Swept Away
Okay, we go from Red and Norm to this. I know. The childish humor will return in short order.
Over the last ten years, it's been abundantly clear that the best sports desk in the state of Iowa has been at the Cedar Rapids Gazette. Yes, there's been nothing like the Big Peach in its heyday, but those days are just plain over; when Gannett calls the shots, good reporting dies.
And it's also pretty clear that with the Gazette's quality, the newspaper's independent status, itself a rarity, was no coincidence. All profits stayed "in-house," so the company wasn't paying for someone else's mistakes a thousand miles away. They even got the blogging part right, putting the blogs on wordpress, making them more author-specific than content-specific, and not bothering with making people sign up for yet another username. This all seems like a "well, fucking duh" sort of proposition, but understand this: nobody else in Iowa was getting it. Remember that Randy Peterson blog we linked a while back? Here's the URL for that, and we promise we are not making this up.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=PluckPersona&U=bc611f9901d44acc9a8848956c7825ea&plckPersonaPage=BlogViewPost&plckUserId=bc611f9901d44acc9a8848956c7825ea&plckPostId=Blog%3abc611f9901d44acc9a8848956c7825eaPost%3ade1a717e-e5ed-4b80-ba22-8852cbcb7e46&plckController=PersonaBlog&plckScript=personaScript&plckElementId=personaDest
How accessible!
But those cruel, cruel waters are taking their toll once again. From that dreadful week in July until even now, Cedar Rapids has been, in effect, a smaller city; downtown remains in traction and neighborhoods close to the river are, in effect, never coming back. We can't imagine that an insurance agency will take that sort of risk again after the last 16 years. Some businesses are back. Some businesses are coming back. Some aren't.
It's the worst thing that could have happened to the Gazette, all as a national economy is in freefall and the Internet devalues the written word. So while the Gazoo is currently operational, unlike the Rocky Mountain News, it operates today with many, many fewer employees.
Sure, there are euphemisms like "reorganization" or "trimming," and it's a lot easier to talk about newspapers with these types of nebulous terms. "What should the industry do," "Is reorganization the key?" and so on. But let's tell it like it is: people who spent years and years with the company are now fired in one fell swoop; careers have just been ended prematurely, swept away like so much flotsam in a flood. Their work experience is in an industry bleeding jobs, not adding them.
We can't necessarily begrudge the Gazette for this move; 2009 Cedar Rapids barely resembles 1999 Cedar Rapids, especially where the balance sheets are probably concerned. It wasn't unexpected. We're told the CEO has a new plan, and for that we suppose we're happy.
Yet at the same time, even though we're clearly trying to stop the rain by shouting at it, it's worrisome--to say the least--that such an across-the-board cutback is taking place at the "good" paper. Reporting will suffer. The 60 years of experience cut from the sports desk will be missed. And anyone who says definitively that they know if this will work is lying. So it goes.
0 recs |
5 comments
Comments
And what's worse (or also bad, anyway),
This opens the door for some faceless media conglomerate to swoop in and buy up the Gazoo, robbing it of any local authenticity once and for all, and likely canning the rest of the staff to make way for cheaper non-local talent. As a news medium, traditional print-on-paper may be dying (if not already dead), so hopefully the internet will be the saving grace for true local, independent news reporting to carry on without being beholden to some corporate whoremaster’s bottom line/agenda.
Quality independent and/or smallish town papers like the Gazoo, the RMN (RIP), the Toledo Blade, the SF Chronicle, etc are just having way too difficult a time keeping their heads above water to remain as traditional newspapers. It’s tragic, actually. And terrifying. Before too long the flow of information/news may very well be controlled by one central source – be it GE, Disney, GloboChem, NewsCorp, whatever. And that, my friends, is a very dangerous thing.
Might not be a bad idea to start pressing your congresshumans and President Obama to overturn the Federal Communications Act of 1996. Or the applicable ownership portions, anyway.
Oh – and The Blade, the Chronicle and the RMN might not actually be independent, but they are good papers. We need that.
Thanks for posting this, OPS. It’s an important issue, and not just a local one or one that only has implications on coverage of Hawkeye sports or whatever other trivial thing. This affects the very core of our democracy and our ideals as a nation.
Poop.
by Bucketochicken on Feb 27, 2009 6:22 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I had heard that Jim Ecker was among
those who got the axe. He hasn’t put a decent column in years – hell Pat Harty lit him up at one point last season. Has their been word of anyone else.
I didn’t read the Gazette’s sports page a whole lot untl this past football season; I’m a Register subscriber, and quite frankly, the paper is a joke – a shell of what it used to be. I remember when I was a kid that you could tell where the sports page was on Sunday before the rubber band even came off; then Gannett took over and decided that peach newsprint was too expensive to keep printing it.
Lately, they’ve eliminated and combined sections, and shrank the actual size of the paper, all in the name of being easier to read and saving cash. I wonder how much cash they saved by axing 45 people in November? The Register used to be a Pulitzer winning publication, now they don’t even have a decent sports page. It’s depressing, because you can’t help but think that at some point in the near future that the Register will cease to exist – and all in the name of profit margin.
by TarHeelHawk on Feb 27, 2009 8:42 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
It shocked me
That they got rid of Duffy.
I understand the concept of cutting back and trying to save money, but it seems to me that a lot of newpaper cuts are either across the board or things like editorial cartoonists that, love them or hate them, are one of the reasons people read and talk about the paper.
Do I get a lot of my news online? Absolutely. But I still read the paper. And as long as I get something out of it, I will continue. I think, though, that people such as myself are being actively turned off by these changes. The coverage is worse. The national conglomerates seem to have no concept that newspapers, and really news itself, is a regional phenomenon. Yes, I want to know what happened in New York and India and Japan, but I can get those stories online, either from the AP feed or from a source closer to the news itself. But give me more detailed coverage of what is happening here with the overview of national and world news.
Also, screw “easier to read”. I’m sure all the format changes, pretty colors, and lowering the vocabulary levels make it easy for papers to claim that they are reaching a larger target audience, but I would prefer my news to not be watered down quite so much.
And lastly, since I’m ranting now. Gossip is not news. If I want to go to TMZ or the Drudge Report, I will. But I don’t. There’s a reason for that.
(I feel like I should end this by waving my cane and screaming at the kids to get off the lawn. That can’t be good)
by chitownhawkeye on Feb 27, 2009 9:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As long as Morehouse is still around, I'm cool
Best Iowa beat writer out there since Page hung it up, and his blog is outstanding.
by NorseHawk on Feb 28, 2009 1:42 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
i got the axe in 2001 and as much as it turned out to be “a good thing in the long run” in the short run it sucked a bag of dicks. after the intital bout of self pity i stood back, looked around and realized as shitty as it was handled, it was really not about me – it was one of the earliest death knells of an industry.
and while the death of newspapers might be well earned given the asshattery of the folks that are running them, there are a number of folks acutely aware of the dangers involved in losing their voice from our regular discourse. that’s an argument that applies at the local level as well. who is going to speak up for the individual communities if the paper of record perishes? TV news? one would think we deserve a better fate than that.
by kleph on Feb 28, 2009 10:38 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 




















