Mistakes Were Made
[As we await this afternoon's emergency Regents meeting, we'll bump this FanPost!, written yesterday morning, by famed BHGP diarist Bellanca. We're also doing this to open a new thread while we try to figure out where the heck to go from here. Thanks to all our readers for keeping your comments civil yesterday, and we look forward to more of the same today.--OPS]
In the language of bureaucracy, the ugly is transformed to the bland. The logic and imperative of individual moral action are replaced by collective procedure, bled dry of conscience. Leadership is fled, because in the culture of bureaucracy, a mania for collective credit requires that no single person ever stand and say, "Wait a second, this has gotten out of hand, and I don't care how many careers and how much money are at stake."
So. Hypothetically, now. Say you're the executive of a small, 150-person outfit and a couple of your staff are accused by a young woman in your office, sitting there with her dad now, of a violent crime. Wait, not a "violent crime". Felony second- and third-degree sexual assa ult. Wait, that's more euphemism. The young woman there accuses someone who works for you of raping her while she is insensate in one of your company buildings. She doesn't know how many men raped her but others of your staff say they know that it happened. She is accusing your staff of a violent crime and others of your staff are saying, "Probably." She woke up alone covered in blood. In the bed of one of your staff, in your bricks and mortar.
What do you do?
a. Whip out the policies and procedures document prepared by the bureaucracy's career legal staff, which parses carefully the definition and "context" of degrees of "non-consensual sexual activity", and offer the alleged victim an "informal policy response" to the "activity" that no one really need learn about. Other truly brilliant strategems include not informing the board of directors, which later convenes an inquiry, of everything that has happened, and hiding files containing primary communications with the victim's family. Hey, mistakes were made.
b. Apologize for her obvious distress, and, after you return from the bathroom where you've been throwing up, because you have children this age, and you're questioning how you came to employ people capable of this behavior, say, "I don't know what happened and frankly, neither do you, but something bad has happened and it is entirely inappropriate for me to be involved other than as follows. I will make every one of my staff available at any time to answer any questions the police may have. I am not in the business of finessing allegations of violent sexual crime -- rape -- just because some cubicle-bound lawyer in Dockers wrote a manual telling me how to do so, and others of this administration say it's okay. I urge you to go to the police because this is so far removed from a workplace discipline, internal-response type of problem, that even discussing it makes me queasy. I will go with you and your Dad, if you wish."
Later, reflecting, you send some dipshit hotshot new hire back to South Dakota for stripping off his clothing in an alley at 3 a.m. while on an orientation visit, and fire his supervisor (who is a close friend). You tell the other middle managers what Urban Meyer tells his position coaches: you want to work here, you better know everything there is to know about every single one of your staff. You may not survive your decision to violate bureaucratic omerta, but at least the bullshit is gonna stop and you have a better chance of looking at yourself in the mirror each morning. Then you call this guy Bob Downer who is on your board of directors and offer to help in any way you can. Downer is a good guy. His firm used to be called Meardon, Sueppel, Downer and Hayes, back when Jim Hayes defended James Hall in the Sara Ottens case. He will think carefully and well. You think you need someone with a moral compass to talk to, who will tell the truth, and speak plainly, and cut through the fog of equivocation and self-justifying bureaucratic happy-talk that emerges each and every day from all the suck-ups, poodles and cube-dwelling ninnies in this metastasizing bureaucracy by the river. Some days you wake up and realize you have no idea how you got to this place. Some days you have the sense, as Sherwood Anderson put it, remarking on his abandoned industrial life, that everyone around you is talking under water. Their lips are moving but there's no sound. What is everyone doing? Some days manifest just the machinery and inertia of an attenuated organization, ungrounded, drifting free of sense, serving self-interest. Those days are bad. That would be today. Today is bad.
1 recs |
47 comments
Comments
Spot On
It is always the apples fault for being bad and never the one who brought the apples in, right?
What? They don't have TV in the D-League? Don't watch me, watch TV.
by Mac G on
Jul 21, 2008 4:57 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
One phone call
That’s all it would’ve taken. Just a phone call. One phone call to set in motion a course of events that would’ve been in the best interests of all parties involved. One phone call to show that alumni, current students and all Iowans and anyone else affiliated with the University really did have the best people in place as our representatives and ambassadors. One phone call to put the entire situation to where we all thought it was a week ago, allowing the slow-turning wheels of justice to roll forward as intended. Just a phone call.
One phone call.
by Bucketochicken on
Jul 22, 2008 7:48 AM CDT
reply
actions
1 recs
Well written
You make it seem like this should have been an easy situation to deal with, Bellanca.
As an outsider, I have just one question: Could somebody give me a background or a link on the James Hall case?
by WhiteSpeedReceiver on
Jul 22, 2008 9:25 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Not easy, but obvious.
I wouldn’t say it possibly could be an easy situation to manage, and I’m glad I didn’t have to manage it. But over time, anyone in leadership is going to be confronted with something ugly, for which there is only one way out. This was such an event. My beef with the bureaucratization of American business and institutional culture is that, as leadership is emasculated in the name of “consensus”, so too is any developed sense of personal moral responsibility.
Bellanca
by Bellanca on
Jul 22, 2008 10:08 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jesus
Well put. Very, very well put.
I’m not ashamed to be a Hawkeye as many of you are—I’m simply deeply saddened that Hawkeye Nation has such inept people running the place. Heads better roll today. They really better.
by imadirtyoldman on
Jul 22, 2008 9:26 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Do we really expect something good to happen today?
Count me as skeptical, but given all the crap that has gone on so far with this case, do we really expect the Board of Regents to clean house? Heck, do we expect them to actually hold anyone accountable? I’d like to think that would happen, but at this point I don’t expect it. If something is done, then I expect it to be something half-assed like a letter of reprimand in someone’s file. There will be no head’s rolling.
You would think that after the Pierce debacle the University would have a better handle on what to do. But it is clear they screwed this up just as bad or even worse.
by Enoch on
Jul 22, 2008 9:59 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
It won't happen today
Today is a day for the lawyers to show why the mom’s letter wasn’t included in the original set of documents provided to the Regents. My guess will be the investigation will be reopened after the meeting. Whether that’s for PR purposes or due to legitimate concerns over the sufficiency of the June report is anyone’s guess.
If there is a firing, it won’t be until after the renewed investigation. In other words, after the season.
"Bob Zook has to be the laziest man alive"
by Hawkeye State on
Jul 22, 2008 10:18 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Answering questions.
I’ll be very surprised if anything happens today. None of these people is going to resign peremptorily, because if it looks like termination is inevitable, they’ll make a great deal more money in severance by waiting to be asked to resign—and then hiring themselves a good lawyer (a privilege or recommendation not afforded the young girl’s parents, who were told to call the SUI’s general counsel and deal with him alone).
I’ll also be extremely surprised if there aren’t 25 questions from hell delivered in soft-spoken, extremely clipped phrasing by Downer. Reading between the lines, he has already concluded that either the mother is lying, or the university constructed a gentle narrative that is itself a grotesque lie. And if it turns out that the university coached the mother not to speak to the Board investigator, so as to not mess up their good little fairy tale, good god, these people are not qualified to run a 7-11. Because it is extremely illogical on reading that letter to assume that the author did not wish that someone in a position of authority would listen to her. Why did she decline to speak with the Board investigator, having been told to pound sand for so long?
The amateurishness, and childish deceit involved in not providing the two letters until (by dint of unending effort and legal challenge) the P-C scoop, is both contemptible and, by itself (independent of any speculation about an alleged major crime coverup) a termination offense. I would fire anyone who did that to me, for cause, without discussion, and I have done so. People who lie to you in difficult situations can drop their keys on their desks and just start walking.
But no, I don’t expect anything precipitous. One longtime Iowa City newsman I spoke with about this expects them to scapegoat Mims and maybe bounce Barta, and launch some new and truly ridiculous revision in “policy” in regard to violent crime.
I am more hopeful and, if the above cynical outcome is delivered, I also hope that a few of the Board will resign rather than accept what would appear today a whitewashing of a whitewashing of an alleged major crime. I think a good outcome would be an AIG or Merrill Lynch style termination—a week or two of exhaustive discussion, note-taking, ass-covering, a couple of Regents standing up and demanding more than a pro forma response and a return to status quo ante. A big problem in all of this is that Culver will weigh the impact of ‘hurting’ Iowa football on his re-election chances. Dig that. Maybe he’ll be a man, or maybe he’ll just be a man who wants to be popular.
Bellanca
by Bellanca on
Jul 22, 2008 10:26 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What have the Iowa Regents done ever?
The only thing the Iowa Regents have done with any success is to jack tuition up every year and saddle young kids and their parents with more student debt.
Accountability does not exist in our government anymore, see current Bush Administration for reference after reference or the many atrocities the corporate owned media commits everyday without any consequences.
I agree dirty old man about being deeply sadden too and yes, I am not ashamed to wear my Hawk colors or pride on my sleeve but just severely disappointed at the unethical behavior displayed by those currently in charge of our beloved University.
What? They don't have TV in the D-League? Don't watch me, watch TV.
by Mac G on
Jul 22, 2008 10:26 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Awesome Media Coverage by Register
So the Register did not completely bury the Regent meeting today but they tried their best. Who cares about a bombshell meeting with potential to bring down the administration of the major D1 In state University when you have a dog fire rescue to cover?
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=NEWS
At least the Gazette put the meeting on its front page unlike the Register.
The Press Citizen and Gazette are leading the state in journalism on this story, seriously?
What? They don't have TV in the D-League? Don't watch me, watch TV.
by Mac G on
Jul 22, 2008 10:42 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Interestingly enough
According to a Clone threat that linked to us yesterday, Tom Witosky covers the Hawkeyes. His kid’s interning for Alfredo Parrish, who represented Pierre Pierce and who (I think) is representing one of these kids this time. I can’t verify any of that, but people seemed pretty certain.
If Witosky was getting pressured from outside not to cover the story more closely, it wouldn’t surprise me one iota.
"This cream cheese story is good .But we can add some other story about the cream cheese." - Dr. Retarded
by Oops Pow Surprise on
Jul 22, 2008 10:49 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Parrish is representing Satterfield
I can’t imagine the DMR not taking an opportunity to bash Iowa football, so this may be the case. Still, you would think Sean Keeler would be licking his chops.
"Bob Zook has to be the laziest man alive"
by Hawkeye State on
Jul 22, 2008 11:03 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well, if my experience in newspaper journalism is any guide it’s less a conspiracy of any type than classic sour grapes. when a paper get’s beat as badly on a story like the DMR has been here, the most common response is to pretend nothing happened. act like the scoop didn’t merit notice in your own august publication. ...and then start scrambling as hard as you can to hit back.
by kleph on
Jul 22, 2008 11:50 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Assuming a Poor Regents/University Response . . .
What will you do? Will you go to the games? I don’t think I can get up the excitement if this is all unresolved. I know my not going to games is not going to hurt the program or do any good, that is not what I am getting at. I do not want to make any statement by not attending or think it is some showing of solidarity. Nor do I think anyone else would be wrong for going. If this goes unresolved, I just doubt I will feel like it. I think it would feel like going to Chuck E Cheese after my Dad’s funeral, or going to cheer on OJ being inducted into the hall of fame or given some other honor. Not saying that’s how anyone should feel or judging anyone else. Maybe it will wane. Hopefully someone does the right thing.
That is the first and last time I discuss my feelings on a blog. “Men have feeling too, can I shaaaaare miiiine with you . . .” —hippy teacher from Beavis and Butthead.
by Henrik Holger on
Jul 22, 2008 11:36 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'll still watch and all that shit
But until there is SOME sort of resolution, no matter how well the team does or whatever, that black cloud will still be hanging over everything (and rightly so). Makes it awfully tough to genuinely give a rip if they convert this 3rd and 12 or whatever (which is highly questionable in its own right).
Your Chuck E Cheese/Dad’s funeral analogy is pretty apt – only let’s say we think it might have been their E. Coli-tainted pizza that killed him but we’re waiting for all of the health inspector’s findings to be revealed. Until then, do we still play Whack-A-Mole and Ski-Ball? Yeah, maybe. But there’s definitely an underlying feeling of nausea while doing so in the meantime.
Fuck, I dunno. Football itself is just so far down the list of priorities and importance (although by reading much of the message board postings it sure doesn’t seem that way), I can’t even really answer that question in any real way.
by Bucketochicken on
Jul 22, 2008 11:50 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I just keep waiting
in this situation, as well as the current business and political climate, for someone in this sort of situation, to stand up and say, “I fucked up. I did something at the time that, because it was policy, because I was told, because I was scared, was not the right thing. I’m sorry, and I am responsible for my actions.”
But we don’t see this. Ever. Everybody gets lawyers and hides behind euphemisms and legalese. The people in power, the ones who go home to their happy families in their happy houses, who weren’t involved or really affected by what happens, just stare blankly say, “What? I did what I was supposed to do.” They form ranks and defend their actions to the end.
Bellanca, thanks for taking point on this. Thanks for being someone who has been/is in a position of authority who can speak from experience to say that it doesn’t have to be this way.
And as far as what I will do this season, I’ll watch. But my girlfriend, just a couple of days ago, asked if we were going to a game this season. I said I wasn’t sure yet. Now I am. I just can’t do it this year, unless this is all shown to be an elaborate fabrication.
by chitownhawkeye on
Jul 22, 2008 2:58 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Good points but...
... I’m not sure many Catholics quit going to mass just because a bunch of padres fessed up to decades of abusing children all across the English speaking world. In the same vein, I’m not going to let the likes of Everson & Satterfield run me out of Kinnick. I’m also not going to get run out by BAD decisions on the part of the coaching staff and administration.
Most of the pain comes from having endured the Pierce deal already and the failures to take lessons from it. I sympathize for the alleged victim. I wonder what caused those who met with her to be unable to empathize by imagining her as their own daughter and asking themselves what they would want done as parents.
But it’s not like the institution was out to get her in particular. It’s not like it was designed to insulate abuse. It simply failed to do what is (now at least) obvious. It would be refreshing to see someone take responsibility and put it simply and succinctly: I fucked up. The administration and staff put themselves in such a position that they have the appearance of trying to cover something up – not that the necessarily did.
Will I feel torn during the first game? Yep. Probably right up until the boom. But I’ll be there.
On Iowa
by keosahawkeye on
Jul 22, 2008 4:31 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well
it’s easier for me not to go. I don’t have tickets. I have to go out of my way to get them. If I already had season tix, I’d probably go too.
by chitownhawkeye on
Jul 22, 2008 4:35 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
fair enough
I’ll cheer on your behalf :)
On Iowa
by keosahawkeye on
Jul 22, 2008 4:39 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
God, I hope I feel the same way
Something tells me on August 30 I won’t, but I hope.
"Bob Zook has to be the laziest man alive"
by Hawkeye State on
Jul 22, 2008 5:26 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Live Feed from Board of Regents meeting
Here’s the link, I can’t guarantee how it’ll work, but give it a shot.
by jebushchrist on
Jul 22, 2008 2:58 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Investigative committee
So the head of the investigative committee is Bonnie Campbell, former State Attorney General who made her career on violent crime victims advocacy/crimes against women. I know I wouldn’t want her dogging my steps in a case involving a rape coverup. I also enjoyed how uncomfortable Sally Brown looked as she apologized.
by MP hawkfan on
Jul 22, 2008 3:48 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Excuse for not disclosing letter
I watched some of the Regents meeting and it seemed to me that UI President Mason made the excuse of not supplying the letters to the Board because of privacy concerns under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) What?! FERPA allows access to student records to, among others:
-Specified officials for audit or evaluation purposes;
-To comply with a judicial order or lawfully issued subpoena;
-Appropriate officials in cases of health and safety emergencies;
I think it would take a very creative interpretation of the law to say the Board’s investigation didn’t fall under one of these categories. If the University lawyers saying FERPA is the reason for not turning over the letters, the University needs to get some new lawyers who know the law and aren’t more interested in protecting people.
by Enoch on
Jul 22, 2008 3:50 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree. Although when cornered like that she did say that it was “untenable” to use that as their excuse. Which meant they were just hoping they didn’t get called out on it in the first place.
by MP hawkfan on
Jul 22, 2008 3:54 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Regents
The University officials should be given the choice between a formal and informal process. [Regents] “The informal process will be much quicker. Formal processes just take sooooo long. I don’t know about you, but if I were a once reputable offical at a University who had just, at best, handled an allegation of a heinous crime in a reckless manner, and at worst, attempted to cover up/play down an allegation of a heinous crime, I would definitely take the informal process. That’s just me though. It’s up to you. If you want a looooong, drawn out process where your good name is drawn through the papers, go for a formal proceeding.” (ssshhhhh . . . no one tell them that the informal process involves sharks with frickin lasers on the heads).
It appears that the Regents are doing all they can do right now. I knew they would not take any immediate action and that there would have to be further investigation. It will, of course, take way longer than it should.
The University will likely stay mute and under a Cheney-like veil of secrecy. I doubt anyone stands up and takes any responsibility.
Go Bonnie.
by Henrik Holger on
Jul 22, 2008 4:22 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
My Blood Will Not Stop Boiling, Questions
So a committee is going to look into this? How long does this take? Does anyone hear the broom coming to sweep this under the rug? Where are the big donors to the University at? Where are the Iowa business leaders? Where are the Iowa pols looking to justifiably grandstand on this horrible event/investigation cover up? Is there anyone that can do anything? Or is it just one long drawn out guessing game?
OH, Can I blame this on Steve Alford?
What? They don't have TV in the D-League? Don't watch me, watch TV.
by Mac G on
Jul 22, 2008 4:51 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Last question first
Don’t let us stop you, pal.
As for the cynical view of the Regents… I’m not so sure. Bonnie Campbell made a name for herself by prosecuting sexual assault. Her selection as head of the investigation was definitely deliberate. Now, without subpoena power (um, WHAT?!) that may not do much good, but it’s a pretty big mistake to think she’ll look the other way.
As for the rest of the Regents, one very smart person told me, “These Regents aren’t rubber-
stampers. They’re irate. They were kept in the dark last fall and made to look foolish, and they may flex some muscle.” We’ll see. I don’t think they’re going to wait for donations to dry up before putting pressure on whoever they think is responsible.
"This cream cheese story is good .But we can add some other story about the cream cheese." - Dr. Retarded
by Oops Pow Surprise on
Jul 22, 2008 6:42 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This blog and comments
I have looked at this blog nearly every day for quite some time. I love the takes you guys have, but honestly didn’t know how you guys would handle this situation. I would just like to say that I am SO happy there are some REAL Hawkeye fans out there that put humanity above football games. I also want to comment all of the commenters on this issue as well. OVERWHELMINGLY the posters have a very good, objective view on this situation and it honestly makes me feel better about being a hawkeye fan. As a frequent visitor to the scout message board I am absolutely DISGUSTED by the overall sentiment over there. I was starting to believe all hawkeye fans were disgusting scumbags. So for this reason, I genuinely say thank you to BHGP and all of you posters. All of you should honestly go over to hawkeyenation and FUCK some people up. They need it. The most popular poster on that board “homerhawkeye777” actually said that we shouldn’t be using words like “the poor victim” and “these disgusting acts” because it takes the empowerment away from the girl. It is truly unreal. Anyway, as a first post….thanks again to restoring a bit of my faith in the TRUE hawkeyenation.
by travisam on
Jul 22, 2008 4:52 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
not sure
but a blog dance off would be awesome!
by chitownhawkeye on
Jul 22, 2008 5:46 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Can we be serious here, please?
No blog wants to get into a dance off with the daddy.
by jebushchrist on
Jul 22, 2008 6:03 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it just seems like
the beef with state of game has waned. need something to keep you busy.
(Sorry, need something light to offset this whole topic)
by chitownhawkeye on
Jul 22, 2008 6:08 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, it's pretty goddamn bad
I spend a lot of time on the Scout.com Hawkeye message board (I even pay for it (yeah, I know)), and I have to concur that a majority of the posters there just do not seem to get it. At all.
While there are very few (only one would still be inexcusable) posters there seem to be of the “it’s partly her fault/they’re not PROVEN guilty yet/can we just play football now?” retarded neanderthal mentality, there are still a disturbingly large number who seem to be unable to not conflate the alleged crime itself with the way the situation was handled. It’s actually well beyond embarrassing, and I’m very glad and thankful to BHGP and everyone posting here for not being such contemptable cretins about the whole thing.
I don’t know if they simply don’t understand the severity of the whole deal, if they can’t get around the whole asinine “The Good Captain would never blah blah blah he’s a Good Man” thing (and I say this as someone who has always stood by and defended KF), or if they have some strange equating of morality with Hawkeye sports and being fans of it that they simply are unable to accept anything other than their own distorted versions of reality or what, but goddamn…... Come the fuck on, people, the alleged rape itself isn’t the issue, it’s how the aftermath was (not) handled. Why is that so fucking difficult to grasp? Can those not be seperate ideas? Jeez…..
There isn’t too much Blame The Victim crap, but there is a LOT of “how is this distraction gonna affect the season?” crap and “is this an IC-PC and ICPD conspiracy against the football team?” crap.
by Bucketochicken on
Jul 22, 2008 6:59 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I shouldn't neglect to add
That a lot of those folks probably also think (just as an example) that Bush just gets a bad rap by the liberal media and Obama is a Muslim/terrist/socialist/etc, so…... well, you know.
by Bucketochicken on
Jul 22, 2008 7:07 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
hey bucket...
... same bucket from HN.com? Gotta be. If you still have access to the premium side of HN.com, what’s the mood like on that board? I’m curious.
On Iowa
by keosahawkeye on
Jul 22, 2008 9:41 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Some people are pissed
and echoing the sentiment found at BHGP. Others are pleading the 5th until the facts of the case are presented, others are concerned about the season and the program, others are mad at everyone else for not being true fans, some are pissed at the ICPC and ICPD, lots of “The Good Captain couldn’t possibly” this & that…... and on and on.
Oh – also a few choice implications that it’s the girl’s fault (at least partly) and/or they’ve “heard things” that she might be “that kind of girl,” stuff like that. That’s a clear minority though.
Ultimately, it’s like with everyone else though – people are upset and in the dark and just want to know what the fuck is up.
by Bucketochicken on
Jul 22, 2008 9:51 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And yes, it's me.
There can be only One.
by Bucketochicken on
Jul 22, 2008 9:51 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My cousin basically told me:
She was probably trashed and wanted to get it on so she was probably asking for it.
He also said, It’s absurd to think there was any cover up. Look at Duke, they were all innocent. This is stupid.
He doesn’t believe in people being actual victims. Or that people can be/are actually gullible and stupid. It’s her fault for not going to the police and her mom is just trying to distract attention away from her daughter’s actions.
He’s a very intelligent person, yet… this saddens me.
by tyger1147 on
Jul 22, 2008 5:44 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Intelligence does not come with enlightenment. Hopefully he’ll grow up.
by jebushchrist on
Jul 22, 2008 6:04 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How can Iowa Officials ever vindicate themselves from this?
I am SO happy there are some REAL Hawkeye fans out there that put humanity above football games.Amen to that and I am the biggest critic there is when it comes to Hawk sports too. Ann Rhodes “why hire Bob Stoops” comments still cause me great pain.
I am upset at the lack of support the university gave a potential rape victim, regardless who she was, if she was drunk, who the attackers were or even if the charges were true. She was examined medically and then NOTHING HAPPENED!!! WTF is that?
Can you imagine if this happened at an Iowa frat house? The media and University would have went wild. I do not think normal Iowa students get “informal” investigations at all. Not the Oppressive Public Safety and ICPD that I dealt with in the late 90s, early 00s.
The accused will have their day amongst a jury and maybe they are innocent. How the University blatantly did not contact the proper authorities in a timely and reasonable manner, only to hide behind each other or some layers of bureaucracy is what makes me so throughly upset at the Iowa Admins.
ps. Iowahomer777 obviously is sexist and thinks rape jokes are funny like McCain. Maybe he should start a legal fund for Hawkeye athletes called “Boys will be Boys” or “Kirk Ferentz can do no wrong.”
What? They don't have TV in the D-League? Don't watch me, watch TV.
by Mac G on
Jul 22, 2008 5:59 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ahem
I’ve never read, nor have I posted on, a message board. It sounds as though that’s for the best, in this case.
by jebushchrist on
Jul 22, 2008 6:02 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Wannabee lawyers and fans of wannabee lawyers
You guys are doing just what you’re accusing the athletic department of doing: handling this informally, so you can spin it for the best outcome. Here are some facts, Jacks:
1. leave your emotions at the door when you are trifling with peoples’ lives and careers. You guys are bleeding through every syllable. Everybody you want to be guilty is guilty. The letter from the mother of the victim is GOSPEL (NOT LIKELY)
2. You are not police or prosecutors. You’re playing Gothcha journalism without all the cards or facts.
3. You judges and jurors all all have taken an emotional leap of faith and are an embarrassment to justice.
4. Yeah, something smells in all this, no doubt. But you are so far from having the goods-all the goods-you’re just like the athletic department and the administration you have convicted and sent to hell.
5. Misguided and confused alleged rape victims never, ever do logical stuff. I’m not holding this young woman to any standard. She did a classic illogical thing by not going straight to the police. That’s a terrible shame. Where I come from, abuse victims are VICTIMS and must be respected like children who can not think clearly for themselves. The VERY FIRST people who knew of her alleged assault should have RUN to the police ASAP. If the letter is accurate, every single person who became aware of this incident should have RUN to the authorities. The charge here is NOT rudeness or BAD FORM. It’s a flippin crime!
6. There is so much WE DON’T know it is unconscionable to be so summary when just a fraction of the truth has been unpacked.
7. You big boys who were “sick” about bringing this to light should have listened to your stomachs and stuck with THE FACTS. There is no shame or twitching in reporting facts . You were nauseated by the height of your moral stand. There is one helluva chasm to jump when leaping from facts to conclusions.
Grow up and leave the law to the law.
Now, come and string me up!!!
Robobubba has spoken!
by robobubba on
Jul 23, 2008 12:05 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs













