Assume the Position: Defensive Tackle
It's about that time. For the next two months, BHGP will be previewing this year's Iowa Hawkeyes, position-by-position. Naturally, as the earth rotates around the sun, things will change. Therefore, we're starting with the position we are most certain of, and ending with running back the position of which we are least certain. Tonight: Defensive Tackle.

For three years, there have been only two constants in Iowa's defensive depth chart: Kenny Iwebema and Bryan Mattison are the defensive ends, and Mitch King and Matt Kroul are your starting defensive tackles. Iwebema and Mattison are gone, but the heart of the defensive line remains intact. It's Kroul and Unusual Punishment, one more time with feeling...
The Starters
Mitch King (6'3", 264, Sr.) - What more can be said about the terrormonster? He came to Iowa as a relatively unheraleded 3-star linebacker. By the start of his redshirt freshman season, he was the starter at defensive tackle, and once there he never let it go. In three years as a starter, he has recorded 96 solo tackles, 39.5 solo tackles for loss, and 13.5 sacks. His numbers dipped ever so slightly last year, as opposing offensive coordinators realized he was a greater threat to their quarterbacks than either of Iowa's defensive ends (and watched in horror as Mattison decapitated said quarterback).
Said to have a "high motor" (which is code for being undersized, white, and really good), King has been one of the keys to the Iowa defense since Norm Parker wrote his name in pen at the top of the depth chart. As repeatedly chronicled here, Iowa's defense is alarmingly basic; the same formation - in fact, the same play - is used with amazing frequency, with small adjustments due to personnel. The upshot, of course, is that Iowa rarely blitzes the passer. Any pass rush Iowa puts together is the result of its defensive line. King, despite being a defensive tackle, is a fantastic pass rusher who also has great instincts against the run. On top of that, he's nasty enough to illicit Zapruder-esque videos from Ohio State fans.
This year, expect similar numbers to last season (58 tackles, 14.5 TFL, 4.5 sacks). Iowa starts two new defensive ends, and opposing coordinators will be more focused on stopping King than ever before. While that might mean happy days for Clayborn and Ballard, it also might mean another decrease in sacks for King. Nevertheless, King remains one of the most instrumental players on the defense.
Matt Kroul (6'3", 277, Sr.) - While King receives the newsprint and accolades, Matt Kroul has quietly become the most important player on the Iowa defense. Kroul doesn't simply take on blockers; he absorbs them like a black hole. Kroul practically forces a double team from the offensive line, freeing up his linemates to rush the passer and harass the running backs. It's Kroul that allows the linebackers to stay back in coverage against the pass and move unabated to fill the gaps against the run. It's Kroul that prevents a thoroughly mediocre secondary from being eaten alive. Kroul might not have the numbers of King or the other great Iowa defensive tackles of the past decade, but he knows his role and plays it to perfection.
That role has never been more important than this year, as Iowa breaks in two new defensive ends and two new linebackers. Again, expect more of the same from Kroul this season: About 75 tackles, maybe a sack or two, and hundreds of blocks digested.
Should See the Field
Anton Narinsky (6'4", 265, Sr.) - Poor Anton - maybe the smartest player on the team - graduated before last season. You read that right. He's still playing football, even though he's in his second year of grad school. Unfortunately, he's never found a niche on this team. He started his career as a defensive end, was switched to the offensive line after his redshirt year, switched back to defensive tackle last spring, and is stuck behind two other seniors. He might be your boss some day, but he probably won't unseat either of his classmates.
Karl Klug (6'4", 235, So.) - Last summer, the moment of highest trepidation was certainly when the coaching staff mentioned they wanted to use Klug in a rotation at defensive tackle. The thought of a 235 lb. defensive tackle seeing time in Big Ten play had me thinking of, well, this. He was injured in early August, though, and didn't see action until the Minnesota game, where he ran around like a poor man's Matt Roth. He was an insane pass rusher in high school, and all indications are that ability was not lost in translation to the college game. Still, unless he adds about 25 lbs., he's eventually a defensive end.
Mike Daniels (6'1", 240, Fr. (RS)) - See Karl Klug. Similar size, similar numbers, similar accolades from his coaches. Will likely be a starter in 2009.
Cody Hundertmark (6'4", 260, So.) - Now that's the size we're looking for. When Klug went down injured, Hundertmark found himself without a redshirt and in the two-deep. He was a rotational sub by Penn State, and saw limited action throughout the season. Looks like the eventual heir to Kroul's position as black hole in the middle, and should be the default fill-in for Matt this year.
Thomas Nardo (6'3", 245, Fr. (RS)) - Boffo high school numbers in Pennsylvania. Didn't make the two-deep at the end of spring practice, but could force himself into the mix with a good summer. Inexplicably wears #87, meaning he's an eligible receiver if necessary.
Jared Oberland (6'0", 250, Sr.) - Two-time recipient of "Team Leader" award, despite never seeing any game action in three non-redshirt seasons on the squad. Still, given his obvious level of respect in the locker room and his upperclassman status, he might see the field on occasion.
6 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice pic!
Captured by the late, great, Ted Roeder. We all miss IowaDoc, but his memory lives on through his pictures. R.I.P. Doc.
My apologies for bringing up a sad subject, but the pic just reminded me of Ted.
Back on track – I cannot wait to see Klug get onto the field. He was a stud up here in MN. Dude can flat out play.
All numbers are eligible in college.
Eligibility depends solely on where you line up. The numbers are “strong recommendations” in the rule book. Mandatory in the NFL, though, or you have to check in as eligible every play.
I’ve always thought we should give our WR’s numbers in the 60’s and 90’s, and our linemen numbers in the 80’s. QB? 95. Seriously, that would HAVE to confuse the defense for a second or so. Of course, that would be the last year it was just a “recommendation,” I’m guessing.
I find it funny...
...that the fictional ramblings of a senile octogenarian, and the fallout from a tryst between the A.D. and an administrative assistant at a rival school, will produce 20 comments in two hours, while actual football talk produces…crickets.
Don’t get me wrong, I adore the JoePa posts, and in fact still take a little credit for the initial germination of the idea (back when I surmised what might happen if JoePa met Fergie, little did I know the extent to which you’d run with THAT ball). I just thought the difference was interesting.
But yeah, hopefully this will be the most effective DL since 2004 (or late 2005). When Iowa has a disruptive DL their entire defensive scheme works so much better (I’m including the ends in this armchair analysis BTW). The inconsistency of the last two seasons has been a big part of the problem IMO. At times the DL looked like the unit we expected. At times they gave opposing QB’s all day to stand back and pick apart a secondary that wasn’t great. The secondary still won’t be great, but the DL, if they play the way they can and should, can make that fact a lot less crucial.
Your bewilderment is shared.
And I was trying to figure out who it was that asked us for that original JoePa Chronicle; I figured it was MC Run but I wasn’t sure. Many thanks for that, by the way.
You and Phil Steele
If you had any doubt how important the line is to this defense, from Phil:
After 3 straight top 25 finishes, the hawks had an experienced secondary in 2005 but allowed over 60% completions for the first time ever due to an inexperienced front 4 and finished #91 (versus the pass).
Phil goes on to note that, despite losing 2 starters and 2 backups in the secondary and dealing with the off-the-field issues (Everson, more or less), they improved to #36 nationally last year. Defending the pass in this defense is far more on the defensive line than it is on the secondary. Strange, but true.
"Who gives a fuck about an oxford comma?"
by Patrick Vint on Jun 15, 2008 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions
Okay, so who knows
Okay, so who knows why our DTs are smaller than first-year tOSU linebackers?
It’s probably the sun, and “dehydration”, but I think this defense will put together a pretty special game this year. Not early, mid-to-late season. There’s talent and depth in the backfield, Edds, and these hosses. If I were to speculate, I’d say we dismember NW at home.

















