Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Newcastle Battle Injury Woes Ahead of Tottenham

It's Not Plagiarism If You Link To It Translates Binary Code

Hangingchads_medium

Mainstream media and coaches and old retired dudes suck and stuff.  Looks like we're not the only ones angry about this week's polls.  Doc Saturday takes the pollsters to task for the absurd contradictions in all three polls (we didn't even look at the Harris poll, assuming tapioca and shuffleboard would be #1-#2 for the 87th consecutive week).  Up for particular scrutiny is the inexplicable love for LSU:

The Tigers are not only playing mediocre football right now, going to the wire to beat Washington and Mississippi State on either end of ho-hum wins over Vanderbilt and Louisiana-Lafayette, but they don't even have that much inertia in their favor: This was an 8-5 team that had to stage a frantic comeback against Troy to fend off a full-fledged, four-game November slide last year, had a losing conference record and didn't even make it into the final top 25. This year, the Tiger offense currently ranks 105th nationally and needed an interception return, a punt return and a goal line stand to get out of Starkville unscathed.

The fact that 2-2 Kansas State, which is a 3-point underdog to Iowa Fucking State this weekend, received two votes in the Harris poll, should be enough to relegate this to the dustbin of history.  Of course, that won't happen.

SBN Ole Miss blog Red Cup Rebellion has a far more psycho conspiratorial cynical opinion of the process: Penn State and Cal fell less than the Rebs due solely to the fact that they are Penn State and Cal and not, say, Ole Miss.

So what I am supposed to gather from all of this is that Ole Miss is overrated whereas Penn State beat themselves.  Iowa is the real deal whereas South Carolina, well, isn't.  Frankly, if I were a South Carolina fan, I would be just as irked by all of this.  Iowa gets praised for defeating a top-five team whereas South Carolina gets an "oh well, yeah, good show, but really you didn't win that as much as your opponent lost it; sorry South Carolina."   Granted, I think Iowa likely wins against South Carolina in a head-to-head, but not by very much at all.   

It almost seems to me as if everybody was a crouching tiger, waiting to strike the Rebels as soon as they lost, where- and whenever that was going to be.  I certainly expected the "ha LOL @ Ole Pi$$" message board backlash, namely because dipshits who post on internet message boards are incredibly predictable, and I cannot say I didn't expect some sort of flame from the mainstream media--but I certainly didn't expect it to this extent. 

As with all conspiracy theories, this is mostly crap.  There is a certain perception that comes along with long-inept programs like Ole Miss and South Carolina, to be sure, but it's more than balanced by the fact that both of those teams come from the mighty SEC, constantly pimped by the two major mouthpieces of the college football mainstream media as forever superior to those of us from the upper midwest.  Iowa's ranked higher than South Carolina because its preseason expectations were higher and its resume is better (for instance, unlike USC, Iowa hasn't yet lost a game), to say nothing of the residual effects of the curbstomping Iowa gave the 'Cocks in January.  As for Ole Miss vs. Penn State, well, that's probably because they're Penn State and you're Ole Miss.  You've got me there.

Cyborg football robots, on the other hand, are cool and stuff.  The human voters (other than Doug Lesmerises, who capably defended resume ranking and made Craig James look stupid on College Gameday) are quite clearly morons.  The superfuturemachines, on the other hand, have it exactly right, as Iowa leads two of the four BCS computer polls:

Sagarin: Iowa, which barely beat Northern Iowa, but won at Penn State Saturday. Please note that Florida is atop both of the formulas that Jeff Sagarin prefers, but that Iowa is first (and Florida is seventh) in the formula that the BCS counts.

Billingsley: Texas

Colley Matrix: Iowa

Massey: Florida.

Hlas is right: It's September.  We all need to settle down just a bit.  The Sagarin ratings are interesting, though: Iowa takes fifth (first in the margin-of-victory-free ELO_CHESS ranking), but I have to take umbrage with any poll that would rank Boise State's schedule strength in the top 40.  Of note when reading the Sagarin ratings is the fact that preseason rankings are still factored in; those factors will be removed once the teams become "connected."  I have little idea of what Sagarin's talking about.  He's much smarter than me.

Star-divide

Fun with depth charts.  The two-deeps for Arkansas State are out.  The injury situation remains unresolved: Bryan Bulaga and Tony Moeaki, who sat out the PSU game, remain conspicuous by their absence.  Derrell Johnson-Koulianos, who was the one game-time decision to get some playing time in Happy Valley, is listed as a backup at wideout behind...Colin Sandeman?  Yes, the junior receiver may have missed the lion's share of fall camp, but back-to-back workmanlike performances against Arizona and Penn State have moved him to the top of the depth chart.

Clayborn also gets the Heisman Trophy, Pulitzer Prize, and Emmy for "Best Performance in a Reality Show."  Two Hawkeyes picked up Big Ten Player of the Week honors following the Penn State game.  Adrian Clayborn was a no-brainer for special teams player of the week, as his fourth-quarter punt block and return put the Hawkeyes on top, drew the praise of his teammates and coaches, and gave him the national lead in punt return average.  Pat Angerer's 14 tackles, interception, and forced fumble were more than enough to garner defensive player of the week.

Caring is creepy.  While knee-deep in the hoopla of last week's game, we neglected the most recent Iowa commit, Miami halfback De'Andre "The Apostrophe" Johnson.  De'Andre receives three stars from Rivals, two stars from Scout, and offers from programs like Minnesota, Duke, and a bunch of the Sun Belt teams (he did have interest from Florida and LSU).  Johnson's commitment was initially announced following the Arizona game, though he sounded less-than-enthused with his decision and still planned on taking a visit to Minnesota.  After the Penn State game, though, he confirmed he is "120 percent committed" to playing for Iowa, which is impossible but whatever.  Johnson is already 5'8", 210 pounds, effectively making him a Jewel Hampton clone from day one.

Footnotes:

Comment 27 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

From Hasty's article
In the twinkling of an eye, the Broncos were up 19-0 as they scored on four of their first five possessions. The Iowa offense, meanwhile, moved slower than a Steely Dan album track.

True. And it’s amazing how far the team has come in a year and a half.

The Rivalry, Esq.
The quintessential Big Ten smoking room.

by Bama Hawkeye on Sep 29, 2009 10:13 AM CDT reply actions  

So with Johnson's commmitment

That puts us at approximately 36 running backs for 2010. Got it.

by Twin Cities Hawk on Sep 29, 2009 10:25 AM CDT reply actions  

From Red Cup Rebellion

“Granted, I think Iowa likely wins against South Carolina in a head-to-head, but not by very much at all. "

I’d venture a guess it would be more in the neighborhood of 31-10

Tee hee.

Brunettes not fighter jets

by rockyh on Sep 29, 2009 10:29 AM CDT reply actions  

Depth chartin'...

It seems like DJK played more snaps than Sandeman (he didn’t play too much after that pooch kicked INT, did he?) last week, so I’m guessing that so long as his hammy or ankle or whatever is OK, he’ll play a decent amount of snaps this weekend. Although if he IS still hobbled, it might not be a bad idea to rest him up for Meeechigan. I don’t think his presence will be the difference between a win or loss versus the Red Wolves.

by RossWB on Sep 29, 2009 11:15 AM CDT reply actions  

And...

he didn’t bicycle-kick the ball to the other team for an INT, either.

In my mind, Sandeman is very close to being banished to the same amount of time Paki is getting (or less).

I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them.

-- Judge Smails

by WaterlooChazz on Sep 29, 2009 9:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't understand that perspective, at all.

Sandeman definitely hasn’t performed up to BigTen starter levels, but he’s not some walk-on who earned scrub time. He played well against Arizona, and yet he’s being trashed for a mistake made in an attempt to make a play. Sandeman didn’t intend on kicking the ball into the air for a Penn State defender to catch the ball, and the mistake should not reflect directly on his abilities.

To me, saying that Sandeman deserves only special teams minutes, or less, is absurd.

by The Mexican't on Sep 29, 2009 10:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm with

Mexican’t on this. One fluke play does not and should not equal banishment to no playing time.

by CapitalHawk on Sep 30, 2009 8:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

He made a really dumb play, but didn’t he also play pretty well against Arizona? I think he’s still worthy of getting a few more chances.

by RossWB on Sep 30, 2009 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Right, but thats the kind

of thinking that we as fans need to avoid. Not that anything we say or do will have any impact on the game Saturday, but it would be nice to get Bulaga back, if for any other reason to just get him some action before Michigan.

I’m not as worried about Moeaki missing time because A: Reisner has proven to be more than an adequate replacement, and B: it isn’t like Moeaki being gone is a new experience.

Ideally, what happens this weekend is that Iowa puts this game away early, and the backups get a lot of playing time, but we’ve seen Iowa lay eggs in not-so-recent past against inferior opposition with a lot more on the line.

by TarHeelHawk on Sep 29, 2009 11:54 AM CDT reply actions  

Yes.

I would love for Vandenberg and Weinke to get an entire quarter each (Brinson too (and Ferentz (and Castillo & Lowe))). Probably never happen, but still…

by Bucketochicken on Sep 29, 2009 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

I do agree

that it would be nice to get Bulaga back so he can shake off any rust he may have prior to the Michigan game. I think that’s more pressing than DJK because he’s been gone for a while and will need to get his timing back. DJK already seems to have a very strong rapport with Stanzi, as evidenced by the fact that he was easily finding open spots on Saturday (he just happened to drop a few of them).

And, obviously, it would be grand to see the back-ups get a fair amount of time to play; thus far, we’ve really only been able to see them for part of the 4th quarter in the ISU game.

by RossWB on Sep 29, 2009 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I want to see Brinson and Davis

I know that sounds greedy with the way the two frosh at RB have played, but I want to see him get a number of carries.

I want to see how Davis works with Stanzi…I know our cup runneth over at the WR position but his RS is gone so let’s see him play.

Karl Klug is an animal. Next game we’re going to bring him in a cage. -- Adrian Clayborn

by StoopsMyAss on Sep 29, 2009 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

This is our only opportunity this season to get the second and third string some decent playing time.

I’d also like to see some different looks on both sides of the ball. Perhaps (heaven forbid) we throw in some blitzes against Arkansas State?

They took the bar, the whole damn bar!

by recoveringfratguy on Sep 29, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Something something
This is our only opportunity this season to get the second and third string some decent playing time.

This seems likely on the surface, but you never really know — no one would have expected that road games against Indiana and Minnesota last year would have turned into such laughers that the reserves could play a huge chunk of the second half. But, yeah, on paper this looks like the best shot to get those guys some looks so hopefully the first-stringers go out and take care of business early on.

I’d also like to see some different looks on both sides of the ball. Perhaps (heaven forbid) we throw in some blitzes against Arkansas State?

I dunno. Maybe some surprises are best kept in the bag until needed.

by RossWB on Sep 29, 2009 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well...
I know our cup runneth over at the WR position but his RS is gone so let’s see him play.

We say this, but is it really true? I mean, we’re a month into the season and is there any WR that you feel truly confident about aside from DJK? McNutt, Sandeman, Chaney, Davis, and Stross have all had flashes, but none of them has really broken out from the pack (in Davis’ case I would say that’s more due to lack of chances, though). So, yes, I agree that it would be nice to see him get more looks to see what he can do.

by RossWB on Sep 29, 2009 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

One more reasons why Iowa is more legit than the Smelley Cocks

Iowa won on the road
USC won at home

Vegas would call that a 6 point swing.

by Internet Legend on Sep 29, 2009 11:58 AM CDT reply actions  

AND

While that doesn’t justify why Ole Miss fell farther than PSU (tough issue for voters to explain) it does justify why Iowa is 13 and USC is “others receiving votes”

by Internet Legend on Sep 29, 2009 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well perhaps Iowa is better than I gave them credit for, but

this is really all I wanted to get accross:

As for Ole Miss vs. Penn State, well, that’s probably because they’re Penn State and you’re Ole Miss. You’ve got me there.

by The Ghost of Jay Cutler on Sep 29, 2009 12:07 PM CDT reply actions  

I think we can all agree

that the polling is absurd. So much of it makes no sense at all.

It never gets to be easy

by chitownhawkeye on Sep 29, 2009 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Except!

Look at the Harris Poll. They wait 4 weeks and that poll is still utter crap. And one-third of the BCS (of course).

by CapitalHawk on Sep 30, 2009 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

ding ding ding

I got more rhymes than Wade Lookingbill's got dunks

by Adam Jacobi on Sep 30, 2009 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

"I'm 120% committed to Iowa"

leaving me 37% leaning towards visiting Minnesota and 19% undecided. Don’t worry though… I’m gonna go the whole 13.8 yards for whatever school I choose.

by Angle's Dangle on Sep 29, 2009 4:11 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm 99% sure that "The Apostrophe" will never play for Iowa

or will play but only for one semester.

Just a feeling.

I wash born here, an I wash raished here, and dad gum it, I am gonna die here

by Gabby Johnson on Sep 29, 2009 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Labeling him "The Apostrophe"...

would be a disservice to Mon’ter Glasper. Please redact or feel his fury.

"I'm not doing any good back here."

by Hawkaloogie on Sep 29, 2009 5:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"It’s so extreme, it’s almost a compliment."

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Importance of Iowa Basketball
Tractor_small
Sherlock Holmes: The Story of the Missing Offense. Chpt. 4

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Mcqueen_small Patrick Vint

Louie_small Adam Jacobi

Stains_small jebushchrist

Dumpster_fire_small RossWB

Default_small PSD

Authors

Images_small StoopsMyAss

Spitzenhofen_small Hayden Fry's Moustache Ride

Herky_small hawk6894

Horace_small Horace E. Cow