Black Heart Gold Pants: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Baby Boilers no more: Michigan State-Purdue Preview

Indications.

a. Michigan didn't get a rush play for more than 12 yards. To me this is the key to the game. It certainly was my biggest concern, their capacity to break big ones. This is the only game this year, I predict, where Michigan's longest play goes for 12.

b. Forcier's line. He is the fourth QB to be humiliated by the Iowa defense, third to be benched (and Clark should've been benched). Someone else will calculate his in-game pass efficiency, but I'm sure it's in the 50-range. Happily for us, his coach then piled on with a televised meltdown and with luck QBForce-Nobel-Peace-Prize-Mother-Theresa-Tate is permanently twisted now in the head. Rodriquez lost control of himself in this game, and it was good to see.

c. Stanzi seems to drink from the idiot savant's cognitive dissonance cup all right. And it is scary bad when he sees someone the other 70,000 people watching don't see -- and then initiates a conversation with him and attempts to play nice and share his football, before the meds kick in. Still and all, our QB play for the season is better than the collective opposing QBs' play.

d. We all thought last year's 32 turnovers was an irreproducible quirk. However, we are >20% ahead of that pace.

e.  We should remember that there probably isn't a team in the Big Ten that doesn't think it can beat Iowa.   We just got 5 takeaways but yielded 28 points and won by 2.   And we returned to clock management hell, while descending to a new circle -- pushing a 48 yard field goal to 53.  

0 recs  |  Comment 57 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Forcier's pass efficiency was

73, if I calculated it correctly. Stanzi was at 126, though with him it’s useful to note that the efficiency calculation doesn’t discriminate between INTs that go for zero return yardage, and INTs that go for six.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Oct 11, 2009 8:33 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

No doubt

our best offensive football is ahead of us. That was said by several players during interviews yesterday, so that was clearly a post-game locker room talking point.

Good news: I think Iowa has been tested with the spread in about every possible way. This may come in handy when we face Pryor and the Buckeyes. Now we get, for perhaps the first time all season, a QB that cannot break us down with the run. I am going on record as betting that we get more sacks in the Wisky game, than in any other all season.

Bad news: Certainly, I think we have all noticed the coaches are tightening up on things…toward the conservative. I, at least, felt that KOK was very aggressive against Iowa State and Arizona, but from the Penn State game forward we have been a smidge tighter on things. The play clock bumbles being an outgrowth of that. This offense/team does best when it is assertive and bold. Norm is carrying his weight as he has the defense really attacking (even though it is still a BDB philosophy). These predictable Iowa offensive play calls in tight spots just have not worked (with the exception of the third down runs on the final drive against Penn State). That is why I liked the 4th down call yesterday…we were too far out for the Wegher leap, and that play works in the future I am betting. Stanzi just needs to let it unfold a bit longer.

Room for improvement: The O-line can get better still. The passing game can improve. As Bellanca says, our double tights are almost like a gadget play for teams. I love thset and the possibilities. The play calling can go back to early season style calling as far as I am concerned—this deffense gives you room for error as evidenced by having three pick 6s and living to tell about it. The kick off coverage needs to improve NOW. I am really fearing a TD return.

But make no mistake…I am really impressed with this team and its potential. It seems up to any task if it performs at its best, and I am not sure I have seen an Iowa team that I could say that about in a long time. And they clearly trust and believe in Stanzi, and that may be worth more than any stat he has or has not produced so far.

"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz

by StoopsMyAss on Oct 11, 2009 10:24 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

conservative KOK

that wasn’t the way I felt watching it. I saw a lot of pump and go’s in spots where I expected give up draws, and obviously PA on 4th and goal from 1-2 is pretty aggressive.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

by shake n bake on Oct 11, 2009 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think most of that pump and go was

Stanzi checking out of something on the ground. I know two of the touchdowns were. I would like to see more deep stuff. I hate Charlie Weis, but he will throw it long on your 5 out of 8 plays if he thinks your up too tight or he feels he has a mismatch. I know KOK and KF hate 3 and outs with a passion, but if it is there…

"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz

by StoopsMyAss on Oct 11, 2009 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought the deep throw to DJK on 3rd and forever was pretty mindblowing in that regard.

I (and probably millions of other Hawk fans) was fully expecting a draw or screen there; instead Stanzi chucked a beautiful ball down the field.

There are certainly times when we get too conservative on offense, though. Some of our red zone playcalling leaves a lot to be desired and I’ve lost track of how many times we’ve gotten stuffed on 3rd and short at the end of a game when we’re trying to run out the clock. I know we want the OL to be good enough to get those yards by just lining up and banging forward… but it’s not there yet.

by RossWB on Oct 11, 2009 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the argument could be made...

that the reason that worked is because everyone (including Michigan) expected KOK to run the ball there. They watch film and know our play calling tendencies. Without seeing a replay I would guess their safeties were in the box like they were for most of the rest of the game.

I think KOK has the ability to throw some teams for a loop in situations like these because everyone is used to the same old conservative shit most of the time.

It's not that I'm lazy, Bob, it's just that I don't care

by Colteyes on Oct 12, 2009 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely.

It’s great to see KOK break tendencies like that, especially when the play is executed as beautifully as that pass was.

by RossWB on Oct 12, 2009 8:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pryor's a dope,

he can’t play QB. He’s really fast, though. They should go straight single wing. I’m not joking. I would go straight single wing with this guy, and look out. I didn’t realize how fast he was. He’s just a great sw tailback. As a modern QB, he’s a joke. What’s with the shot put ball release? Did his mom teach him how to throw a football?

I think, Stoops, when you throw 38 times against the 8-9 fronts that UM brought, it’s hard to say Iowa has tightened up. Strongly disagree.

Our O-line began the year in disarray, and it’s not arrayed yet. Success has been anecdotal.

Stanzi is confounding. I don’t blame him, candidly, because a) he is not responsible for how Iowa prepares for games; b) he’s 14-3, and good luck, Mother-Theresa-Tate-I-shoulda-been-the-nobel-peace-prize-winner getting to 14-3; I believe you are currently 4-2. If the head coach (the guy who melted down on national TV and spitefully benched you?) gets his shit together, you will finish the year 7-4, at best, and that makes the Ricky-man better than you. But I have never seen such bad throws from a QB who wins so many games. Who has? Seriously. Who has? Favre at his chuck and duck worst? Maybe. But Stanzi is not chucking and ducking. He’s throwing to people who don’t exist. Of course, then he stops, magically. It makes me laugh, now that the game is over and we’ve won. It makes me stupid during the games.

I cannot fathom how we are so bad at kick coverage and clock management. When was the last time you saw a D-I team that burned two timeouts and pushed a critical 48 yard FG back five yards, because no one can count to 40? This is the easy stuff, folks. Easy. D-III teams don’t do this. Go watch BV-Central: they don’t do this. Ferentz needs to start enforcing the law with his prized, longstanding, never-leaving assistants.

Well, they’re lovable enigmas, these guys. They win, and genii like RichRod fall apart on national tv and destroy any trust their super-cute QB has for them. Nonathletes like Brian Cook think, “Our boys have more stars, we win, and RichRod is so great, oo-wah.” I think we laid some pipe for the next few years. Great-Tate won’t enjoy playing Iowa for the rest of his sainted UM career. We are now in his head. Also in his head: when will his head coach go vindictive again? Other than an NCAA investigation, debts near and far and a federal lawsuit, I have no idea what’s in Rich Rodriguez’ head. He has the sole and character of an NAIA big shot, which he was, but we’re not in Elkins, W.V., anymore. I do know that had we been unlucky enough to lose Ferentz to UM two years ago, we’d of just lost 41-3. The guy coaches that which counts. But Brian Cook knew the score. Ferentz is a loser. Just ask him. Leave Ferentz to the ground-bound, prosaic, talent-shy Iowans. Ferentz is not good enough for Michigan, says Brian “We have more stars” Cook. Ferentz is a catastrophe, says Brian. Meanwhile, which coach is more loyal to his own players, and which coach slept last night?

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Oct 11, 2009 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

SNAP.

I will haunt your dreams and eat your children.

by Dr. Hawk on Oct 11, 2009 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: kick return coverage...

This is something I’ve been wondering too, especially since our punt coverage is so excellent. Is it the kicker? Donahue makes the job of the punt coverage team a LOT easier with all of the height and distance he gets on his kicks. So is Murray the main problem on kickoffs? Distance has been a problem at times; is he also not getting enough height on his kicks?

I have a hard time believing that the players we have on kickoff coverage are worse or that the coaching is worse. And if it IS Murray (and no slight against him; I will love him forever after the PSU game and he’s grown into a decent FG kicker for the most part), then what are the alternatives? Donahue? Burning Mossbrucker’s redshirt? Guthrie?

by RossWB on Oct 11, 2009 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not Mossbrucker

His leg is much worse than Murray’s, which is part of the reason he didn’t get to take the Penn State kick. Donahue maybe, he was a great kicker in high school, and seems to have a pretty strong leg.

Murray suddenly struggling with distance is weird to me. Last year he had no problem booming deep kickoffs. Not sure what went wrong there.

by NorseHawk on Oct 11, 2009 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm just going to throw something out there...and you are going to laugh...but look it up.

Wegher is a damn good kicker. He put most of them into the endzone for touchbacks in high-school. Just saying…now laugh at me. The best kick coverage is a touchback IMO and if your RB can do it consistantly…why not let him?

Why not Iowa????

by CUNKNNK on Oct 11, 2009 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you had your way, Wegher would touch the ball on every snap

And play defense.

He came to Iowa to run the football, I doubt he has any interest in kickoff duties.

by The Mexican't on Oct 11, 2009 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know how silly it sounds, especially coming from me.

But he does have the strongest leg on our team, wouldn’t cost us a redshirt, and would be more successful than what we currently use. Seriously. I bet he has interest in anything that improves the team. Sounds silly, but it would work better.

Why not Iowa????

by CUNKNNK on Oct 11, 2009 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would be ok with that

He would have been a legit DI kicker prospect if he wasn’t such a good back. It’s not like he’d be any more likely to get hurt doing it, but I dunno if they’d want him to waste time in practice working off kickoffs when he could be doing other stuff.

by NorseHawk on Oct 11, 2009 4:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not being sarcastic.

I seriously don’t know…How much work would it take to practice kicking it forward as far as you can? I’m not suggesting he kick field goals, just kickoffs for touchbacks. Is it really impossible?

Why not Iowa????

by CUNKNNK on Oct 11, 2009 6:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No.

Welker kicked for the Dolphins. It s amateur football, give #3 the shot.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Oct 12, 2009 9:18 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Aren't high school kickoffs from the 35 or 40?

Kinda makes a difference when its 5-10 yards closer.

I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.

by HoyaGoon on Oct 12, 2009 8:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have the tendancy of being drunk watching games

But I don’t remember any of them landing at the 20-25, I feel like they get to at least the 10. I’m not saying that’s good at all, but if they are only getting to the 25 everytime we might as well kick it out of bounds and let them have it at the 40.

It's not that I'm lazy, Bob, it's just that I don't care

by Colteyes on Oct 12, 2009 7:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are right. Maybe I should not be so drunk when I watch the games (wakeup call)

High School Kickoffs go from the 40. So Wegher had a 10 yard head start. That means he was putting them in the 7-10 yard range when you adjust it.

I just looked at both the Michigan game and the Penn State games on my DVR (*Data below). Last game we had a kick go to the 21. It wasn’t a squib or anything…just that bad. Against Penn State we had one only get to the 18. BUT, those are outliers. The average landing position of the ball was the 12 yard line each game, which seems about normal watching other college games. Resulting in avg. starting field position of 28 (UM) and 31 (PSU) yards, respectively.

So, in conclusion Wegher would likely only be 3 yards or so better on average most likely and probably isn’t worth it as the destraction. I’ll drop it then.

I guess maybe this is all over-reacting and we need to get down there and cover better. Is it the arc or something? I was the holder for all the FGs but never kicked so I don’t know. Any former kickers out there…Are they high enough for our coverage to get down there?

*Mich – 15, 13, 15, 6, 5, 21, 5. PSU – 10, 18, 6, 14. (+One squib not counted)

Why not Iowa????

by CUNKNNK on Oct 13, 2009 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's strange to me that Mossbrucker doesn't have a stronger leg.

Why would you give a scholarship to a kicker who only has middling power? And I thought the buzz on him as a recruit (CARING IS CREEPY) was that he did have a strong leg.

Weird.

by RossWB on Oct 11, 2009 9:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He seems really accurate from like 35 or so in

Which you can’t exactly say about Murray all the time. Up until being passed over for the Penn State kick, Mossbrucker was having a great season last year.

by NorseHawk on Oct 11, 2009 9:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pryor against Wisconsin:

5/13, 1 TD, 1 INT.

He is a receiver. I think Tressel’s wasting his time.

DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on Oct 11, 2009 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's still just a true sophomore

He looks terrible now, but I’m willing to give him a little more time before I totally write him off. Vince Young (who had a very similar skillset) also had a wacky delivery and struggled as a passer his first two years (he was actually a little worse than Pyror). By year three, he was 3rd in the country in pass efficiency and almost single-handedly carried his team to a NC victory over a great USC team. Of course, he also had a coach who was willing to tailor the offense to his strengths. I’m not sure Tressel will ever do that for Pyror.

by NorseHawk on Oct 11, 2009 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's something Doc Saturday was talking about

Against USC, there were no rollouts or zone reads.

DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on Oct 11, 2009 6:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, it really makes no sense to me

They did that shit with Troy Smith all the time, especially earlier in his career before he developed as a passer. I don’t get the resistance to do the same with Pyror.

by NorseHawk on Oct 11, 2009 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

For genii.

"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69

by jtothep on Oct 11, 2009 8:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

jtot!

DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on Oct 11, 2009 8:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

/outing myself

Bellanca’s too much fun to pass up a browse.

"For me the game wasn’t grounded in reality. It was about the uniform you put on that turned you into a warrior. It was about the mythology of the battle, the victory, the defeat, the struggle." - Mike Reid, PSU '69

by jtothep on Oct 12, 2009 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

F*ck me, I'm actually curious. Someone be gentle and sweet and clue me in.

And I promise to never post anything about Brian Cook ever, ever again.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Oct 12, 2009 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm confused.

What’s left that could be piquing your curiousity? J to the P. jtot.

by The Mexican't on Oct 12, 2009 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on Oct 12, 2009 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I posted it because jtot's above post was classic jtot

He’s a lover of the English language and its nuances.

DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on Oct 12, 2009 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude, win-loss record is not how you judge a quarterback and you know it. At least I assume so.

Otherwise, Kyle Orton is one of the greatest QBs ever to play in the NFL. And, uh, no. Just no.

I don’t even want to think of how awful Stanzi would have been if he’d have been thrown in as a true freshman when he can’t avoid throwing utterly mindboggling pick-sixes every other game as a junior. Forcier’s a true freshman. This shit happens. We were all well aware of it, hence why nearly every Michigan fan you could have talked to thought we were going to lose. And yet somehow it was only by two points in a game with a minus-4 turnover differential, including two completely unforced turnovers that Iowa had zero to do with whatsoever (and notably Iowa was the Fluck recipient, recovering every fumble in the game when normal distribution has been shown to be 50/50)

And as I noted in your other post, two years ago when Brian wrote that post Iowa had gone 6-7 and 6-6 in the previous two seasons and the only thing they were ever in contention for was the Fulmer Cup. Hell, some Iowa fans when they heard Michigan was interested basically said “take him, please, like you relieved us of Mary Sue Coleman”. Congratulations, you’re asshole hindsight guy. I don’t know when Brian pissed in your Cheerios, but just stop it. Maybe you noticed on Friday when Brian also said this was going almost certainly going to be Tate’s worst stat line of the year due to Iowa’s defense and predicted an Iowa win? Oh, but that wouldn’t fit into your jihad.

By the way, weren’t you the one (or one of several) ripping me for saying it would be a bad idea to single-block Brandon Graham? How’d that work out for you? I think Bulaga still has burn marks from the flames coming from Graham’s feet as he blew right around him for a sack.

by Yinka Double Dare on Oct 12, 2009 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Peter King has Orton as his fifth place in MVP voting.

Just sayin’. There is something to be said for your team and your coach actually having faith in you.

by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Oct 12, 2009 5:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, Orton had plenty of support with the players in Chicago, but he’s had the great fortune of starting for a team with an excellent defense in Chicago, and now again in Denver (though it’s shocking that Denver turned it around after being rotten defensively last year — their DC should win some sort of award along with the Saints’ DC).

I loved him for his Jack Danielsness and general neckbeardom, but the guy couldn’t throw anything but short passes, and he’s still that same guy. The Bears’ deep ball play was “throw it up there and hope Hester gets interfered with coming back for the underthrown ball”.

by Yinka Double Dare on Oct 12, 2009 6:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed - but not my point.

The point is that there is more to being the defacto leader of your team than what the stats say – and while win/loss record has about as much merit for QB’s as it does for starting pitchers, you can’t quantify leadership.

Anywho – Tate got yanked and bitched out by his coach. Even in the yo-yo beginning to last season with the QB experimenting, I don’t once recall JC or Stanzi getting treated like Tate did. Not getting rattled in the face of defeat goes into that win/loss thing for team leaders.

by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Oct 12, 2009 7:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Look, guy, I understand that you want to defend Michigan

But getting hostile at an Iowa blog isn’t going to do you any good.

You may have seen some Iowa followers asking Michigan to take Ferentz, but that’s just because they were the loudest. I can assure you that a strong majority of Iowa fans did not want Ferentz to move to Ann Arbor.

Finally, it doesn’t really mean much to anyone here that Graham played as well as you’d hoped. Trying to clown Bulaga because he was beat around the edge on one play is pretty absurd. Especially considering that Graham had enough football smarts to run over Iowa’s punter on a crucial 4th down (a fact that went largely unnoticed due to the muff). I’ll wait for Cook’s UFR, but I would imagine that most of Graham’s destruction came from the right side of the Iowa OL. In the end, Iowa found a way to win, and that’s all anyone will remember.

by The Mexican't on Oct 12, 2009 5:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that’s all anyone will remember, as it usually is unless something bizarre happened.

But when someone’s way off base I’m going to respond. And the idea that Stanzi is better than anyone based on his W/L record is just bizarre. I mean, he’s better than Eli Manning, Phillip Rivers, Jay Cutler, Tom Brady, etc. too? I don’t even think Peyton Manning started 14-3, though he might have.

by Yinka Double Dare on Oct 12, 2009 6:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think you'll find a single [rational] person

that would ever claim Stanzi to be a superstar QB. He’s a mistake prone player, but he’s been a great leader for this Hawkeye football team and is a big reason for the success over the past year and a half. He may not ever play in the NFL, but not a lot of Iowa QBs do.

The facts are that Stanzi wins games. The only reason Forcier is getting the attention he’s received this year is because Michigan started 4-0. If Michigan only wins 2 more games this year, the media will chalk it up to true freshman jitters. If he never progresses, I’m sure they’ll continue to dig for excuses (see: Williams, Juice). In the end, if you’re not winning football games, then passing yards & TDs don’t mean much.

by The Mexican't on Oct 12, 2009 6:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought that Bulaga competed well,

Michigan had five turnovers and we didn’t, Graham’s pretty good, Michigan’s run D is pretty good when Michigan rolls the safeties up into the box (leaving the TEs uncovered, and the corners with no help?), you never read any of my posts from the time Ferentz was in play at UM so your calling me a hindsight guy is 180 degrees off, and if I have a QB who wins more than another guy’s QB that’s good — because the objective function is to win games, not accumulate QB stats.

I also think you have a ruthless, morally questionable coach who lost control of himself last Saturday, is implementing an offense that is killing your 175 lb. QBForce.com dude (ribs, shoulder, hand, brain — all injured so far), who is defended blindly by your blogging team, and about whom you guys are ridiculously defensive. As evidence, the ‘how dare you’ aspect of your note, above.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Oct 12, 2009 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My point is you’ve already decided that because he’s had a bad game as a true freshmen, he’s rubbish for the next three-plus,.and that’s just plain stupid. Pretty much everyone (well, outside the drive-by national media who probably aren’t even watching the full games and therefore missing the NO NO NO WTF ARE YOU DOING WHEW FIRST DOWN throws he’s made) admits he’s gotten away with some throws that should have been picks or at the very least absolutely should not have been thrown. Part and parcel of watching a team with a true freshman who gets too improv-y and tries to do too much. It’s not his fault that the media got all slobbery over him after a nice start. Hell, I think Rodriguez sitting his ass down for saying the wrong thing to the coach might not be a bad thing as far as sending a message to the whole team.

QB W-L record to me is even more useless than wins as a stat for pitchers to tell you how good they were. I mean sure, the QB obviously has some control, but only so much. He’s not playing defense, he’s not the one blocking. Hence why I brought up Kyle Orton, who was pretty much wretched by any definition in 2005 but won a bunch of games because he had the best defense in the NFL on his side.

Iowa got a deserved win, three of the turnovers were forced and they won the yardage battle too.

I understood Michigan’s defensive strategy. The idea clearly was to force Stanzi to throw a lot hoping he’d throw picks, playing press man coverage with only one safety supposed to be deep (Williams, who was rotten) basically daring Iowa to pass all the time. Stanzi threw one and there were two or three others that probably should have been but were dropped or were broken up by Iowa’s receiver playing good defense. Covering a good tight end was a weakness when they DIDN’T do what they did Saturday night, so I think they figured they may as well go for what they did and cross their fingers. It burned them.

Rodriguez’s offense is what it is. They knew what they were getting when they hired him. If they wanted the same thing as they’d had, they would have thrown the money at Ferentz or Schiano. And pretty much any offense runs you a risk of getting a QB hurt at about an equal rate. Forcier probably needs to learn to dodge hits a little better so he doesn’t take the full force, as he sometimes seems to run right into it instead of making the subtle self-preservation move.

And I’m totally cool with ruthless. Bo was ruthless too, running off half the team when he took over. Urban Meyer, Les Miles and Nick Saban are ruthless. Ruthless wins.

by Yinka Double Dare on Oct 12, 2009 7:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you really mean this?

“QB W-L record to me is even more useless than wins as a stat for pitchers to tell you how good they were. I mean sure, the QB obviously has some control, but only so much. He’s not playing defense, he’s not the one blocking.”

You do know that no player handles the ball more than the QB? It is the most important position in ALL of team sports. It isn’t even close. No team wins without effective QB play…is that really debateable?

Also, ask Dan Marino about stats? Ask him how he feels about never being mentioned in the same breath as Joe Montana (who played only two fewer years yet passed for 20,000 fewer yards, 1,500 fewer completions, and 150 fewer TDs than Marino). I can assure you that Bill Walsh would never have preferred Marino to Montana.

Oh, and find me a post where anyone on this blog claimed Stanzi was a lock for first team all Big Ten. You know, if Iowa were 3-3 this season and Stanzi had the exact same stats how do you think he would be portrayed by fans and the press? If QBs get the blame, then they damn well ought to get the credit too.

But just use your head…Iowa has two freshmen RBs, an O-line that has had three starters out with injury and thus has made it a rotating starting line-up from game one, a wide receiver who was a QB less than a year ago, the best TE has missed three games, and so the ONLY constant on the Iowa offense has been the QB. IN fact, As Morehouse taught everyone, Stanzi and Bulaga were the ONLY players who started the first game of the season having played more than two games at their starting position. No team in the BIg Ten had that kiind of lack of continuity. I would bet Stanzi is one of the few QBs with the attitude to manage that.

"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz

by StoopsMyAss on Oct 12, 2009 7:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The pitcher in baseball has the ball in his hands more than anyone else too, you know, and wins are still a shit stat to judge who’s better there.

I’m saying using W/L as the sole judge of a quarterback’s quality, which is what Bellanca did (he’s got a better won loss record so he’s better — his words), is spectacularly stupid. It ignores the fact that Iowa loses to Penn State if they have, say, Michigan’s defense instead of their own. It ignores special teams play. It ignores whether or not your offensive line is any good, because I don’t give a shit if it’s Jesus Christ himself, a guy isn’t going to do well with a sieve for a line (not that this is the case for either Iowa or Michigan).

It was simplistic, reductive reasoning worthy of Matt Millen or Tim McCarver and since I know Bellanca has a lot more statistical background than that since I’ve seen him post on Smart Football, it was a stupid thing for him to say. Yet he continues to insist that he’s absolutely right, that won/loss record automatically means a quarterback is better if his record is better. He’s not, and I’m pretty damn sure he knows it too.

And Bellanca, when Rodriguez knowingly leaves Forcier in a game with a concussion, then bitch away. He’s already show he’s not going to play a guy with a concussion, leaving Carlos Brown home this weekend, putting Threet on the bench for the rest of the year last year after he got a concussion against Purdue, etc. If he knew, he would have yanked Forcier. As it turns out he says he didn’t but he pulled him for other reasons. News flash: football is a contact sport. Concussions happen to pretty much anyone. The measure of a coach is whether he sits the guy or whether he pushes that player to play despite the risk if he’s not fully recovered. Hell, they said yesterday Forcier is the starter if he’s healthy, i.e. if the concussion symptoms are gone. If he’s pushing injured players into the lineup, I’ll be there with the torch and pitchfork too.

by Yinka Double Dare on Oct 13, 2009 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Never mind.

I allot myself one bickering intertubes session each month and I thought this was it.

But it’s clear that a) you are arguing with the benefit of your secret mind-reading insights, and, b) you don’t know anything about football or winning football games. So I guess not. I could care less if mother theresa tate is better as a sophomore, if indeed he survives six more weeks of being richrod cannon fodder. He could survive, he could transfer before your coach has 18 more hissy fits, or he could get better and be good. Meanwhile, iowa starts two seniors on defense. Wait’ll next year?

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Oct 12, 2009 8:50 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Ruthless is grotesque.

Tate is 19 and he has already received one or two concussions, and i ll be shocked and amazed if he doesn t have two more — this year. But richrod has to win to pay off $8-10mm of extant liabilities. Tate will have a 65 year old brain in four years — if he submits. You guys have bought into a very bad regime.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Oct 12, 2009 9:11 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Yinka Dinka Do...

say “uncle,” would ya? This isn’t even a fair fight. You are making massive sweeping statements that, besides being all over the place, support an argument against your posts. And for God sake man, a pitcher plays once every four or five games. Get a grip on yourself.

If you don’t understand the role of the QB in the success of a football team, and/or the effect the offensive scheme has on that QB and vice versa, then where are we to go with this conversation. Besides, if you really read Smart Football then you know that the site almost never breaks down a defense or special teams play. It is almost exclusively dedicated to offensive scheming and coaching decisions.

Bye, bye.

"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz

by StoopsMyAss on Oct 13, 2009 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure how

pass efficiency is figured, but 8/19 for 94 yards, 1 INT and getting benched tells me everything I needed to know.

This marks the 2nd time this year where Iowa has (seemingly) been willing to give up the run and dared the opposing QB to beat them.

by TarHeelHawk on Oct 11, 2009 10:25 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

One thing, Bellanca

Clark was dominated mentally by your Hawkeyes, but had we taken him out, his replacement would have been Kevin Newsome or Matt McGloin. Newsome can run, but is a freshman and has not passed capably out of the pocket or anywhere. Against Temple, he sat in the pocket until he was sacked. McGloin is a former walk-on. You may compare him to a considerably less-talented Stanzi.

That would have not worked out very well.

But, really, I’m just picking here. Good luck to your boys in future endeavors.

DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on Oct 11, 2009 2:46 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

You're right.

Its not baseball. If he were hurling you’d sit him just to protect his confidence, because, you know, he was getting seriously shelled out there. But in theory he could have turned it around. Looking forward to Oct 24. Tate can set the record this year for body parts, taped, and xylocaine administered, with your help. Then richrod can blame him before propping him up for the ritual osu sacrifice. Furman?

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Oct 12, 2009 8:56 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

I doubt we'll hurt Tate too bad

We can stop the spread, but we never fully shut it down. Hell, we do that against any offense that’s not 2008 Wisconsin.

DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on Oct 12, 2009 10:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And we sure as hell need Lee back by then

Josh Hull against the spread is not a fun thing to contemplate.

DO YOU HAVE PRIDE, DANNY?

by ReadingRambler on Oct 12, 2009 10:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

If you don't love it or leave it, USA, Number 1!
Start posting about the Hawkeyes »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Images_2__small
NFL Great Griese Comments on Stanziballs at Super Bowl
Biglebowski2_small
Iowa vs. Utah Valley Wrestling
20071_1317799871834_1435866490_30924685_4938494_n_small
13 Year Old QB Commits to USC
Gtvsia_small
A completely off topic apology.
Bob-sanders-081107_small
7 Hawkeyes get NFL combine invites
Lesjepsen_small
Bud Bowl II was apparently played in Iowa!
Heat-pacino-great-ass_small
Girl's Generation - Oh! Iowa!
Iowa-title1_small
Recruiting snobs list bigten worst conf. in this years class
Voyager1_small
Tim Dwight at the Millrose Games (Super 60)
Bob_sanders_iowa_small
Typical Iowa State: Paul Shirley.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Mcqueen_small Hawkeye State

Anchower_small Oops Pow Surprise

Stains_small jebushchrist

Editors

Editorinchimp_small RossWB

Authors

Images_small StoopsMyAss

Spitzenhofen_small Hayden Fry's Moustache Ride

Official Partner of CBS Sports