Wha Happened? Week Ten
I'm told there were other games going on during and after just Northwestern successfully executed their gameplan of "knock out Iowa's best offensive player" for the second consecutive season. So Wha Happened?
Nice tune, but it needs more Caruso.
Ohio State 24, Penn State 7
Sigh. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. All Penn State needed to do to ensure that Ohio State's reign of terror atop the Big Ten over the last five years (and their accompanying pratfalls in BCS games: 1-3, including two humiliating beatdowns in National Championship Games) was truly done, to drive a stake through their cold, unfeeling, blackened hearts, to send them to a Florida bowl game... was just win this one fucking game. Alas, the Penn State offense coughed up a hairball of a performance (Daryll Clark went 12/28, 125 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT, 20 yards rushing, 1 TD on the ground, though he didn't get much help from his offensive line or any receivers not named Graham Zug) and the Nittany Lions just never appeared to be in sync. Maybe Clark needs Creepy Sex Offender Lion to console him.
His counterpart, the boy wonder Terrelle Pryor, contributed the sort of confounding stat line that's becoming typical of his play: 8/17, 125 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT, five carries, 50 yards, 1 TD on the ground. Looking at it purely in terms of black and white numbers, it's not exactly impressive stuff. And yet... he did guide them to a decisive victory and he did make some big plays when OSU needed them -- the 62-yard bomb he threw to DeVier Posey (fast becoming one of the best big-play receiver in the Big Ten) was a key play in opening up the game. It gave Ohio State some much needed breathing room and the two-score margin seemed to make Clark press even more, with predictably disastrous results against the Buckeye defense. Still, the Ohio State win did have the effect of dramatically simplifying the Big Ten title race: whoever wins next week's Iowa-Ohio State tilt will be smelling the roses in Pasadena. So no pressure or anything in that one.
Not even Mike Barweis' brutal fitness regimens can save Michigan from the knife that is Big Ten conference play.
Purdue 38, Michigan 36
Life among the peasants sucks, doesn't it, Big Blue? It was a lot easier when you were a member of the aristocracy and teams like this just rolled over for you. Shame the peasants don't do that when you're down rolling around in the filth with them. The numbers for Michigan are grisly: losses to middling Purdue teams in back-to-back years, five consecutive Big Ten losses (which is actually worse than any losing streak they had in-conference during last year's horrorshow of a season), and eleven conference losses (and counting) over the past two years -- with games against Wisconsin (in Madison) and Ohio State (in Ann Arbor) still to come. Losses in both of those games would lead to perhaps the grisliest stat of all: a second consecutive season without a bowl game. The culprit, as it has been pretty much the entire season, was largely the GERG-led defense. The LOLverine defense conceded nearly 500 yards of offense (494, to be exact) for the second straight week, with most of the damage coming through the air: Joey Elliot went 28/39 for 367 yards and a pair of touchdowns (and a pair of interceptions). RichRod may or may not be burning up on the hot seat this year, but it would be stupefying if Greg Robinson was back as defensive coordinator next year.
Meanwhile, Danny Hope's maiden voyage on the SS Boilermaker continues to be a long, strange trip. Three weeks ago, they had a season-defining upset of Ohio State in West Lafayette. A week ago, they got blanked by Wisconsin, 37-0, in a game in which virtually nothing went right. And now they go into Ann Arbor and pick up their first win there since 1966. And all this is after the crazy first part of the season, in which they lost a series of nail-biters and bizarre, turnover-filled games. Yet in spite of all the ups and downs they've endured this season, Purdue finds themselves still alive for a possible bowl game (they just need wins over Michigan State and Indiana), which would be a helluva way to cap off Danny Hope's crazy first season.
Illinois 35, Minnesota 32
Remember what we wrote about Adam Weber's offensive explosion last week?
But what to make of the TRY FIGHT WIN HEAVILY PENALIZED Gophers a week after losing their top offensive weapon (Decker) and nearly getting shut out in back-to-back games by Penn State and Ohio State (only a garbage-time touchdown against OSU's reserves prevented that ignominious fate)? Was this an aberration? A sign that the Gopher offense may not be quite as woeful as we thought? Considering that Weber hadn't thrown for a TD pass since the Wisconsin game 28 days ago and that he nearly doubled his season total for TD passes in one game, we lean towards the former explanation.
Yeah, we're gonna go with "last week was a mirage" for $1000, thanks. Weber's first half this week:
5/17, 74 yards, 0 TD, 1 fumble, 1 pick-six ("That's an interception returned for a touchdown." (c) Pat Harty).
Now that's more like the Weber we've come to know and love this season. All told, the Golden Gopher offense managed only 288 yards (just 66 on the ground) against an Illinois defense not previously known for its stopping power. Meanwhile, the Save the Zooker's Job Tour continued with... yet another win? Huh. That still doesn't sound right. Juice Williams' ankle got tweaked, but Jacob Charest proved to be an able fill-in (10/19, 195 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT) and Jason Ford tacked on 82 yards and a touchdown on 20 carries. With the win, the Illini retain their unlikely bid for a bowl appearance and a desire for revenge by proxy demands that this corner of BHGP will be cheering them on when they take on that other Big Ten team from Illinois next week. And, fuck, if you can't root for a mustache like this you have no soul.
Don't pretend you care about this game.
Wisconsin 31, Indiana 28
John Clay ran wild in the first half (15 carries, 134 yards, 1 TD), but got concussed; freshman Montee Ball came in and picked up right were Clay left off (27 carries, 115 yards, 2 TD), including the game-icing touchdown with eight minutes to go in the game. It was classic Wisconsin football: 294 punishing yards on the ground and just enough passing (194 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT) to keep the opposing defense honest. The only difference between this week and last is that the defense was a bit looser and let Indiana get enough points to keep it interesting. Indiana is now in "win or stay home during bowl season" mode for the final two games; sadly next week involves a trip to Happy Valley to play a pissed-off Penn State team. Ouch.
Michigan State 49, Western Michigan 14
Sparty jumped out to an early 21-0 lead and never looked back, ensuring that Western Michigan wouldn't add a Big Ten scalp to their collection for a third straight year. WMU had no answers for the Spartan offense -- Kirk Cousins dissected their pass defense (22/25, 353 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT), while Ashton Leggett gashed them on the ground (14 carries, 110 yards, 4 TD); all told, Sparty rolled up 602 yards of offense. With the win, MSU moves to 5-5, needing just one more win to get to bowl eligibility. A difficult game with Penn State awaits at the end of the season, so next week's game at Purdue could be a virtual elimination game for bowl contention.
0 recs |
18 comments
|
Comments
It's a very schizoid B10 we're living in right now.
Illinois is beyond awful and then pretty darn good.
Purdue is good, then awful, then good, then awful, then good.
PSU is Purdue and MSU, only with more talent. Next week, they destroy Wisky, of course.
Wisky is pretty good, and reasonably consistent. I give them credit for that, but nothing else.
Indiana is irrelevant, as they always are.
Michigan is that hot girl who let herself go after she discovered soft serve ice cream in college her frosh year. Now, no one will date her.
OSU is piss-me-off-OSU as usual: they lose when you want them to win, then they win when you NEED them to lose.
And Iowa? Healthy, I truly believe we’re the best of the conference. Only we ain’t healthy. We’re damaged goods. Things could get ugly for us real quick.
All told, anyone NOT predicting another terrible bowl season for the B10?
If it's not too much trouble, search your soul--and then ask yourself if maybe I might have a point.
by The Director on Nov 8, 2009 4:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Strike that: It's Indiana that will get crushed at PSU next week.
I misread Oops post in that regard. Will have to look up who Wisky will drop a game to next week—but I’m predicting that right now, and I don’t even knnow who that will be. Could even be an OOC patsy for all I know.
But Wisky will lose that game, because it’s that kind of season with the B10.
If it's not too much trouble, search your soul--and then ask yourself if maybe I might have a point.
by The Director on Nov 8, 2009 4:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wisky has Michigan in Madison next week.
They SHOULD win, but who knows.
Re: bowl season… hard to say. I think if the Big Ten only gets one BCS team we could wind up with reasonably fair match-ups, which could lead to more wins IF the Big Ten teams actually show up and play well in their bowl games. The Big Ten should avoid the only two scary SEC teams (Florida and Bama), and perhaps LSU if they wind up in the Cotton Bowl. I don’t think any of the SEC middle class is that scary this year. And considering how outrageously mediocre most of the Big 12 is this year, the Alamo Bowl and Insight Bowl match-ups shouldn’t be too awful. A lot does depend on whether or not we see “good” MSU or Minnesota if they make a bowl game, but I don’t expect the bowl bloodbath that we saw last year
by RossWB on Nov 8, 2009 5:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So let's say we don't get a BCS bid, and end up in the CapOne or Outback -
What kind of teams would we like to destroy?
I think we (when healthy, of course) could beat any SEC team, really, and I’d love to kick the shit out of a B12 team… the conference affiliations restrict it to only a handful of teams, though. Who would you like to see the Hawks play? What would be a good matchup and give us some cred/respect? Getting stuck playing say, a Missouri would suck, but playing someone like maybe GT or I dunno, Tennessee? might be pretty cool. Ok St? I’d really love to dismantle one of the scary high-octane B12 or Pac10 teams…
by Bucketochicken on Nov 8, 2009 5:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I really want to play Oregon
I think a healthy Iowa can beat both of these teams. Stanford showed that Oregon isn’t the best team in the country that at least 3/4 of the media was saying this week.
But we all know where we would see Oregon at and we need to win out to play the Ducks in Pasadena.
"If Ron Zook were an ice cream flavor, it would be praline and retard"
-Garth Algar
by Tree Meister on Nov 8, 2009 5:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
beat this team*
stupid second guessing my own thought processes.
"If Ron Zook were an ice cream flavor, it would be praline and retard"
-Garth Algar
by Tree Meister on Nov 8, 2009 6:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm
Even if the worst case scenario ensues and we lose the remaining two games and finish 9-3, there can be no more than three Big Ten teams with records as good/better (OSU, PSU, Wisco). As a result, I don’t see how we could fall below a Florida bowl (since the Champs Sports Bowl selects ahead of the Alamo this year), even if the Big Ten only gets one team into the BCS. So that’s either the CapOne (SEC), Outback (SEC), or Champs Sports (ACC). The SEC teams in play for those bowls look like LSU, Georgia, South Carolina, Auburn, and Ole Miss. The whole SEC middle class looks pretty muddled up.
And the ACC is even more of a crapshoot. Maybe BC, Miami, Va Tech, or Clemson? I can’t recall how many bowls pick ahead of the Champs Sports Bowl.
In terms of cred/respect, LSU and maybe Va Tech or Miami would be the best bets. Georgia and Ole Miss have some name value, but the overriding theme seems to be that they’re having disappointing/rebuilding seasons.
by RossWB on Nov 8, 2009 6:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Assuming we go 10-2....
….there’s NO WAY we fall below Cap One. If we were NW without any fans, it’s a different tale. But we travel as well as anyone—better than Wisky and about as good as PSU.
If we go 10-2. BCS is an outside possibility and Cap One is most likely.
At 9-3, though, you start getting into Champs territory, assuming everyone else finishes 10-2. I can’t see us going Outback again under almost any circumstance, especially since we were just there last year. And I can’t see us falling all the way to Alamo Bowl under any scenario.
If it's not too much trouble, search your soul--and then ask yourself if maybe I might have a point.
by The Director on Nov 8, 2009 6:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, the Outback would probably be difficult.
They do love us, but if we go 9-3, it means that we’ll have lost our last three games of the season, which may sap some excitement from fans to travel. Not to mention that we were just there last year.
by RossWB on Nov 8, 2009 8:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The results are terrible, but...
GERG is going to be back next year. The defense was similarly terrible last year at the same positions, so at this point they probably won’t blame the scheme and instead blame the constants between the last two years: the players (symptomatic of poor defensive recruiting particularly in numbers from the last few Carr years and RR’s half-class in the month or so after he was hired where he mainly recruited guys for his offense) and the position coaches. The linebackers and safeties were bad last year and they’re bad now. If someone’s getting fired, it’s probably one of those position coaches rather than having a fourth coordinator in four years.
Everyone would really appreciate it if you’d somehow manage to beat OSU this week. Maybe you can force enough Arm Punts from Pryor to make up for not having Stanzi.
by Yinka Double Dare on Nov 9, 2009 6:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
the 62-yard bomb he threw to DeVier Posey (fast becoming one of the best big-play receiver in the Big Ten) was a key play in opening up the game.
For the record, this play was also confounding and typical of his play. Posey was inexcusably wide open. Our cover 3 scheme has been prone to one or two of such plays every game. Anyway, the point is that Pryor really threw a bad pass. I’d say 8 out of 10 times it’s picked off or batted down.
Sam Lickliter. Never forgive. Never forget. Beat IU.
by ReadingRambler on Nov 9, 2009 7:17 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Based on what you saw....can a completely inexperienced QB lead his team to
more than 10 points against this Buckeye team, in the shoe?
I think we could hold Ohio State to 10 points if we get some offensive traction and don’t leave the defense on the field all day.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 9, 2009 7:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Please kill them
thx
Lucky gun, fake fifth, 8XY bitch
Daryll Clark, The Penn State Football Story Is...
by letsgopsu on Nov 9, 2009 7:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It all depends on your o-line
I’m going under the assumption right now that you’ll hold them to 20 at least. I think your secondary is more talented and probably more disciplined than ours. I think your front seven can contain Pryor.
But, in all honesty, from what I’ve seen from Iowa these past few weeks, I don’t know if they can score 10 without Stanzi. That front four is very, very good. Ohio State did not even come close to putting the game in Pryor’s hands on Saturday. To beat Ohio State you must still force their offense to beat you. We weren’t capable of it.
Sam Lickliter. Never forgive. Never forget. Beat IU.
by ReadingRambler on Nov 9, 2009 8:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
Yes, if their front four wreak havoc on Saturday without their LBs helping out, then we are royaly screwed. I look to that Wisconsin game when the Badgers just owned them for most of the game. Of course, they hrew a million interceptions and had no special teams but that is the game that I am hanging my hat on.
Ohio State was very focused on your game. They knew they had their hands full. I could easily see them having a let down this week. We have, in fact, become a sort of trap game for them. On their boards they are talking fear of Michigan, not us.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
by StoopsMyAss on Nov 10, 2009 6:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The loss of Stanzi also probably makes it easier to overlook us.
That said… I am sure that Tressel will be drilling them all week that this is a one-game playoff to get to the Rose Bowl, a trip no one on the current OSU team has ever made (not even ol’ Sweatervest himself, thanks to the quirks of the BCS during their decade of dominance).
I hope they are looking past us and overlooking us… but I dunno.
by RossWB on Nov 10, 2009 8:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm, that's true about Wisconsin
I only watched the first half, but I never got an impression of complete dominance by Ohio State’s line in that game.
So for me there is the question of whether Ohio State just looked really good against a (our) porous line.
As for their message boards, before our game with them some of them were already saying stuff such as “This is the Big Ten championship game because we own Iowa”, etc. Of course, Tressel probably doesn’t read message boards.
Sam Lickliter. Never forgive. Never forget. Beat IU.
by ReadingRambler on Nov 10, 2009 9:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
FWIW, there's a really good breakdown of Vandenberg's play on Saturday
Over at HawkeyeNation – it’s on the front page.
http://www.hawkeyenation.com/football/the-vandenberg-breakdown
by Bucketochicken on Nov 10, 2009 8:39 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 





















