Black Heart Gold Pants: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Race to the BCS: rankings, in-game scores & blogs Bar-right-arrows



SPRING FOOTBALL EXTRAVAGANZA: Almost 2000 Words About the Spring Depth Chart

We haven't forgotten that actual Hawkeye sports exist and that they're actually going on these days [could have fooled me.--ed.]. For example, spring football started, which gave Pat Harty a positively orgasmic opportunity to bring up all the arrests that happened over the past year. As far as what happens on the field, we've got a brand new depth chart, linked rightchere (embedded PDF, pops). There aren't many surprises, as you might expect; after all, it's not like A.J. Edds is seeing time at quarterback or anything. But still, we've got several situations for you to keep a close eye on over the next few weeks.

1. The Offensive Line. This is an area of great concern, and really has been since Joe Philbin left (you know our thoughts on that, no doubt). Nonetheless, almost everybody's back from last season, including previously injured Rob Bruggeman (more on him in a moment). Nobody graduated, but Dace Richardson's knee suffered a 9/11-esque structural failure, and there's no reason to expect any contribution from him at this point. Quite a shame, that. So the tackle spots will be manned by known beastmaster Bryan Bulaga on the left side and Kyle Calloway (no, not him) on the right. This is a bit of a juggle, as Bulaga was at left guard last season with Calloway at left tackle. Seth Olsen, last year's right tackle and top lineman, moves to the interior at right guard in front of Travis Meade.

At left guard are two highly underwhelming players, Julian Vandervelde and Dan Doering, both of whom split time at RG last season. Neither was effective, though Doering was slightly better at times. It's quite possible, though, that neither will receive the lion's share of the snaps at LG this fall. That's because there's a remarkable battle underway for the center spot, as Bruggeman and Rafael Eubanks are listed as co-starters. Bruggeman, as you might recall, was in the OL rotation last spring when he tore his ACL and missed all but the last three games of the season. Now, it's hard to think that Eubanks isn't one of the five best linemen on the team, especially considering most guys aren't capable of playing center. Therefore, as the coaching staff decides on a "best five guys" to put out there, it's highly likely that they decide Eubanks is better at center than the Julidan Vanderdoering duo is at guard, and they move Bruggeman over to LG.

If that's the case, and I think it's way more likely to play out that way than with a potential four-year starter sitting on the bench most of the time, then this is what your starting five looks like:

LT: Bulaga
LG: Bruggeman
C: Eubanks
RG: Olsen
RT: Calloway

Considering they're all more seasoned at this point than they were 12 months ago, it's only reasonable to expect better things out of the unit for next season. At the very least, the odds that Vandervelde's going to be on his ass the backfield are far lower than they were last season.

(keep reading...)

Star-divide

2. Wide Receiver. Another aspect of the passing game that looks to be improved. Andy Brodell is back, starting at split end. Ferentz said Brodell is "back to full speed," and we need not tell you what great news that is. Before his injury last season, of course, Brodell's hands were--ahem--suspect. It definitely warrants mention, however, that Christensen was doing a much better job of putting the ball in a receiver's hands before Brodell was hurt, which tells you one of two things:

A) Christensen's accuracy dropped way off when Brodell's hamstring exploded;
B) Brodell's route running is far better than anyone else on the team.

B) is your far more likely answer, and his return is a major plus for the passing game. His backup at SE is Colin Sandeman, another(!!) white WR, although he hasn't made the Inexplicably Great leap yet. Sandeman spent time at punt returner, though his speed and acceleration don't really seem to warrant his presence back there. The depth chart lists him at 195 pounds now, which if true is a welcome change; he looked like he didn't even weigh that much in pads last season.

On the other side, your co-starters at flanker are Trey Stross and DJK, which is no real surprise. Both are highly talented receivers without a great deal of collegiate experience, but who are more than capable of starting. It'll be interesting to see how often Iowa goes 3-wide next season, because it doesn't seem like you'd want any of the top three receivers off the field. A lot of it will probably come down to how well they block off the ball during running plays, as downfield blocks are usually the difference between a 10-yard gain and a 65-yard touchdown. No predictions here on that outcome, because it'd be ridiculous to bet against any of those guys.

3. Running back. Yes, the three most important questions are on offense, because this just so happened to be the worst offense in the BXI last season, and that cannot continue if Iowa wants to have any measure of success [easy there, Nostradumbass.--ed.]. The only two scholarship backs on campus are Jevon Pugh and Nate Guillory, and they're listed as co-starters for now. The benefit of practicing with the team over the spring gives the two a major edge over Shonn Greene, Jeff Brinson, and Jewel Hampton. Yes, Greene has considerable experience with the team, but his time away from the program can't help, so he'll have amost as steep a learning curve as Brinson and Hampton do. This race is wide, wide open, and it would be no surprise if Iowa went back to a three-back committee style like they used in 2006 with Young, Sims, and Greene. Still, someone's got to emerge as an every-down horse, or the run game won't earn any respect in 2008, and that usually spells disaster.

4. Cornerback. Ah, finally some talk on defense. Three-time letterwinner Bradley Fletcher is back and a near-prohibitive favorite at the left corner, though he hasn't exactly sparkled on the field thus far. His backup is Chris Rowell, who was high on some lists coming out of high school, so expect some decent competition to emerge there. Still, hard to bet against a senior on a Kirk Ferentz team. On the other side, Jordan Bernstine is likely your starter, but he's coming off shoulder surgery and probably won't see any field time this spring, which opens the position up for jockeying in the meantime. Behind Bernstine is Drew Gardner, a walk-on who's generously listed at 5'10" and 178. Gardner doesn't suck, per se--he made a solid tackle on a much bigger receiver to finish off Michigan State in the second overtime last season--but we have no real idea if he can succeed on an island against a good wideout. In other words, we'd feel a lot more confident with an elite athlete like Bernstine on the edges and letting Gardner play short zone as a nickel or dime back. So please come back healthy, Bernstine. Please.

5. Quarterback. Okay, this isn't the fifth-most important position battle, but it's probably the fifth-most likely to change. We're not ready to throw all the dirt on Jake Christensen just yet. As you might recall (especially if you're a creep), Christensen was named the Most Accurate Passer when he attended the Elite 11 camp in 2005 alongside such talents as Heisman finalist Chase Daniel, supreme talent and ne'er-do-well Ryan Perriloux, and USC's Dirty Mark Sanchez. So it's not like he's some walk-on with a noodle arm. Ferentz has publicly stated that it's important for Christensen to show improvement in 2008, and there's no doubt that he's keeping a close eye on backups Ricky Stanzi and Marvin McNutt this spring as well. Unless Christensen has in fact regressed or shown little improvement in relation to Stanzi and McNutt, we expect him to stay atop the depth chart. We also wouldn't be surprised, however, to see McNutt spell Christensen for a series or two at a time, not unlike the McCann-Banks tandem of 2001.

6. Linebacker. A.J. Edds is a mortal lock to keep his starting role. He's fierce, athletic, and relentless; we'd be surprised if he wasn't named at least second-team All-BXI this season. At the Mike and Will spots, though, questions remain. Gone are Mike Klinkenborg and Mike Humpal, who were excellent in 2007 and who will certainly be missed in 2008. Jacody Coleman is the current favorite to take over the middle linebacker role, as he spent a good deal of time in the middle while Klinkenborg was injured. He didn't excel, though, and Iowa's run defense seemed to suffer without Klinkenborg in the middle. Still, Coleman was a true freshman last year, so he can be forgiven to some extent. Nonetheless, the success of Iowa's run defense depends on Coleman's ability to step up into the leadership role that usually accompanies that position.

The starting weakside linebacker is Jeff Tarpinian, an Omaha native who spent most of last season battling back problems. He's listed ahead of star recruit Jeremiha Hunter, who certainly has the talent to be a big-time linebacker. Having not seen the depth chart, we probably would have bet that Hunter would get the nod here, but the coaches must like what they've seen out of Tarpinian when he's been healthy. Ferentz said that Edds was the only linebacker whose role is secure, so watch for good competition this spring out of the weakside position.

7. Defensive End. There's little to no question who your starters will be, but how they perform will definitely be worth noting. Adrian Clayborn and Christian Ballard, two highly rated recruits (VHTs!), played quality minutes last season down the stretch, and one could certainly argue that their contributions to the pass rush were instrumental in Iowa's comeback against the SPARTAAAANS. They replace the much-lauded duo of Bryan Mattison and Ken Iwebema, but it seems like those two peaked in 2005, especially Iwebema. Mattison will be missed, of course, and he'll make an NFL team very happy over the next five years. But his pass rush disappeared for weeks at a time, and both Ballard and Clayborn are much more athletic. If the two talented sophomores can play with an appropriate amount of discipline and complement the disruptive forces of Matt Kroul and Mitch King on the defensive line, Iowa stands to be at an advantage on defense for most of 2008.

8. Bits and pieces: Your starting safeties are Brett Greenwood and Harold Dalton, just like last season. Neither are particularly outstanding, but Greenwood plays well and Dalton's got every bit the nose for the tackle Bob Sanders or Marcus Paschal did, if not the highlight-reel hitting ability ... Tony Moeaki is still recovering from his arm injury, though coaches expect him to be at 100% for the summer and fall; his replacement, Brandon Myers, is not a liability at TE ... Paul Chaney Jr. is the current punt returner, though that typically changes as spring and summer practices progress ... All three kickers (Daniel Murray, Austin Signor, and Ryan Donahue) are back on special teams, and their roles should stay the same. Considering their--ahem--inconsistency last season, Hawkeye fans with end zones seats should probably invest in crash helmets. INCOMING!

0 recs | Comment 21 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Totally off topic

but are we (err..you) liveblogging Wisky and the rest of the games?

by chitownhawkeye on Mar 28, 2008 6:19 PM CDT   0 recs

Nevermind

Wisconsin has decided they don't want to play.  They'd rather hurry 3 pointers and turn the ball over.
That's a good choice guys

by chitownhawkeye on Mar 28, 2008 7:30 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I was going to liveblog

but I took a nap instead, waking up just in time for the never-ending barrage of three pointers from Davidson.  Wisky didn't show up tonight, and that's deadly agaist a white-hot team.

Good news?  I just won on the UT/Stanford over!

by Hawkeye State on Mar 28, 2008 8:26 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Taking a nap
was the better option.  Gonna be a long trip home for the Badgers.  And I wouldn't wish that film study session on anybody

by chitownhawkeye on Mar 28, 2008 9:03 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

ugh

That would have been a liveblog up there with a few Iowa games we rolled with this year.
Those late games were fucking ugly as sin. When Michigan St. cut it to 16, the dude next to me in a Sparty hat pumped his fist. I laughed in his face.

by jebushchrist on Mar 29, 2008 9:07 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Our main concerns are

RB and LB. Those are big concerns.

one bourbon, one scotch, and one beer

by chosen1 on Mar 29, 2008 12:34 AM CDT   0 recs

non-player related

I would say our main concerns have nothing to do with player personnel:

  1.  We didn't show up to play in half the games.  We venerate (didn't even look it up in a thesaurus) Ferentz to the point where no one seems to remember this fact.  Name another D-I team or NFL club that shows up with a game face half the time, without comment.  It's the Bob Brooks school of reporting.  Be nice, or be excluded from the buffet, or something.  This team didn't show up, over and over and over.  WTF?  On reflection, the single worst game I have seen in 30 years was at PSU last year.  If it looked listless to you on TV, you should have seen it in the flesh.  A total flat-liner.
  1.  It's an old complaint, but I add an intellectual stripe to it.  Other teams know what we're going to run before we snap the ball -- and even admit it after they win (cf., astonished WMU coach: "Well, actually, believe it or not, they did exactly what they do on film.  So, uh, it was kinda like practice against our scout team.  I appreciate the generosity and all, but why do they do that?  Thanks for the W and the visitor's fee.")  This problem compounds, season over season.  In conflict theory, this is known as being inside the adversary's decision cycle.  Note to troubled-marriage husbands, victims of corporate political intrigue, and Marine LTCs: you never lose when you are inside your opponent's decision cycle.  It's gonna be real hard to win if they are inside yours.  Fry knew this as well, and no opposing coaches liked waiting and wincing for the five bombshell surprises he pulled each week.  We invite other teams to waltz in, camp out and spread out, inside our decision cycle.  Talk about bizarre.
  1.   Let's face facts.  It's very possible that our QB coach, who is also our OC and playcaller, cannot coach our QB.  This would make two starting QBs in a row, incidentally.   He certainly didn't bother adapting the offense to 2007's constraints, and it's clear our QB's head is now in a sling.  Our playcalling, and the regression of an extremely (physically) talented QB, are not just related.  They are inextricable.   Tate also regressed.  This is why it's wrong to criticize the QB.  Just as an aside, name a single quarterback at Iowa since Vlasic who can throw the 15 yard out with more zip than Jake.
  1.  Our special teams, once special in 2002-2004, are dull.  You don't need 5-star ballplayers to be good on special teams.

So I can't get pumped up about this or that guy, this or that position battle, with the exception of our 230 lb DT, Klug, who must be one Tom Brands-like crazed animal.  The question marks are all dressing in the coaches locker room.  It's like there is some dark mid-life ennui infecting the lot of them.  

A few questions to jog your minds:

  1.  When was the last time we said, "Can you believe how we f*cked with their heads with the playcalling on that 90-yard drive?"
  1.  When was the last time KOK turned down a head coaching job?  A lateral move to a glory school?  A move to the pros?
  1.  When was the last time we said, Can you believe how jacked up the guys were on that first drive?  They couldn't remember the play, but opponents helmets were floating in the air.
  1.  When was the last time we said, Can you believe our special teams?  What are they feeding those dudes, straight epinephrine?
  1.  What would Tom Brands do if his wrestlers showed up with the level of effort we saw against WMU or PSU?

Ennui, listlessness, dumb-ass lawbreaking, mailing our game plan to the opponent with the game tapes, a QB under suicide watch; beating Illinois but losing to WMU; special teams in the tank after winning games for the team 2002-2004; a HC who jokes that he still doesn't know what the spread is (consigning us to another year of hey-diddle-diddle-once-more-up-the-middle?) while Bob Brooks chuckles, fingering his 40-pound analogue tape deck and thinking, "tuna salad, next".  This is borderline strange.

Sure, Bruggeman's great.  He'll be on the field.  And?

--Bellanca

by Bellanca on Mar 29, 2008 10:06 AM CDT   0 recs

You're right, but I'll answer 'em anyways
  1. The 90-yard drive last season in the closing seconds of the first half, where JC was allowed to go out and fling the ball around.  Don't remember the game, and it hadn't happened at all that season (and didn't happen again the remainder of it), but that one drive was glorious.
  1. Never.  He doesn't get offered jobs, and his continued employment by KF is an embarassment.
  1. Ditto; Alamo Bowl v. Texas
  1. Outback Bowl v. UF (round 1).  That blocked punt leading to a TD was impressive.
  1. Beat the ever-living shit out of them.  This is my biggest complaint about KF -- he's all business on the sidelines, NFL-style, when he needs to get his players motivated.  College-style.  That's why I want McCarney as an assistant, so we at least have some fire on the sidelines.

by jason3kidd on Mar 30, 2008 2:31 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Excellent points

Can I add a couple of questions.

In addition to question 1, when was the last time a current or former player praised our play calling?
and when was the last time that our O line consistently provided time for the quarterback or consistently opened holes for the running backs?

by chitownhawkeye on Mar 30, 2008 3:22 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

MSU 2007

We ran when and where we wanted to, against MSU 2007, in a listless first half.  So we threw, unsuccessfully.

Sometime later this year (watching the latest conscripts go hey-diddle-diddle-up-the-middle) people are going to ask themselves, "Tell me again how we had Young and Sims last year and couldn't get them on the field at the same time?"

by Bellanca on Mar 30, 2008 3:27 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I would argue

(although not against you) that the ground game in the last 2 years has been largely a function of AY's desire and ability, not of the line.  If they had consistent blocking they would have been over 100 every game.  But regardless, you're right, a lot of that goes back to play calling.  Pounding when we had the size advantage, change of pace calls when the defense was expecting pass, etc.  Things that we haven't been seeing

by chitownhawkeye on Mar 30, 2008 5:53 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

A true travesty

That AY didn't get the love he deserved.  Hart is good, Mendenhall is great, and AY deserved to be listed @ third in the B10.  But he didn't, b/c the OL sucked so bad, and now he may not see the league.  Truly a shame.

by jason3kidd on Mar 30, 2008 6:13 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

they're smarter than that

Iowa runs a great "pro day" and if AY has NFL qualities, he'll get a shot.  

But you need a back in the NFL who is faster than the defensive ends.  Is AY?

We could have featured him as a kind of late career O.J. Anderson third down pass-catching change of pace, but that would have involved adjusting our offensive scheme.  We don't adjust.  Even if it would have allowed us to play Sims and AY 30 plays a game, in concert.  We're not adjusting, mixing it up; we don't do fun.  I can't speak for the players now, but in the day, it was always exciting to show up Monday and get a new wrinkle, a new surprise, from the coaches.  That made the grind, fun.  And very fun when the other guys didn't expect it on Saturday.  Do Iowa ballplayers have fun, amidst the monotonous execution rhetoric?

Fry had a way of creating playmakers, and putting playmakers in space, but we have a fetish now for "execution" of a monolithic scheme, apparently unheedful of adjustment or minor innovation.  And we publish our unvarying scheme to the world.  I guess we're just that good.

by Bellanca on Mar 30, 2008 7:27 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

AY is a great guy

but he's not a great back.  Just a gamer, probably runs a 4.8,  yet still Iowa could have run AY for more than 100 each week if the coaches had chosen to integrate deception into the hey-ho-we're-Iowa-so-we-go ... up the middle.  The game is played between the sidelines, not the hashmarks.

Those teams we physically dominated inside the hash marks (MSU) we let off the hook, evidently because we had scripted a different game than the one that was actually being played.

Rule No. 1 in football: find a weakness and beat it like a rented mule.  Make them take it away.  Our famous scripting of our playcalls removes the value of observation from in-game management.  I sat on the 50 last fall watching the MSU game, screaming "Run the football" like a moron for the first two quarters.  When your backs average 6-7 ypc, you can't run enough.  We threw.

Rule No. 2 in football: if game plan No. 1 doesn't work, improvise.  Iowa improvises worse than than any Iowa team since Commings.  We're strangely locked, in these situations, into attrition combat.  It's all a lot like the Somme, then.  

by Bellanca on Mar 30, 2008 7:19 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Very true

I won't debate you on AY; I think we'll end up disagreeing, and that's cool.

But you're right on the offensive play-calling.  Its morbid.  And more than that, its depressing.  The other teams KNOW what's coming, we REFUSE to change, and the losses are beginning to mount.  KF tries to run this like a pro program, where the better team usually wins by executing better, but when you play the same teams year in and year out, and you don't have more talented players, execution can only do so much.

Bottom line is that KOK has got to go.  Period.  I'd make the same argument for Parker too, but that's for another day.  If KOK isn't gone after this year, I'll hop off the KF bandwagon and start screaming for his head.  This is getting ridiculous.

by jason3kidd on Mar 31, 2008 8:34 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

that's a lot of null sets

Chatter today is the Pugh didn't come back after break.

If true:

How many times has a kid with the option of being the #1 RB for a run-happy above-average team in the Big Ten -- decided to stay home and watch TV?

by Bellanca on Mar 30, 2008 2:01 PM CDT   0 recs

McNutt or what?

So we need a QB who can rise above his position coach and OC?  None exists.

My theory is wrong if you think Tate was better his senior year than sophomore year.

by Bellanca on Mar 30, 2008 2:03 PM CDT   0 recs

AY 40 time

Alberto even ran a 4.5 on pro day, http://www.hawkmania.com/articles/20...

Duez I say

by Duez I say on Mar 31, 2008 10:14 AM CDT   0 recs

Cloverfield Antagonist

after that reference a few weeks ago, Casey McMillan has become my new favorite hawkeye.  As my interest and coverage of Iowa sports really doesnt leave this web site or $20 drink/omlette bar deals at 10am, whats his story on the depth chart?

by TheBlackMetalMcGrath on Mar 31, 2008 10:32 AM CDT   0 recs

Redshirting???!!!

I hope only red shirts that involve Casey McMillen are the blood soaked jerseys of anyone that stands in his way.

SLAYER!!!!!!

by TheBlackMetalMcGrath on Mar 31, 2008 1:16 PM CDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Go Hawks or Get Herpes.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

4gca23hh9aca2qtb14caaolilmcaebudmjcav2n212ca5jab38cal6807ycaklh2accapes6qyca8cqz9wca0sb1x3carzdfdscaisogh2can3qt07ca2i001ycacwcem1ca88e9mncazhu356ca3yl9ow_small
Color me impressed...
Bob-sanders-081107_small
Shonn Greene vs Javon Ringer redux
Small
I hate to say it, but we're losing to Minnesota
Spitzenhofen_small
The Odd Couple
Images_small
Top 10 reasons why Shonn will stay:
Kent_small
Help Me BHGP, Yr My Only Hope...
Bob-sanders-081107_small
Shonn Greene back on Nissan's Heisman ballot
Iconcornshoes_medium_small
Saving Daniel Murray
Natty_boh_logo_new_small
Favorite Stat of the Week.
Taxidriver_small
New Scothawk Video - Iowa Beats #3 Penn State

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Meter