Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Rock-Paper-(null set).

 

Rules for Game Planning Iowa:

Do not game plan the unknown.  There is no unknown when playing Iowa.   They play offensive rock-scissors-paper with just a rock and a pair of scissors; the paper they leave back in the office file drawer.  They run 9 plays, and for each situation, choose 1 of 2 or 1 of 3.  It is Lombardi offensive football all the way: they execute their handful of plays extremely well, or they lose.  Since you have paper and they don't, you have 150% of their options.  It's a super-sophisticated game theory problem!   (You also have 10 years of identical film to study.  So, rock-paper-scissors and near-statistical certainty.)

Do not try to beat the Iowa defense, unless you are a top 5 team, talent-wise.  You can't.  You will complete some underneath routes over the middle -- before they pick you off a couple of times.  (They lead the league with 16.)  They appear to have fixed that 250-lb.-human-covering-track-stars issue.  They will not miss tackles and they will knock you senseless.  They are tough as hell in the red zone, and lead the league in red zone D, are second in scoring D, third in total D.

Do try to beat Iowa by beating their offense, by:

a.  On third and short, in a game critical situation, with Greene in the game, blitz to the fullback and blow him up (MSU and IL did), everyone else key on Greene.  It's the one time you will take him before he is going downhill.  So far this year, their tendency in this situation is nearly 100%.  The one time they didn't run this play, in this situation, uh, they threw for six (IN).

b.  On third and long, assume play action waggle right (remember, they play with only rock and scissors, no paper), and blitz and overload the backside, so that the RB in max protect has to choose between two guys.  One will blindside the QB and likely strip him (MSU and IL did).  Their QB is much more comfortable throwing on the run, but he can't see what's behind him.

c.  Hope that the OC, with the game's best RB and a strong O-Line, scripts pass first. Iowa has now lost four games in which it controlled the LOS.  Iowa is the rare .500 team that is second in the league in rushing D, and third in rushing O -- and second in league first downs.  Iowa is a statistical anomaly of the first rank, and it ain't the players' problem.  For a Lombardi enthusiast, this OC is weird.

d.  Hope that the OC, with the game's best RB, conducts his only run-centric series with the freshman #2 back -- even when that series straddles a quarter break, and the game's best RB isn't tired because he's been blocking all quarter.  For some reason, Iowa will go out for hamburger when they have steak at home.  Beats me, too.

e.  Remember that the OC scripts the game on Tuesday, and makes no in-game adjustments based on what is actually happening in front of his face.  You may not believe what you are seeing, since you're watching the actual game.  But it's not, actually, a set-up for something deceptive.  Lombardi thought deception was for wimps.  No wimps at Iowa.  QED.

f.  Remember that Iowa has run maybe two reverses all year to punish teams for collapsing the middle and attempting to stop Greene's cutback on the zone read.  Sell out for the zone read, single cutback, and cross your fingers that Greene doesn't send one of your DBs to the hospital.  Now, another guy might say, I have a slash (ex-QB) at flanker, they're collapsing on Greene, let's run that reverse a few times and then throw off it.  But that guy?  His name is Zorn, and he don't live in Iowa City.

g.  Iowa fullbacks touch the ball every third game, and one of the wideouts (DJK) is curiously thin in his involvement.  It's very charitable of them, removing 2-3 eligible receivers from every pass play.  If your strong safety doesn't get nosy and you have decent linebackers, their seam route won't work and you have a shot at stopping Greene if your D-Line is active enough.  (If you let the O-line get to the second level, the game is over and you have lost -- unless of course, the OC has decided not to run the ball.  He does that in about half of their games.)

h.  There is no quick-read pass checkdown capability in the Iowa offense.  Your linebackers will have a blast playing north-south.  No side-to-side stuff against this team.

i.  If you double the TEs on the crossing routes, the QB may well throw it in there anyway, because no one has doubled them before IL, and he is too young to check down beyond his first two reads, and because they're running max protect with both backs out of the action anyway.

So, the strength of the Iowa offense is its strength.  They might be tougher in the trench than OSU this year.  You might catch them when they choose to ignore their primary strength.   No one thinks they have played their best game yet.  It's just that they don't believe in running what works until it doesn't, and strangely lack confidence that what we're seeing in the games and in the stats each week is actually true.  Oh well.

Errors, above, are of course my responsibility.  Thinking? Chris Brown did it for me.

 

Unless otherwise expressly indicated by BHGP editors, this FanPost is strictly the viewpoint of the author and is not endorsed by BHGP in any way.

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good stuff

Kirk Ferentz maintains that he can’t recruit top notch athletes to the middle of Iowa.. The problem here is that once you’re resigned to that fact, you’re best making up that deficiency by being unpredictable. Expecting superior execution (that’s all that’s left when both teams know what’s going to be run) with inferior athletes seems to me a losing game.

Disclaimer: I am not suggesting that Iowa’s athletes are all inferior, rather that a coach who believes this ought to have a different strategy than ours does. Either that or don’t use it as an excuse.

by Eubanks on Nov 2, 2008 12:57 PM CST reply actions  

I think he's sandbagging ...

on the “We’re poor ol’ Iowa” trope. While, sure, the Terrell Pryors and Tim Tebows and the other all-intergalactic 18-star high school boys don’t want to come to Iowa City — for whatever reason — the team I’m watching on the field holds its own physically with most ballclubs. I except a few like USC or Oklahoma, which could beat the Bengals this year. So let’s say the top 5 (which, unfortunately, includes Penn State).

We are in the same category as Texas Tech. Half a dozen of our top 22 might make the three deep at OSU. I’m sure there isn’t a single guy playing for Leach who was offered by Texas. I think we have one guy Tressel would have taken had his grades been okay earlier (DJK). However, there are all manner of criteria for selecting players, and for choosing game strategy.

No one watching this team this year thinks we have a talent deficit. We surely don’t have a heart deficit, and forget about the toughness exam.

I don’t even care that we only run 9 plays. Bill Walsh gameplanned 25 or so. He had two for short yardage, two for being backed up on his own end zone, four for first and 10. And he said that, basically, everyone had the same ones. I don’t care that we script at least the first 15 plays; Bill Walsh wrote that your head is a damn sight clearer on Thursday night than after the game starts and your brain is exploding with stress. I care that we are the only college football team I’ve ever seen that loses games while dominating the line of scrimmage, but then chooses to go to the passing game (our constraint plays) in order to open up the running game. Hey! The run-game is already open! Make them hit the heat before you start fucking around with change-ups!

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Nov 2, 2008 2:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks, I will forward to Joepa

I cannot wait to see our offense against your defense. Hopefully Ohio State didn’t beat the HD out of us, Iowa is going to be a good game.

I don't know, Mello Yello is pretty awful. What's the worst that could happen?

by psu on Nov 2, 2008 1:19 PM CST reply actions  

We'll play hard ...

but PSU, off a bye, I don’t know. Reason for optimism: it’s an important game for Ferentz. It’s a Ferentz Signature Game. cf. those games against LSU and Florida a few years ago. With luck no one wearing white and blue next week will take us seriously.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Nov 2, 2008 2:22 PM CST reply actions  

We didn't control the line of scrimmage on offense

The offensive line was awful against Illinois, and it’s the biggest reason we lost. Stanzi had no time to throw and Greene wasn’t getting any room. It’s a credit to him that he managed to get over 100 yards again, but he couldn’t dominate like he usually does, or how he needs to for Iowa to win. There where lots of plays, especially in short yardage, where he had absolutely no where to go and got stuffed for a loss, and it killed a bunch of drives.

by NorseHawk on Nov 3, 2008 8:39 AM CST reply actions  

28/131

In a game like this, against an active D-line, any coach will take 4.7 ypc as indicative of run dominance. If we sort out the sacks from Stanzi’s designed runs, it’s better: we’re at about 30/150. There is no scenario in which 4.7 ypc does not describe run dominance.

The fact that we didn’t obliterate them at the line, and simply achieved run dominance, doesn’t mean we were “awful”. The numbers are the numbers.

With a guy like Greene your big dividend comes in Q4, when the other team has been worn down. Ferentz talks about this all the time: the virtue of a back like Greene, who will pound away at you and take over late. We forget it in the course of many games.

No question, Illinois’ pass rush outperformed their run defense. And no question, teams know exactly what we call in short yardage. Teams now sell out to stop a single play, and we oblige them.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Nov 3, 2008 9:38 AM CST reply actions  

Not when you factor in the competition

Illinois has one of the worst run defenses in the conference. Just look at their game against Wisconsin for evidence of how vulnerable they are to a good rushing attack. If the offensive line played well all game, instead of just in the fourth, this would have been another 150-200 yard day for Greene.

Furthermore, the pass rush was a bigger problem than you’re making it sound like. Stanzi didn’t have a turnover day just because of playcalling. His throws were rushed all day and he took some huge hits because the line couldn’t give him time to throw. 6 sacks is totally unacceptable and it would have been a lot worse if it wasn’t for Stanzi making a few Drew Tate-esque plays and getting away.

by NorseHawk on Nov 3, 2008 10:38 AM CST up reply actions  

Actually

Illinois was selling-out early and completely to stop the run, asking to be beat by the pass. Unfortunately, the biggest problem we had early (and for most of the game) was that Stanzi was just flat-out inaccurate. There were a number a passes in the first half and third quarter where he had plenty of time, but he just missed the receiver. This is the learning curve of a young QB, unfortunate that it showed up so prominently in the Illinois game, but somewhat inevitable. Our line wasn’t as dominant as it’s been, but they were taking on 6-7 defenders and plenty of run blitzes. You’ll notice that Greene got most of his yardage in the fourth quarter, after Stanzi had made Illinois pay through the air. Once Illinois thought they had to be honest (or at least acknowledge the passing game), then Greene had room to run.

But the sacks were bad. And surprising. It’s hard for any team to win when the QB gets sacked six times, including one that leads to fumble, TD and game-winner.

I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.

by HoyaGoon on Nov 3, 2008 11:37 AM CST up reply actions  

No,

he had 75 early in Q3 — and that’s after not playing an entire series in Q1/Q2.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Nov 3, 2008 12:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Time stamp.

He had 75 at 4:22 p.m. (in Q3) CDT. See Hlas’ blog.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Nov 3, 2008 12:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Even though Greene wasn't stopped

we should have killed them in the air early. Yes, Stanzi was inaccurate and couldn’t go through his progressions, but we should have been play actioning all first quarter as they crowded the line.

by chitownhawkeye on Nov 3, 2008 4:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Meanwhile, more evidence-based reasoning.

Illinois’ best RB carried 12 times for 30. That, my friend, is a defense shutting down the opponent’s run game.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Nov 3, 2008 9:42 AM CST reply actions  

And lastly,

if you really want to get sick to your stomach, and understand why our guys were so frustrated after the game (re-read their comments, they’ve never departed from the bland sportstalk-script before): we controlled possession 30% more than they did. They rightly think they beat up the other guys and lost. If you play this game the old fashioned way, as we do, you are taught that if you run for 5 ypc, they run for 2 ypc; if you dominate in ball possession; and if you give up 19 yards in penalties, you’re going to win.

But good football games turn on a few (4-5) plays. The plays were: our failed kickoff, the ensuing busted coverage; our predictable short yardage game, which you identify, leading to two critical stops; the Stanzi strip on the backside blitz, a replay of an identical play by MSU.

The alternative view blames Stanzi’s turnovers, but I don’t because I think two of them are the result of our predictability. The kid is not experienced enough yet to make plays every time when the opposing DC knows what is coming. Note too that the one time we ran him off the boot, on a short yardage down (instead of Shonn zone left) he collected 15. I believe that is the first time we ran that play this year in that situation and — ta-dah — they were caught flat-footed.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Nov 3, 2008 10:15 AM CST up reply actions  

Whoops, that was in reply the the first comment

Not to the stuff you said when you inexplicably replied to yourself. I never said Iowa’s defensive line didn’t dominate (although they did do a fairly poor job of pass rushing). I was referring strictly to the offensive side of the ball.

by NorseHawk on Nov 3, 2008 10:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Off the bye week

I think the Big Ten teams are now 3-6 off of a bye. Let’s hope that PSU continues this trend….

by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Nov 3, 2008 10:15 AM CST reply actions  

Maybe we'll get some bye-sloth, working in our favor.

But we’ll have to play a nearly perfect game. It’s happened before, of course. We’re due, and we’re capable of it. Think how happy we’d make the rest of the country, since they all seem to have decided that only the SEC and Big12 should play for the title this year.

It would be supremely great too if our OC could get through this game without forcing the waste of two timeouts by getting the play in late. At least Stanzi’s errors were forced. Being a 55 year-old OC who can’t get the play in on time is the very definition of unforced error. I really can’t believe how frequently we fuck that up. It’s beyond defense or explanation. It’s pathetic. It’s unfair to the athletes.

Mr. Boh Knows ...

by Bellanca on Nov 3, 2008 10:31 AM CST up reply actions  

We left Champaign with our pants around our ankles.

Not that this was a woodshed beating or anything, but it was an embarrassment. Zook was sigh the better coach. And it has nothing to do with the players. Yes, there was poor execution at times. Stanzi doesn’t do the progression well yet. Blocks were missed, and god knows we can’t defend the middle of the field. But the players weren’t given the tools to succeed.
What constantly bothers me is not that we only have a handful of plays, it is, like you said, that anyone can predict which play is going to be run given the circumstances. On the defensive side, how can you not tighten up when the clock is running out and they are driving into field goal range to win? There is no room to bend in that situation, but we did anyway.
I feel bad for the players. I don’t know what they’re being told, but if I were them, I’d be pissed. They have to feel like each one of these lost games were not only winnable, but should have been won.

by chitownhawkeye on Nov 3, 2008 11:12 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"It’s so extreme, it’s almost a compliment."

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dwighthit_small
An Introduction Thread
Cimg0974_small
KSG's Recap of Saturday's 86-87 Reunion Festivities
Small
The Importance of Iowa Basketball
Tractor_small
Sherlock Holmes: The Story of the Missing Offense. Chpt. 4

Recent FanPosts

Chuehremake_small
Hamsterdam No Habla Americano
Small
Tony F**KING RAMOS
Small
MIKE EVANSSS
Canters-deli_small
Hamsterdam Has a New Mayor
Default_small
The Hawkeyes Name Defensive Backs Coach Phil Parker Defensive Coordinator
Dumpster_fire_small
Hamsterdam Gets Nostalgic
Default_small
Iowa is Honoring the 86-87 Hoops Team Tomorrow

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Mcqueen_small Patrick Vint

Louie_small Adam Jacobi

Stains_small jebushchrist

Dumpster_fire_small RossWB

Default_small PSD

Authors

Images_small StoopsMyAss

Spitzenhofen_small Hayden Fry's Moustache Ride

Herky_small hawk6894

Horace_small Horace E. Cow