IOWA CRUSHES NORTHERN IOWA IN 17-16 LAUGHER
IOWA CITY: Joy and laughter fill the streets of the River City after Iowa demolishes powerhouse Northern Iowa. The game, which was never in doubt after the opening kick, represented Iowa football's largest margin of victory in nearly nine months.
The hero of the day was undoubtedly Paki O'Meara, who rushed 9 times for 16 whole yards while also generously donating a football to the underprivileged UNI defense in the third quarter. Also sterling in relief of the decorated tailback was Adam Robinson, whom the Daily Iowan credited with 240 yards rushing and 512 yards of total offense. That account of the game is in dispute, however, as they credited all Hawkeyes with the exact same statistics.
Also, another hero of the game was Tony "Ol' Reliable" Moeaki, who seems to be made of iron and non-Newtonian fluids. The Ethnically Ambiguous Atomic Weapon registered 10 catches for 83 yards and a score--not to mention running his streak of consecutive starts to at least 30.
The highlight of the game came at the very end, of course, when Northern Iowa was trying to register a single field goal in order to bring the score to some semblance of respectability. Iowa dutifully blocked the kick back into the Panthers' faces, then iin a stunning display of audacity, declined to recover the ball in order to allow UNI to attempt the kick again! Not since Casey strode the basepaths of Mudville did a titan of sport display such hubris! But though karma punished Casey that day, fate itself took a back seat to the Hawkeyes' whims; UNI's second kick was also swatted, sealing their ignominy.
Said Kirk Ferentz to the vanquished Mark Farley and his bloodied charges: "Hope we didn't hurt your boys too bad." But Iowa probably did.
Iowa is expected to rocket up the Top 25 this week, as theirs was easily the top performance in the land this weekend. After all, it's generally agreed that championships are more important than mere bowl games. Northern Iowa plays in the Championship Subdivision, and Iowa in the logically inferior Bowl Subdivision.
Indeed, there are zero worries about the state of Iowa football tonight! All that's left to ponder is how many 1st place votes they'll get. Probably all of them!
Congratulations, Hawkeyes, and if you pull that shit against a I-A opponent you will lose by 70.
14 recs |
72 comments
|
Comments
Great recap or Greatest recap?
It's not just your perceptions that can be wrong. Even your memory is often incomplete or possibly flat out wrong.
by shake n bake on Sep 5, 2009 9:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
eiher way rec'ed recap
It's not just your perceptions that can be wrong. Even your memory is often incomplete or possibly flat out wrong.
by shake n bake on Sep 5, 2009 9:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
OOPS!
While I don’t want to dignify your sarcasm-filled humor piece, I must admit it is pretty funny—-and Iowa deserved it. Your Borowitz-influenced disdain was only matched by Paki’s ineffectiveness. I predicted, on another thread, that Iowa would win 24-17 and drop off the Top 25. I was off by a little, but dead on in the 2nd part of my prediction as my alter-ego Nostradumbus. Meanwhile, I thought Robinson would show something, and he did. We are in trouble, but then we always are. On to Iowa State and redemption!
"It's a cookbook!"---The Twilight Zone
by Buck18 on Sep 5, 2009 9:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I can't figure out if you are...
an Iowa hater, a self hater, Robert Duvall or Andy Dick. In any case, enjoy!
Oh, and Iowa will not leave the top 25. Winning is the name of the game in the rankings biz. A win is a win. Blah, Blah, Blah. Fill in the blank (just trying to sound like you). And after next week, win or lose against ISU, no one who votes in the rankings will much recall or give a Cyclones ass about this game. It’s just the cold hard nature of the wins and losses business.
You have to admit though, blocking two field goals with the game on the line—even if it was against the Sisters of the Poor—takes some gigantic stones.
Zed: You could be my right-hand man.
Oh: I've seen what you do with your right hand. No, thank you.
by StoopsMyAss on Sep 5, 2009 10:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
All of the above?
We won’t drop out of the Top 25, but we’ll fall 2 spots or so (to be right around 25). Fortunately, Bradford’s injury and OU’s loss will overshadow our shortcomings (as well as tOSU’s near-loss). Plus, we have the added benefit of back-to-back blocked field goals as a feel-good/epic effort (almost too late) effort to cushion us.
Spievey was an absolute beast today. Prater can’t return soon enough.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
by HoyaGoon on Sep 6, 2009 1:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Top 25ing
Not that it matters, because I don’t think anyone could possibly think that we look like a Top 25 team anyway (for however little that distinction matters in Week 1), but I think it’s conceivable that we drop out of the Top 25 if some of the teams in the Others Receiving Votes category had impressive wins. I haven’t looked to see if they did, though.
Plus, we have the added benefit of back-to-back blocked field goals as a feel-good/epic effort (almost too late) effort to cushion us.
Here’s to hoping that stand doesn’t become like the Syracuse goal-line stand in 2006: a tremendous defensive stand in a season of disappointment.
by RossWB on Sep 6, 2009 8:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We looked bad
We’ll have some guys back in the next couple of weeks, but that being said, if there aren’t massive improvements made, this season is going to be ugly.
It never gets to be easy
by chitownhawkeye on Sep 6, 2009 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Others Receiving Votes
Iowa was 22 in the AP (with 229 votes), and 21 in the USA Today poll (with 257 votes). The first “others receiving votes” team in each poll was Oregon St in the AP with 122, and Kansas in the USA Today with 138.
AP “others” – Oregon St, Illinois, Pittsburgh, Mich St, Rutgers, TTech, W Va, Cincy, Clemson, Miami FL, ECU, Tennessee, Arizona.
USA Today Coaches’ poll “others” – (Oregon St was already ranked) Kansas, Mich St, TTech, Cincy, Pittsburgh, W Va, Rutgers, Miami FL, Mizzou, Illinois, Clemson.
I will list “others” results in order of the AP poll, as Iowa is one lower in that one (22 instead of 21) and more likely to drop from it.
Oregon St wins at home against Portland St (FCS), 34 to 7.
Illinois lost to Mizzou in St. Louis, 37 to 9.
Pitt wins at home against Youngstown St (FCS), 38 to 3.
Mich St wins at home against Montana St (FCS), 44 to 3.
Rutgers plays host to Cincy Monday afternoon 3pm.
TTech wins at home against North Dakota (FCS), 38 to 13.
West Virginia wins at home against Liberty (FCS), 33 to 20.
Cincy plays at Rutgers Monday afternoon at 3pm.
Clemson wins at home against Middle Tenn St, 37 to 14.
Miami FL plays at #18 Florida St on Monday night at 7pm.
ECU wins at home against Appalachian St (FCS), 29 to 24.
Tennessee wins at home against Western Kentucky, 63 to7.
Arizona wins at home against Central Michigan, 19 to 6.
Kansas wins at home against Northern Colorado, 49 to 3.
In the AP poll, Notre Dame, Nebraska, and Kansas were behind Iowa in the top 25. In the USA Today, it was Nebraska, Notre Dame, BYU, and Oregon St. Obviously, BYU should jump about 8 or 10 spots after beating #3 Oklahoma.
Nebraska wins at home against Florida Atlantic, 49 to 3.
Notre Dame wins at home against Nevada, 35 to 0.
Kansas won (see above).
My conclusions: I could see Iowa dropping out of both polls if voters decide that Iowa sucks because they needed two blocked kicks to beat an FCS team (albeit, UNI is a very good FCS team). The teams I think are most likely to jump ahead of us would be Oregon St, Pitt, Mich St, TTech, Tennessee, and Kansas. I could also see all the top 25 teams behind Iowa jumping ahead of us. So, Iowa will be lucky to stay in the Top 25, but I see them in the “others receiving votes” category for at least a week or two (until after we hopefully beat ISU and Arizona, which are certainly not locks for us right now).
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Sep 6, 2009 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hawks will be in top 25...
it’s not even an issue.
Zed: You could be my right-hand man.
Oh: I've seen what you do with your right hand. No, thank you.
by StoopsMyAss on Sep 6, 2009 8:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You could be right, Stoops.
But I always take the pessimistic view when it comes to Iowa and rankings.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Sep 6, 2009 8:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Something like the paragraphs below should have been added:
When questioned about just how great Iowa played, the following UNI Panther players provided varying comments. “It took my breath away. I’m so tired of running” said a breathless Carlos Anderson, the undersized running back who led the day in rushing yards but who Iowa obviously would never recruit.
“I speak for all of us when I say we are all exhausted from catching passes” said Jarred Herring of a UNI receiving corps who obviously felt like they had played through a painfully-long day.
Finally, UNI quarterback Pat Grace was overheard saying that “…My arm hurts a little. Not so much from having it driven into the ground, but more so from throwing for 270 yards.”
It is this reporter’s conclusion that the great Iowa defense has not skipped a beat from last year’s excellent performances.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Sep 5, 2009 10:25 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
RB Apocalypse
Just awful. Makes you appreciate just how absolutely dominant Shonn Greene was. I hope that Brinson bounces back VERY quickly from his injury. Otherwise, it’s going to be a long, long fall. On the plus side, I don’t know when (certainly not in my lifetime) Iowa was deep or talented in the receiving department.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
by HoyaGoon on Sep 6, 2009 1:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey!
Still, that’s extremely funny, and funny, as you know, is part of the healing process.
I thought there were a few positives of note:
I thought Robinson did okay, especially since the right side of our line showed all of the anger, resistance and generalized violence of the checkout lady at the Hy-Vee. Obviously he’ll start next week. With luck Calloway will make a big difference and he won’t get killed before he’s old enough to drink.
I thought McNutt had very unusual field presence, presence in the sense that he controls the space he’s in. Too bad he dropped a good one.
I thought it was mighty interesting to see us running a zone blitz of some sort, leading Clayborn to man up and chase their TE (successfully) into the end zone. It looked like he needed a respirator when the play was over, but still.
Spievey is all-world. Forget the coverage skills, when he says you are going down, you are going down immediately.
Stanzi was 16-21 in the second half. We should just script his Stanzi-ball in O’Keefe’s first 15 plays, so we get that out of the way in order for him to get started earlier on his heartwarming personal comeback.
Nobody got hurt?
That’s all I got. I’m not sure I’ll have the nerve to watch next week. That Kirk Ferentz! He’s such a cutup, messing with our expectations.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
by Bellanca on Sep 6, 2009 4:25 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
yes, yes and yes
There were plenty of good things out there yesterday. First, I saw an emerging pass attack. That’s a good thing. Second, Chaney finally emerging is a good thing. I want D-coordinators to think about him when they are planning. And to beat a dead horse, Spievey is a serious, serious weapon. I agree w/ Bellanca that Robinson exceeded expectations and should start next week—I think he can do more. Brinson, Calloway, Prater in the wings is no small matter. Their losses were not helpful.
First games are never a true and complete indication of your potential. Certainly, Ferentz is totally committed to building the team as the season goes along. His comments in the press conference reiterating that yet again, “it’s not where you start, but where you finish” and he even highlighted that the Michigan team that lost to App State beat Florida in a bowl. So I sense he was not confident that the team was where it needs to be going into the game.
I guess ISU will try to replicate the UNI attack, lots of underneath crossing with screens and so forth—-we will not be shocked by it.
Sure, this could have been a catastrophe…But, so too could Purdue have been last year. We move on.
Zed: You could be my right-hand man.
Oh: I've seen what you do with your right hand. No, thank you.
by StoopsMyAss on Sep 6, 2009 8:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Spievey . . .
He is all-world.
What an effort. The defensive half of the equation took the game seriously, did their homework and wanted desperately to win.
The offensive side wasn’t prepared. Not even close. If everything is a set up, then that was insanity. The offense, especially with that OL, has no margin for error. None. Zip. They wanted the game to go Stanzi’s way, but the guards were in trail technique too many plays.
"I always like it better when the clowns seem to try to be happy."
by MarcMorehouse on Sep 6, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Question
What exactly has DJK done to deserve this? How can we have our best WR on the bench for 2.5 quarters when we are in a tight game like that. I found it interesting that on the very first play he entered the game we have a WIDE OPEN touchdown pass(called back for holding,but still).Captain Kirk better learn how to forgive- and- freaking- forget.Obviously we are not good enough to win with our best players on the bench.
I agree with everyone on Spivey.By far, the best player on the field today.
What if KOK spelled god????
by HerkyLerky on Sep 6, 2009 6:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It's up to the players to stay off the bench
Not Kirk’s ability to forget about trespasses. If you want that, hire Bobby Bowden.
I think the players that were (rightfully) benched this week got the point. Keep your nose clean, or sit and watch this team go down in flames. Your choice. UNI game better have scared them straight.
by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Sep 6, 2009 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good, Bad, Whatever
GOOD:
Second-half Stanzi. 16/21, 180 yds, 1 TD (or something like that) and not to play the coulda/shoulda game, but that doesn’t include two drops by McNutt and Stanzi or the beautiful TD pass to Chaney called back for holding. The Stanziballs and the inexplicable turnovers are infuriating, but Stanzi’s ability to bounce back and come through in the clutch is mighty impressive. I think it says something for him when he’s led us to a pair of come-from-behind wins in the fourth quarter in just 12 starts, which is almost half as many comeback wins as all the other KF QBs put together. (Last year, I remember seeing some absurd stat last year that KF teams were like 4-40 when trailing after the 3rd quarter; Ricky at least gives me hope that he might be able to pull it out.)
TonyMo: Without DJK or Myers, Moeaki was definitely the main object of Stanzi’s affection yesterday and he did a great job of catching damn near everything thrown his way. And he didn’t get hurt (knock on wood). Huzzah! This is the TonyMo we all dreamed of five years ago.
Spievey: What a stud. Good coverage ability and fantastic tackling yesterday (which is good, since most of the other defenders wanted to play two-hand touch rather than tackle football). In fact, he was so good (and the other CBs were so… less good, to be kind) that it’s made me re-evaluate my position on Spievey as return man, too. The drop-off from him to the remaining CBs is pretty damn precipitous – far moreso than the drop-off from him to another return-man option.
Donahue: Yeah, that was way more punting than you should ever see against a I-AA team, but he was money. He more than did his job at the end of the game by pinning UNI back at the 8-yard line; it’s not his fault the defense was so spectacularly unable to take advantage of his great field position.
WRs: I can’t recall ever being more excited about a crew of WRs during the KF Era. Maybe 2002 after it became clear that CJ Jones and Mo Brown were gonna tear things up. But this group has a ton of talent: Chaney looked super-motivated and he brings a speed threat we haven’t had for a while. Using him on the end-around was genius (though if Sandeman was healthy, I have depressingly little doubt that KOK would have called that play for him instead) and he made a great catch on the called-back TD. He may not be a 1/2 WR option, but we need to try to get him at least 4-5 touches a game. McNutt looked like the sure-handed, find-the-holes-in-the-defense guy we’ve missed since Hinkel (or maybe good ol’ Double D), until that unfortunate drop. Stross had a great catch and looked solid and DJK was DJK. I don’t know why he, KF, and Campbell can’t all get on the same page but it needs to happen ASAP. And I was intrigued to see Keenan Davis get a shot on one play; I don’t consider it a waste of a redshirt (unless he doesn’t see the field again all year, of course) because he’s clearly very talented (he has a great combo of size and speed) and we can ill-afford to leave talented guys on the bench.
BAD:
RBs: Paki was what we all feared. If he doesn’t have the burst to hit the hole against an FCS defense, what prayer does he have against Big 10 defenses? He can keep his third-down RB job and do some damage on special teams (although he didn’t impress on KR, either), but please no more heavy RB duty. Robinson flashed some promise, but he seems to have trouble seeing (and hitting) the holes at the right time and he doesn’t seem to be as tough a runner as Shonn or Jewel were. Let’s hope that Brinson or Wegher can progress quickly.
OL: The interior line was a sieve for much of the game. I am hopeful that the guard positions will improve with the return of Calloway and Vandervelde; Julian should take over one spot and hopefully Dace can slide over the other guard spot; Doering and Gettis looked rough out there. What happened to Kuempel? He looked great filling in for Olson last year against Wisco, but now he can’t beat out those guys? Weird. Still, even if those guys get the G position settled down, we need better play out of the C spot. Raf has no shortage of experience, but he still seems to struggle a lot.
Whoever was responsible for pass coverage in the middle of the field: The LBs? The safeties? Grace was gutting us out there, which surprised me given the coverage abilities of Edds and Angerer (and the latter’s nose for the INT). There wasn’t much punishment being delivered out there, either. Granted, part of the problem was that Grace too often had way too much time to work with, but the soft zone got wrecked yesterday; that makes me a bit nervous for the ISU game. When the coverage tightened up in the third quarter, the defense looked a lot better.
The other cornerback spot: Come back soon, Prater… there’s a starting spot waiting right here. It would be idiotic to throw in the towel on Castillo/Lowe after one bad game (Antwan struggled mightily as a frosh, but it paid off later in his career), but they’re definitely not our best option at that spot this year.
Kick/punt returns: We’re still getting sweet fuck-all out of the return game.
by RossWB on Sep 6, 2009 8:42 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
They never really got a returnable punt
They were all so short that the returner (and we tried at least three of them) either just let it bounce, had to fair catch it because the coverage was right there, or caught one that he should have fair caught (Spievey’s last attempt before they pulled him). Spievey did okay the one time they kicked it too him on kickoffs, but, yeah, Paki didn’t show much. I’d love to see Wegher back there, but I’m sure they have their reasons for not doing it.
As for the corners, I actually thought Lowe looked okay as a nickle. Castillo was really bad though, and got picked on all day, especially when Greenwood (as bad in coverage as ever) was lined up over the top of him. Getting Prater back will help a lot, because I don’t think anyone is going to be throwing to the other side. I can’t exaggerate just how good Spievey is. I couldn’t take my eyes off of him when the defense was on the field. He was always had his man locked down, and he was ridiculously quick to recognize run and get over to help, even when he was on the other side of the field. There would have been several more long runs to the outside if it weren’t for him reacting quickly, because no one else was doing any sort of outside contain. And holy shit can he hit. The guy’s an NFL player right now, and I’ll be surprised if he’s still here next year.
by NorseHawk on Sep 6, 2009 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: punt returns
That’s true, the punts were really lousy and unreturnable for most of the day. I guess the jury’s still out there. Kick returns … Wegher would be nice to see back there. I can understand not using him at RB if he hasn’t picked up blocking yet (especially if the interior OL is going to doing ole blocking), but it would be nice to try him out at KR. Or give Chaney a few more looks. I know his past attempts at KR were middling, but he does seem to have a new focus this year… might be worth another look.
100% agreement on Spievey, though. He absolutely looks the part (dude looks chiseled out of granite this year) and was playing the part, too. He will be fun to watch the rest of the year and (selfishly) I hope he comes back for another year in ’10…
by RossWB on Sep 6, 2009 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Correcion: Paki was WORSE than we feared.
by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Sep 6, 2009 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
1.6 ypc wasn't what we were looking for?
Oh… right.
by RossWB on Sep 6, 2009 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even the FB had a higher ypc
Of course, I think Morse had only the one run. But that is more FB handoffs than the past 4 years combined.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
by HoyaGoon on Sep 6, 2009 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
One run on 4th and a mile
UNI was totally giving up the run there. He did show some surprising quickness though, I wouldn’t be against seeing him get the ball more. He’s always had pretty decent hands.
by NorseHawk on Sep 6, 2009 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Solid
Excellent, clear-eyed and accurate picture of where we are and what we have to do to move on. Wegher, uh, no—-not that I have anything against the kid, but I think Brinson is the better bet. We have got to have a running back who can wait for the zone blocking holes to open. Robinson looks like he might learn how to do that.
"It's a cookbook!"---The Twilight Zone
by Buck18 on Sep 7, 2009 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Redshirts
Besides Keenan Davis, did any other true frosh see the field?
by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Sep 6, 2009 9:42 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wegher was on kick coverage
I think Hyde might have been too, but Wegher made a tackle and got his named called, so he was the only one I know for sure.
by NorseHawk on Sep 6, 2009 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good eyes, Norse
Brinson was also listed on the participation list, but I don’t remember seeing him.
"I always like it better when the clowns seem to try to be happy."
by MarcMorehouse on Sep 6, 2009 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Injury/Suspension list
I’m losing track of who is returning and when. Can someone fill in the question marks…
Player / Yr / Po / Return / Reason
Shaun Prater SO CB Arizona? Suspended for OUI
Kyle Calloway SR OL ISU? Suspended for OUI
Jeff Brinson FR RB Arizona? Ankle injury
I know that Berstine and Hampton are out for the year. Adam Robinson and DJK should both be starting soon. Might Clayborn still face a suspension down the road for the alleged assault?
by Duez I say on Sep 6, 2009 10:47 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No one know when Brinson will be back
It sounds like he’s started practicing again, but he has a lot of catching up to do.
Prater will be back for the Arizona game, and Calloway will be back next week. The Clayborn assault hearing has been delayed until next summer, so no worries there.
by NorseHawk on Sep 6, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did Prater get one more game than Calloway because car>moped or just for the retarded ass excuse he gave the cops?
It's not just your perceptions that can be wrong. Even your memory is often incomplete or possibly flat out wrong.
by shake n bake on Sep 6, 2009 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think Prater was underage
I do what I can.
by Anonymous Hero on Sep 6, 2009 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that's right.
Prater got 2 games, Calloway got 1. Ferentz the Younger also got 1 game, so he’s eligible to get some PT as of the ISU game. Injury-wise, Vandervelde should be in the mix in the OL against ISU (and if not then, definitely for Arizona) and I guess Brinson is back to practicing regularly, but I don’t know when he’ll get PT. Hopefully soon, judging by the state of our running game.
I can’t even remember when Clayborn’s court date was set for – it might even be after the season. Either way, KF hasn’t seemed to think there’s much to it and given his relatively hardline stance on lesser infractions, I think he would have dealt with him pretty severely if he thought there was much merit to the charge. Time will tell, I suppose.
by RossWB on Sep 6, 2009 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's set for January 19th
I said summer in my last post because I was thinking of his original date, which was supposed to be June of this year. Regardless, it’s not going to interfere with the season at all.
by NorseHawk on Sep 6, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Prater . . .
Too many major mistakes all at once. The explanation to the cops, his age and standing in the program, that all factored.
Calloway didn’t have anything against him until the moped-o-cross.
Calloway should be back this week. Prater is out this week. James Ferentz should be a go this week, if he’s pushing for a spot (I don’t know). Vandervelde might be another two weeks. He says one thing; KF says another. We’ll see.
The inside threesome was brand new yesterday. It was chaotic at times.
"I always like it better when the clowns seem to try to be happy."
by MarcMorehouse on Sep 6, 2009 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Any thoughts
On way Doering just can’t seem to make it work? I know he’s had a bunch of injuries, most of the smaller, nagging variety that make it difficult to establish rhythm, but it is surprising that’s he’s never lived up to the hype/recruiting ranking. Granted, we all know the “value” of the star system in high school recruiting, but still, it is shocking that Doering has been consistently passed by lower-rated players. If I recall correctly, Doering was the highest rated of the now infamous 2005 class, and the one with the “can’t miss” prospect tag. Funny how those things work out.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
by HoyaGoon on Sep 6, 2009 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He was good two years ago when he finally got to play too
That line (which was an unmitigated disaster for most of the year) finally started to show a little something towards the end of the year with Doering and Bulaga in at guard, I was hoping he was finally going to put it together and have a good year now that he’s healthy. He was really bad in pass protection though. Gettis didn’t have a great game either, but he was the better of the two guards. Doering just straight blown up a couple times.
Hopefully Richardson sliding down next week helps. He was surprisingly good, considering that he was going against arguably UNI’s best player all game. I wasn’t sure he’d have the lateral quickness to play tackle anymore, but he did a nice job.
by NorseHawk on Sep 6, 2009 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Those damn recruiting stars . . .
Entertainment purposes only.
Doering did break his wrist in camp last season and that kinda flushed his junior year. He returned, but Vandervelde was established and he wasn’t going to budge Olsen.
Remember Pete McMahon? He had to beg his way into Iowa and passed so many starred-players.
Rob Bruggeman is a good example. Some kids simply plateau, with strength, speed and agility. Bruggeman never did. He kept getting stronger and stronger, his feet came around and, wham, all-Big Ten caliber center and should’ve been a two-year starter.
With Calloway, now there’s a pool of three (Gettis, Dace and Doering). That at least increases margin of error. I wonder what happened to Riley Reiff? He was getting guard looks early in camp. Must not have been impressive.
"I always like it better when the clowns seem to try to be happy."
by MarcMorehouse on Sep 7, 2009 7:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As unimpressive as Reiff may have been
With the poor guard play of Doering and Gettis, I think he deserved no less than a look against UNI. I have complete faith that this line will clean up, and become the unit everyone was expecting, but it had better happen by week 3, or Iowa’s season could be over before October.
by The Mexican't on Sep 7, 2009 10:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Top 25
If Iowa is still in the AP Poll this week, they should count themselves lucky…
- 23 Notre Dame’s lop-sided victory over Nevada, combined with the fact that many AP voters play Lewinsky to Notre Dame’s Bill Clinton, absolutely guarantees that the Irish leap-frog Iowa.
- 24 Nebraska and # 25 Kansas thumped their cupcakes this weekend, making it very likely that they too will move past Iowa, leaving the Hawkeyes at no better than # 25.
Three of the top four “also receiving votes” teams—Oregon State, Pittsburgh, and Michigan State, in that order—also won big over weak opponents. Whether that will be enough for any of them to jump past Iowa for the # 25 spot isn’t certain, but I would bet on it, for the reasons below:
The other top “also receiving votes” team was Illinois, and they were beaten soundly by Missouri. That doesn’t help Iowa, anymore than tOSU’s squeaker over Navy helps Iowa, or the Gophers’ Paulus-gift OT win helps Iowa. All three games reinforce the perception that the Big TelevEN is a weak football conference.
Finally, the ESPN ticker yesterday evening read that Iowa “escaped” with a victory over UNI. If the national perception follows ESPN’s suggestion that Iowa had to escape with a win at home against an FCS opponent, albeit a very good one, it doesn’t bode well for Iowa’s polling numbers.
Of course, it is early in the season, and early losses and narrow escapes in September often get over-looked or forgotten by November. (People in Norman, OK are certainly hoping that’s the case.) A solid win against ISU next weekend would help Iowa in that department.
by Midnight Rambler on Sep 6, 2009 1:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
"Largest margin of victory in nearly nine months"
Wait, I didn’t see that in the notes.
"I always like it better when the clowns seem to try to be happy."
by MarcMorehouse on Sep 6, 2009 2:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Players stay off the bench??
Usually I would agree 100% with that, but what did he do?I have no problem with the other guys being suspended.They deserve it for being arrested.But I have not ever heard of DJK’s infractions.Does he loaf in practice or something?Hopefully, this benching is over and DJK can get more snaps in the next game.I don’t care if he starts or not, just have him in the game.I don’t think it was a coincidence that the minute he stepped on the field Chaney was wide open in the end zone.
I am hoping that Ferentz is using DJK to make an example to the other players because he is strong willed enough to handle it.I would hate to see him transfer when Kirks kid gets a 1 game suspension for a highly publicized run-in with the law while he gets a 3 quarter game suspension for whatever it is he did.
Generally, I agree with everything Kirk does and have no interest in a Bowden type coach.I just don’t like sitting through a nail-biter knowing there are better players on the bench for an unknown reason.
What if KOK spelled god????
by HerkyLerky on Sep 6, 2009 3:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
DJK...stuff
Kooli will see a couple of more plays in the ISU game. I would not expect a lot more than that yet though.
The O-line needs to work as a unit and gel. That means not a lot of shifting from week to week. I hope we lock-in this week and maybe Vandervelde sneaks in at some point. ISU does not scare me. But AZ and PSU do. We need to tighten the screws big time this week, and as much as I applaud the PakiBomb, as he represents all that is Iowa (walk-on who earns his way) we need to allow Robinson to get comfy and see if Brinson or Wegher can carry it a few times to rest him. There were holes there but for some reasons these guys missed them…either jumping into them too soon or too late. And then not breaking what seemed like arm tackles.
Zed: You could be my right-hand man.
Oh: I've seen what you do with your right hand. No, thank you.
by StoopsMyAss on Sep 6, 2009 8:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right, why would you be afraid of ISU?
They NEVER beat us!
Until they prove that last week wasn’t a fluke, we should be worried about every game.
by NorseHawk on Sep 6, 2009 8:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep.
If we were to play like that, or even just a little better, I’m not sure I see very many wins on the schedule. Maybe Arky St (although they “only” crushed an FCS team in Mississippi Valley St), maybe Indiana.
Then again, maybe ISU is not good. They beat a ND St team (that was only 6 and 5 last year) by only 17 points.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Sep 6, 2009 9:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Hawkeyes did not play well
But I don’t think there’s any reason to have a full scale fire sale on the season. Iowa will beat ISU, and will beat them handily. If the OL can figure it out over the next couple weeks, Iowa can compete in Happy Valley. The season does not look as promising as it did with Jewel in the backfield, but I still believe this team can win 8 games.
by The Mexican't on Sep 6, 2009 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They aren't good
That also doesn’t matter anymore in this series.
It’s way too early to write this season off, and we could definitely put it all together once everyone gets back. But after last week, we’re in no position to overlook anyone, especially a big rival who always plays us close, in a stadium we haven’t won in since 2003.
by NorseHawk on Sep 6, 2009 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
How this season will play out lies somewhere between the post Big Ten Network tour where DiNardo had us in the top 3 (or higher) and the Chicken Little routine everyone is in right now. It’s clear that Iowa cannot afford to look past anyone or take any game for granted. But it’s important to remember that UNI is a very good team, one that could probably beat any number of D-1 teams.
I hope this game scares the team out of a sense of complacency, to convince them that the preseason hype is just that, hype, and that it will take a strong effort every week, regardless of opponent. The optimist in me says this is a good thing. Last season, the early game blowouts didn’t prepare the team for adversity, something the team didn’t put together until the Penn State game. The realist in me says Iowa, sans Jewel Hampton, isn’t as good as I thought they were; that we’re still the same team we’ve always been: a team that has to out-execute almost everyone because we just don’t have the talent level to simply plug in the next guy on the depth chart and expect the same results. I think we’re better than what we saw yesterday, but we’ll have to prove that on the field. I hope the team can rise to the challenge.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
by HoyaGoon on Sep 7, 2009 12:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Michigan lost to Appalachian State
Then beat Florida with tim Tebow in the Capital One Bowl. So clearly, our season is not worth continuing.
We will not be ranked laer today or ever again. We will lose to ISU by 40 or more points because they dominated their home opener. We will gain 100 yards rushing when hell freezes over. The only thing we might be able to do this season…is block a field goal every once in a while.
Zed: You could be my right-hand man.
Oh: I've seen what you do with your right hand. No, thank you.
by StoopsMyAss on Sep 7, 2009 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No one said any of that you big baby.
by NorseHawk on Sep 7, 2009 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Big baby?
Someone was grounded today?
Zed: You could be my right-hand man.
Oh: I've seen what you do with your right hand. No, thank you.
by StoopsMyAss on Sep 7, 2009 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, because you're acting like one
Quit overreacting to even the mildest of criticism towards the team. There’s a big difference between saying that there is a cause for concern (which is what everyone is actually saying) and saying the season is definitely doomed (which is what you’ve decided is going on)
by NorseHawk on Sep 7, 2009 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You need a sense of humor
or a colostomy bag. Anything to get you off my ass and focused on your own. You’ve been stalking me on what seems like every post I’ve made in the last 48 hours. I guess I should be flattered, but I’m weirded out instead. And your overraction is in print…so go reread your fanatical, non-ironical or overly humorless tirades after every thing I post.
Zed: You could be my right-hand man.
Oh: I've seen what you do with your right hand. No, thank you.
by StoopsMyAss on Sep 7, 2009 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then stop saying things that are wrong
by NorseHawk on Sep 7, 2009 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So we all get posting pre-approval from NorseHawk
Got it. Thanks Mr. Censorship for all that you do to make this blog site a better place.
Zed: You could be my right-hand man.
Oh: I've seen what you do with your right hand. No, thank you.
by StoopsMyAss on Sep 7, 2009 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's all chill out.
Even if the weekend’s game got us in a pissy mood, we’re (almost) all Hawk fans here.
While I’ll admit that I am in the pessimistic mood about the Hawks right now, the optimists also have their right to a more sunny opinion. And for all our sake (s), I hope the optimistic vision is the one that comes true.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Sep 7, 2009 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was a joke, dude
I honestly don’t even pay attention to who I’m responding to most of the time, you happened to say some stuff I disagreed with, and I said so. Let’s just calm down.
by NorseHawk on Sep 7, 2009 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
But it’s important to remember that UNI is a very good team, one that could probably beat any number of D-1 teams.
I thought Iowa was supposed to contend this season, not listen to Joe Pa’s famously complimentary pressers…
The realist in me says Iowa, sans Jewel Hampton, isn’t as good as I thought they were…
The realist in me says the Minnesota Twins aren’t as good as I thought they would be without Joe Mauer and Justin Morneau either…
I applaud the determination and the"it’s only week 1"itus of the Iowa Fans, but to be surprised when your #1 offensive weapon goes down and you struggle to bean UNI…it spells bad news…
Syracuse…even with Tea Bag Paulus… could put up a fight against the “Ground Squirrels” you never know, but if Iowa keeps playing like this…well…good thing I saved my pilgrimage to Beaver Stadium for OSU…but time will tell.
Put a tarp on that circus! - showtime @ BSD
by bconway6 on Sep 7, 2009 3:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
no fat cats.
I thought we looked crappy the last couple of years playing the cupcakes. Last year we looked okay; Shonn looked great. But we didn’t look great, if by great you mean dominant and destructive at the LOS. We pushed, we didn’t punch. There was no obvious talent gap, again, not factoring Shonn.
I think Ferentz has a major issue with early season games, and probably always will. I think he’d like to win them, but he’s just never had a team as ready for them as other coaches do their teams. (And of course some teams look all-world in ooc and get steadily more ineffective through the season.) I think one reason for this is that Ferentz does not coach with fear and humiliation, so the players have a greater responsibility to prepare themselves mentally. And remember, you’ve got an average age of 20 on that squad, and a young 20 at that. So they’re learning, each year, what it takes to win.
I think now we may be missing Bruggeman even more than Shonn. Bruggeman was smart — and nasty and intense. Center is just a really, really important position in this offense. Also, as SMA notes above, the line has been in disarray throughout camp, and you can’t run this offense with strangers playing next to each other.
If we go by history we have no idea what kind of team this will be, and so should just have fun with it. UNI was tougher and hungrier than Iowa. That’s not good. The shadow of the ‘fat cats’ season will always be there, on the margin.
Footnote: Ferentz mentioned that our backs needed to develop some patience in this one-cut run scheme. I’m curious if they move Robinson back a half-yard or even a full yard. We have been lining up 7 deep. Freddie Russell was 8 deep.
The arm tackling of the backs was disturbing.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
by Bellanca on Sep 7, 2009 8:11 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Arm tackling
That was the scariest thing I saw Saturday. Maybe I’m too used to seeing Shonn, but then I watched Mark Ingram fly through Va Tech defenders, and I realized that, No, decent running backs DO NOT fall down when the first defender brushes them on the side.
Shonn had amazing balance. The Iowa RB’s need to find how to run with balance. And to step higher when going through that hole and over a defender.
by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Sep 7, 2009 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
RBs
The arm tackling of the backs was disturbing.
That was far more troubling than the lack of patience in the running game. I think that Robinson will get better about learning how (and when) to hit the holes given a bit more experience, but he’s also going to need to learn to run with a lot more toughness.
by RossWB on Sep 7, 2009 9:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Jake even got an award
Jake Christensen was named the Ohio Valley Conference Offensive Player of the Week
by Duez I say on Sep 8, 2009 8:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
add'l alumni news
King and Chandler were re-signed to practice squads, Tenn. and Dallas.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
by Bellanca on Sep 7, 2009 10:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow...
I did not realize that Signor was at Eastern Illinois also.
I am glad to see that Mitch King made the practice squad at Tennessee. I watched some of the first preseason game (Buffalo v. Tennessee), and I did not see King until well into the second half. Add his “fight” at practice to that, and I feared he was not long for their roster.
I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.
-- Judge Smails
by WaterlooChazz on Sep 7, 2009 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
King fought at practice?
What was the story on that?
by Duez I say on Sep 8, 2009 8:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Link
Apparently, he’s a scrappy lil guy.
by The Mexican't on Sep 8, 2009 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
























