber for less that than are pretty slim given the natural recruiting disadvantages that Iowa faces.
Maybe
But we can get a 7 win coach for half what we’re paying now. And there are always hot shot coordintors and MAC/WAC guys who want to make the jump.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
I have to agree partially
with rocky’s point that he is not paid entirely for wins and losses. He is paid for fielding a competitive team at a School that lacks the natural recruiting advantages and tradition of the “traditional powers”
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:38 PM CST up reply actions
He's paid to be CEO of Iowa Football, Inc., in other words
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Nov 29, 2010 12:39 PM CST up reply actions
I knee-jerked-reactioned KF salary earlier
and I was wrong, but I don’t know that I agree that we had to shell out the money. From what I remembered, to lazy to look it up since I’m waiting for the fucking UPS guy to get here, but I remember a quote/statement/or something like that, that KF said he was not going to leave, by his decision, until his last kid graduated.
I'm too lazy to look up his name
but Minnesota’s intermim coach said before the game that the team who played with more physicality in this one would come out the victor…and he was absolutely right.
I thought he was still playing BBall somewhere in Europe?
I miss him and Brunner…
I spent half my life's earnings on wine, women & song. The other half I wasted.
by therealCatnuts on Nov 29, 2010 11:31 AM CST up reply actions
This season was
flat out difficult to watch but I think I will always remember AC for his Orange Bowl performance, I will always remember Rick in the 4’th quarter against Indiana last year, and DJK jumps onto my list of Hawks that I will follow religiously in the NFL. Even with the disappointment that was 2010 I am going to miss these Seniors.
Also, the Gophers just reminded me why I hate them. I had no ill feelings towards them before this game, the rivalry has been renewed for me.
And one last point, not asking for rumors here, I know they are out there. How long is it before we find out what the Wegher situation was this year and what it is for next year. Is that book officially closed?
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 10:01 AM CST reply actions
Also
It seems that there just isn’t a great fit for Iowa in the bowl picture this year. With a downtrodden fanbase you’d want something new and exciting to get people to travel to the bowl game. Yet, we’ve been to Florida every year since Ponce DeLeon discovered the joint…and we already sent somewhere between 10-20K fans to the Pheonix area earlier this year…most of whom don’t want to go back.
I meant to add
I think if the Alamo were in the picture this year that might have been the best fit.
There are two other Texas bowls for Big Ten teams to go to (the, uh, Texas Bowl and TicketCity Bowl, I think).
So Iowa could go to a relatively fresh locale if they fall far enough in the bowl pecking order. I think the problem is that outside of the top three teams, hardly anyone in the Big Ten is too excited about their bowl destination. Penn State fell short of expectations, albeit not as dramatically as Iowa did. Michigan is back in a bowl for the first time in three years, but they got waxed in their last two games and RichRod’s future is still uncertain. Northwestern is back in a bowl, but they’ve barely been competitive with Persa out of the line-up. Illinois might be the most excited among the middle class Big Ten bowl teams — and given who they are their fans would probably rather save their money for a Sweet 16 trip.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
And I doubt that any 11-1 team's fans will be thrilled with the Citrus.
Yeah, MSU fans would probably have been happy with that at the beginning of the season, but as a reward for an 11-1 season it seems a bit underwhelming if that’s what happens.
A lot of fans
will use the bowl game as an excuse to get out of the Iowa winter for a few days. So there’s that.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
At least we're still getting press
From Sports Illustrated
By now, it’s abundantly clear there’s no point heaping high expectations on a Kirk Ferentz-coached team, because Iowa’s most hyped teams inevitably flop. An embarrassing 27-24 loss to rival Minnesota (3-9) put the finishing touches on a disappointing 7-5 season for a team that began the year ranked ninth in the AP poll. And because of the glut of other 7-5 Big Ten teams (Penn State, Michigan, Northwestern), the Hawkeyes may have cost themselves a New Year’s Day bowl appearance.
And the worst part of that is, it’s true.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
Yep.
I still don’t expect Iowa to get jumped by Northwestern — especeially a Persa-less jNW — but everything else in there is dead-on.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
On the bright side . . . .
Everyone is going to think Iowa will suck next year, so we’ve GOT THEM RIGHT WHERE WE WANT THEM!
I guess I can live with only being good when “under the radar” if those under-the-radar teams actually go out and win BCS Bowl games like they did in 2009.
I think
a 7-5 season next year will be pretty good considering the talent that we will be losing. I will have fun watching and talking with all of you regardless!
Welcome to Ohiowa, the great potato state!
Bret Bielema is a damned red-commie traitor.
Exhibit A as to why we won't be going to the Outback Bowl
honesty is the best policy…thanks niner
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 29, 2010 10:31 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I certainly don't think 7-5 is a ceiling next year
Looking through the schedule (no Ohio State, no Wisconsin) I’m feeling like 8-4 or 9-3 is very doable if the young guys are as talented as I think they are.
I will look back on the 2010 seniors with a combination of fondness and frustration, but mostly fondness. But I am always very excited to see new guys come in. That’s part of the beauty of college football.
Hell, maybe Vandenberg, or Derby or Ruddock is the next Chuck Long.
Hate to be playing the "next year" game, but...
I think Iowa has a great chance to finish a couple of games better next year, record-wise. You never know, but the OL should be very good, McNutt is awesome, running back a big plus if they stay healthy, both corners back, lots of young guys (unfortunately) got experience at LB, and Daniels proved to be a playmaker. Next year’s schedule is also pretty favorable.
by H I McDonnough on Nov 29, 2010 10:58 AM CST up reply actions
I'm keeping my expectations low for the coming season
I don’t know if the old ticker can handle another year like this year. I certainly would take a 9-3 year (or better) next year. But I would not be too upset if we did end up with a 7-5 record.
Welcome to Ohiowa, the great potato state!
Bret Bielema is a damned red-commie traitor.
True story...
For once it would be nice if they actually did come through when expectations where high.
Welcome to Ohiowa, the great potato state!
Bret Bielema is a damned red-commie traitor.
Of course with a a first-year starter at QB
KK will have to trim that massive, complex playbook by at least half.
Life is hard. It's really hard if you're stupid.
I hope you guys were being sarcastic.
If Vandy doesn’t know the playbook after 3 years, he never will.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Dec 1, 2010 12:15 AM CST up reply actions
Michigan could jump us.
We’ve got 3 teams ahead of us (MSU, OSU, Wisco) all 11-1 (7-1).
Assuming Illinois wins next weekk,
3 @ 7-5 (4-4) – Iowa, Illinois, PSU
2 @ 7-5 (3-5) – NW, Michigan.
Here’s the bowls
Rose Bowl – Jan 1 – Pasadena CA
Other BCS
Cap One – Jan 1 – Orlando FL
Outback – Jan 1 – Tampa Bay FL
Gator – Jan 1 – Jacksonville FL
Insight – Dec 28 – Tempe AZ
Texas Bowl – Dec 29 – Houston TX
TicketCity – Jan 1 – Dallas TX
Pizza Pizza – Dec 26 – Detroit, Rock City
Cap One will probably be MSU after they get fucked out of the Rose Bowl and BCS at large goes to OSU.
Outback will want Penn State. And who can blame them.
Gator takes Michigan because, well, why wouldn’t they. It would be stupid not to.
That leaves Us, Illinois & NW for the next three and who knows what criteria they will use. I don’t see us falling to the Ticket City but who knows. At least it would be Jan 1, right?
Detroit looks elsewhere, not enough Big 10 teams are bowl eligible.
I don’t know how the team jumping rules all get applied here but with 5 teams at 7 – 5 and only a half game difference in conference record, I think its a free for all.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
I think the really interesting thing here is what happens with Alabama.
There’s a chance Bama could fall to the Outback. In that case, will they want to have a match up for Penn State and Alabama that already happened this year? Taking Iowa is a known quantity for them (strong fan support), and a match up that produced one of the most memorable endings in bowl history the last time these two coaches got together.
Not saying it’s likely, but if I’m the Outback Bowl, and I get Alabama…I’d be ringing Mr. Bloodpunch on the double.
Black and Gold Blood: Cubbie Blue Heart
Twitter: @MattLaCasse
by MissouriHawk on Nov 29, 2010 1:39 PM CST up reply actions
I think Bama only falls to the Outback if South Carolina beats Auburn in the SECCG.
Otherwise, Bama and LSU/Arkansas will be in the Cap One and Cotton Bowl slots.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
So The Mexican't says, so it shall be.
Although it would probably help if the NCAA would declare Cam Newton ineligible, like, tomorrow.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I'd figure LSU/Arkansas for the Sugar and Citrus, Bama Outback.
Bama has more losses than either of the other two.
thank god we're still going bowling
recruits making visits the next few weeks can view real, somewhat meaningful practices instead of just a few guys dickin’ around in the weight room
Darkness warshed over the Dude - darker'n a black steer's tookus on a moonless prairie night. There was no bottom.
by AcrimoniousAngerererer on Nov 29, 2010 10:04 AM CST reply actions
ya know
Ricky Stanzi was never that good. He just had a few games where he put together a nice last drive. He was actually much better in 2010 than in 2009, which is saying something.
Same with the rest of this team. The difference between 10-2 and 7-5 is merely a matter of execution. Last year, we didn’t execute well, but somehow put it all together at the end of the game to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. This year, we executed a bit better over the course of the game, but when it really counted, we folded. Maybe our boys were trying too hard, or maybe they were reading their own press and getting complacent, who knows. But this team, at 7-5, is not that different from the team that went 10-2 during the season last year.
I’m just as frustrated as anyone at the tenor of the losses we’ve suffered this year, but conversely expectations were sky high to start the season, and perhaps unreasonably so.
Brunettes not fighter jets
I agree
I think the biggest difference, and the ones we miss the most are the changes at linebacker. I don’t think the linebackers we have this year are bad, in fact I would say they have done a decent job considering all of the injuries. However, if there is one thing that I would say that is missing this year from last is the coverage skills of Angerer and Edds. I didn’t realize how good they actually were until this year. The thing I keep reminding myself of is, we were in every game this year, so while it was highly disappointing, we did not get blown out. We fought through adversity and nearly came out on top of them all, but just didn’t have enough to get us over the hump.
Welcome to Ohiowa, the great potato state!
Bret Bielema is a damned red-commie traitor.
IF we would have had a group of linebackers that could consistently mark up on B10 WRs
and a shut down corner, this season would have been a lot different I think. Better LBs and CBs make those 4th quarter drives that has us all cursing go away… or at least makes them more difficult.
Agreed
Better coverage last year also gave the D Line more time to pressure the QB. Losing Speivey, Edds, and Angerer in pass coverage really impacted the defense. I don’t have time to look it up, but I’d wager Edds and Angerer had far more INTs and pass break-ups than this year’s group of LBs.
Hmm.
2009 LBs: 7 INT, 13 PBU
2010 LBs: 3 INT, 15 PBU
Not as big a gap there as I would have thought, although the coverage this year certainly seemed worse. What was definitely worse — both in terms of perception and actual stats — was the performance of the defensive line.
2009 DL: 52 TFL, 27 sacks, 20 QB hurries
2010 DL: 34 TFL, 14 sacks, 14 QB hurries
That was a fucking killer.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
by RossWB on Nov 29, 2010 1:45 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
There were about 94 reasons for that drop off.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
Please.
It was a hell of a lot more than just him. Klug was the only player who posted numbers anywhere close to what he did last year.
CLAYBORN
2009: 70 tackles (20 TFL), 11.5 sacks, 9 QB hurries
2010: 51 tackles (7 TFL), 3.5 sacks, 6 QB hurries
KLUG
2009: 65 tackles (13 TFL), 4.0 sacks, 3 QB hurries
2010: 52 tackles (11 TFL), 4.5 sacks, 5 QB hurries
BALLARD
2009: 54 tackles (9 TFL), 5.5 sacks, 5 QB hurries
2010: 40 tackles (4 TFL), 2.0 sacks, n/a QB hurries
BINNS
2009: 63 tackles (10 TFL), 6.0 sacks, 3 QB hurries
2010: 33 tackles (1 TFL), n/a sacks, n/a QB hurries
Obviously Daniels made up for some of Binns’ lost production (40 tackles, 11 TFL, 4.0 sacks, 3 QB hurries), but Binns still look an enormous step backwards this year that was costly and Ballard was worse, too. Clayborn was the most obviously down performer, but he was far from the only one.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
by RossWB on Nov 29, 2010 2:07 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Not to mention that
opposing offenses were using different blocking schemes and getting rid of the ball a lot quicker.
Templeton Rye'd the Lightning.
by Smokin Herb Grigsby on Nov 29, 2010 6:17 PM CST up reply actions
D-Line
It seems as though Binns may have had his career year in his soph season.
And while Ballard’s stats went down this year, I thought he was quite good toward the end of the year.
It will be interesting to see how next year goes at this position. Ideally, I’d like to put Daniels and Binns at DEs, but I’m not sure if we have big enough backups (most of them are smallish, except perhaps Nardo, and two frosh named Carl Davis and Mike Hardy).
Who knows. Maybe Daniels and Binns become the next Kroul and King next year.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 9:31 PM CST up reply actions
Those stats
certainly are surprising, but I think River Otter nailed it. Had our coverage been like it was last year (not blaming anyone in particular) I think our D-line would have gotten to the QB like last year. It seems to me that the formula for beating us this year is to get the ball out quickly before our linebackers can close on the receiver’s break and before the d-line got to the QB. I can recall plenty of times when our d-line was just a half-step too late.
Welcome to Ohiowa, the great potato state!
Bret Bielema is a damned red-commie traitor.
That's kind of a chicken/egg argument.
If the defensive line can get pressure quicker, the LBs/DBs don’t need to be covering receivers for as long. If the LBs/DBs can cover receivers longer, the defensive line gets an extra half-second or second to get to the QB. And round and round it goes. Ultimately, there was a breakdown on both levels for Iowa this year — and that seems a lot more excusable with the coverage side of things, given that they were forced to play a lot of freshmen/sophomores at CB/LB this year. It’s a lot less excusable along the defensive line, where we returned all four starters and had tons of experience.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
Well hard to disagree
with that argument. I guess I’m trying to find any reason other than the obvious one – our DL did not play up to our, and probably their, expectations. I guess if there is a silver lining, it is that our younger defensive players got some good game experience.
Welcome to Ohiowa, the great potato state!
Bret Bielema is a damned red-commie traitor.
Well put..........
That puts the season into perspective. The real shame to me is that this senior class was one of our best. I hope they are remembered more for what they accomplished last year than this November collapse. If there was one thing that was certain this year, it was the defensive line was going to be lights-out. It really shocked me that they were so ordinary. How can the same team team crush Michigan State and look so bad the rest of they way? It looked like they sleep-walked their way through November. I want KF to retire here, but starting Sandeman ahead of DJK because he had a better week in practice? Are you kidding me? I think it is remarkable DJ stayed here considering how Ferentz treated him. He is one of the best receivers in Iowa history. But he had a personality, and Coach hates it when the players speak their mind. So…time to move on…..I think Vandenberg has a chance to be really good….we shall see….
you think a guy that just got a 10 year contract extention would retire?
Darkness warshed over the Dude - darker'n a black steer's tookus on a moonless prairie night. There was no bottom.
by AcrimoniousAngerererer on Nov 29, 2010 10:11 AM CST up reply actions
I don't think he means he wants him to retire this year.
sounds like he wants KF to stay here until he retires.
by HawkeyeRecon on Nov 29, 2010 11:28 AM CST up reply actions
Ross, excellent write up!
Insightful, balanced, sane, thoughtful. All the things I avoid so as to ensure I get the first pick on appointment times each Tuesday with my social worker.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
DJK, I'll miss you most of all.
You could tell he left it all on the field, despite Kirk’s obsessive desire to keep him from having fun. Seeing him break down in tears as the student section chanted his name on senior day demonstrated to me that he was truly proud to be a Hawkeye, and was sorry to have to leave it all behind. I wish he could have had a better ending to his career here.
I find it hard to swallow that this is the kind of player that's not Kirk's cup of tea...
one of the many things that frustrated me about this year. Seeing this play out as it did was like watch a mother spank her child in the aisle of a grocery store for touching the canned string beans. It was too eerily similar to the way Lickliter dealt with players.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 29, 2010 10:34 AM CST up reply actions
It's not surprising though
Kirk learned from Fry & Bellichick, and they are both message control freaks. The guys doing the radio broadcasts had a contract clause where they could not say anything bad about iowa coaches or their decisions.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
Fry a message control freak?
Why yes, yes he was: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsWTHIKrtGc
One thing Fry’s press conferences had that Kirk’s don’t? Entertainment value.
DJK....
really was leaving it all on the field. The TD catch and the return for a TD really kept us in that game in the first half. I will never know why he is not in the game all the time when he clearly is the best WR that we have right now.
I really think
the way KF handled the DJK thing this season set us up for the late-season swoon. KF had these guys wound too tight, too on edge in fear of making a little mistake/going off message, that the second things went awry, they up and quit (except, ironically, DJK). KF seemed determined to not let this team have any personality or swagger to it, and unfortunately that’s exactly what he got.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
Breaking news...
Sandeman will get the start in the to-be-determined bowl game due to DJK scoring touchdowns and generally playing with enthusiasm against Minnesota unlike his teammates Sandeman having a better month of practice.
by Feelin' Orney on Nov 29, 2010 4:22 PM CST up reply actions
The Bank....
is a very nice upgrade from the dome, which is a shithole, and the jumbotron was very nice. My frozen feet made the fucking “who hates Iowa, we hate Iowa” chants even worse to listen to.
I know it seems like forever ago
They’re 1-4 away from Kinnick, with the lone win being a brutally ugly (and frankly lucky) win at Indiana,
…but pretty sure the win at Michigan still counts. Fuck. We DID win that won right? Memory fading….
No, right you are.
It only felt like a loss, because it was yet another fourth quarter chokejob — we just happened to have built up a big enough lead to withstand it that time.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
That, of course, being before the offense decided it could lean on the defense
Despite all the evidence to the contrary.
"Yeah, and that’s bullshit, cause Boise plays Kirkwood every other weekend".
Smokin' Herb Grigsby's Mom (+1, I say)
Thank god I don’t have to live and die with Iowa football next Saturday. I’m kind of done with them for awhile. I’ll remember these seniors fondly with a little more distance and I’d much rather they win a bowl game than lose. I’m sure we’ll never know what went south for this particular group, but it’s like they used up all their enthusiasm and fun for the season in the first half of MSU, never to be seen again. The whole thing is really baffling.
Exactly.
Love watching the Hawks, but after the way this season played out, it will be a relief to wake up Saturday morning and not have to worry about Iowa football.
Also, Dude, Chinamen is not the prefered nomenclature. Asian-American, please.
by Settles'7thYearOfEligibility on Nov 29, 2010 12:09 PM CST up reply actions
I hate felling like that
It never gets to be easy.
Why the fuck doesn't it ever get to be easy?
by chitownhawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 2:43 PM CST up reply actions
I am with you
And I’m not even sure how I feel about a bowl game right now. I am sure that feeling will pass, but with the way this season has gone capped by that performance against the goofers, I am pretty tired of IOWA football right now.
Life is hard. It's really hard if you're stupid.
Well said.
Disappointing is the word in every article about this team today, and it’s correct. My greatest disappointment is with a lack of intensity. We’re probably always going to live on the edge at Iowa, and I can handle close losses when we’ve left it all on the field, but it seems like Ferentz and his coaches just don’t control the emotion of their teams. You can’t force chemistry, but one of the biggest differences between this year and last was intensity and attitude of play. We can’t always have a Sanders or Angerer on the field, and at some points the coaches need to find a way to control the team’s attitude. Am I off base here?
"Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
Not at all.
Attitude and intensity have been two of my biggest issues with this years team.
by MP hawkfan on Nov 29, 2010 11:10 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Not at all.
Attitude and intensity have been two of my biggest issues with this years team.
by MP hawkfan on Nov 29, 2010 11:11 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Agree completely
At some level, someone needs to recognize the lack of enthusiasm and do something about it. I can handle losing if we’re playing to win (not playing to not lose), and showing some emotion. But this lifelessness we’ve been showing is what really bothers me.
Everyone knows God is a Hawkeye
I was thinking the same thing earlier today
Ferentz seems to be of the opinion that motivation/fire/desire/whatever you want to call it is something that the players have to manufacture themselves, that it is not the coaches’ responsibility. That’s great when you have a King or Angerer or Edds; but sometimes, YOU Kirk Ferentz need to be the one to fire up the players under your charge. It’s not enough to just hope they take care of it for you.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
If you look around the landscape of college football...
it is usually younger assistant coaches doing the barking and “motivating.”
Obviously, Ferentz is steady and not real loud.
Some of our assistants appear to be the same way: KOK, Erb, Morgan, maybe Campbell Phil Parker, Wilson. Obviously, Norm had health issues. That means it is basically Kacz and Johnson (I have noticed them on the Hawkeye football show) that have to be vocal and motivating. Perhaps this is also an area where the GAs can really help out, too.
A week or two ago, someone talked about what it would be like to have Gable on the football coaching staff. To me, it wouldn’t be the worst idea to have someone like him give a pep-talk once in awhile. Perhaps over time, Fran would be another option: “You just got beat down on that series. LET’S GET MAD AGAIN!!!”
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 9:41 PM CST up reply actions
A lot people are saying this
but do we actually have any clue what Kirk does during practice and in the locker room to pump (or not pump) these guys up? If someone does please feel free to chime in. But, if you think you know Ferentz doesn’t do these things based on how he acts in his press conferences, the only time the public gets to talk to him, you’re crazy.
Angerer said
that there are no motivational speeches at halftime, at least nothing worth mentioning. It was all very much about adjustements and such.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
When Iowa came out of halftime
the sideline reporter stated that the Iowa sideline was “quiet”.
An optimist could have interpreted that as determined. But how many people here heard that and interpreted it as resigned? I know I did.
It never gets to be easy.
Why the fuck doesn't it ever get to be easy?
by chitownhawkeye on Nov 30, 2010 3:20 PM CST up reply actions
From the player perspective.
A friend who played for Fry said that this is a common topic of conversation between former players. Fry’s teams consistently pounded lesser teams, where Ferentz’s teams tend to play to the level of the competition, which I think relates to this question of emotion and motivation. Clearly Fry and Ferentz are different kinds of coaches, but it was understoon under Fry that it was unacceptable to not perform at your best. Perhaps it’s true that this is something that needs to come from assistant coaches, but it seems someone needs to step up in this area.
"Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
And Fry did have some people who hated him.
Pat Fitzgerald has never forgiven Iowa for one comment that Fry made. I’m guessing ISU players/coaches from the era of the streak might feel a bit similarly.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Dec 1, 2010 12:14 AM CST up reply actions
Trying to look big picture
The more I think about this, the more I think that our offense is really the big problem here, and what is separating us from other top programs. Our defense wasn’t clutch this year, for sure, but I do think we had a good enough defense to win more games. Our offense isn’t getting it done, and hasn’t for years. This is Big 10 rank for offense and defense by yards per game:
Year (O rank, D rank)
2010 – 8, 2
2009 – 10, 3
2008 – 5, 3
2007 – 11, 5
2006 – 5, 7
2005 – 5, 4
2004 – 10, 2
2003 – 9, 4
Ave – 7.9, 3.8
We have a defense that is consistently a top 3-4 D in the league, while our offense is consistently near the bottom. That’s not getting it done. This year we had the most talent at skill positions on O that we’ve had in a long time – lots of experienced seniors – and we still can’t do better than 8th in O. Yes, stability has helped us, but its time to find a system/staff that can create more points.
by RodgersHasAHose on Nov 29, 2010 11:05 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Yes.
Even this year, the defense was good on the whole, bad in specific (and very harmful) situations. The offense has just been generally moribund for a very long time. There was an uptick from them in the first two months, but the power outtage in November was baffling — especially since they only played one good defense (OSU) in that span. Given the amount of experienced, talented players on offense, it’s even MORE baffling.
I’m not sure a wholesale change in scheme or anything is the answer — Wisconsin runs a very similar offense and has been scoring like crazy this year — but we definitely need to change something. The playcalling, the attitude (keep fucking scoring, don’t get satisfied at 17-20 points), the adjustments (i.e., making some), the scheming… something.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I think KF would disagree because we don't turn the ball over and produce high turnover margin stats.
In this he is the inverse of the RichRod school, which piles up huge numbers but screws up with sufficient frequency to negate all that frantic running around that Michigan does.
Another way to put this is: would KF prefer to have the third ranked offense but have a turnover margin of 0? I don’t think so. Here’s a fun thought: maybe our offense is playing to the coach’s expectations, in many respects.
We play tackle football, most of the time.
Yes, but this year proves this isn't working
Ricky had a terrifically efficient year and we were one of the national leaders in TO margin. And still nothing special. Sometimes we can’t rely on TOs to get points, but need to create points. Another thing, a better O helps our D. When we get out to a nice lead, other teams have to break tendencies and throw (see MSU) and we eat them up. I think our D would is even better when the O is cooking.
by RodgersHasAHose on Nov 29, 2010 11:34 AM CST up reply actions
Maybe he is focusing too much on keeping our negative stats down
and not enough on shooting the positive stats through the roof. Like the equivalent of a basketball coach focusing only on rebound and turnover statistics while forgetting that even the best defense can’t win a game without making baskets.
“Defense wins games” only works if the offense holds up it’s end of the bargain as well.
by HawkAtHeart on Nov 29, 2010 11:52 AM CST up reply actions
an offensive, killer mindset
when has Iowa ever had that, save 2002? I recall the games earlier this year against EIU, ISU, Ball State, PSU – all games Iowa could have used to really get some offensive swagger and mojo going. Instead, here comes the ball control slow-down play conservative approach. Wisconsin certainly didn’t do that this year and it paid huge dividends for them. These are 18-22 year old kids, let them effen destroy and bury the other team if they can’t stop them and get those big play repetitions, the kind that eat huge chunks of yardage, into their sense and muscle memory. Think of the kind of confidence and swagger that kind of approach could potentially instill in a team. I think the older Kirk gets, the more he becomes like the bad Paterno. Entirely too predicable. Entirely too conservative.
well then we just have to wait for senility....
and all hell will break loose!!!!! :)
fightin for president stanzi's fightin americanzis since his first 13 yard charge - syracuse '07
by metcalfrhymeswithblodbath on Nov 29, 2010 12:01 PM CST up reply actions
BRAAAAIIIIIINNNNNNNNNSSSSSSSSS
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:12 PM CST up reply actions
Wait,
first Wisconsin is run by a bunch of douche bags who run up the score but now they have an awesome and efficient offense? Which is it?
Both?
I don’t think that these two are opposed to each other.. Biliema is a douche who runs up the score with his awesomely efficient offense.
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:52 PM CST up reply actions
Ok, I should re-word that.
We don’t want to be like Wisconsin because they’re douches, but now we want to be like Wisconsin because they score a lot of points even though they’re douches. I don’t want to be a douche.
This is just how I’m reading most of this thread. I’m probably over-interpreting things.
Well, considering that Wisconsin is like US
And we’re not so much like Wisconsin, I think it would make more sense if we just said that we’d like our offense to be that efficient.
I think the point
is that Wisconsin doesn’t randomly abandon something that is working offensively. In a way, they’re not even running up the score. It’s a running offense, so if the defense can’t stop that, he’s not just going to call kneel downs.
It never gets to be easy.
Why the fuck doesn't it ever get to be easy?
by chitownhawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 2:49 PM CST up reply actions
+1
That was the most frustrating thing to watch this year – going away from things that work. I understand keeping them off-balance, but if we are wearing them down with certain play calls, keep doing it, at least until they can prove that they can stop it.
Welcome to Ohiowa, the great potato state!
Bret Bielema is a damned red-commie traitor.
Wisconsin threw once in the 2nd half vs. Michigan.
Once. Think about that.
They have an OL that is in sync and just mauling people. They have a smart, efficient, veteran QB. They have great running backs. They have almost everything Iowa doesn’t.
We have a decent OL, a decent QB, and decent running backs. Theirs are great.
by DonnyDonovan on Nov 29, 2010 3:04 PM CST up reply actions
Theirs are also healthy.
The RBs, I mean.
So just shut your face and take a seat, 'cause after all, you're just talking meat.
by Bucketochicken on Nov 29, 2010 5:20 PM CST up reply actions
Sometimes
you just need to go out and throw a bad team against the wall, beating them mercilessly. If for no other reason than to prove to your own team that you have that ability/talent and give them confidence going forward. Ferentz pulls the plug far too quickly. It’s one thing not to want to embarrass another coach/team, but that’s what the MACrifices and EIU’s of the world are there for, take advantage of it.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
We beat
EIU 37-7, ISU 35-7, and Ball State 45-0 with any points scored coming in meaningless 4th quarter time. You really think we needed to win these games by a larger margin?
Yes
but, to be fair, we probably would have beaten EIU by more if not for a couple of red-zone turnovers/miscues. I’m not saying play the starters in a blowout (coughMSUgamecough), but I am saying you don’t immediately take your foot off the gas once you get up by more than 10 points as Ferentz seems far to willing to do.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
While there is something to be said
for learning how to play in tight games, there is also value in a blow out. Get some reps for backups and teach the guys that yes, we are good. Plus, trying uncertain techniques at game speed (against an opponent that you are not likely to fail spectacularly against) can be extremely valuable.
It never gets to be easy.
Why the fuck doesn't it ever get to be easy?
by chitownhawkeye on Nov 30, 2010 12:26 AM CST up reply actions
I agree.
Looking back, in most of the games lost, the offense should have created much bigger leads. To me, the biggest problem always has been and always will be (until they change) the offense.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
If we're counting Indiana in "deja vu"
Then we might consider counting both jNWU’s 4Q scoring drives.
I think we know who Iowa is now.
Some of the dark emotions related to a belief or hope that the program reached an inflection point in 2006 and slowly climbed to a higher plain, with this year being the last step before which we are annually in the small group of well-coached, successful teams that perpetually outplay their apparent peers.
But I don’t think that storyline is accurate. We’ll play everybody close, we’ll always have a brilliant signature win each year or at least every other year, but we’re a .600 team against BCS clubs — in the best case. It’s probably enough to keep the stadium filled and the athletic department funded. But the team that made a big step this year to eye-opening prominence and frequent dominance was Wisconsin, not Iowa. Iowa is back to figuring out how not to play down to the level of inferior teams (e.g., Indiana) and how to somehow, someday beat Northwestern, and how to develop the sort of confidence and esprit de corps that carry the team wins over any team Iowa leads with five minutes left in the game.
There won’t be any changes, to speak of, and our quarterbacks will continue to go sideways or regress the longer they play, and we’ll continue to run out of running backs, and flamboyance will result in benchings while more prosaic, less talented sorts will get reps because they always do and say what the coaches prefer. We’ll tackle as well if not better than anyone in the Big Ten, and we’ll continue to move above-average numbers of well-schooled, old-school athletes to the NFL.
This program — the KF era — is no longer ‘becoming’ something new. It is a middle-aged program. I almost see it as a developmental team for the NFL, in the sense that we value skills, an organizational focus, and managerial control more highly than winning. We either have to enjoy that or get another pastime to over-study.
I am always more interested in organizational behavior and leadership, and the subtleties of strategy, than the fun blind faith rah rah stuff that is equally, and perhaps more, important. I mean, this is just college football, head outside and yell for a few hours and enjoy it. So no need to rap my knuckles for calling Iowa a middle-aged program; I get it. But no one can tell me Iowa was ready to play and wanted to play on Saturday, or against Indiana, or with the game on the line in several 2010 contests. This team just did not step up and flatten the teams it should have flattened, and it did not step up and elevate its intensity and desire and — yes — thinking, in the tough games we led and should have won. That 5th gear, that bigger hammer in the toolbox, that gleam that characterized Iowa in its best wins — they didn’t exist.
We play tackle football, most of the time.
by Bellanca on Nov 29, 2010 11:20 AM CST reply actions 3 recs
You know, a Badger might have written your post about UW last year . . .
No offense, Bellanca, but one thing that drives me crazy is people making assumptions about the directions of a program based on the results of a team.
As a former Madisonian, I still follow Badger football pretty closely. What has been fascinating to me over the past 10 years or so, is how often the two fanbases use their adversary as the measuring stick. It makes sense, as both are “right there” in terms of being Big 10 powers, but still a step behind Ohio State.
But the amusing thing to me is the schizophrenic nature of this analysis. Depending on the year, it’s Badger fans going OMG, IOWA IS TAKING THE NEXT STEP AND LEAVING US IN THE DUST AND WE’LL NEVER GET THERE WITH BIELEMA. And then the next year it is Iowa fans going OMG, BIELEMA HAS IT FIGURED OUT AND NOW UW IS GOING TO BE AN ELITE PROGRAM LEAVING US IN THE DUST!
Here’s a crazy though. Maybe Iowa AND Wisconsin are both developmental programs that every once in awhile get a great team put together (UW’s offensive line may be the best in the conference since Iowa in 2002) and then have a stellar season.
I just have a huge problem with letting one season’s results somehow become an indictment on a PROGRAM’S trajectory. Time and time and time again, it has been shown that one particular team’s foibles are not necessarily indicative of program direction.
Hell, I’m coming around to the belief that really the main thing that derailed this season is simply a group of seniors and team leaders who, once they realized that their reasonable pre-season dreams could not be obtained, simply mentally checked out. That totally sucks and is inexcusable. But to me, that says more about that team than the program.
by Torbee on Nov 29, 2010 11:34 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
It's not just one season
with the exception of last year, we’ve been stuck in “meh” since 2005. That’s 5 out of 6 years. The D is usually really good, the O is usually not. So Bellanca’s and my and a lot of other people’s opinions on the status and future of this program are being heavily influenced by that, whether they realize it or not. The glory of 02 – 04 isn’t even in the rear view mirror anymore.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
by Flakbait on Nov 29, 2010 11:43 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Incorrect.
2008 wasn’t really meh. We had what was probably the nation’s best RB. We had a big win over a top-5 team (PSU).
And how do you talk about the last 5 years and just set aside 2009 like that. It was the first BCS win of a half-century in the program. It included another win over a top-5 opponent (PSU), this time at their place. We took OSU to OT in the shoe with a backup QB. Don’t act like it doesn’t count.
Where was all this talk about our lack of enthusiasm last year when we were playing 4th quarters like clutch sons-of-bitches?
This year, we act like it is some sort of lack of will that lost us all our games. I disagree. Yes, our offense (and sometimes defense) needed to step up and play better in the IU, jNW, and Minnesota games. But, it certainly appears now that we dominated a couple of decent-to-good teams (PSU and MSU). And it appears that we lost in the last few minutes to a couple of very good teams (OSU, Wisky). We absolutely shot ourselves in the foot against AZ.
It is OK to be bummed out. But to act like we are in some type of vortex that will eventually pull us to the bottom third of the conference (and to blame it on Ferentz and the coaches that have taken us to two Big Ten titles and our only BCS win in 50 years) is just letting the depression get the better of you.
And if there is anything I’m an expert in in the last couple years, it is letting depression get the better of me. But I can’t do it now. Next year starts in 4 weeks. We’ll probably be in the Outback or the Gator Bowl, and I foresee our seniors gearing up for that game and playing to make memories for 2010. I think it will be a re-enactment of Bastogne, not Waterloo.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 10:03 PM CST up reply actions
Oh yeah.
And in 2008, we stuck it to a national-championship-winning coach in the bowl game. Just like the end of 2004.
But I guess that’s just “meh.”
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 10:17 PM CST up reply actions
This year, we act like it is some sort of lack of will that lost us all our games.
Reporter: Is there something broken, something unplugged?
Adrian Clayborn: Our will to win i guess. I mean, the last 4 games, or however many, in the 4th quarter, we always lose it.
Get it now?
Clayborn has been frustrated for a month.
And some people have been questioning his own work ethic.
While AC has done great things for Iowa, let’s not take his word as gospel right this moment. If another player echoes those sentiments, then I can buy it.
And in fairness, we would all be frustrated if we were seeing this LB corps getting beaten repeatedly only a few yards away.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 10:55 PM CST up reply actions
ReporterIs there something broken, something unplugged?
Alan Reisner I don’t know if anything is unplugged. I think that we’re just not making the plays that we made last year. I think that we’re just kind of complacent right now, and we can’t be in this state.
2 seniors that have been vetted by Kirk to speak to the media. One says Iowa has lost it’s will to win. The other says Iowa has been complacent. That’s called ‘tip of the iceberg’.
It's hard to understand
how a 5 loss team is complacent.
It never gets to be easy.
Why the fuck doesn't it ever get to be easy?
by chitownhawkeye on Nov 30, 2010 12:28 AM CST up reply actions
Not really.
Once your season goals (national title, Big Ten title) are shot, it’s not that hard to see why guys would get complacent.
Granted, that doesn’t explain the Indiana or jNW games, since the Big Ten title goal was still in play then.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
And how many great seasons have the Badgers had in that span?
One. This year.
So tell me again how we know their program is on the trajectory, and ours is in the shitter.
It has been less than one year since Iowa won it’s first BCS-Level bowl since the 1950s. But because of this year’s senior class mailing it in after a couple gutting losses, we now know for a fact that we are mired in mediocrity?
Sorry, not buying it.
I’m going to need another season or two of data before deciding that.
First, I’m not talking about Wisconsin. I’m not going to talk about them. Have whatever opinion of them you want, I don’t care.
Second, I don’t think the program is in the shitter. It’s not in any danger of heading there under KF. He and the most of the staff are very good at their jobs.
Third, could KF turn this into an awesome program? Sure. But the on field evidence of the last 6 years doesn’t point in that direction. It just doesn’t.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
Take a look at the record for the last 6 years
And tell me it isn’t mediocre.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 12:00 PM CST up reply actions
How many great seasons have the Badgers had since 2005?
See for yourself:
2005: 10-3 Cap One Bowl Win
2006: 12-1 Cap One Bowl Win
2007: 9-4 Outback Bowl Loss
2008: 7-6 Champs Sports Bowl Loss
2009: 10-3 Champs Sports Bowl Win
2010: 12-1 Rose Bowl Win
Now, how does Iowa stack up each of those years?
by the_iowa_hawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 12:08 PM CST up reply actions
That's pretty telling stuff.
Even knowing that we beat them in many of those years, they went on to have great seasons.
So does that make us Bucky’s ISU?
Iowa's average record for the last 6 years
Is 8-5 while Wisconsin’s is 10-3. Sorry, but that just isn’t acceptable. Wisconsin essentially took Iowa’s style of play and ran the system better than Iowa itself. While Wisky’s Defenses haven’t been as good their Offenses have been much, much better. The result is what Iowa SHOULD have been all along had it had an Offense that could actually put points on the board.
It is simply time for KOK to go. His performance is just not up to par. If KF held KOK as accountable as he holds DJK then we might have an Offense that could actually produce.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 12:22 PM CST up reply actions
The question has been asked
how much of the problem is KOK and how much is it KOK doing what KF tells him to do.
In my mind, either way it’s on KOK. Either he is not good enough or he isn’t pushing back hard enough.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
I hold the opinion
That KOK should be just as responsible for the O’s performance as is Parker for the D’s performance. They both run the conservative style of play that KF wants. The difference is that Parker gets production and KOK doesn’t.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 12:26 PM CST up reply actions
i just asked this question
on another part of the board.. that is a good answer.
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:31 PM CST up reply actions
SOMEONE has to be held accountable
And if it’s not Ferentz, then he has to realize that requires sacrificing KOK. I think Stoops said it best the other day in the vent-a-thon: KOK (and Norm) are crutches for Ferentz which have allowed him to avoid making the really difficult decisions/choices. Ferentz will never leave his comfort zone as long as their around, and his opinions/approach will never be challenged. In short, the basic thinking of this team has become stagnant and fetid. Some new blood is required, and if it’s not at the top, then it’s right below it.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
But that is just not correct.
NOBODY has to be “held” accountable. Iowa has had one “bad” year in the last decade, and we were still .500 in that year.
Ferentz is 5-3 in his bowl games, the lowest of which have been two Alamos.
If we go to an Outback or a Gator Bowl and beat an established program like LSU or Florida or Alabama, then do we as fans need to be “held accountable” for being a bunch of whiners? Should they lock us you out of Kinnick for 3 years as punishment?
Has this year been a disappointment? Yes. And still a winning season. You don’t start making high-level staff changes based on that.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 10:14 PM CST up reply actions
Chazz,
I really appreciate your persistence in standing up for rational thought. It’s been a jungle in here lately and you’ve constantly been (although sometimes over the top) a voice of reason. Thanks.
Glad to be of service, Mrs. President.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Dec 1, 2010 12:11 AM CST up reply actions
Yes you do
Here’s the win totals for Ferentz, by year: 1,3,7,11,10,10,7,6,6,9,11,7. But for the 2002-2004, seasons, this has been about a 6-7 win team, with two outlier seasons. That’s fine, but we’re paying an awful lot to be middle-of-the-road. Second, this season can’t be evaluated in a vacuum, it must be looked at with an eye to last season and expectations coming into this year. Next year, I think most people would be ok with 7 wins, what with having to replace so many multi-year starters and stars. BUT THIS YEAR?? With the talent we brought back? 7 wins is simply unacceptable. And it’s part of a larger trend over the past 6 seasons. At some point, SOMEONE has to be held accountable for so regularly falling short of goals. It ain’t fair, but that’s life. And since no one really believes that it should be KF, then it has to be KOK. Again, it’s not fair to KOK, he probably takes more of the blame than his share for Ferentz’s conservatism, but it’s become clear that as long as KOK’s around, Ferentz isn’t going to do anything to disturb his comfort zone and make necessary adaptations. This coaching staff has become stagnant, it’s time to start draining the swamp.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
I used to feel a little like that about KOK.
But I never threw out all the good seasons to make my arguments.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Dec 1, 2010 12:10 AM CST up reply actions
Good seasons?
Offensively, that basically means 2002. And, kinda sorta, 2008 once Shonn Greene got going. Again, this isn’t completely fair, I don’t think KOK deserves all the blame for our vanilla offense, but it’s become clear over the PAST DECADE that our offense has become stagnant. Changes are needed, and this staff has shown an unwillingness or inability to make them. If nothing else, it is as simple as needing a new way of looking at an old problem, this staff can’t provide that, thus the need for some new blood.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
That is some pretty selective statistical analysis right there.
Of the twelve seasons that Ferentz has coached, you’re dismissing five of them because they don’t fit your argument. Ferentz has produced four 10-win seasons. That’s one more than Fry had in eight fewer seasons. It also means that one in every three seasons Ferentz coached resulted in 10+ wins.
by Abbas_Cincinnatus on Dec 1, 2010 11:53 AM CST up reply actions
I have one problem with this logic
Wisco is running a very very similar offense to us. I may be wrong here but isn’t it every bit as vanilla and predictable as what we do. This year Wisco has had outstanding execution (see Iowa ’02) with the system and it translates to huge offensive games. I could be wrong here and Wisco could be much more aggressive than us but I see the two systems as remarkably similar, they have just done it to a higher level of execution this year.
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:26 PM CST up reply actions
"they have just done it to a higher level of execution this year"
And better Offensive coaching.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 12:28 PM CST up reply actions
They are also running
behind an absolutely outstanding Offensive line, I guess I am not sold on their system being better or even different than ours.. I think that they have more aptly suited players this year.
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:32 PM CST up reply actions
Yes, their O-line is what OUR O-line was supposed to be last year
So now I have to question who really develops/recruits the better O-lines. What our O-line looks like next year will go a long way in answering this question. We will return five starters next year in Reiff, Gettis, Ferentz, MacMillian, and Zuesivics.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 12:35 PM CST up reply actions
good point here
Next year’s O-Line SHOULD be absolutely outstanding.
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:36 PM CST up reply actions
And our new QB will need that O-Line
Who we have in the backfield will go a long way towards making the new QB’s job easier too. However, all of this is for naught of the OC/QB coach screws it up again.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 12:37 PM CST up reply actions
Wasn't our OL pretty damn good this year?
Not that they were on the same level, but I really don’t see the two lines as one varsity the other JV. I think we were worried about the OL at the begining of the season, but they jelled much quicker that I would have imagined possible. Top 3 OL in the Big10 to me.
Like...
giving up over 200 yards rushing to Minnesota and only having less then 100 yards rushing in that game.
I don't know how legit it is to evaluate the lines during that game
Considering that no one seemed to care what happened on offense or defense. Aside from DJK and a handful of other guys.
Don't get me wrong...
I think that the OL exceeded expectations this year and played better then most thought, but I don’t think the fact that players not caring and giving up should be acceptable.
At times they were good, yes
But they didn’t hold a candle to Wisky’s O-line. It took them 4 or 5 games to really come together, but when they did they just OWNED teams. That we held them to 30ish points is a testiment to what our D is capable of doing – and that was on one of their bad days. Because we got EVERYTHING Wisky had to give.
But our O-Line had games even late in the season where they just weren’t getting anything done – in fact every game in November.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 12:47 PM CST up reply actions
I don't know
I’m not saying they are great, but they jelled faster that I could have imagined, and other than AZ I didn’t see them letting down Stanzi. But I am a D guy so I pay more attention to the play of the D then I do the O so I could easily be whitewashing what I just didn’t pay attention to.
Should be
but it will still be small, compared to teams like Wisconsin. Then again, we still are having center – QB exchange issues and false starts on the center. That shouldn’t be happening at the end of the season.
I guess what I’m saying is, they will have experience. I hope that translates into consistency.
It never gets to be easy.
Why the fuck doesn't it ever get to be easy?
by chitownhawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 2:54 PM CST up reply actions
I'm of the opinion
that the center-QB exchange problems are on Stanzi. He had problems with Bruggeman in 2008, Eubanks last year and Ferentz this year, Stanzi is the only constant.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
Very possible
that being the case, then it goes back to KOK and the lack of a QB coach.
It never gets to be easy.
Why the fuck doesn't it ever get to be easy?
by chitownhawkeye on Nov 30, 2010 12:30 AM CST up reply actions
Bielema's record is significantly better than Ferentz's record...even when you throw out the first two years for Ferentz
and what Bielema did this year was step on the gas. He called fake punts, he ran up the score. He went for two up 25 points. He sent messages to his team and to others, we are here to play. Was it good etiquette? No. Not even close. But it was certainly a departure from last year. And the year before that.
In 4 of the last 6 years Iowa has had at least 5 losses. If Iowa would have lost the Outback bowl in 2008 season, it would be 5 of the last 6. Wisconsin under Bielema has lost 5 games once.
Iowa is not really in the same class as Wisconsin since Barry Alverez took over. They won three Rose Bowls with that guy. Bielema has been an ass, but he produces.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 29, 2010 11:56 AM CST up reply actions
Of course he did
Wisconsin has 17 senior starters. If there was ever going to be a year for them to put everything together, this was it. Kudos to them.
by TarHeelHawk on Nov 29, 2010 12:04 PM CST up reply actions
Bielema's hot seat years
I think that was due to his learning curve with developing young players more than anything. He appears to have figured that out. Running up scores is not something I expect to continue, I think it’s about style points to secure a Rose Bowl bid more than anything. Which is BS. Sparty beat Wisco. Sparty should get Pasadena.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
That's my point...
Kirk would never play for style points. He is not interested in the BCS formula for success. For some that makes him an ideal fit for Iowa, and for other it makes him problematic.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 29, 2010 12:15 PM CST up reply actions
So then the question becomes
“what do we want?’
by TarHeelHawk on Nov 29, 2010 12:16 PM CST up reply actions
surprisingly tough question
I am a firm believer that if you are not playing to win then get out of the game. So my answer is I want a MNC, but what price am I willing to pay to get it. Recruiting violations, running up the score on inferior opponents, trick offense/plays?.. I don’t know. One of the things I like so much about us is our style of play and how classy this program is.
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:19 PM CST up reply actions
I want a clean program
or clean by NCAAF standards anway. They all violate.
But the rest of the stuff I have no problem with. Trick plays are fun, and running up the score can be too. 55-0 was an awesome game.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
I am with you here
trick plays are ok by me… running some BS gimmick offense like MIchigan though would be the equivalent of selling our soul IMO.
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:27 PM CST up reply actions
I don't care about the scheme
as long as it works. I see Michigan as a team that is exciting, fun to watch and productive as hell. Granted that relies a lot on having a guy like Denard Robinson but hey, he is doing what he needs to do to win games. If the rest of the offense stepped it up, he wouldn’t need to have all of those rushing yards.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
Bielema will be absolutely hated by half or more of the Big Ten...
by the end of his career. And the second someone does the same things to him (running it up, going for two when up big, being a douche), most people will laugh.
I’m OK with Ferentz not doing those things, and being respected by every person in college football except Wizgerald.
Imagine, for a moment, Ferentz acting like Bielema. Then, when Iowa has a down year or two, imagine how bad Wisky, OSU, MSU, Michigan, Illinois, jNW, and possible Minnesota (if they ever get their heads out of their butts for more than two games in a row) will thrash us and like it? The 20 or 25 point losses to OSU could easily turn into 40 or 50 point losses.
It is becoming apparent to me, in the current era of college football, that you can sacrifice class for wins. Saban, Meyer, Pelini, Carroll, Cheezuk all appear to be willing to make that trade. I love Ferentz because he will never trade his dignity for a two-win bump.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 10:26 PM CST up reply actions
You run trick plays
so you don’t have to run them. That is, you want to introduce some uncertainty for the other team, you don’t want them to know what you’re going to do. Iowa, unfortunately, has completely abandoned this concept.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
I want two things, though the proper way to put this is, I don't know why we don't want two things:
1. Deception and surprise.
2. Adaptation, annually, our our base schemes to reflect that individual team’s personnel strengths.
I don’t see that we attempt either and I can no longer believe that we are the only team in the top 30 which does not need both.
BTW, these two qualities would head my list of things that Hayden prized that Ferentz dismisses.
We play tackle football, most of the time.
Had to do it ...
Our chief weapon is surprise…surprise and fear…fear and surprise…Our two weapons are fear and surprise…and ruthless efficiency…Our “three” weapons are fear, surprise and ruthless efficiency…and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope…Our “four” no…“Amongst” our weapons…Amongst our weaponry…are such elements as fear, surprise…. I’ll come in again.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Nov 29, 2010 12:51 PM CST up reply actions
Frankly, it is almost beyond belief
the degree to which we do not attempt to surprise anyone. As for adaptation, Kirk will say he is very much a coach who adapts. But he would be missing your point. Kirk believes that taking QBs and amking them WRs is a major form of adaptation. He misses the point about in-game adaptation, week-to-week adaptation. And player emergence. When I played high school football our biggest guy was a Offensive Tackle and we ran behind him endlessly. But by the third game we were going no where offensively. Our coach noticed the guy had tremendous balance and decent speed and in practice one day — for fun we thought — he made him our running back. Even the kid thought the coach was crazy. Long story short, he went on to play at Florida State as a fullback. We changed our entire philosophy after his first game to exploit his freakish ability.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
not just in game adaptation
but year to year.. I think JNU knows how to beat us and maybe we should try something different with them.. just a hunch here.
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 1:02 PM CST up reply actions
Those two end arounds worked pretty well at surprising Minnesota...
wait that didn’t work well at all.
Yes
Would it kill this team to add a wrinkle or two? Self-evaluation is so important to game prep. Iowa has a plan and sticks to it. That’s the right course about 80 to 90 percent of the time. The other 10 to 20 percent is when Iowa falls flat.
A zone blitz or two would have blown jNWU’s mind.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Nov 29, 2010 1:06 PM CST up reply actions
I'd love to see the 2nd point
for the 1st, I don’t even need actual deception or surprise, but it would be nice to not be so predictable that everyone can script our plays for us. Just some level of uncertainty.
It never gets to be easy.
Why the fuck doesn't it ever get to be easy?
by chitownhawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 3:00 PM CST up reply actions
I don't mind
not going for style points to the extent Bielema has, although it would be fun. Let’s face it, he’s not making any friends and if the victims ever get Wisco on the ropes, they’re going to return the favor. That part would certainly not be fun.
My problems are basically what you have said elsewhere on this page and this site.
No swagger
Accepting a better than average offense.
Low tolerance for risk.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
Sooner or later ...
Bielema is going to take the pipe for some of the scores his team posted this year.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Nov 29, 2010 12:26 PM CST up reply actions
In every executive decision there is risk and there is reward
both of which are in the eye of the beholder. There is always a price to pay for whatever your outcome. In this case, we are pondering if the prices is living with the 7-5 season when the pressure is on.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 29, 2010 12:34 PM CST up reply actions
and the reward is feeling we do things the right way
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 29, 2010 12:35 PM CST up reply actions
And I believe it is.
In the highest levels of the business world, you have to trade short-term profits for long-term dignity. Because you have stock-holders, and you have a golden parachute if the momentum turns the other way.
In college football, you have to more prominently factor in “doing things the right way” because you are setting an example for young men who are about to begin their careers (football and non-football).
It is a little bit (not completely, but a little bit) like the junior high school coach who puts 6 kids on the end of the bench and forgets about them for 3 years, and then still goes out and finishes in 3rd place. Was it worth it?
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 10:32 PM CST up reply actions
Probably. However, most knew what he was doing
And with the state of the tie-breakers the way that they are he really had little choice. If he didn’t “convince the voters” to keep him ahead of OSU then he would have lost the Rose Bowl. Given the circumstances I can’t really blame him and can’t say I would have done it any differently. It would have been a cruel irony beyond words had Wisky beat OSU only to end the season with the same record and then watch OSU go to the Rose Bowl.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 12:44 PM CST up reply actions
You mean
kinda like MSU is going to have happen to them?
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
No MSU disqualified themselves by getting demolished.
Guys, this is a beauty contest. It is not a playoff. That is the WHOLE POINT of this thread. How does one wear makeup in the beauty contest.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 29, 2010 12:48 PM CST up reply actions
In other words, Bielema showed cleavage this year. Kirk doesn’t.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 29, 2010 12:51 PM CST up reply actions
That's because
Kirk has an “athletic” build.
I get the beauty contest. I just think on field, head to head results should count for more than they actually do.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
Maybe, but if the Jets lose to New England this week by 1000
it won’t mean anything because the NFL is in a playoff system. I think people interchange principles and values of both systems to satisfy their subject views.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
Like a girl who looks classy
but is secretly a freak in the bedroom?
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Nov 29, 2010 12:52 PM CST up reply actions
I like this idea
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 1:02 PM CST up reply actions
MSU lost its bid to the Rose Bowl
When they were dismantled by a 7-5 team.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 12:52 PM CST up reply actions
I don't hate what he/they did
i just know that it will be used as fuel. Kind of like how one of Hayden’s off-the-cuff remarks about Northwestern is still used as fuel more than 10 years later.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Nov 29, 2010 12:47 PM CST up reply actions
We've tried.
He pulled that horseshit kickoff loophole thing on us a few years ago, and the old man’s dropped 38-7 and 48-7 since.
Thank God we didn’t play them this year, though. They would’ve rung up 70 on us.
--
@scrappled
SlowStates.com - Podcasts now (finally) on iTunes.
by Run Up The Score on Nov 29, 2010 4:49 PM CST up reply actions
Disagree slightly. Our defense isn't that awful.
It would have been like the Alabama game if Alabama had kept passing.
Wisconsin – 42
Penn State – 14
At least we're not Michigan since 1855.
Beat some mediocre SEC team or whatever.
by ReadingRambler on Nov 29, 2010 6:00 PM CST up reply actions
stupid post fail...
Sparty also lost to a 7-5 team in a blow out. Wisky is playing the best football in the Big Ten right now, they should go.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 12:25 PM CST up reply actions
by far the best football
i wouldnt want to have to face them again. for anything.
fightin for president stanzi's fightin americanzis since his first 13 yard charge - syracuse '07
by metcalfrhymeswithblodbath on Nov 29, 2010 12:38 PM CST up reply actions
That is true
but when MSU and Wisco played, MSU won the game. Head to head results have to count for something.
If there was a love triangle where MSU loss was because of the Buckeyes, that would be different. But it’s not.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
You're right. But because MSU didn't play OSU other things have to be looked at
And MSU was dismantled by a 7-5 team and then barely squeeked past both Purdue and Penn State. Wisky, on the other hand, has been DESTROYING everyone they play. Wisky deserves to go based on how they are playing now.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 12:55 PM CST up reply actions
as a Big Ten fan
who wants to see us do well in the Bowls. I want Wisko playing top level competition.
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:56 PM CST up reply actions
…… for which they should be thankful. Had Boise won this weekend Wisconsin would not have faced up well. I have a ton of respect for what Gary Paterson has done at TCU, but TCU is a much better matchup for Wisconsin than the batshit stuff Boise would have done.
The way Wisconsin's running the ball.
I don’t think it matters how gimmicky the opposing offense is. If Nevada’s D can shut out Moore and Co for a half, then Wisconsin’s certainly can. I’d also wager that Wisconsin’s run offense is better than Nevada’s.
by The Mexican't on Nov 29, 2010 1:32 PM CST up reply actions
The same TCU...
that is supposedly going to the Big East starting in 2012. At least they are smart enough to join the weakest of the AQ conferences.
2002 Iowa wants their money back.
:D
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Repeating this here, due to my idiotic reply fail below . . .
You guys can put your stock in fatass Bielema and the Badgers.
Iowa under KF is the better long-term investment in my mind.
I guess we’ll see how it goes over the next few years.
I think Bellanca has very eloquently laid it out
This program — the KF era — is no longer ‘becoming’ something new. It is a middle-aged program. I almost see it as a developmental team for the NFL, in the sense that we value skills, an organizational focus, and managerial control more highly than winning. We either have to enjoy that or get another pastime to over-study.
Kirk has always struck me, and I have mentioned this repeatedly in posts, as a guy who places winning behind a number of other factors. It just is who he is as a person, and now as a coach. He spent one year on the razor’s edge and he is never going back there. It blew up in his face. Kirk is about developing young men and having a solid program.
Would he have liked to have won more this year? Yes, of course. But the way he dealt with the loss of Norm. The way he dealt with DJK. The way he carries himself before. during and after each game—very composed and disciplined. Is revealing of a man who does not want to sell his soul or forget the much bigger picture. It becomes borderline naive at times, for example, the way Iowa seemed utterly unpreapred for the willingness of other teams to take agressive risk (fake punts, onsides kicks, etc.). KF would NEVER take these risks.
Kirk rationalizes his behavior, his philosophy as Bellanca says by saying “I put guys in the pros.” Making him a mans man in the world of college football. I was also struck this week by the way he answered the question about guys going pro after this year. He basically said I would never advocate. He was saying, I believe, that he felt betrayed by those guys who left last year. Saban would, and has, said publicly that it made no sense for a guy to stay.
Kirk is just very different from the guys who routinely are in the National Championship hunt. But this year I learned a valuable lesson. I learned that Jim Tressel has, in fact, been getting screwed come coaching award time. That guy is doing 98% of what Kirk kills himself to do outside of the wins and losses, and still he delivers. He has done everything that Urban Meyer or Bob Stoops or Mack Brown has done and probably done it cleaner. He delivers in ways that I previously did not appreciate. Watching them play us this year was eye opening. I don’t think Kirk could match his record if he was there. I don’t even think he would endeavor to try. And that is not a slam. It is just understanding Kirk.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 29, 2010 12:13 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Exactly.
Ferentz is who he is, and there’s much to like about our program and the way we develop talent. I think most Iowa fans are proud of the traits of our program and our head coach, they just forget that when we lose.
"Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
this
is the essence of what bothers me about the “fire _” group. We talk passionately about college football and how we do it the right way and how that is the reason that we love Iowa football but when we have a rough season it goes out the window… Maybe we are in need of a new OC but isn’t KOK an extension of KF and isn’t his game plan worked into what KF wants to do?
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:30 PM CST up reply actions
yes, absolutely...to be angry at any of his coaches is to displace one's anger at Kirk
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 29, 2010 12:31 PM CST up reply actions
I guess i never look that deep
but the idea of being angry or complaining about Kirk just bothers me.. so I regularly hate on KOK instead. Ultimately, I still love the idea behind the program and that is that we will do what we do so well that we could tell you what we are going to run and it will still work.
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:34 PM CST up reply actions
I think you are in some pretty hearty company around here
I’m in a different crowd, but I like the overall premise behind Kirk Ferentz. I really do.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 29, 2010 12:39 PM CST up reply actions
I know you want
to see this team be more aggressive and to play like they “belong” in an MNC but do you think that the premise behind Kirk can win a MNC or do you think that this system will always produce a great year once every 3-4 and 7-8 wins in the other years.
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:41 PM CST up reply actions
the latter
I think Kirk reduces his chances, not increases them, of winning really big. Simultaneously, I think he has learned how to reduce his chances of being a less than .500 team. He’s middling to upper-middling. That he went 7-5 this year speaks volume for his coaching style.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 29, 2010 12:46 PM CST up reply actions
can't say i disagree
because I have no good evidence to say that our scheme can produce a MNC but I really like to think that it can because I enjoy how we do things.
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:49 PM CST up reply actions
It will be interesting to see how a playoff affect the Big 10
it might not at all. Although, it might to a great deal.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 29, 2010 12:52 PM CST up reply actions
thats the thing.
after this season, we’re all nitpicking the coaching style of our coaches, but all i can think of is our DISMANTLING of georgia tech in the bowl last year. i think this team can win a MNC, it just means we have to have the chips fall in our favor. the fact that USC was so dominant for so many years means nothing, knowing how dirty they were. we aren’t going to get any favors from anyone, but i wouldn’t sell my soul for one MNC, as long as we win one the right way. i’d wait a lifetime for it, as long as it is as pure as the driven snow.
I piss people off on a fairly regular basis. I cherish my right to speak my mind, whether I sound like an uneducated savage or not. I've never been accused of keeping what I think a secret, nor will I ever. Don't like it? I don't care.
by IABerserker1 on Nov 29, 2010 7:40 PM CST up reply actions
that dismantling was a 3-point game with 2 minutes left
further validating that even when we dominate someone, we are still slightly imperiled.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
Sooooo...KF is basically Lickliter, only successful at the concept?
You got no fear of the underdog; That's why you will not survive!
by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Nov 30, 2010 9:15 PM CST up reply actions
Lick had the "Butler way."
Ferentz has the “Baltimore way.”
/sarcasm font.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Dec 1, 2010 12:07 AM CST up reply actions
I think SMA really nailed it.
think Kirk reduces his chances, not increases them, of winning really big. Simultaneously, I think he has learned how to reduce his chances of being a less than .500 team.
The goal of Ferentz’s game is to have simple schemes and good, clean, execution of the fundamentals — the blocking and tackling. That doesn’t mean that our team is impenetrable, but it requires the opposition to be relatively flawless and make plays over and over again if they want to win.
In 2009 our opponents just couldn’t make plays when they needed to. The slant to McNutt against MSU was something we’d probably run 100 times. We recognized the coverage and played fundamental ball. It was a simple pitch and catch, we executed, they didn’t so we won. Same thing against Michigan last year. We kept finding Moeaki on the TE seam route and they just didn’t make plays to stop it.
This season, our opponents made plays when they had to. For various reasons (injuries, inexperience, poor conditioning, lack of leadership) we lacked the fundamental discipline in all phases of the game that we need to win close games. We couldn’t open running lanes in the fourth quarter to milk out the clock. We couldn’t stop FOURTH AND FUCKING 14 to win the game. We were a combined 5-for-22 on third down in the second half of the Indiana, jNWU, tOSU and Minnesota games.
I like the idea that we’re going to be predictable, fundamentally sound and physical. It means that you are more likely to win games against teams with inferior discipline (i.e. Michigan). But it also means almost every game is going to be close and your chances of always winning every battle is slim. In a situation where all of the chips have to land just right to play in a MNC game, the chances of playing in that game is infinitesmal.
by Abbas_Cincinnatus on Nov 29, 2010 9:37 PM CST up reply actions
No
Sweatervest has better recruits and facilities than we do. I will give him credit for never losing his team, but then again, he has never been in a situation where losing the team has been possible.
It never gets to be easy.
Why the fuck doesn't it ever get to be easy?
by chitownhawkeye on Nov 29, 2010 3:10 PM CST up reply actions
the point is Kirk could probably not match the sweatervest's accomplishments if HE were at Ohio State
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
This.
Templeton Rye'd the Lightning.
by Smokin Herb Grigsby on Nov 29, 2010 6:24 PM CST up reply actions
That is fine...
but if you don’t think OSU is at least a little dirty, then I think you are kidding yourself.
Vest knows what it is like to have to keep a team at the highest level (from his days at Youngstown). That is the type of experience that can’t be easily gotten, and that Ferentz does not have.
Also, OSU is the type of place where they run you two years after you win a Sugar Bowl, a share of a big ten title, and go 11-1, because you dared to go 6-6 and 8-4 (and drop some games to your rival when they are at their highest point in 25 years) in the two years after.
Ferentz would never go to a situation like that, not because its a challenge or because he can’t hack it, but because it is not an atmosphere that values principles.
If I knew Tressel could do things squeaky-clean, then I might trade Ferentz for him. Because I can’t confidently say he does them clean, I’ll take Ferentz.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 10:46 PM CST up reply actions
OSU is no dirty
I don’t like them, but they are not dirty. You’re grasping at straws. Frankly, they don’t need to be dirty. They have more of a lock on upper echelon talent, at this stage, than does Florida or Texas. No one and I mean NO ONE raids Ohio. Maybe Michigan did once upon a time get a guy here or there…but no longer. Texas loses top players to LSU, OU, and even USC and now Oregon. Florida is split into a million pieces. Nope, OSU is not dirty and they don’t need to be.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 29, 2010 11:50 PM CST up reply actions
A couple of things...
that make me feel differently (and yes, I know a couple of these are very circumstantial or indirect):
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/220143-jim-tressel-the-youngstown-state-scandal-revisited
http://www.cleveland.com/osu/index.ssf/2010/07/ohio_state_admits_secondary_vi.html
http://www.thelantern.com/2.1345/osu-leads-big-ten-in-recruit-violations-1.71440
Obviously, Iowa just had the Kutcher-gate thing with basketball, but I’m struggling to think of any football violations for the Hawks. For OSU, a quick google search provides plenty of info.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 30, 2010 12:31 AM CST up reply actions
those are on par with the Kutcher thing
secondary violations are a joke. Kirk even made a statement about the tediousness of the NCAA on most of these level of violations at his presser right after the whole Kutcher thing.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
He told Dallas Clark to go pro.
I’ve always felt that if he thought a guy was “ready” or he wouldn’t have a better chance, he would advise them to leave. Maybe that’s wrong. But maybe he’s saying he did or will advise against guys leaving early because he thinks no one is ready.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Are you sure?
I always thought that Dallas (and Shonn) simply said, “Sorry, coach, gotta go.” Adrian simply decided to finish school. Some think that he may have done it for his ma.
by The Mexican't on Nov 29, 2010 5:45 PM CST up reply actions
If he ever told Dallas not to go...
then that is possibly inexcusable.
I don’t fault Greene for leaving, because of his age. But, I wonder how much mental maturation he might have gained with another year at Iowa.
It would have been nice to have Speivey and Bulaga for another year, but it seems to be working for them.
This next notion may be too naive, but is it possible that Ferentz knows how dog-eat-dog the NFL is, and he would love to see players go into it with a degree and a possible backup plan? It seems that Ferentz and his players get along pretty well with the franchises that we might call “principled” (Colts, Packers, maybe a few others).
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 10:51 PM CST up reply actions
Not if that Badger looked at Bielema's record and gave him credit for it.
The issue up there is that Bielema, an unatttractive person to many, was perceived as a coattails/legacy coach riding on the success that Alvarez had. He didn’t get the credit for achieving superior results. I don’t think he has that problem any more. The character they are taking on is that of the 1985 Bears, in all of that team’s vulgarity and freakish domination. They have a clear, post-Alvarez identity.
But my real point is that anyone saying that about Bielema wasn’t looking at the record.
We play tackle football, most of the time.
One thing about that record, though . . .
Is gaudy as it is, until just this year, Bielema had a HUGE problem beating any good teams.
If I recall correctly, Bielema had an absolutely horrendous record against Top 25 teams until this season, and even struggled beating BCS teams with a winning record.
One thing he generally does better than Ferentz is never losing to allegedly “inferior” opponents, but Iowa had the upper hand in notching “signature” wins, that Brett and the Badgers did not under his tenure until very, very – as in the last few weeks – recently.
This was a HUGE complaint by Badger fans leading up to this year. That Bielema was able to mask mediocrity because of a gaudy schedule built on beating up on losers. They specifically pointed to Iowa’s big wins over PSU and in the Orange Bowl, and going back a bit, over Florida and LSU, as reasons they felt Iowa was passing them by.
I still maintain that the two programs – on the whole – are pretty close to identical performance wise – although with much different personalities.
Actually, until after the Iowa game,
Bielema had a problem beating average to bad teams (at least this season). I was in the stands when the Badgers needed several miracles to beat a bad ASU team and watched uninspiring performances against UNLV and San Jose State. This is to say nothing of losing to an MSU team who I still feel is over-valued (which a shellacking from a middling Iowa team should prove).
Yes, Wisco is currently playing better than anyone (Oregon included) but let’s not pretend like they’ve been a dynamo all season long.
Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.
by Kyle McCann't on Nov 29, 2010 4:57 PM CST up reply actions
Re: The Ferentz/DJK dynamic
While I respect the DJK love on display here, why do we automatically assume that Ferentz is the bad guy in this situation? Why do we assume that there is a bad guy?
Maybe DJK is the kind of guy who always tries to get in the last word. Maybe he’s the kind of guy who is always muttering comments just out of earshot. Maybe he’s the kind of guy who always makes life difficult. What’s clear is that the two just don’t connect. There’s no chemistry there, unless you count those chemistry experiments that produce a cloud of gas and kill all the lab mice.
DJK is in that no-man’s-land between acting like a kid and acting like a man. That just comes with the age. For those of us who are older, remember what we were like in our early 20s? I could be a real dick, I can admit.
My concern for Kirk is that he appears to have let the tension get the best of him. My concern for DJK is that he appears unable to leave well enough alone. Kirk should have enough life experience to know that some guys just won’t get the program and that it’s best to bite your lip and leave well enough alone. My disappointment for DJK is that no one pulled him aside and told him that sometimes it’s better to go along to get along and that to do so could be a choice worth millions in pro money.
They have a broken relationship, I’m sorry to say, and may have cost the Hawks a season to remember.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Nov 29, 2010 11:29 AM CST reply actions
It's a good question
Of why we assume that KF is the bad guy in this situation. I can’t come up with a logical reason. I just feel like you have to be batshit crazy/angry to bench your best WR.
It's widely known that WRs
are usually the most difficult position to coach/manage(Moss, TO, Ochocinco, Plaxico B, Kenny Britt and more). Not saying all other football players are eagle scouts but I don’t get the ‘DJK is the obvious victim’ viewpoint. Ferentz ‘mismanaged’ him all the way into the Hawkeye record books.
If there was a hero on this team it would be Adam Robinson.
"GO HAWKS!" - only cure for Hawkeye Envy
by BentNotBroken on Nov 29, 2010 11:55 AM CST up reply actions
I know we all love DJK
but it should be noted that he was never (I think) voted a game captain.
by SallyMason on Nov 29, 2010 1:08 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Kirk didn't grow up in Chicago.
And Stanzi would never allow an American institution like voting become tarnished like that. (yes, I know he didn’t vote this year, not the point of the joke)
Well you guys can put your stock in fatass Bielema and the Badgers . . .
Iowa under KF is the better long-term investment in my mind.
I guess we’ll see how it goes over the next few years.
Woah, you were right.
That was pretty bad.
"Yeah, and that’s bullshit, cause Boise plays Kirkwood every other weekend".
Smokin' Herb Grigsby's Mom (+1, I say)
Its all Brandon Wegher's fault. His bailing on fall camp threw everything off.
I’m only mostly joking.
I asked above
if the book is completely closed or when we can expect to find out his status for next year. No rumors please but its there a news story out there about a time line for him?
"If you're easily offended, we thank you for stopping by but ask that you turn your browser elsewhere." -- BHGP Disclaimer
by SaturdayMorningKegStanzis on Nov 29, 2010 12:39 PM CST up reply actions
If he's still in school in January, there's a chance.
If he’s not, that door can be closed for good.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
If his family is well off
as has been reported, and he has two years in at Iowa, he would probably just finish his degree here no matter what. It’s a good school and all. So I don’t see him leaving the school. When does summer camp start?
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
I believe...
that his family is pretty well off. They live in the same community as my in laws and it is a pretty well off community.
His family is definitely well off, but I'm not sure that matters a ton.
He may not want to stay and deal with all the questions and rumors.
In any event, summer practice starts around late July, I think, but if he’s not here for spring practice (late March-mid April, usually), he’s not playing football for Iowa again.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
Not that it matters
as far as being on the team, just for being a student at Iowa. They’re not going to be saying “son, you gave up that scholarship so it’s time to look at in-state tuition”.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
might we be able to respect the fact
that maybe he has just had enough of lying under piles of 300 pounders,,,
My brother in law by marriage, who was always considered a stud at 6’5 240 in the 70’s lasted one year at Marshall,,, for the simple reason that being the biggest stud in southeast ohio turned into a guy who got hit by much bigger guys, turning the game from fun to pain.
I propose we respect his decision for what ever reason he may choose
If Sarah Palin were any smarter rocks would be in trouble
I'll respect him for whatever path he chooses.
I just don’t think his reason for taking the year off was due to football (pain). It was personal. It was family. I thought that much of the mystery had pretty much been cleared up. The particulars of the personal situation were never discussed publicly.
The decision to play at this level (and go to school) will pretty much take 100% of a person’s time. He had a different priority this year.
As a football fan, I’d love to see him make football work in his life next year. As a human being, I understand if he needs to spend time doing other things.
by iowabeakster on Nov 29, 2010 8:10 PM CST up reply actions
Would any of you all trade the sanctions and vacated titles that’ll come down on Auburn in a couple years for the one Cam Newton year? I wouldn’t – I’d prefer my alma mater not be “that” school. But I don’t think it’s strictly an either/or scenario for conference championships or MNC.
I guess I’m coming around to seeing this season as more a leadership/emotional problem than anything. After the Wisconsin loss, these guys sleep walked through the crap teams and played with purpose twice – MSU (which now looks like a complete aberration for this team) and tOSU. We all know Richard doesn’t comport himself emotionally on the field. In my salad days, it was Jonathan Hayes, a TE, who was in the middle of every skirmish. I just don’t see an upper classman in this group who has that attitude. Was that what was wrong? I don’t fucking know.
I just don’t see an upper classman in this group who has that attitude. Was that what was wrong? I don’t fucking know.
Iowa excels when it has a Pat Angerer-type or a Mitch-King type or a Robert Gallery-type… or even a Matt Roth-type. There is no one on this Iowa team like that — at least not among the seniors. Stanzi, Clayborn, Ballard, DJK, Vandervelde all seem like really good guys, but they’re not the emotional, intense (maybe even a little crazy) leaders that you need to have. One of the most indelible images I have from the 2008 PSU game is Mitch King getting everyone fired up before the game and screaming his head off; I don’t think I saw a scene like that once this year.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
Angerer was on the field for the Colts Sunday night
I had that fleeting “God, the Hawks miss him,” thought.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Nov 29, 2010 1:56 PM CST up reply actions
Indeed.
And as much as I love Pat, the Colts sure as hell miss Gary Brackett.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
No doubt.
You’ve got trouble in Indy when Rivers can throw for 185 and no TDs and the Bolts still win by 21.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Nov 29, 2010 2:13 PM CST up reply actions
Why did Kaeding
have to end up in San Diego.
Indy would have been sweet.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
For whatever reason, the San Diego and New England defenses are Manning's kryptonite.
They fuck him up time after time, especially San Diego.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
Which is to say that I think they're still OK to win that division.
What with the Titans imploding at a rapid rate and the Jags and Texans still being, well, the Jags and Texans. Although if the Colts have to keep rolling out this injury-ravaged squad, they may be boned.
I don’t see the Colts doing much in the playoffs, though.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
This years' seniors were pretty low key guys.
Which is OK. It takes all kinds.
But since KF is also a low key guy… the competitive fire, which I think is absolutely necessary at this level, just never seemed to get lit.
The closest thing this year I saw was Sash after the Hyde lateral. It might be coincidence, but that was the best game they played this year.
Hell, even KOK went nuts trying the McNutt to DJK play.
by iowabeakster on Nov 29, 2010 8:22 PM CST up reply actions
What it boils down to for me
I’ve been coming to some conclusions this season and many of my recent posts have been trying to untangle and refine these thoughts.
1. Ferentz is a great talent developer, an exemplary manifestation of Midwestern values, and I really like the guy.
2. Iowa is never going to win an MNC under Ferentz because of many of the reasons why I like him.
He is both loyal and stubborn. He is a great big picture thinker in terms of program direction over years at a time, but can’t seem to make adjustments today based on obvious information directly in front of him.
The stoic lack of emotion is great for planning, but in the heat of a game comes off as distant and uncaring.
We will never be a bad team under Ferentz, but I don’t think he has the killer attitude to get a team to play at peak levels for the full season required for greatness.
As a lifelong fan, and a fairly competitive person, this all combines to leave me at odds with myself as to what I want to see going forward.
Do we accept average most years or do we take more risks with both the higher amounts of good and bad. I don’t have those answers as to what I would like to see from Ferentz yet and probably won’t for some time.
by MP hawkfan on Nov 29, 2010 1:43 PM CST via mobile reply actions
You put it about as well as I could hope to.
The things that I absolutely love Kirk for in seasons like last year are the things that really frustrate me in seasons like this.
Templeton Rye'd the Lightning.
by Smokin Herb Grigsby on Nov 29, 2010 6:27 PM CST up reply actions
When you choke, it's cultural, or as you say, "leadership/emotional" in origin.
I don’t think the only alternative to choking the life out of the ball and losing by 3.7 ppg, or putting dispirited teams on the field, is a corrupt program such as Auburn. That’s a false choice, I believe.
We play tackle football, most of the time.
I couldn't agree more
Ferentz’s record in close games is atrocious and the one thing I want to see improve more drastically than any other. Adjusting in game is the only way it will happen.
by MP hawkfan on Nov 29, 2010 1:51 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Also how many of those close wins came last season
Making it even more of an outlier.
by MP hawkfan on Nov 29, 2010 1:56 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Is lost in all this program talk just how devastating AIRBHG has been?
While I love Adam Robinson and what he did this year, he is not a gamebreaker. He is not a back who causes opposing defensive coordinators sleepless nights. When Iowa went 6-1 to close out 2008, 4 of those wins were by 20 or more and one was over the #3 team in the country. Why? Because by the end of that season Shonn Greene was in shape and running over, around, and through people. He was breaking long touchdown runs. He was a difference maker at RB.
Last year Iowa had a version of A-Rob probably not as good as this year’s version and a true freshman. Put a healthy Jewel Hamption on last year’s team and I doubt UNI or Arkansas State gives Iowa a scare. Put a healthy Jewel Hampton on this year’s team and maybe Iowa holds off Wisconsin, stays motivated, and goes 7-1 in the league. Hell, Wegher at least had a gear A-Rob doesn’t and might have made a difference.
You can’t dominate if you can’t run the football. Iowa had stretches where they got the running game going pretty good, but it was never consistent. This OL was undersized and always better at pass protection than plowing over people.
Yes, all the other issues are legitimate. Lack of leadership, some strange coaching decisions, 4th quarter meltdowns, special teams, all of it. Don’t underestimate the role AIRBHG played in this season not unfolding the way we all hoped. Hopefully in some future season AIRBHG takes a year off and we’ll have healthy backs who can break 50 yard TD runs. Coker might be that guy. A-Rob, bless his heart, isn’t.
A-rob had alot of 100 yard games and was generally one of iowas better and more reliable weapons
iowa did fine running the ball under A-rob, the issue was that they went to stanzi too often really. the only game off the top of my head where A-rob was shut down entirely was the Arizona game behind a O-line who was really in there first true test.
Coker is good too, but i think A-rob has earned his spot and just because he wont bust out 80 yard runs isnt really a reason in my mind to say “well, hes a failure as a RB”.
Greene was the best running back in the nation. iowa isnt going to get a Greene every year.
by justsomehawkeyefan on Nov 29, 2010 3:27 PM CST up reply actions
I never said he's a "failure."
He’s a decent back, catches the ball out of the backfield, picks up his blocking assignments, has good balance, doesn’t fumble, he has a lot of what you’d want in a running back. And I understand Iowa isn’t going to have Shonn Greene every year. But, he also doesn’t have great size, great speed, great anything. He’s a nice back. He’s never going to be 1st or 2nd team all Big Ten. Jewel Hampton may have been. Marcus Coker may someday be. That’s my point.
by DonnyDonovan on Nov 29, 2010 3:53 PM CST up reply actions
A-Rob is fine, but I think this year was close to the max output for him.
Which is fine — it’s a good season of work — but not totally fine for the offense. He needs help. The offense needs depth. If you can get a back like Greene — AWESOME. 300+ carries, 1800 yards, 20 TDs. That’s some great shit. But if you don’t have (and most years you won’t), you need a stable of backs. Our stable this year was reduced to A-Rob and a freshman. Now in hindsight Coker should have got more touches than he did, even with his sketchy pass blocking. But going forward Iowa needs more out of the rushing game. Mind you, part of that is also developing an offensive line that can bully people and open up plenty of holes for the running backs — especially at the end of the game when everyone knows a run call is coming.
Wisconsin doesn’t surprise anyone in the second half, but it doesn’t matter because their offensive line can impose their will on a defense and just open up hole after hole for the running backs. Iowa hasn’t been able to do that for a while. This year’s offensive line was on the whole a pleasant surprise and good at pass blocking, but not hugely consistent at run blocking. They were especially poor at the end of the game; one of the reasons we struggled to bleed clock at the end of the game and hold on (or improve) leads was because the offensive line wasn’t opening up a ton of holes at that point.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
Exactly
And the fact that Iowa returns Reiff, Gettis, Ferentz, McMillan and Zuzevics, five guys who started multiple games this year, is reason for optimism. If these guys can all add a little productive weight without losing anyting, Iowa might have a pretty darn good offensive line next year. Combine this with A-Rob, Coker with a full Spring and Fall, DeAndre Johnson with a full Spring and Fall, and maybe even Hampton, and Iowa might have a running game that CAN put away teams when they lead in the 4th quarter.
If I had to point to my single biggest 2010 frustration, it was that Iowa, in every game they lost, had at least one 4th quarter drive where they had the LEAD and the BALL. If any of those drives end in a TD, or maybe even a FG, or, in some instances, just result in some first downs that bleed 4 or 5 minutes off the clock and change field position, Iowa wins. And those drives were 3 and out or at best 4 or 5 and out EVERY SINGLE TIME. I’m not talking about the two minute drills, I’m talking about the drives before the two minute drills. They were an exercise in frustration and failure. The OL, the QB, the RB, none of them ever stepped up and made a damn play to put a game out of reach.
by DonnyDonovan on Nov 29, 2010 4:22 PM CST up reply actions
Your second paragraph
is what I found most frustrating about this season. It’s not the unpredictability or adjustments of Fry that makes me miss him most, it’s his understanding of the importance of going for the kill. It’s not that Kirk had too much faith in his defense, it’s that he didn’t have enough in his offense (except Northwestern, that’s on Ricky). Except for against Arizona, this team had an opportunity to put everyone away early/earlier and had that conservatism come back and bit them in the ass.
Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.
by Kyle McCann't on Nov 29, 2010 5:24 PM CST up reply actions
I agree, although it's part conservatism, part terrible execution.
Sometimes we ran the ball in those situations — nada. Sometimes we passed the ball in those situations — nada (and, worse, we didn’t even bleed much clock then). I’m all for more unpredictability from the offense in general, but the end of the game is when good teams do what they want, whether it’s predictable or not. It just works because they’re good and they can execute well. Iowa has really struggled to do that.
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I'm just sick
of seeing the SAME GODDAMN STRETCH RUN PLAY TO THE LEFT SIDE OF THE LINE THAT DIDN’T WORK ALL SEASON!!!! Sorry, but that one play really bothered me. Neither ARob, nor Coker, really had the speed to make that play work, yet we till try it 7-10 times a game for little or no gain (and often a loss). Just frustrating to look up, see the formation and know exactly what play was coming, and that said play was going to be unsuccessful
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
It might be nice to throw some new wrinkles into our running game.
However, with the wrath that AIRBHG has wrought, I think it is pretty amazing to see what A-Rob and Coker (and Rogers) have been able to do this year. And we were still able to keep the red-shirt on DeAndre Johnson.
Sadly, I get the sinking feeling that we may not see Hampton able to be a key player again. On the other hand, people probably said similar things about Albert Young, so I hope I’m wrong.
One thing I’d like to see Iowa do once in awhile is use the fullback as a runner. I think we’d be amazed at how many yards someone like Morse could get on a dive on first or second down.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 11:01 PM CST up reply actions
As a fan base, where are we going?
because i see two directions. one is the “i want a National Title” direction and the other is a “i want to be competitive” direction.
personally i want a National Title, and personally i dont think KF will be able to give Iowa one. now if we want to get winning records on a constant basis, get into a BCS bowl once in a while and rarely stir the pot like good middle of the pack schools do then Ferentz is our guy, but i want to take the next step, even if its a risk and we end up in the 90’s again, no one succeeded without taking risks.
by justsomehawkeyefan on Nov 29, 2010 3:18 PM CST reply actions
I kind of view championships as a crapshoot
In this way I believe Kirk and I think alike. BCS or playoff system, you never know how things are going to shake out. So what do you do? Build a successful process that focuses on improvement and being in a good position when opportunity strikes.
That process broke down this year. And sometimes it takes a leap of faith to strike for opportunity.
So what do I want? I want an Iowa team that competes for B10 titles. And I want coaches who aren’t afraid to throw the dice from time to time.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Nov 29, 2010 3:28 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah, about that...
I don’t have the time to write down a long comment here so I’ll trust someone else to write down a longer, more thoughtful comment, but what Iowa needs is a mix of both with something closer to the latter.
Schembechler is still right; aiming for the MNC is foolhardy. Aim to do your best. Right now I think Iowa knows their best was better than this tripe.
At least we're not Michigan since 1855.
Beat some mediocre SEC team or whatever.
by ReadingRambler on Nov 29, 2010 3:47 PM CST up reply actions
You are both right...
and both wrong.
Aim for the Conference title, and let the BCS chips fall where they may.
In this case, the worst possible outcome is a BCS at large or Rose Bowl. (the latter being on my bucket list).
Exactly.
The goal for every Iowa team should be get to the Rose Bowl. Anything after that is gravy.
by The Mexican't on Nov 29, 2010 5:53 PM CST up reply actions
I want
to see a team that can consistently play to it’s potential and learn from its mistakes. I agree that shooting for the Rose would be a pretty good goal, and everyone knows the national championship game will just fall wherever the BCS flings its shit. But I also realize that there may be "rebuilding’ years and “bad recruiting” years and what not, even in a consistently top-level program. In those cases, if our boys have 7-5 potential, then I want to see something like 7-5 from them, with anything else making me ecstatic. But this year we had 10-2 potential (or maybe better) and ended up with 7-5, with nearly all of our losses (and one of our wins) falling into the EXACT SAME pattern of mistakes. That’s the part that pisses me off.
Why get angry?
Disappointed is fine, but it also usually subsides once we see better days.
Anger just eats up a fanbase. And, in my book, seems silly when you are winning and making (and hopefully winning) bowl games.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 11:04 PM CST up reply actions
I want a national championship.
Is there something wrong with that?
I recognize that this isn’t Texas or Florida or Ohio State and it will be harder for us than it is for them. Guess what, Oregon isn’t Texas or Florida or Ohio State either but they are finding a way. Had Dixon not blown out his knee they may have done it a few years ago.
What I’ll settle for is a team that doesn’t quit playing with half a quarter to go. A team that is motivated to win and plays like it. A team that doesn’t get beat with disturbing regularity by teams with less talent and atleticism. Because that is a team that at least has a shot at greatness.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
@ Flakbait.
I want to ask you a couple of questions. I’m not doing this to be a dick or to throw anything in your face, but just to gauge your mindset.
Did you play high school or college sports? Did your team (or you if it was an individual sport) win any type of championship (conference, district, state, whatever).
Championships are not as easy as we all think. I’m not even sure wins are as easy as we think. My high school football team was 1-17 over my varsity seasons, and I didn’t really play at all. It gives me the perspective that there are important lessons to be learned. It also makes me feel like a winning record (and any type of earned post-season) is a good thing, and even if it is disappointing, can’t be taken for granted.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 11:08 PM CST up reply actions
I can relate
to your experience in high school. My sophomore year we were one game away from going to the playoffs and then the following year we went a horrid 1-8. The summer between my Junior and Senior year all of us seniors busted ass working out and getting together to try to turn things around. We ended up going 5-4 and missing the playoffs by a few points (had we won our last game we would have been in). The disappointment was enormous, but it also wasn’t the end of the world.
I look at this year as an enormous disappointment, but I will not be jumping off any bridges because a bunch of kids that play a game didn’t meet my expectations.
You can't record your own Vinegar Strokes.
That is a nice turnaround, Niner.
Even if you didn’t make the postseason, I’d be proud of getting better by 4 games.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Dec 1, 2010 12:02 AM CST up reply actions
I feel your pain
Between my sophmore and senior year in high school my football team lost 23 straight games, but the feeling of finally winning a game was like winning a championship. I guess that is what happens at a school when one of the kids goes on to become a top player in college basketball and play in the NBA. People forget about football and focus on basketball.
I wish I had as good an excuse.
Some of our better athletes starting focusing more on boozing and weed (and I assume, chicks). So, we only had about half of the skill-position guys that we should have had.
It was kind of bad when, during my junior year, we were in 3A football, and one week, we had 18 or 19 upperclassmen who were healthy enough to practice.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Dec 1, 2010 12:05 AM CST up reply actions
I did not
When your glasses used to be the bottom of Coke bottles, organized sports involving balls are not on the agenda. I was a pretty decent wrestler and a lousy BMX racer and in both cases I learned that if you want to have any chance at winning, you can simply never stop going as hard as you can.
The reason I, and many others, are pissed off is that the team gave up. They didn’t even come close to their potential. NW, MN & IN should have been cake walks for this team. They weren’t. If they finish 8-5, that’s a decent season but they should be 10-3, maybe 11-2. If they had gone out every week, tried like hell for 60 minutes and had this same result, that would be different. That ain’t what happened.
Besides the motivation, there are issues with how vanilla the scemes are. That is also holding the program back from it’s potential. They don’t have to get all crazy and have Saban and Peterson draw up the playbooks but c’mon, we should not have Persa saying “We know exactly what they’re going to do because it’s always the same”.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
Thank you
Besides the motivation, there are issues with how vanilla the scemes are. That is also holding the program back from it’s potential. They don’t have to get all crazy and have Saban and Peterson draw up the playbooks but c’mon, we should not have Persa saying "We know exactly what they’re going to do because it’s always the same".
This, especially, is what bothers me the most, complacency and what has become an almost pathological resistance to any change by the coaching staff. NOTHING stays the same in this universe, when organisms stop evolving, they go extinct. Radical change isn’t necessarily the answer (and I for one do not believe that is), but some subtle – and a few pronounced – changes are always necessary to keep your opponents honest.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
Everyone WANTS the MNC
and to say otherwise is insulting but one group is beginning to expect it which is silly since the Wisconsin program everyone is falling over themselves to praise hasn’t won one, nor has (for the moment) Oregon, or Virginia Tech or a slew of other really fine programs. I would agree that risks need to be taken but not in the arena of firing a coach and starting over after a couple of hugely disappointing seasons mixed in with a bunch of really exhilarating ones. Kirk needs to make a change in philosophy or staffing, but to tear it all down in reaction to a bad season that turned on a razor’s edge is Tom Davis all over again.
If this year taught me anything it’s that Pat Angerer and AJ Edds were far better than I ever gave them credit for.
Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.
by Kyle McCann't on Nov 29, 2010 4:49 PM CST up reply actions
Could not agree more
especially that last sentence.
Welcome to Ohiowa, the great potato state!
Bret Bielema is a damned red-commie traitor.
Well...
They were good no doubt. But it sure would’ve been a hell of a lot different if we actually had our healthy starters.
Exactly.
Shoot for conference titles. You do that, then maybe, just maybe, you’ll have that season where all the stars align and you get that right combination of schedule, health, luck, chemistry, etc., and get to play for the MNC.
Heck, there have been years where one loss in a major conference gives you a shot. There have been years where Bucky may have had a shot. This year there are still three undefeateds with one week left. You just never know.
IIRC, the 2004 Auburn Tigers went 12-0 in the SEC and got left out of the MNC game. It’s too much of a crapshoot to make that your goal.
Speaking of humbling defeats
I just watched Barcelona whup Real Madrid, 5-0.
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Nov 29, 2010 4:03 PM CST reply actions
Good.
Christiano Ronaldo is an asshat.
Templeton Rye'd the Lightning.
by Smokin Herb Grigsby on Nov 29, 2010 6:28 PM CST up reply actions
Having a bit of the weekend to mull this all over, I think KF should move on now to the NFL
He’s not leaving us with a mess, plenty of good talent coming back and Iowa will be able to attract a good coach with the salary we can offer and the facilities/fan base. I see nothing wrong with trying to get a football equivalent of a McCaffery – aggressive, offensive-oriented ball, and it doesn’t have to be of the Rich Rod variety. I think Kirk is running a serious risk of running the program into the ground if he continues his stubbornness of refusing to adjust in-game. Let him do that at the next level. Iowa isn’t going to suck, the foundation is there for continued success, but it may be time for someone else to drive the bus.
Guess what?! I got a fever, and the only prescription...is more cowbell!!
If past comments are any indication.
Then my guess is James Vandenberg.
by The Mexican't on Nov 29, 2010 7:04 PM CST up reply actions
How about...
James VanDerBeek?
As long as we get Jon Voight as the grizzled, wise old defensive coordinator.

I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 11:11 PM CST up reply actions
I posted this mistake on last nights thread
but i feel it needs repeating
plenty of prayers have come my way and yours embellish a simple truth i have learned surviving 58 weeks after radical head and neck surgery
if you beleive, if you releive believe things will happen , but not necessarily in your time,,,
I want our kids to know that I beleive in them, and no matter how much shit is slung on the wall if they want to really show is what being a Hawk is they can,,, and what ever has happend (watching AC getting double and triple teamed in Bloomington with my own eyes is just one example) doesn’t mean they can’t look inside and find the strength to end the season the best of their abilities .
If anyone understands the concept of leaving nothing on the field, I do. I want to share that with the young men wearing the hawk on their helmet. I can’t go out and block anyone or throw or do anything but offer encouragement because they can. It doesnt matter what I feel about KOK or Captain Kirk or Norm,,,,
GO HAWKS
(my apologies 1-10 not 1-11 mental methane)
If Sarah Palin were any smarter rocks would be in trouble
And still a nice comment with the corrected record.
Continued best wishes to you, OH Hawk.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 11:13 PM CST up reply actions
I was contemplating a personal moratorium on Iowa football...
but instead have read/listened to fans here and elsewhere and have come to the conclusion that wrapping my mind around this season will take another week or so, if not much longer.
Yes, we’re all extremely disappointed. Yes, most of us realize that this truly is a solid team we’re talking about and that the marquee wins this year are much more indicative of their collective ability than the last 4 games. And yes, we’re all very conflicted about the coaching staff, especially KF, and their ability to manage games and instill confidence and a sense urgency in their players.
That last part is what I’ve been most upset about in the weeks since the Sparty beatdown; the coaching staff, especially the defensive coaches, have shown little to no sense of urgency before, after or during games. I’d love to see what goes on in practice or film sessions during the week, because I (and we, for that matter) could be very wrong about this, but the way it has appeared on the field these past few Saturday’s is that this team doesn’t play with passion or the drive to execute when it matters most. Of course, this is not all on the coaches. Last year, things went the Hawks way a lot. They played extremely well when it mattered, and they played with passion. Whatever the cause for this monumental shift may be, it absolutely needs to be corrected if this program hopes to return to the form of the latter half of the ’08 season and the full ’09 season in the years to come.
And that ultimately falls on the shoulder of KF. This off-season is going to be an incredibly interesting one, and I have a strong feeling that Kirk will be under the microscope heading into next season more than he’s probably ever been. So it goes when you follow a resounding success with an ugly-duckling of a season. By my book, the changes that must occur are as follows; the message of the coaching staff in tough moments and behind closed doors needs to be reevaluated; the complete and utter reliance on a system that the opposition has effectively been handed the keys to defeat must be adapted when necessary; and most of all, a sense of urgency and outward passion must be relied upon much more heading into future years.
I, for one (and as far as I can tell, I am not the only one), still believe in this program and Coach Ferentz. When we win and play well, the mantra KF and his staff preach makes all other programs look inferior. Perspective is certainly one of the most important things a coach can extol… but when the going gets tough, it’s time to live in the now and correct things before preaching perspective turns into the door hitting you in the ass.
Templeton Rye'd the Lightning.
by Smokin Herb Grigsby on Nov 29, 2010 6:46 PM CST reply actions
On a completely different note
I watched the entirity of Glass’s press conference last night saying ta ta to herr Lynch. It was the classiest put the boy in the boat and set it on fire speech I have ever seen.
Real Class,,,,
If Sarah Palin were any smarter rocks would be in trouble
Grass is Greener?
Every year I think about coaches and coaching in the B10 at the end of the year and a bit of panic sets in. Brew and his first recruiting class, DickRod and past sucesses, the Zooker (recruiter extroadinaire), and the Fitz. How will Iowa keep up? I will take my chances with Ferentz. Look at how some of those others turned out. I think the the next coach at Minnesota will be Wiscy offensive coordinator, Crist. The loss of him and the OL will put a little pressure on Bielema. We’ll see. By the way, how come noone comes to raid Iowa’s coordinators? Something to think about.
by George Un-Raveling on Nov 29, 2010 8:36 PM CST reply actions
Exactly
Maybe thats where the (partial or complete) change should happen.
by George Un-Raveling on Nov 29, 2010 8:42 PM CST up reply actions
Being a OC or DC
does not mean you would be a good coach.
by Bryce Carlson on Nov 29, 2010 8:48 PM CST up reply actions
Excellent point, Carlson.
Let’s look at the immediate background of the current B10 head coaches:
Paterno (was an assistant or maybe even coordinator at PSU before he was the man).
Ferentz (NFL assistant).
Tressel (FCS head coach).
Bielema (Wisky DC).
Wizgerald (jNW LBs).
Zook (Florida HC).
Dantonio (Cincy HC).
Hope (Purdue associate head coach)
DickRod (WV HC).
Lynch (IU OC).
Brewster (Denver Broncos TEs coach).
Getting the job really depends on what the university is looking for: previous head coaching experience? NFL ties? Ties to your program? Recent high-level success?
And it is difficult to get the reins of a big program if you are over 50 or 55 anymore. Which probably kept Norm from being considered by other programs in his time at Iowa.
KOK has never been dynamic enough (either personally or professionally) to be sought out by other programs, and he seems to value Ferentz’s trust enough to not look around. While many of us have questioned his development of QBs, I also think he has done a nice job of developing some from obscurity (Banks, Chandler, Stanzi. Tate may not have been from complete obscurity, but his other 2003 offers listed by Scout were: Hawaii, Baylor, Houston, Iowa State.)
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Nov 29, 2010 11:30 PM CST up reply actions
Chryst isn't taking the Minnesota job
Will be interesting to see if he takes some other position. He’s oft-rumored in head-coaching searches, if he’s going to make the jump this would be the year he does it if for no other reason than a failure to move up might tar his as insufficiently ambitious (i.e. prefers to be the guy not in charge, the one who isn’t willing to risk it).
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
Coordinators
No one wants KOK and Norm is seen as too old and too much of a health risk (even before this season). This isn’t meant as a knock on either (well, ok, a little bit on KOK), but I am on record as wanting some fresh blood, and a new, different perspective in the coordinator positions.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
As I continue to chew the ending to this regular season over in my head
the one thing that I simply haven’t been able to comprehend is that Iowa teams lead by KF are supposed to get stronger over the course of the season.
This is to say, we’re not flashy, we’re not overwhelmingly talented, we’re a scheme driven team, that relies on timing and a complete understanding of each players part in the system. Those early season losses and close calls in previous years have been explained by lack of experience, but generally by the end of the year, we’re as good as possible. We don’t typically plateau in halfway through the season. There are still mistakes, still plenty of teaching moments, and those are used to get better.
We didn’t see that this year. We didn’t see a team where execution appeared to be fine tuned over the course of the year
It’s easy to point to all of the injuries, and I have no doubt that they are the majority of the cause, as well as sheer player inexperience caused by guys pressed into action because of the injuries.
However, it still seems to me that we didn’t see the kind of progress as the year went on that we normally see. I’m used to being excited for the end of the year to see how good we can be, but that’s not the case this year.
It never gets to be easy.
Why the fuck doesn't it ever get to be easy?
Let us look at this year and look at ourselves also
Expectation Defense will be monsters….. reality two linebackers to the pros one starting lock down corner to pros starting and who did we have to replace them? Well yes some experienced player but by years end true freshman playing. Now guys and gals how do teams in the big 10 do playing true freshman on defense.
Offense a new line oh hell that’s no problem they will just be as good as last year right off the bat. Well they were good but they still had and have much to learn. I do believe this will be a real strength next year. QB he is better but not the gunslinger we came to love. He can’t lead drives to win when he is laying on his back. RB Hampton is back no he is not. Well no problem Arod and you know who. Opps no just ARod and we have to keep him healthy all year. Oh that is so easy to do in the big ten hell no one ever gets hurt. Now if we look at this how in the hell did we think we were going to contend for the MNC? Boise had an easy schedule 22 of 24 starters back and hell they didn’t even get the job done.
I was disappointed beyond belief in losing to the Golden Rodents but now that I reflect on the year as a whole 7-5 and in every game they played I can live with it and even be satisfied not happy but satisfied.
( Now when some of you decide to rip on my this was posted at 1 in the morning and I am sleep deprived)























