The Takeaway: Michigan State
Sure, Iowa just squeaked by the Spartans, 15-13. But how much do we really know? What was really important about beating Michigan State? What does it all mean, Basil? The Takeaway has the answer.

Did we have to jump over the sad Jerel Worthy? Doesn't that seem like rubbing it in? Oh well; at least Micah Hyde didn't sneak in a few rib kicks.
50/50. Going into the game, with the betting line oscillating somewhere between Iowa -2 and MSU -2 (recall that HFMR called it a pick'em and nobody complained), this game was essentially a 50/50 affair. Heads, the Hawks win; tails, we crawl into an oven and have a sympathetic friend turn it to 350 degrees (you'd think as high as it can go, but broiling humans doesn't really do the trick as elegantly; the skin chars too quickly and actually let's go ahead and drop this subject now).
Sure enough, for all the drama packed into the first 59 minutes and 45 seconds, it all culminated in Iowa down four points, ball on the MSU seven yard line, and one timeout. Not a gimme, certainly not impossible. 50/50.
After three unsuccessful throws, the Hawkeyes called time out and Ken O'Keefe called... a fade route. Yes, we know what happened on the play, but KOK called a fade. Let's let Marvin McNutt tell the story:
McNutt told offensive coordinator Ken O’Keefe that cornerback Chris L. Rucker lined up on his outside shoulder, giving McNutt, with the steps and technique, an open release to the inside, the quick slant. McNutt told O’Keefe he could win with the fade, but that Rucker was on the outside.
"If you have a bad release, you’ve got to go to the other side," said McNutt, who played just two plays against Wisconsin the week before because of a jammed thumb . "I came off him. I think they put another DB on me. The last couple times I ran a fade. I told coach that he was playing off me and on the outside.
"I told him I could win on the slant. He trusted me enough to call the play where I was isolated on the slant. And we won."
Just like that, it turns into a play where it's just one man against another, and whoever makes the play wins the game. 50/50. And though it's already a constant staple of coachspeak, there's rarely so vivid an example of how one player can affect one play, one game, and one season.

Are we officially calling this play "Seven Gets Six"? Because if so, that's fine, but one more vote here for "McNutts in your motherfucking mouth." Although we guess that one's more of a mouthful. Doesn't roll off the tongue. Pause.
Lest we forget, both McNutt and Ken O'Keefe deserve credit for that play call. McNutt's credit needs no explanation, but KOK listening to McNutt's observation and adjusting the play call instead of pulling a "you're run the play I fucking told you to run"--which a lot of coaches would probably do with the game literally on the line--is commendable.
Further, recall that this would not be the first time an Iowa player has affected the call of a play that ended up deciding the ballgame. Back in Week 1, after these refs were out to get our boys, Jeremiha Hunter told the team that the UNI kicker was firing line drives over the middle. Iowa adjusted to overload the middle and swatted the potentially fatal kick away.
Think about that. Obviously, all teams have smart players and all coaches encourage their players to be observant and everything. But to have a coaching staff that trusts its players enough to change their last calls of the game--twice--is a special situation.

Ugh.
Fare thee well, Dace Richardson. Broken ankle, says the QC Times, and fuck that sucks. While Dace didn't have the spate of random injuries plaguing him like Tony Moeaki, what he did have was a knee that betrayed him with a drunk ex-wife's malevolence. With that knee healthy, Richardson was back in business this season, and had been Iowa's steadiest, best performer on the line through the first seven games. He was a mid-season All-American, and nobody flinched.
One freak play later, Richardson was on the ground, having been rolled up from behind. Just like that, his regular season's definitely over, and January's completely in doubt as well. In other words, Richardson's star-crossed career with the Hawkeyes may already be over. If so, what a damned shame.
Julian Vandervelde was fine, we suppose, but he's not Dace, and that's just one more area where Iowa's going to have less of an advantage than they would have preferred. Fortunately...
It looks like Bryan Bulaga is back. Maybe it's just because he wasn't facing guys like O'Brien Schofield or Brandon Graham. Maybe it's just because the coaches fixed something in his mechanics coming out of his stance. Maybe that thyroid still had a little bit of recovery to do. Whatever. Dude come to play last night, and thank God--it was agony to see him fall off so badly and struggle against the type of player he would normally eat for breakfast. We didn't get any "put Riley Reiff back in there already" texts this weekend, and it's not only because Reiff's holding it down at right guard.
It's doubly a shame that Richardson went out, because it looked as if Iowa had the front five it had wanted all season long, with this fourth version of the starting o-line (Bulaga, Dace, Rafael Eubanks, Reiff, and Kyle Calloway) starting its third straight week--and, it would appear, its first with Bulaga back to his usual self. Now, we prepare for the fifth iteration.

That hook-and-ladder was awesome. Boo Michigan State and all, but yeah. That's all. Nice call, Dantonio.
And finally, this time the breaks didn't go Iowa's way, and it was still okay. For as much of a dynamic playmaking unit the defense has been all season long, this week served as proof that there is a bit of luck to creating turnovers. Three times, the Hawkeye defense basically had a ball in hand and each time, they failed to turn it into Iowa ball.
- Just before the half, Kirk Cousins threw an insanely ill-advised out route, one that bounced off Hunter's hands. If he catches it, it's either six points or Iowa in easy field goal range. Incomplete, and the half ended without incident.
- In the third quarter, Adrian Clayborn chases down Larry Caper and strips the ball inside MSU's 20 yard line; though Clayborn falls onto the ball, he doesn't gain possession of it, and MSU eventually recovers. The Spartans would keep this drive alive and kick a field goal to gain a 6-3 lead.
- Later in the third quarter, with MSU again inside their own 20 yard line, Cousins lofted a pass under duress; the ball floated on Cousins and hit a diving Shaun Prater in the hands before harmlessly falling incomplete. It would take seven snaps and three first downs for Iowa to get to the field position they'd have had if Prater had caught the ball.

Yes, it would have been the toughest of these three plays, but does this reaction look like Prater had no shot at it?
Now, this isn't to say that Iowa deserved to win by bigger or that MSU had no opportunities to force a turnover or whatever. It's just that there were three moments at which the Hawkeye defense had its hands on the ball and couldn't give Iowa (at least) a very short field by hanging on. That Iowa still won is a testament to the mental toughness of both sides of the ball.
Not every team comes away from those missed golden opportunities with a win. And for Iowa, until that clock hit 0:00 with the ball in McNutt's hands, that was a 50/50 proposition.
[Photo credits: Top: the AP; 2, 4, 6: The Gazette, 3,5: Iowa City Press-Citizen]
0 recs |
73 comments
|
Comments
Troy Johnson...
is pretty big for a linebacker. i think that’s Christian Ballard. Or maybe Troy Johnson ate Willie Lowe hoping to improve his coverage skills.
by alnamiasIV on Oct 26, 2009 6:22 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You beat me to the punch
I was planning on going into work a little early this morning and putting up a fanshot/post discussing the always-reliable punching bag O’Keefe deserving a metric shit ton of credit for the way the offense drove down the field on the final drive. That little crossing route Stross ran that got us into MSU territory was a thing of beauty, not to mention the McNutt fade that exposed the hyper MSU cornerback and the 4th down slant to end the game.
Sure, our offense looked bad in goal line situations (equally, MSU’s defense looked fantastic) and I know I would have liked to see some other plays in a couple of those situations. But, hats off to KOK for getting it done when it mattered the most.
by Twin Cities Hawk on Oct 26, 2009 7:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Where the hell did I read that Iowa didn't practice the two minute drill all week? Morehouse?
That’s incredible. What does the fact that they executed a perfect two minute drill not having practiced it all week actually mean? Good coaching? Good work in the preseason? Great players that are cool under pressure? Just “Wow!”
by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Oct 26, 2009 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it was just that particular play - not the Two Minute Drill as a whole.
I’m sure they work on the 2MD every day.
by Bucketochicken on Oct 26, 2009 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I read it as they scrubbed the entire 2MD
by storminspank on Oct 26, 2009 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, I might have just heard/read it wrong.
In that case… WOW.
by Bucketochicken on Oct 26, 2009 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand what you're saying
but on the other hand, where are these calls during the rest of the game. We should have a good passing offense (minus the occational Stanziball), but we have not consistently seen it. Why not?
It never gets to be easy
by chitownhawkeye on Oct 26, 2009 4:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I haven't the faintest
I don’t excuse KOK for other perceived failings; I ask the same questions you do as well. I just happen to think that in order to be objective in his overall assessment as OC, we should recognize all that went well the final two minutes of that game knowing he had his hands firmly on the controls.
by Twin Cities Hawk on Oct 26, 2009 6:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem
is that he didn’t. He did a great job of directing the Hawks down the field once MSU changed their defense, but they were still 0-3 getting into the endzone. He deserves credit for listening to McNutt, but he didn’t call the play that won.
It never gets to be easy
by chitownhawkeye on Oct 26, 2009 7:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure there was much there
for either team. MSU is a monster passing team by Big Ten standards, and other than two plays, they had squat. Watch the replay, their defense was out of thier minds good. As for the goal line, I agree, KOK should have test the Wegher leap or a stright dive play. But, let’s admit that if Morse does not cut off his route, and catches that ball in tthe end zone we all call that a fabulous play. I have read plenty of critiques, and written a few myself that Iowa doesn’t pass enough in close. Give the guy some slack. He has gone to the pass in the red zone and that is what many wanted.
As for the Wegher run on 3rd and goal from the 9…that had Ferentz written all over it. He puts EVERY game in the hands of the defense. And, he is on record for saying that coming away without points inside the 10 is the greatest cardinal sin that exists in football. He believes in the rock always going forward. And so far, he’s right.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
by StoopsMyAss on Oct 26, 2009 7:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This reminds me of past player's contribution
Some special team’s guy in 2002 spotted a subtle difference in Charles Roger’s stance on pass plays vs run plays. It worked because it was the first game in like so many that Rogers didn’t have a touchdown.
by Duez I say on Oct 26, 2009 8:19 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Are you sure Dace is Out for the Year?
I thought on KF’s post game he said broken bone, but could be back in a few weeks. It’s not like Dace has to make cuts or anything. Give him some pain meds, wrap that ankle up, go beat up some DLinemen.
Maybe?
by storminspank on Oct 26, 2009 8:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ankle?
I also recall reading that it was a broken bone in the foot, not the ankle. Big difference, I would think.
by alnamiasIV on Oct 26, 2009 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You may recall reading that
But the QC Times said broken ankle, there’s a link right there in the article for a reason..
I got more rhymes than Wade Lookingbill's got dunks
by Oops Pow Surprise on Oct 26, 2009 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would be great
but you have to wonder, with only four weeks left in the season, would the line be better served with a healthy and consistent Vandevelde or an injured and uncertain Dace?
by Hawkeyes on Oct 26, 2009 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Out a few weeks" translates into
We’ll be happy if he’s back for the bowl game. Damn shame.
by Imustbreakyou on Oct 26, 2009 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
IV
Yes it’s a broken bone in his foot. Referring to ankle, just to wrap the foot to stabilize it was my thoughts. Then again, I am an athletic supporter not an athletic trainer. Zing.
by storminspank on Oct 26, 2009 9:45 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
ESPN says
He may make it back for the bowl game, but I wouldn’t put any money on it.
by Hank Thrasher on Oct 26, 2009 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm furious
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4594710
That shit made my blood boil.
by TAMPAHAWK on Oct 26, 2009 10:12 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Why? This is ESPN's male equivalent of Erin Andrews dispensing advise on college football
Personally, I prefer to have most of the media questioning this team. It has to serve as motivation to them.
by Twin Cities Hawk on Oct 26, 2009 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Palmer is a fucking tool...
Just worthless
Hawks....yup, I like 'em
by Rozhawkfan on Oct 26, 2009 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Worthless is an understatement
He completely undercut the relevance of the computer rankings, and instead insinuated that what’s more important than actually winning, are the “STYLE POINTS” associated with running up the score. What a joke.
by TAMPAHAWK on Oct 26, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why do you care what The Bachelor thinks about the team?
They’re fourth in the BCS standings, that’s really all that matters. You guys need to just stop reading and watching ESPN if it pisses you off so much. I’ve pretty much stopped beyond the actual games, and am much happier for it.
by NorseHawk on Oct 26, 2009 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Without even clicking that link
I’m guessing that will play a video of Jesse Palmer bitching about Iowa passing up Boise and Cincy from last night. When you consider that Palmer apparently doesn’t know that the computers don’t take margin of victory into consideration…..well.
by TarHeelHawk on Oct 26, 2009 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Correct
The World’s Worst Liars in Sports ESPN, and Mr. Hair Gel Jesse Palmer, also don’t take into consideration that they should remove Tebow’s and Saban’s epletives from their mouths before speaking on television. They must have learned charity and empathy from Tebow the Almighty in that they are so heartly sorry for Boise’s and Cinci’s drop. It must have been so hard for Herbstreit to stand up for us to the hair gel like that.
Hey Dolph, you look like I need a beer.
by Give Eddie a Beer on Oct 26, 2009 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I find it amazing how
Palmer or whomever else can state how Boise State and Cincinnati should be furious that Iowa is ranked in front of them, because they too, are unbeaten. They then turn around and say USC—A TEAM THAT LOST!—should be ranked in front of Iowa because of the team they are now and they lost without their starting QB. As Edds said, “yep, we’re just lucky, that’s it.”
by Kinnick Stadium is my Graceland on Oct 26, 2009 10:24 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention
USC isn’t really dominating over their opponents either. granted they have beaten decent teams by a couple of touchdowns and obliterated Cal but they almost lost last week and got beat by Washington
by Pain in the Sash on Oct 26, 2009 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's not forget
They still have to get by Oregon.
You know, the team that’s actually leading the Pac-10 right now, and whose one loss came against a top-5 team.
by With Ferentz Like These... on Oct 26, 2009 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"I'm not taking anything away from Iowa... but..."
Jesse, you’re a cunt.
Your hair looks nice though, and let’s face it – that’s the important thing.
by Bucketochicken on Oct 26, 2009 10:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wonder where he got his hair gel
I’m thinking it’s an all natural formula concocted by Tebow.
by Hank Thrasher on Oct 26, 2009 2:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
All natural?

Photo courtesy of ew.com
"You don't become a Hawkeye fan, You're born with Black and Gold in your veins." - Me
by BStylin Hawkye on Oct 26, 2009 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Palmer and "They did nothing wrong."
They both play in substandard conferences and have scheduled mostly patsies on their out-of-conference. Say what you want about USC but the way they schedule, if they ever manage to play an entire season and go 12-0 nobody will question their right to play in the national title. If Boise State wants to be taken seriously (and to a slightly lesser degree, Cincy) then they can’t have any teams named UC-Davis or SE Missouri State on their automatically (due to the inferior conferences in which they play) weak schedules.
by alnamiasIV on Oct 26, 2009 10:49 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, no one would question USC's right to play in a title game if they went 12-0
But, they FUCKING LOST!!! This mythical 12-0 USC team would be amazing, too bad that’s not the one that has actually shown up this season.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
by HoyaGoon on Oct 26, 2009 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They did play Oregon...
But yes, they need to schedule a tougher non-con season, because the WAC is not up to the level of the BCS conferences.
by With Ferentz Like These... on Oct 26, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rankings
Yes, Palmer is a douche. Here is where the human rankings do not work.
There are preseason rankings that come out and set the early standard. Iowa was preseason #22 in AP and Cincy was not even ranked. Boise was #14. Then when the season begins the first two or three games solidify rankings. Iowa dropped despite winning its first game while Cincy appeared by week three thnaks to early season unexpected success. Arizona was Iowa’s first “real” test and they were unranked preseason. So no human voter bump for that win, which now looks very good. Boise meanwhile had a nationally televised, much discussed (thanks to THE PUNCH) game that helped solidify them in the rankings.
But, if one were to evaluate from week three on, Iowa has the best resume there is…despite the Ark State game—which was the game that hurt Iowa’s national perception the most. That team has done nothing before of since and it “confirmed” Iowa’s poser-ness established against UNI.
Computers are indifferent to all that and focus on the accomplishments and not the “let downs” that have occurred.
The Iowa resume is not being fairly discussed either. We are not receiving much love for having the secoond longest win streak, nor are we getting credit for Iowa State blowout…which looks better and better. And, we are not getting credit for road victories.
What stands out to me is that Penn State winning big on road against a fading Michgan has more value than our road win over a surging MSU. The word now, is that MSU is merely a 4-4 team. four days ago, they were in the conference championship mix and had a great schedule to accomplish that feat. They were darlings. Now, they are chumps.
The WWL and MSM do this all the time. They decide who is the power team then make them fit. They rarely, if ever, analyze and report the results. They know Iowa does not have national currency and Ferentz is not the Ol Ball Coach, and we don’t have a Shonn Greene and thus we have no compelling storyline. And so committed to this sort of shit are the WWL and MSM that if we were to win out and win the National Championship game we still would not get the love. They would compare us to last year’s Florida team and say, “Well, this was a down year in college football.”
We are upsetting the apple cart. People don’t ppreciate that.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
by StoopsMyAss on Oct 26, 2009 12:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe the human polls aren’t being totally fair, because there’s certainly something to be said for just winning, a la Ohio State 2002 (though that team did mostly blow out the crappy OOC teams on their schedule) rather than gacking up a game like USC does every year. It’s hard for me to believe that wins over probably the 2nd, 4th, 5th and 6th best teams in the Big Ten, with the games against 2, 4 and 5 all coming on the road, don’t at least trump USC (who lost) or Boise or TCU (both of whom I think have had inferior schedules to Iowa’s at the moment) right now.
But honestly, if the BCS hadn’t mandated the changes to the computer polls to completely eliminate margin of victory from consideration, the computers would likely be ranking Iowa even lower than the humans are. For example, we know Sagarin would have them 12th.
by Yinka Double Dare on Oct 26, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree....
The human polls are about winning early and losing early. By mid-season those fucking things are set in stone. You can move the needle to the tune of a 10-15 spot jump. In fact, Iowa went from unranked before Penn State to like 14. But now…no one will get that kind of jump. If Oklahoma State beats Texas by 50 they will only move 3-4 spots. That is the problem with the human voters. They lack the interest and will to evaluate on a weekly basis the landscape.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
by StoopsMyAss on Oct 26, 2009 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Indeed
Poll inertia is a big problem, and it definitely happens because of lazy voters who just robotically move teams down an approximately set amount for any loss, and often just move everyone else up to fill the vacancies. Drives me nuts to see some of the inconsistencies in the earlier polls that show for a fact that the voters aren’t evaluating based on on-field results only. If they can’t get something so basic and logical at that point, then I don’t know why we’d give any credence to those electorates later in the year.
I know Brian has said he never wants it involved in anything, but the Blog Poll seems to have a better set of voters than any of the human polls. Especially the coaches and Harris, which of course are the two actually used. At least the AP had fewer of the “team B beat Team A but is ranked behind them despite being undefeated” issues, and ranked Bama first for a week.
by Yinka Double Dare on Oct 26, 2009 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great.
Except Brian is a dope who confuses fan-typing with sports writing. If RichRod fails, which is, actually, very possible, what with his idiotic sacrifice of a high school baby jesus QB, weekly, because this is the Big Ten?, he has zero credibility. I believe he called the last game UM by two. UM winning by two. Close game, well-matched competitors.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
by Bellanca on Oct 26, 2009 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jesus Tapdancing Christ
My post: Blog Poll is better than other human polls.
Your post: Approximately your 5000th “I hate Brian Cook and Rich Rodriguez” post.
Seriously man. Your obsession is showing.
by Yinka Double Dare on Oct 26, 2009 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the substantive comment is
that asserting superiority based on history (UM’s storied, unique history) is probably the dumbest thing to do in a changing game. Jay Berwanger won a Heisman, Oberlin is the last Ohio team to beat OSU, John Heisman coached at Oberlin: it’s safe to say: Chicago and Oberlin and history are not telling us much about 2009.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
by Bellanca on Oct 26, 2009 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There was no reason to bring your obsessive hatred of Cook and Rodriguez into it based on what I said, at all. I didn’t reference Michigan or Rodriguez and only mentioned Brian tangentially because the Blog Poll is his thing.
To your substantive point (which still weirdly references an unranked Michigan team) hell, why stop with Chicago and Oberlin — your real complaint is that Darrell Royal and Bear Bryant and Marcus Allen and Charles White still seem to matter in the polls. And even that 2008 seems to matter in the polls. And you won’t get any disagreement from me that it’s wrong.
by Yinka Double Dare on Oct 26, 2009 5:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well,
truth be told, I think Cook is silly, not hateful. (Why you’re wound up defending his purity is beyond me.) He doesn’t know anything about football, and if he’s ever hit a sled or run the ropes, I hope it was filmed.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
by Bellanca on Oct 26, 2009 6:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget just being lazy
Was listening to the Dan Patrick show today when he interviewed Chris Dufrense of the LA Times (who’s come around on Iowa). Amongst other things, Dan just doesn’t believe in Iowa, but Dufrense does, he basically said “Why not Iowa? It’s not like anyone else is making a more compelling case. They’re like 2002 OSU, they just find ways to always win.”
A more troubling aspect was Dan’s talking about how the SEC would be the one eventually pushing for a playoff because they were the “power conference”. This is neither the time nor place to go on my anti-playoff rant (one I know I am in the minority on), but the second part is what bothered me: the assumption that the SEC is far and a way the best conference in football. Now I happen to agree that the SEC is the best conference this year, but that it is far closer than generally thought. This conference has two dominant teams at the top, one vastly overrated team that still hasn’t done anything despite this being week 8 (LSU) and is very, very weak through the middle. It bothers me that the media clings to the idea that the SEC is, always has been, and always will be the world’s greatest conference. In the past 5 years? Yes. Before that, not so much.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
by HoyaGoon on Oct 26, 2009 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What the fuck are you whining about?
Twice in under a minute you used this line. If the comment’s long winded, and yet still related to the discussion, then it belongs in the comment thread, not in a fan post.
by The Mexican't on Oct 26, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What the fuck is your problem?
It’s not like “Wall of text” is a term of art.
Always say WHY you are superior, if you’re going to say you’re superior. (But you’re not.)
Mr. Boh Knows ...
by Bellanca on Oct 26, 2009 4:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was two paragraphs, you retard.
And that’s par for the course here. If that upsets you, there are certainly less content-heavy websites out there. May I suggest lemonparty.org?
I got more rhymes than Wade Lookingbill's got dunks
by Oops Pow Surprise on Oct 26, 2009 11:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Iowa’s opponents’ record = 38-22 (.633). TCU’s = 26-25 (.510). Boise’s = 22-28 (.440). Cincy’s = 21-28 (.429).
It’s possible the Hawks could only face one team with losing record this year (plus UNI with a winning record).
It shouldn’t matter how they get it done as long as they get it done
by iatoil on Oct 26, 2009 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ark State may end up .500 even.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
by StoopsMyAss on Oct 26, 2009 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nearly everything cooks on 350 dude
Screw what the cookbooks say.
by Leftcoast Hawk on Oct 26, 2009 12:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It helps if you rotate halfway through, or use the middle rack
Hey Dolph, you look like I need a beer.
by Give Eddie a Beer on Oct 26, 2009 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
“I told him I could win on the slant. He trusted me enough to call the play where I was isolated on the slant. And we won.”
That says metric assloads about your team’s undefeated record. Unbelievably impressive. I’ll now be rooting for you guys to win out and put a thumpin on Brutus after we do. Please don’t chuck up a douchey one to Jnw or Minny and make me regret this.
p.s. sorry about Dace. That this run includes 5 different Olines is just too much the awesome for me to comprehend.
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Oct 26, 2009 3:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
McNutt took the scholarship that would have gone to Cousins.
Brunettes not fighter jets
by rockyh on Oct 26, 2009 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very interesting
Even Irony makes an appearance in this magical season.
Brutus remains concerning, for both of us. But, damn, they’re such doucheas, it makes it even more fun to slug it out with them. I really cannot wait to watch Odrick bitchslap Justin Boren. He ended up in the right place. And if you follow that up with another a week later, we’ll slide a nice big turd down their Christmas chimney.
"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69
by jtothep on Oct 26, 2009 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please please bitchslap them in State College. Make Terrell cry.
by txhawkeye on Oct 26, 2009 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is remarkable that the coaches deferred to the player with fourth and infinity.
Enjoy it, guys, it is not going to happen again.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
by Bellanca on Oct 26, 2009 4:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
KOK .... he deserves some love.
I was one of those who was a KOK fan who would write the occasional critique. But, I have never lusted after another O-coordinator. This guy is special. I really think that he has made the most of what he has had to work with…there are so many players who with another team would never have been as productive and he did not undervalue or hinder progress for great talent like Greene. He maxed it out.
This is just another example or him doing great stuff. I fell for the guy when I read that he told Ferentz in the Pitt game last year that Stanzi was the best chance to win. Ferentz overruled him and he learned his lesson, and has not done it again. I also expect KOK told Ferentz that Wegher is ready, despite the diapers.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
by StoopsMyAss on Oct 26, 2009 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, based on the medical report, it's Wegher's time.
We’re hard on backs, we all have to admit. This offense asks a lot of the backs. Good luck Brandon, it’s clear you are not concerned.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
by Bellanca on Oct 26, 2009 5:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am weirdly obessed with Wegher
I have no idea what his ceiling is…but he is a ball player. I could see him getting 35 on 13 carries on Saturday or 185 on 18 carries. I would never bet against the kid. He is righ t out of the classic head down, Iowa hard worker mold.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
by StoopsMyAss on Oct 26, 2009 7:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Siouxer Rats
Are always hard workers. There’s no fancy jobs there.
by Duez I say on Oct 26, 2009 7:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Amen
And no high paying jobs either – this being the reason I left town after I graduated HS and never went back. But, I still love going back there for Christmas and not just to see the family.
I’m strangely obsessed with Wegher as well. Even though he’s from my HS rival, he’s very impressive, especially as a true freshman.
by CapitalHawk on Oct 27, 2009 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
























