The Big Ten Betting Extravaganza: Week 12
Last week's loss was probably my fault. You may recall the Failpants I was wearing when I wrote this:
I don't know about you, but I don't think I would want to have to give Indiana 21.5 points.
That was a typo. Clearly what I meant was:
I don't know about you, but I don't think I would want to have to give Indiana 63.5 points.
My punishment is to eat a slice of Hawaiian Biebercake.
mmmmmmm
This week I'm going to keep my comments to myself and leave it all up to the experts, and......well shit, that's you guys.
THE ROAD TO FINANCIAL EQUILIBRIUM
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I have never been surer of anything in my whole life
Iowa will own the Buckeroos on Saturday. After two weeks of less than acceptable play on the road, the Iowa seniors are looking at this game as bigger than any game they will play in their entire Iowa careers. The seniors will be grunting fire and farting thunder.
Ambition is the willingness to kill the things you love and eat them to stay alive.
pulling out all the stops
I hear their doing a ‘fly over’ and Dan Gable is the honorary capt.
AMURICA!
by KentuckyThunderPussy on Nov 19, 2010 12:30 PM CST up reply actions
MSU steam rolls the B**l*rm*k*rs
to try and match Wisco in the scoring dept.
MSU -20.5 easily
"You don't become a Hawkeye fan, You're born with Black and Gold in your veins." - Me
by BStylin Hawkye on Nov 19, 2010 12:07 PM CST reply actions
I voted the WIS/MICH over, but this was my second pick.
(And the MICH over would been fine last week if it wasn’t for that goddamn monsoon.)
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
I love showing defiant team loyalty with other peolple's cash.
Iowa wins straight up! Lock it in and ship the money-line.
/deal-with-it.gif
I'm going Michigan +4.5
for no other reason than to see Wisconsin fail.
Welcome to Ohiowa, the great potato state!
Bret Bielema is a damned red-commie traitor.
MICHIGAN OVER
This Michigan Over business is like housing prices: Small blips but no way in hell it’s going to crash completely.
I spent half my life's earnings on wine, women & song. The other half I wasted.
by therealCatnuts on Nov 19, 2010 12:13 PM CST reply actions
Everyone who picked Indiana last week
Take a bow, chumps!
"The coaches don't know what they're doing! Start Newsome!"
Beat Sam Lickliter.
by ReadingRambler on Nov 19, 2010 12:13 PM CST reply actions
Unfortunately I am too
in fact, i think all of my predictions were wrong. I’m pretty terrible at this.
Welcome to Ohiowa, the great potato state!
Bret Bielema is a damned red-commie traitor.
I've got to go with MSU -20.5
Last week, Purdue couldn’t score a touchdown against Michigan’s defense in a home game. I repeat: THEY COULDN’T SCORE A TOUCHDOWN AGAINST MICHIGAN’S DEFENSE AT HOME. Something will have to go terribly, terribly wrong for Michigan State to score less than 21 against the Purdue defense.
Michigan v. Wisconsin
I have this image in my head

Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Nov 19, 2010 12:29 PM CST reply actions
How did John Clay get on top of the building?
"I want to be a cowboy. I don't want to be a panda. Pandas are boring, stupid and boring. Bad panda!"
by RossWB on Nov 19, 2010 12:38 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Same way peacocks get in the top branches of trees
fucking magic
I spent half my life's earnings on wine, women & song. The other half I wasted.
by therealCatnuts on Nov 19, 2010 12:43 PM CST up reply actions
Harry Potter magic...
or David Copperfield magic?
Going, going, going, going, going, going, going, going.... Alright, I'll stop for now.
by EnergizerHawk on Nov 19, 2010 7:28 PM CST up reply actions
He heard there was a solid chocolate turducken up there?
Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.
by Blackheartnopants on Nov 19, 2010 12:48 PM CST up reply actions
that's racist
"The coaches don't know what they're doing! Start Newsome!"
Beat Sam Lickliter.
by ReadingRambler on Nov 19, 2010 1:00 PM CST up reply actions
I voluntarily eat a "hair" piece of the Beiber cake
because I posted t foreget these choices, take Utah and give points. I could not fathom Notre Dame showing a pulse for the first time in 5 years, with a brand new QB. My ND-fan buddies were stunned themselves. I was all over that but thankfully, not in Vegas.
Anyway, back to the Michigan over. Since Bielema has decided it’s cool to throw bombs when up 50, this should be something to see. But did I vote that? No. Becuase my only thinking in approaching tomorrow’s game is exactly as written. I don’t know how, don’t care how, but somehow, F it, Iowa wins.
In Norm we trust.
Last Week Was Tough
because nothing seemed… safe. In retrospect it’s easy. I suspected UM & Ill would be tired after their track meet but it doesn’t count because I didn’t say anything.
This week though.
Penn St, MSU, Illinois, the Michigan over.
I voted Penn St, which is probably the least safe of the bunch because, fuck it. I just like JoePa. Go get ’em old man!
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
I voted for Iowa wins.
Not cuz I think it will happen necessarily, but because that one had naughty words in it.
I also picked Indiana to win last week, so I pretty much am a stone cold lock to be right.
Michigan and the points. Why?
Because while Wisky took a walk on the wild side of prolific offensive production last week, no team in America is more shackled to that style of play than Michigan. This game will resemble those ridiculous run and gun Loyola Marymount basketball games with Bo Kimble and Hank Gathers. They would play UCLA and the Bruins were all about slowing the pace down and controlling the boards—that is, right until tip off—then their inner undisciplined pick-up ball mindset kicked in and voila…a 134-110 beat down at the hands of a school that almost encouraged you to score against them.
Wisky (and more importantly, B-enema) just might believe they can produce another 11 touchdown game….Michigan has them right where they want them.
I have never been surer of anything in my life than Michigan covering this spread.
"I wish you luck with a capital 'F'" - The Real Elvis.
My logic:
Fucking Bielema covered the over by hisself last week.
-4.5 to that turd RRod is, uhh, the difference between a TD v. a FG, minus .5 point. Michigan can’t kick FGs, and can’t hold teams to FGs, so I’m not sure where the FG comes in.
Bielema wants style points very badly, although he’s not running up the score (where’s my fucking chart?)
If Wisconsin doesn’t score 60 points, it’s only because Michigan has the ball too much.
I actually voted Wisconsin + the points, because I think they’ll win by plenty. Because, while I think RRod is a turd, I believe Bielema, is, um, a grander turd, I guess.
Therefore, I do not endorse your selection. I wouldn’t be unhappy were you to be right, so long as Michigan actually wins (threw up in my mouth that I had that thought). After all, we’re wagering with HFMRs fake money, so what do I care?
I don't think it's style points
so much as it is preparing his team for the idea that they will NOT let off the gas. They’ve got a Rose Bowl coming up where they will face either Oregon, TCU or BSU. All of whom can put up a ton of points and Wisco might need to keep up with them if their D doesn’t hold. It should, but you never know.
"If you need a rah-rah speech at halftime, you’re playing the wrong sport." - Pat Angerer
Not if you do your job.
Then MSU gets that task (assuming we can, you know, not soil ourselves in Happy Valley or against YMHR).
Bradley-Terry ratings for college football and basketball
Because there aren't enough computer rankings already.
Hmmmmmm
This week I’m liking both Wisconsin -4.5 and Illinois -7.5.
BUT, I can’t put any money on them dirty bastard Badgers so imma imma imma be taking Illinois -7.5. Who knows who the jNW back up is and honestly I could care fucking less. He/she won’t be as good as Persa and the timing of the offense will be off. Also, the fact that they’re not playing Iowa means they will like lay a turd.
I’m always a big fan of the Michigan Over but 67 is a colossal fuck ton of points. It only takes a couple of decent defensive stands by either team to throw that out the window. So I can’t take it. and ok yea yea I realize this is Michigan’s defense
Don't want to hijack but
Iowa wrestlers win first match with Iowa Central 45-0. The team did not give up a takedown for a good start to the season. They are currently wrestling against Coe college. Andy hamilton is covering the meet in a live blog here
Ambition is the willingness to kill the things you love and eat them to stay alive.
The Fighting Bielemas
Our former captain has a checklist in his bathroom of the coaches he is trying to displace.
Brewster- get to demonstrate lack of control to on field post game to show Admin is is losing it… Going for 2 might do it… CHECK
Lynch- curb stomp until he can’t yell anymore… CHECK
Rodriguez – get to bench DR and TF because they can’t outscore us and our power run game….
We all know BB well enough to know he is going to enjoy making RR absolutely miserable tomorrow…. His level of douche-bagged-ness is top shelf and putting the screws to someone on the hot seat must make his stinkhole tingle….
I’ll Take the OVER…
I'm pretty sure I didn't get anything right but here goes
Penn St -10.5 because Indiana sucks
Michigan St -20.5 because OMHR sucks
Mich/Wisky over because it’s going over also Wisky probably covers
Iowa wins straight up for no other reason than I’m a homer
jNWU +7.5 because they keep every game close and maybe they will even without Persa.
It's not that I'm lazy, Bob, it's that I just don't care
Scratch out one vote for jNWU +7.5
I totally forgot that Persa was damaged…
Wisky -4.5… J.J. Watt comes up big and makes the RichRods cry.
PSU-Indiana: I don’t know how Indiana is only getting 10.5 for this game. This seems like an unholy lock for PSU to cover. I’d also go under; feels like a 38-7 type game.
MSU-Purdue: I think MSU sends out the seniors with a big win. Kerrigan can’t cover this by himself. Also thinking under here; if Purdue can’t score on Michigan they can’t put up more than 10 on us, and MSU is pretty consistently in the 30s but doesn’t hit 40 often.
Wisconsin-Michigan: Holy mother of God is that a high over-under. It’s still the best bet on the board; the weather won’t be a factor this time, so take the over to the bank. As for the spread … I wouldn’t touch it with a 39 1/2 foot pole. Wisconsin never plays well in the Mitten State (got smoked by a bad, bad 2004 MSU team and lost to the Worst Michigan Team Ever in ’08), but their offense should be able to name their score against the Michigan sieve.
OSU-Iowa: Iowa and the under. Part ARM PUNTS AHOY, part “you wouldn’t like me when I’m angry”, and part hope that you can do your part in giving me a New Year’s holiday in Pasadena. Not a whole lot of confidence on the under, though.
Illinois-NW: Basic rule of Northwestern betting: if the spread is more than 7, take the points. Always. You’ll lose occasionally (the NW-PSU game, for instance), but you’ll win the vast majority of the time. Leaning over as well.
Bradley-Terry ratings for college football and basketball
Because there aren't enough computer rankings already.
PSU-Indiana: PSU yes, under no.
MSU-Purdue: Double fail.
Wisconsin-Michigan: Over yes.
OSU-Iowa: Push on the spread, under yes.
Illinois-NW: NW no, over yes.
4-4-1 for the week. Not good enough to break even thanks to the vig, but better than last week.
Bradley-Terry ratings for college football and basketball
Because there aren't enough computer rankings already.
Eating that cake
Is worse than anything I could possibly imagine. I’m so sorry.
Visit Inside The Shoe
The Buckeye blog for every fan!
by Ian_InsideTheShoe on Nov 19, 2010 9:45 PM CST reply actions

by 







![[No words to describe this. No words.--AJ]
Notti Boy gets some competition for the crown. NSFW-ish.](http://cdn3.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/203389/0_small.jpg)
















