Wha Happened? Week Six
Yes, there were other games involving Big Ten teams before Kinnick Stadium turned into a turnover-forcing black hole and Rich Rodriguez went apeshit... so Wha Happened?
Some people have too much time.
Ohio State 31, Wisconsin 13
Offense? Who needs fucking offense to not only win a football game but cover a seemingly ludicrous 16-point spread? Then again, if Vegas truly knew Scott Tolzien was going to throw not one but two pick-sixes to Ohio State defenders (although the latter pick six was a truly gorgeous deflection, catch, and runback by an OSU linebacker), I'm never going to bet against them again, because clearly their psychic monkey army is not to be trifled with. Anyway, in the game itself Wisco dominated time of possession (42:47 to 17:13), total yardage (368 to 184), first downs (22 to 8, and 3 of those came on the OSU offense's lone TD drive)... basically any offensive stat you care to look at. But they lost decisively for two reasons: they couldn't convert that offensive dominance into many points and they gave up three critical big plays (the aforementioned two pick sixes and a 96-yard kick return touchdown, which occurred immediately after Wisco had sliced OSU's lead to 21-13 and effectively served as the nail in the coffin for the game).
So what to take away from this game? Well, Wisconsin is fairly legit -- you aren't going to give up 217 return yards and three touchdowns too often and their defense did an impressive job of stifling Ohio State's offense -- and Ohio State's defense is scary. They did a fair amount of bending against Wisconsin, but they almost never broke and they came up with more than enough big plays to win the game. With the Pryor-led offense continuing to flail around like drunken ostrich whenever they play a defense that's at least halfway good, the defense and special is going to have to pick up the slack. So far they seem more than capable of doing so.
Michigan State 24, Illinois 14
Hey, remember when the Zooker was turning to Eddie McGee to light a spark under the moribund Illinois offense? Remember how he said it wasn't a "knee-jerk reaction"? Right. It sure seemed that way after he pulled McGee after barely more than one half of work and went right back to everyone's favorite massively-domed quarterback named after a beverage. Then again, a quick look at McGee's line (2/11, 31 yards, 6 carries, 11 yards rushing, and one crippling pick-six interception that was STANZIBALL-esque in its awfulness) would reveal why a new knee-jerk reaction was in order. Juice was bad in the early going this year; McGee was, improbably, even worse yesterday.
On the bright side, Juice did lead the Illini to their first touchdown against BCS competition that was scored before the fourth quarter this season. Baby steps, Illinois! At this rate, you'll be scoring first quarter touchdowns by the Cincinnati game at the end of the season! Anyway, Illinois is still terrible and the only reason to watch them is out of a macabre desire to see how disastrous this season can get for the Fightin' Zookers -- and to see if the head cheese himself can escape the guillotine. As for Sparty... ho hum. What does a win over Illinois really tell you at this stage? Maybe the biggest positive is that they finally mustered a solid running game; it took a cast of thousands (or, like, five dudes), but they ran for 193 yards and a pair of touchdowns on 45 carries. Then again, their two main running backs (Larry Caper and Glenn Winston) left the game due to injury (although The Only Colors says Caper is going to be alright). 24 is also the fewest points allowed by the Illini to FBS competition; even the offensively-challenged Buckeyes managed 30 points against Illinois, and they were playing in a monsoon.
This video may be too late to help Purdue, but you can still take its lesson to heart.
Minnesota 35, Purdue 20
Purdue is either the unluckiest team in football this year... or they just kinda suck. If good teams make their own luck, do bad teams make their own bad luck? A week after giftwrapping a victory for jNWU, Purdue was back to those same tricks. Once again, they jumped out to an early lead (10-0 this week). And once again, their inability to protect the football led directly to defeat. Three of Minnesota's touchdowns were scored on drives that started at the Purdue 30 or better; one of the other touchdowns was scored off a return from a blocked field goal. Like Ohio State, Minnesota was outgained (402 to 281), but still won comfortably thanks to turnovers and special teams. When their offense did have the ball, Minnesota opted for a surprisingly effective ground-and-pound strategy, mashing the Boilermakers for 207 yards and 4 touchdowns on 44 carries. Wha Happened? man crush target Eric Decker had a largely anonymous day (three catches for 50 yards), although the 47-yard bomb he hauled in helped set up one of the Gophers' touchdowns. For Purdue, this was the latest embarrassing death rattle in a season that's officially gone belly up. For Minnesota, this was a critical win in the pursuit of bowl eligibility; the next two weeks send them to Happy Valley and Columbus for games, which should put them at .500 heading into the home stretch of the season.
AWW SO CUTE.
Northwestern 16, Miami (OH) 6
Oh LOLcats. Don't ever change. 16-6? Almost getting outgained in total yardage? Against the other Miami? Now, some people would cry "glass houses, motherfucker!" Or, "hypocrisy, bitchface!" To them, I would say three things. One, that's just fucking rude. Two, our ugly wins against lesser foes came against better teams. Three, I don't really care. Watching justNorthwestern struggle with inferior competition is just funny. Motherfucking Kent State scored almost twice as many points against Miami as jNWU. jNWU scored 21 points less than Miami has been giving up on average. They completed less than 50% of their passes and ran for barely more than three yards a carry. Again, against Miami (OH), one of the legit worst teams in the Football Bowl Subdivision. You want to talk about "moral defeats"? Look no further.
Much like Indiana football, this is not for the faint of heart.
Virginia 47, Indiana 7
No, that is not a typo. Virginia, the same schizophrenic sad sack outfit that lost badly to I-AA William & Mary a little over a month ago, took Indiana behind the woodshed for one of the most jaw-dropping beatings of the season. Actually, scratch that -- they straight up fed them to the wood chipper (NSFW). How else to explain a game in which they were almost doubled up in total yardage (536 to 272), made Jameel Sewell look like a Davey O'Brien Award candidate (20/30, 308 yds, 1 touchdown, 7 carries, 29 yards, 1 touchdown, 0 turnovers... he had three interceptions against William & Mary), and were down 47-0 at one point in the fourth quarter? Going back to last year, Indiana has lost their last six games against BCS conference opponents (who was their last win against? Guess who.) and they haven't even been remotely competitive in any of them except the Michigan game a few weeks ago. Aside from being a gosh darn nice guy, how does Bill Lynch still have a job?
60% of the time, it works every time. Just like scheduling Eastern Illinois.
Penn State 52, Eastern Illinois 3
Despite what you may have heard, rest assured that there is no truth to the rumor that Penn State is lobbying to have Jake Christensen start for the opposition in all games in Beaver Stadium. But you can't blame them for trying. First visit? 16/29, 146 yds, 1 TD, and a 20-point defeat. Second visit? 13/25, 137 yds, 0 TD, 1 INT, and a 49-point defeat. I'm not positive, but if he comes around again, I think he'll throw four interceptions and they'll win by 100. Something like that - I'm no mathemagician. Anyway, hail to the conquering victors; they won their first game against ranked competition, after all. They ran well (285 yards and 3 touchdowns on 36 carries), they passed well (Clark threw for three touchdowns and 234 yards on 13/19 passing)... they did whatever they wanted.
0 recs |
23 comments
|
Comments
I have a very uneasy feeling about this game on Saturday
The first BCS poll comes out after this week’s games. It’s Wisconsin’s homecoming. They moved the ball well against a retardedly good OSU defense, against their first real competition of the year, on the road at Ohio Stadium.
We desperately need to shut Clay down in order to force Tolzien to throw a couple of those TOLZIENBALLS our way.
by Twin Cities Hawk on Oct 12, 2009 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions
Yeah, me too.
I really, really want this to be a “statement game,” completely shutting down their offense and winning by at least three scores…
but I’m a skosh nervous.
by Bucketochicken on Oct 12, 2009 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions
Conversely...
Ohio State’s defense did what our defense tries to do as well, which is make the offense run a LOT of plays to get down the field and score points. And Wisco could not do that. Hopefully we’re able to do the same. Historically, since the talent level has gotten more equal (so throwing out the 99-00 teams), Norm’s defenses have done a pretty solid job against the Wisco offense. We match up well with them. Although I think Ballard is really going to have to step up and have a big game; he needs to excel in the Kroul plugger role in this game so that we can keep Clay under wraps. We’ve been uncharacteristically average against the run, but I think part of that has to do with our scheming (giving opponents a bit more of the run and shutting down the pass more, perhaps) and part of that has to do with the opponents’ scheming (running out of a spread approach). But that trend will need to stop on Saturday; letting Clay do well will enable Tolzien to slice us apart with play-action.
I’m far more concerned about our offense versus their defense. Their defense has been hot and cold this year, but they were pretty damn solid when it counted against Sparty (gave up quite a bit late, though) and also against OSU (although their offense has looked like a hot mess against a lot of teams this year). But the STANZIBALL Pick Six needs to stop and if the offensive line could get their shit together and play at a high level consistently (rather than a series or two a game), that would be great.
Addendum...
I’m also concerned about the matchup against O’Brien Schofield, their senior DE who’s been a terror this year. Brandon Graham seemed to spend about half the game in our backfield on Saturday; I don’t know if Schofield is as good (probably not), but he’s no slouch. Whoever gets matched up with him (either Bulaga or Calloway; I think both got their cracks at him on Saturday and both guys got burned a time or two) will need to really step it up (and probably get a bit of help from a TE or FB or someone).
Graham >>>>> Schofield
Schofield’s good, but it’s not a close comparison.
"Do not cheat your team or your teammates. Know your plays. Block. Protect. Add to what we are trying to do."
The Only Colors
The Badgers, that is.
I actually really like the state itself. Anyway…
by Bucketochicken on Oct 12, 2009 12:00 AM CDT reply actions
I like the cheese and the beer.
And the mustard, too. They seem to have an inordinate number of specialty mustard-places.
And brats—I like the brats a lot, too.
I’m not too hard to please, actually.
If it's not too much trouble, search your soul--and then ask yourself if maybe I might have a point.
by The Director on Oct 12, 2009 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions
Northwester Pounded Miami, not
I want to argue, but I got nothin’.
Except another winner, by betting the under.
Oh, yeah: Brent Musberger showed video of night time corn harvesting, so take that.
by Purple Flag on Saturday on Oct 12, 2009 9:57 AM CDT reply actions
On the other hand....
It is a proven fact that night-time corn harvesting is 500% sexier than plain ole day-time corn harvesting.
Except for the fact that they showed it TWICE. Once did not, apparently, create the sexy night-time harvesting vibe the network truly wanted.
And in our defense, Northwestern coeds are also 500% sexier in near-darkness than in day-time, too. And we can make alcohol from our corn! And high-fructose corn syrup!
From what I’ve seen, there ain’t much you can make from a NW coed, except a night full of regret.
BAM!
If it's not too much trouble, search your soul--and then ask yourself if maybe I might have a point.
by The Director on Oct 12, 2009 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
They did show it twice,
but on one of those shots, ABC had cleverly set up Michigan and Iowa helmets facing each other! On the back of a combine! Or whatever type of equipment it was!
They also showed the Field of Dreams set in Dyersville. So there’s that.
by TarHeelHawk on Oct 12, 2009 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions
Indeed
They also showed the Field of Dreams set in Dyersville. So there’s that.
More cornfields! In a different context! Hooray!
It’s been a while since we’ve had a game on BTN, but it doesn’t seem like they play up the “in the middle of a cornfield” stereotype nearly as much with their broadcasts. Maybe they don’t have the budget to go send cameramen out to ride on combines.
Showing the Field of Dreams is perfectly fine
That movie is the greatest thing to ever come out of Iowa and we should constantly remind people of it. The state motto should be “That place where Field of Dreams was filmed”
Well played.
BAM, indeed.
While the network had to go cornholing, they also served up the coed in disbelief shot of the week.
If the Hawks keep winning, there may be a Girls of Disbelief Calendar opportunity.
by Purple Flag on Saturday on Oct 12, 2009 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Now THAT is a good idea.
Or a Bud commercial, a la “Real Men of Genius”.
Girls of Disbelief calendar—great idea.
If it's not too much trouble, search your soul--and then ask yourself if maybe I might have a point.
by The Director on Oct 12, 2009 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions
I thought Christensen looked
a smidge less muscle-y in his Eastern uni. I didn’t see the game so I can’t comment on that. Although, I read somewhere that he was quoted after the game as saying something like, if Stanzi would have been Eastern Illinois QB then the score would have been 59-3 because of the whole pick 6 thing.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
I tuned in for a little bit
And within :30 seconds he had (comically) thrown a ball over a receivers’ head and fumbled for a 90 yard TD return. Needless to say, his opinion that it was Iowa and not him that sucked was a little off.
Black and Gold Blood: Cubbie Blue Heart
by MissouriHawk on Oct 12, 2009 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions
I ran back to my apartment to grab more beer right around when EIU was starting their first drive. I looked at the clock said “hey before I go back out I should see if Jake is getting killed”, flipped on the TV, and immediate got to watch him hold onto the ball for way too fucking long and get killed by Odrick. It was like he’d never left.
Please tell me you're kidding
about JC quote thing. Because if not, then that’s really going too far.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
call me crazy
but wasn’t that muppet video originally a cover for “in the navy”?
damnit, i’m old.
Eat what the monkey eats, then eat the monkey. -U.S. Navy survival guidance
Scrape together some money right away
Early line is Iowa +1 1/2 @ WI.
by Purple Flag on Saturday on Oct 12, 2009 4:33 PM CDT reply actions
That's about right
Vegas is putting this sucker line out here so people like yourself bet heavy on Iowa, then end up tilting the line back towards the end of week near a Pick Em line or Iowa slightly favored.
My personal belief is that we shouldn’t be favored and, like I stated before, I am really nervous for this game.
by Twin Cities Hawk on Oct 12, 2009 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions

by 



















